1
|
Tian Y, Saradhi S, Bello E, Johnson MD, D’Eleuterio G, Popovic MR, Lankarany M. Model-based closed-loop control of thalamic deep brain stimulation. FRONTIERS IN NETWORK PHYSIOLOGY 2024; 4:1356653. [PMID: 38650608 PMCID: PMC11033853 DOI: 10.3389/fnetp.2024.1356653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Introduction: Closed-loop control of deep brain stimulation (DBS) is beneficial for effective and automatic treatment of various neurological disorders like Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET). Manual (open-loop) DBS programming solely based on clinical observations relies on neurologists' expertise and patients' experience. Continuous stimulation in open-loop DBS may decrease battery life and cause side effects. On the contrary, a closed-loop DBS system uses a feedback biomarker/signal to track worsening (or improving) of patients' symptoms and offers several advantages compared to the open-loop DBS system. Existing closed-loop DBS control systems do not incorporate physiological mechanisms underlying DBS or symptoms, e.g., how DBS modulates dynamics of synaptic plasticity. Methods: In this work, we propose a computational framework for development of a model-based DBS controller where a neural model can describe the relationship between DBS and neural activity and a polynomial-based approximation can estimate the relationship between neural and behavioral activities. A controller is used in our model in a quasi-real-time manner to find DBS patterns that significantly reduce the worsening of symptoms. By using the proposed computational framework, these DBS patterns can be tested clinically by predicting the effect of DBS before delivering it to the patient. We applied this framework to the problem of finding optimal DBS frequencies for essential tremor given electromyography (EMG) recordings solely. Building on our recent network model of ventral intermediate nuclei (Vim), the main surgical target of the tremor, in response to DBS, we developed neural model simulation in which physiological mechanisms underlying Vim-DBS are linked to symptomatic changes in EMG signals. By using a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller, we showed that a closed-loop system can track EMG signals and adjust the stimulation frequency of Vim-DBS so that the power of EMG reaches a desired control target. Results and discussion: We demonstrated that the model-based DBS frequency aligns well with that used in clinical studies. Our model-based closed-loop system is adaptable to different control targets and can potentially be used for different diseases and personalized systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yupeng Tian
- Krembil Brain Institute—University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Srikar Saradhi
- Krembil Brain Institute—University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Edward Bello
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Matthew D. Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | | | - Milos R. Popovic
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Milad Lankarany
- Krembil Brain Institute—University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tian Y, Murphy MJH, Steiner LA, Kalia SK, Hodaie M, Lozano AM, Hutchison WD, Popovic MR, Milosevic L, Lankarany M. Modeling Instantaneous Firing Rate of Deep Brain Stimulation Target Neuronal Ensembles in the Basal Ganglia and Thalamus. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:464-475. [PMID: 37140523 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for movement disorders, including Parkinson disease and essential tremor. However, the underlying mechanisms of DBS remain elusive. Despite the capability of existing models in interpreting experimental data qualitatively, there are very few unified computational models that quantitatively capture the dynamics of the neuronal activity of varying stimulated nuclei-including subthalamic nucleus (STN), substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr), and ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim)-across different DBS frequencies. MATERIALS AND METHODS Both synthetic and experimental data were used in the model fitting; the synthetic data were generated by an established spiking neuron model that was reported in our previous work, and the experimental data were provided using single-unit microelectrode recordings (MERs) during DBS (microelectrode stimulation). Based on these data, we developed a novel mathematical model to represent the firing rate of neurons receiving DBS, including neurons in STN, SNr, and Vim-across different DBS frequencies. In our model, the DBS pulses were filtered through a synapse model and a nonlinear transfer function to formulate the firing rate variability. For each DBS-targeted nucleus, we fitted a single set of optimal model parameters consistent across varying DBS frequencies. RESULTS Our model accurately reproduced the firing rates observed and calculated from both synthetic and experimental data. The optimal model parameters were consistent across different DBS frequencies. CONCLUSIONS The result of our model fitting was in agreement with experimental single-unit MER data during DBS. Reproducing neuronal firing rates of different nuclei of the basal ganglia and thalamus during DBS can be helpful to further understand the mechanisms of DBS and to potentially optimize stimulation parameters based on their actual effects on neuronal activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yupeng Tian
- Krembil Research Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Leon A Steiner
- Krembil Research Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Suneil K Kalia
- Krembil Research Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mojgan Hodaie
- Krembil Research Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Krembil Research Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - William D Hutchison
- CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Milos R Popovic
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Luka Milosevic
- Krembil Research Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Milad Lankarany
- Krembil Research Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; CRANIA, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maçaneiro MT, Azevedo AC, Poerner BM, da Silva MD, Koerbel A. Directional deep brain stimulation in the management of Parkinson's disease: efficacy and constraints-an analytical appraisal. Neurosurg Rev 2024; 47:43. [PMID: 38216697 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02268-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a widely employed treatment for Parkinson's disease. However, conventional DBS utilizing ring-shaped leads can often result in undesirable side effects by stimulating nearby brain structures, thus limiting its effectiveness. To address this issue, a novel DBS electrode was developed to allow for directional stimulation, avoiding neighboring structures. This literature review aims to analyze the disparities between conventional and directional DBS and discuss the benefits and limitations associated with this innovative electrode design, focusing on the stimulation-induced side effects it can or cannot mitigate. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, ScienceDirect, and EBSCO databases using the Boolean search criteria: "Deep brain stimulation" AND "Parkinson" AND "Directional." Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, the selected articles were downloaded for full-text reading. Subsequently, the results were organized and analyzed to compose this article. Numerous studies have demonstrated that directional DBS effectively reduces side effects associated with brain stimulation, prevents the stimulation of non-targeted structures, and expands the therapeutic window, among other advantages. However, it has been observed that directional DBS may be more challenging to program and requires higher energy consumption. Furthermore, there is a lack of standardization among different manufacturers of directional DBS electrodes. Various stimulation-induced side effects, including dysarthria, dyskinesia, paresthesias, and symptoms of pyramidal tract activation, have been shown to be mitigated with the use of directional DBS. Moreover, directional electrodes offer a wider therapeutic window and a reduced incidence of undesired effects, requiring the same or lower minimum current for symptom relief compared to conventional DBS. The utilization of directional leads in DBS offers numerous advantages over conventional electrodes without significant drawbacks for patients undergoing directional DBS therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ana Clara Azevedo
- Medical Department at Universidade da Região de Joinville - UNIVILLE, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Bruna Maurício Poerner
- Medical Department at Universidade da Região de Joinville - UNIVILLE, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Milena Dangui da Silva
- Medical Department at Universidade da Região de Joinville - UNIVILLE, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - Andrei Koerbel
- Universidade da Região de Joinville - UNIVILLE, Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|