The Correlation Between Rates of Falling, Balance, Quality of Life and Fear of Falling in Patients With Chronic Stroke

Contributing factors and interventions for fear of falling in stroke survivors: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the prevalence, measurement tools, influencing factors, and interventions for fear of falling (FOF) in stroke survivors.

METHODS

A PRISMA-guided systematic literature review was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science were systematically searched. The search time was up to February 2023. All observational and experimental studies investigating FOF in stroke patients were included. The assessment tool of the Joanna Briggs Institute was used to assess the quality of the included studies and the risk of bias assessment. (PROSPERO: CRD42023412522).

RESULT

A total of 25 observational studies and 10 experimental studies were included. The overall quality of the included studies was "low" to "good." The most common tool used to measure the FOF was the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). The prevalence of FOF was 42%- 93.8%. Stroke survivors with physical impairments have the highest prevalence of FOF. The main risk factors for the development of FOF in stroke survivors were female gender, use of assistive devices, balance, limb dysfunction, and functional mobility. The combination of cognitive behavioral and exercise interventions is the most effective strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that the prevalence of FOF in stroke survivors is high and that understanding the factors associated with FOF in stroke patients can help develop multifactorial prevention strategies to reduce FOF and improve quality of life. In addition, a uniform FOF measurement tool should be used to better assess the effectiveness of interventions for stroke survivors.

ETHICS APPROVAL

PROSPERO registration (CRD42023412522).

Fear of falling, meaningful activity participation and community reintegration among stroke survivors in southwest Nigeria: a cross-sectional study

Background/Aims

Community reintegration remains one of the most important goals of rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between fear of falling, meaningful activity participation and community reintegration of community-dwelling stroke survivors.

Methods

The Fall Efficacy Scale-International, Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey and Reintegration to Normal Living Index were used to assess fear of falling, meaningful activity participation and community reintegration respectively among self-ambulant stroke survivors receiving treatment in physiotherapy outpatient clinics. The study was a cross-sectional survey. Tests of relationships, regression and association were performed with a level of significance set at P<0.05.

Results

A significant relationship was found between fear of falling and community reintegration (r=−0.27; P=0.01; 95% confidence interval=−0.53 to 0.04); meaningful activity participation and community reintegration (r=0.72; P=0.001; 95% CI=0.48 to 0.89) and fear of falling and meaningful activity participation (r=−0.71; P=0.53; 95% CI=−0.32 to 0.24). Older participants had lower levels of community reintegration and meaningful activity participation. A significant association was found between fear of falling and fall history (P=0.02); increased falls meant higher levels of fear of falling. Sex and duration of stroke had no significant impact on fear of falling, meaningful activity participation and community reintegration. Meaningful activity participation was the strongest predictor of community reintegration (β=1.7; 95% CI=1.30 to 2.11; P=0.001).

Conclusions

Fear of falling might limit participation in meaningful activity and community integration among stroke survivors. These parameters should be assessed by allied health professionals during stroke rehabilitation.

Evaluating a Novel Multifactorial Falls Prevention Activity Programme for Community-Dwelling Older People After Stroke: A Mixed-Method Feasibility Study

Purpose

The overall purpose of this study was to explore participants’ and physiotherapists’ experiences regarding the acceptability, implementation, and practicality of a novel group-based multifactorial falls prevention activity programme for community-dwelling older people after stroke. Specifically, the purpose was to explore if and how participating could impact on the participants’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in terms of their daily lived experience regarding physical, mental, emotional and social well-being. A secondary purpose was to explore whether participating in the programme could positively influence participants’ balance, strength, falls efficacy, mobility and motor impairment of the trunk.

Materials and Methods

This was an exploratory mixed-method Phase I feasibility study. A convenience sample of five older community-dwelling people after stroke participated in a novel eight-week multifactorial activity programme which included falls education, a mix of individually tailored and group-based strength and balance exercises, exploring limits of stability and safe landing techniques and a social element. Qualitative data from post-intervention interview transcripts with the participants and the physiotherapists who delivered the programme were thematically analysed using both deductive and inductive approaches to explore the participants’ and therapists’ experiences with the programme. Quantitative outcomes included balance, strength, falls efficacy, mobility and motor impairment of the trunk.

Results

The programme was deemed feasible in terms of acceptability, implementation and practicality by the participants as well as the physiotherapists delivering the programme. The overarching theme regarding HRQoL identified that participating in the programme was perceived to empower the participants living with stroke and positively influenced their daily physical, mental, emotional and social well-being. Participant outcomes showed a change in the direction of improvements in balance, strength, mobility, motor impairment of the trunk and reduced concerns about falling. Subjectively, participants only reported perceived improvements in balance and strength.

Conclusion

Running a novel multifactorial falls prevention activity programme for older community-dwelling people after stroke was feasible. Participating in the programme helped participants to perceive improved balance, strength and empower them to make meaningful changes, improving their daily lived experiences. A future fully powered study could build on these results to investigate physical improvements, prevention of falls and improvements to domains of HRQoOL.