Other Hospital-onset Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Large Vessel Occlusion Treated by Mechanical Thrombectomy after Inter-hospital Transfer

Mechanical Thrombectomy for In-Hospital Onset Stroke: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In-hospital onset stroke (IHOS) accounts for a significant proportion of large vessel occlusion acute ischemic strokes, leading to worse outcomes due to delays in evaluation and treatment. Limited data is available on the effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy in IHOS patients. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy for patients with IHOS and compare the outcomes with those of community-onset strokes (COS).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following established guidelines, by searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases up to April 11, 2023. Eligible studies reporting outcomes of interest were included, and relevant data was extracted and analyzed using Stata software version 17.0.

RESULTS

In a meta-analysis of nine studies, comprising 540 cases of IHOS and 5,744 cases of COS, IHOS cases had a significantly lower rate of good functional outcomes on follow-up (35.46% vs. 40.74%, P<0.01) and a higher follow-up mortality rate (26.29% vs. 18.08%, P<0.01) compared to COS patients. Both groups had comparable successful recanalization rates (IHOS: 79.32% vs. COS: 81.44%, P=0.11), incidence rates of periprocedural complications (IHOS: 15.10%, COS: 12.96%, P=0.78), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (IHOS: 6.24%, COS: 6.88%, P=0.67). It is worth noting that much of the observed effect size for mortality and good functional outcomes on follow-up was derived from only one and two studies, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While the current literature suggests that mechanical thrombectomy is a safe and effective treatment for IHOS, further research is necessary to comprehensively evaluate its impact, particularly during follow-up.

Large-Vessel Occlusion Stroke Treated by Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patient with Coronavirus Disease 2019

We report a case of acute ischemic stroke caused by large-vessel occlusion in a patient infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who was treated by endovascular thrombectomy. The patient was a 41-year-old man hospitalized with moderately severe COVID-19. Fourteen days after the onset of COVID-19, dysarthria and right hemiplegia were observed, and acute occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery was diagnosed. Mechanical thrombectomy was performed with a stent retriever while the patient was under local anesthesia and sedation. The staff involved in the intervention was as minimal as possible. The interventional surgeon wore a disposable surgical gown, an N95 mask, a face shield, and two pairs of gloves, while the patient was fitted with a surgical mask. The intervention involved the usual procedures, such as sheath insertion, catheter manipulation, and stent deployment, and the thrombus was removed with the stent retriever. The time from puncture to recanalization was within 30 minutes. No infection was observed in our staff or inpatients after the intervention. Thus, we were able to perform neuroendovascular treatment without spreading COVID-19 by taking appropriate measures to prevent infection.

Workflow and Outcomes of Endovascular Thrombectomy for In-Hospital Stroke a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Acute strokes due to large vessel occlusion in hospitalized patients is not uncommon. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the timing and outcome of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for in-hospital stroke.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of clinical studies published in English until September 2020 in the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. Studies reporting original data on the characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital stroke patients treated with EVT were included. We extracted data on the time-metrics from last known well (LKW) until reperfusion was achieved. We also collected data on procedural and functional outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of 5093 retrieved studies, 8 were included (2,622 patients). The median age was 71.4 years and median NIHSS score on admission was 16. Patients were mostly admitted to the cardiology service (27.3%). The pooled time from LKW to recognition by staff was 72.9 min (95% CI: 40.7 to 105 min). 25.6% received IV tPA. The mean time from stroke recognition to arterial puncture was 134.5 min (95% CI: 94.9 to 174.1). Successful reperfusion occurred in 82.8.% with a pooled mean time from detection to reperfusion of 193.1 min (95% CI: 139.5 to 246.7). The 90-day independent functional outcome was reported in 42% of patients (95% CI 29 to 55%).

CONCLUSION

EVT can be performed safely and successfully for in-hospital strokes. Noticeable delays from LKW to detection and then to puncture are noted. This calls for better stroke pathways to identify and treat these patients.

BACKGROUND

Stroke in hospitalized patients, referred to as in-hospital stroke (IHS), accounts for 2.2-17% of all strokes.¹ The majority of these are ischemic while intracranial hemorrhage represents 2-11% of all IHS.¹ These patients are expected to have a rapid diagnosis and treatment given the ongoing medical supervision, and therefore favorable outcomes.^1-3 However, existing studies report poor outcomes in patients with IHS with a mortality risk that exceeds that of community-onset stroke (COS): 24.7% vs 9.6%.⁴ Surviving IHS patients are also less likely to be discharged home compared to COS (27.7% vs 49.9%) and to be functionally independent at 3 months (31.0% vs 50.4%).^1-4.