1
|
Nieto-Sanchez C, Hatley DM, Grijalva MJ, Peeters Grietens K, Bates BR. Communication in Neglected Tropical Diseases' elimination: A scoping review and call for action. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2022; 16:e0009774. [PMID: 36228006 PMCID: PMC9595560 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the practice of communication is often called upon when intervening and involving communities affected by NTDs, the disciplinary framework of health communication research has been largely absent from NTD strategies. To illustrate how practices conceptualized and developed within the communication field have been applied in the context of NTD elimination, we conducted a scoping review focusing on two diseases currently targeted for elimination by the WHO: lymphatic filariasis and Chagas disease. METHODS We examined studies published between 2012 and 2020 in five electronic databases. Selected articles were required to (i) have explicit references to communication in either the abstract, title, or key words; (ii) further elaborate on the search terms (communication, message, media, participation and health education) in the body of the article; and (iii) sufficiently describe communication actions associated to those terms. Using the C-Change Socio-Ecological Model for Social and Behavior Change Communication as a reference, the articles were analysed to identify communication activities, theoretical frameworks, and/or rationales involved in their design, as well as their intended level of influence (individual, interpersonal, community, or enabling environment). RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS A total of 43 articles were analysed. Most interventions conceptualized communication as a set of support tools or supplemental activities delivering information and amplifying pre-defined messages aimed at increasing knowledge, encouraging community involvement, promoting individual behavior change, or securing some degree of acceptability of proposed strategies. Although important attempts at further exploring communication capabilities were identified, particularly in participation-based strategies, for most studies, communication consisted of an underdeveloped and under-theorized approach. We contend that a more complex understanding of the capacities offered by the health communication field could help attain the biomedical and social justice goals proposed in NTD elimination strategies. Three ways in which the field of health communication could further enhance NTD efforts are presented: informing interventions with theory-based frameworks, exploring the political complexity of community participation in specific contexts, and identifying conceptualizations of culture implied in interventions' design. CONCLUSION This article is a call to action to consider the resources offered by the health communication field when researching, designing, or implementing NTD interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Nieto-Sanchez
- Socio-Ecological Health Research Unit, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- * E-mail:
| | - David M. Hatley
- Department of Epidemiology, University of London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mario J. Grijalva
- Infectious and Tropical Disease Institute (ITDI), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America
- Center for Research in Health in Latin America (CISeAL), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Koen Peeters Grietens
- Socio-Ecological Health Research Unit, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- Nagasaki, School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Benjamin R. Bates
- Infectious and Tropical Disease Institute (ITDI), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America
- Center for Research in Health in Latin America (CISeAL), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador
- School of Communication Studies, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Manolas RK, Kama M, Rainima-Qaniuci M, Bechu VD, Tuibeqa S, Winston MV, Ram N, Naqio F, Ichimori K, Capuano C, Ozaki M, Kim SH, Aratchige P, Sahukhan A, Graves PM. Lymphatic filariasis in Fiji: progress towards elimination, 1997-2007. Trop Med Health 2020; 48:88. [PMID: 33132735 PMCID: PMC7592542 DOI: 10.1186/s41182-020-00245-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is a major public health problem in the Pacific Region, including in Fiji. Through transmission by the mosquito vector Aedes, Fiji has suffered the burden of remaining endemic with LF despite efforts at elimination prior to 1999. In the year 1999, Fiji agreed to take part in the Pacific Programme for Elimination of LF (PacELF) and the Global Programme to Eliminate LF. Methods This study reviewed and collated past data on LF in Fiji between 1997 and 2007. Sources included published papers as well as unpublished PacELF and WHO program meeting and survey reports. Records were held at Fiji’s Department of Health and Medical Services, James Cook University and the WHO office in Suva, Fiji. Results Baseline surveys between 1997 and 2002 showed that Fiji was highly endemic for LF with an estimated 16.6% of the population antigen positive and 6.3% microfilaria positive at that time. Five rounds of annual mass drug administration (MDA) using albendazole and diethylcarbamazine commenced in 2002. Programmatic coverage reported was 58–70% per year, but an independent coverage survey in 2006 in Northern Division after the fifth MDA suggested that actual coverage may have been higher. Monitoring of the program consisted of antigen prevalence surveys in all ages with sentinel and spot check surveys carried out in 2002 (pre MDA), 2004, and 2005, together with knowledge, attitude, and practice surveys. The stop-MDA survey (C survey) in 2007 was a nationwide stratified cluster survey of all ages according to PacELF guidelines, designed to sample by administrative division to identify areas still needing MDA. The national antigen prevalence in 2007 was reduced by more than a third to 9.5%, ranging from 0.9% in Western Division to 15.4% in Eastern Division, while microfilaria prevalence was reduced by almost four-fifths to 1.4%. Having not reached the target threshold of 1% prevalence in all ages, Fiji wisely decided to continue MDA after 2007 but to move from nationwide implementation to four (later five) separate evaluation units with independent timelines using global guidelines, building on program experience to put more emphasis on increasing coverage through prioritized communication strategies, community participation, and morbidity alleviation. Conclusion Fiji conducted nationwide MDA for LF annually between 2002 and 2006, monitored by extensive surveys of prevalence, knowledge, and coverage. From a high baseline prevalence in all divisions, large reductions in overall and age-specific prevalence were achieved, especially in the prevalence of microfilariae, but the threshold for stopping MDA was not reached. Fiji has a large rural and geographically widespread population, program management was not consistent over this period, and coverage achieved was likely not optimal in all areas. After learning from these many challenges and activities, Fiji was able to build on the progress achieved and the heterogeneity observed in prevalence to realign towards a more stratified and improved program after 2007. The information presented here will assist the country to progress towards validating elimination in subsequent years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosie K Manolas
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences and JCU WHO Collaborating Centre for Vector-Borne and Neglected Tropical Diseases, College of Public Health, James Cook University, Cairns and Townsville, Queensland Australia
| | - Mike Kama
- Fiji Centre for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Suva, Fiji
| | | | - Vinaisi D Bechu
- Fiji Centre for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Suva, Fiji
| | - Samuela Tuibeqa
- Fiji Centre for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Suva, Fiji
| | - Mareta V Winston
- Fiji Centre for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Suva, Fiji
| | - Nomeeta Ram
- Fiji Centre for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Suva, Fiji
| | - Flora Naqio
- Fiji Centre for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Suva, Fiji
| | - Kazuyo Ichimori
- WHO Office of Pacific Support, Suva, Fiji.,Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | | | | | - Sung Hye Kim
- Department of Environmental Biology and Medical Parasitology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Aalisha Sahukhan
- Fiji Centre for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Services, Suva, Fiji
| | - Patricia M Graves
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences and JCU WHO Collaborating Centre for Vector-Borne and Neglected Tropical Diseases, College of Public Health, James Cook University, Cairns and Townsville, Queensland Australia
| |
Collapse
|