Surgical Technique and Outcome of Extensive Frontal Lobectomy for Treatment of Intracable Non-lesional Frontal Lobe Epilepsy

A Comprehensive Review of Recent Trends in Surgical Approaches for Epilepsy Management

Epilepsy is a neurological disorder that affects millions of people worldwide, with a significant proportion of patients experiencing drug-resistant epilepsy, where seizures remain uncontrolled despite medical treatment. This review evaluates the latest surgical techniques for managing epilepsy, focusing on their effectiveness, safety, and the ongoing challenges that hinder their broader adoption. We explored various databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library to look for relevant literature using the following keywords: Epilepsy, Resective Surgery, Corpus Collectumy, and Antiepileptic Drugs. A total of 54 relevant articles were found and thoroughly explored. Recent advancements in surgical interventions include resective procedures such as anterior temporal lobectomy, corpus callosotomy, and hemispherectomy, which have been particularly effective in reducing seizures for specific types of epilepsy. Minimally invasive techniques, including laser interstitial thermal therapy and focused ultrasound, are increasingly being used, offering promising outcomes for certain patient groups. Additionally, neuromodulation methods such as deep brain stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, and responsive neurostimulation provide alternative treatment options, especially for patients who are not suitable candidates for resective surgery. Despite these advancements, the full potential of epilepsy surgery is often underutilized due to various challenges. Inconsistent referral practices, a lack of standardized surgical protocols, and significant socioeconomic barriers continue to limit access to these procedures. Addressing these issues through improved referral processes, better education for healthcare providers and patients, and ensuring equitable access to advanced surgical treatments is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. Future research should focus on overcoming these barriers and assessing long-term outcomes to further enhance the care of patients with epilepsy.

Functional frontal lobectomy in the surgical treatment of pharmacoresistant frontal lobe epilepsy: how I do it

BACKGROUND

Frontal lobe epilepsy is pharmacoresistant in 30% of cases, constituting 10-20% of epilepsy surgeries. For cases of no lesional epilepsy (negative MRI), frontal lobectomy is a crucial treatment, historically involving Frontal Anatomical Lobectomy (AFL) with a 33.3% complication risk and 55.7% seizure control.

METHODS

We describe Frontal Functional Lobectomy (FFL), in which the boundaries are defined on the patient's functional cortico-subcortical areas, recognized with advanced intraoperative technologies such as tractography and navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS).

CONCLUSIONS

The FFL allows for a broader resection with a lower rate of postoperative complications than the AFL.

Value of semiology in predicting epileptogenic zone and surgical outcome following frontal lobe epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability of semiology alone in localising the epileptogenic zone (EZ) in people with frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE) who underwent resective surgery.

METHODS

We examined data on all individuals who had FLE surgery at our centre between January 01, 2011 and December 31, 2020. Descriptions of ictal semiology were obtained from video-EEG telemetry reports and presurgical multidisciplinary meeting summaries. The putative EZ was represented by the final site of resection. We assessed how well initial and combined set-of-semiologies correlated anatomically with the EZ, using a semiology visualisation tool to generate probabilistic cortical heatmaps of involvement in seizures.

RESULTS

Sixty-one individuals had FLE surgery over the study period. Twelve months following surgery, 28/61 (46%) were completely seizure-free, with a further eight experiencing only auras. Comparing the semiology database with the putative EZ, combined set-of-semiology correctly lateralised in 77% (95% CI: 69-85%), localised to the frontal lobe in 57% (95% CI: 48-67%), frontal lobe subregions in 52% (95% CI: 43-62%), and frontal gyri in 25% (95% CI: 16-33%). No difference in degree of correlation was seen comparing those with ongoing seizures 12 months after surgery to those seizure free.

SIGNIFICANCE

Semiology alone was able to correctly lateralize the putative EZ in 77%, and localise to a sublobar level in approximately half of individuals who had FLE surgery. Semiology is not adequate alone and must be combined with imaging and EEG data to identify the epileptogenic zone.