1
|
Chen Y, Zhang B, Liu C, Cao Y, Lyu C, Qiu M. Clinical efficacy of adjuvant treatments for patients with resected biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e051421. [PMID: 35440445 PMCID: PMC9020290 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the benefits of adjuvant therapy in patients with resected biliary tract cancer (BTC) and identify the optimal adjuvant treatment scheme. DESIGN Systematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Studies comparing different adjuvant therapies in patients with BTC were searched in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception to December 2021. Additionally, the references were manually searched for the related literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible studies were identified, and data were extracted independently by two authors. A random-effects network meta-analysis was performed using R software. The pooled outcomes of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were measured using the combined HRs with 95% CIs. RESULTS Nineteen eligible studies reporting three types of adjuvant therapies were included in our network meta-analysis. Adjuvant radiotherapy (ART, HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.42 to 0.93), adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT; HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.83) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT; HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.98) were more effective in prolonging OS than that of observation, with no significant difference between the three adjuvant therapies. Moreover, the improvement in DFS was also found in ACRT and ACT compared with that of observation (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75; HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.97, respectively). Furthermore, ACRT obtained a slightly better DFS benefit compared with that of ACT (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.95). CONCLUSIONS Our primary results demonstrated that, compared with that of observation, ACRT and ACT after radical resection could provide better OS and DFS benefits in patients with BTC. However, ART only showed improvement in OS, but not in DFS. Due to the lack of head-to-head studies of ACT, ACRT and ART, the above results need to be further verified by prospective randomised controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Baoxia Zhang
- Department of Medicine, CSPC ZhongQi Pharmaceutical Technology (Shijiazhuang) Co., Ltd, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Chang Liu
- Department of Medicine, CSPC ZhongQi Pharmaceutical Technology (Shijiazhuang) Co., Ltd, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Ye Cao
- Department of Medicine, Ascentage Pharma (Suzhou) Co. Ltd, Suzhou, China
| | - Cheng Lyu
- Department of Medicine, CSPC ZhongQi Pharmaceutical Technology (Shijiazhuang) Co., Ltd, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Meng Qiu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang L, Deng M, Ke Q, Lou J, Zheng S, Bi X, Wang J, Guo W, Li F, Wang J, Zheng Y, Li J, Cheng S, Zhou W, Zeng Y. Postoperative adjuvant therapy following radical resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study. Cancer Med 2020; 9:2674-2685. [PMID: 32072774 PMCID: PMC7163087 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims The prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after radical resection is far from satisfactory; however, the clinical value of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains controversial. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of AT and identify potential patients who would be benefited from AT. Methods Data from ICC patients who underwent radical resection were retrospectively collected from 12 hepatobiliary centers in China between December 2012 and December 2015. Patients were divided into AT and non‐AT groups based on whether AT was administered or not. Overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan‐Meier method before and after 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the established staging systems. Results A total of 412 patients were enrolled in this study, and 77 patients (18.9%) received AT, including 32 (7.8%) patients who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), 21 (5.1%) patients who received chemotherapy, 10 (2.4%) patients who received radiotherapy, and 14 (3.4%) patients who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The median OS and DFS were both longer in the AT group than in the non‐AT group (43.0 months vs 21.0 months, P = .015; 16.0 months vs 11.0 months, P = .045, respectively), and the advantage of AT was confirmed for both the OS and DFS (P = .023; P = .046, respectively) after 1:2 PSM. Furthermore, based on the established nomogram, only “middle‐risk” patients receiving AT cherished a longer median OS (43.0 months vs 20.0 months, P = .033). In subgroup analyses that were stratified by different AT strategies, patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy had a longer median OS (37.0 months vs 21.0 months, P = .039), while patients receiving postoperative TACE had a longer median DFS (50.0 months vs 11.0 months, P = .007). Conclusion With the current data, we conclude that AT benefits ICC patients following radical resection, especially those “middle‐risk” patients, as evaluated by the established nomogram. However, exactly which patients are the most suitable for AT requires further study and validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Manjun Deng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qiao Ke
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jianying Lou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shuguo Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Southwest Hospital Affiliated to the Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xinyu Bi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jianming Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Wei Guo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Fuyu Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yamin Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jingdong Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Chuanbei Medical University, Nanchong, China
| | - Shi Cheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Tiantan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Weiping Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery Ⅲ, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Secondary Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongyi Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huguet JM, Lobo M, Labrador JM, Boix C, Albert C, Ferrer-Barceló L, Durá AB, Suárez P, Iranzo I, Gil-Raga M, Burgos CBD, Sempere J. Diagnostic-therapeutic management of bile duct cancer. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7:1732-1752. [PMID: 31417920 PMCID: PMC6692271 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i14.1732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Revised: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Biliary tract cancer, or cholangiocarcinoma, comprises a heterogeneous group of malignant tumors that can emerge at any part of the biliary tree. This group is the second most common type of primary liver cancer. Diagnosis is usually based on symptoms, which may be heterogeneous, and nonspecific biomarkers in serum and biopsy specimens, as well as on imaging techniques. Endoscopy-based diagnosis is essential, since it enables biopsy specimens to be taken. In addition, it can help with locoregional staging of distal tumors. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a key technique for the evaluation and treatment of malignant biliary tumors. Correct staging of cholangiocarcinoma is essential in order to be able to determine the degree of resectability and assess the results of treatment. The tumor is staged based on the TNM classification of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. The approach will depend on the classification of the tumor. Thus, some patients with early-stage disease could benefit from surgery; complete surgical resection is the cornerstone of cure. However, only a minority of patients are diagnosed in the early stages and are suitable candidates for resection. In the subset of patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease, chemotherapy has been used to improve outcome and to delay tumor progression. The approach to biliary tract tumors should be multidisciplinary, involving experienced endoscopists, oncologists, radiologists, and surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José María Huguet
- Digestive Disease Department, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia 46014, Spain
| | - Miriam Lobo
- Medical Oncology Department, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia 46014, Spain
| | - José Mir Labrador
- Unidad Hepática Avanzada, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestiva, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia 46014, Spain
| | - Carlos Boix
- Digestive Disease Department, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia 46014, Spain
| | - Cecilia Albert
- Digestive Disease Department, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia 46014, Spain
| | - Luis Ferrer-Barceló
- Digestive Disease Department, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia 46014, Spain
| | - Ana B Durá
- Digestive Disease Department, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia 46014, Spain
| | - Patricia Suárez
- Digestive Disease Department, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia 46014, Spain
| | - Isabel Iranzo
- Digestive Disease Department, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia 46014, Spain
| | - Mireia Gil-Raga
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital de Requena, Requena 46340, Spain
| | - Celia Baez de Burgos
- Unidad Hepática Avanzada, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestiva, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia 46014, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Matsukuma S, Tokumitsu Y, Shindo Y, Matsui H, Nagano H. Essential updates to the surgical treatment of biliary tract cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2019; 3:378-389. [PMID: 31346577 PMCID: PMC6635684 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Biliary tract cancer, which includes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic bile duct cancer, gallbladder cancer, and ampullary cancer, is an intractable disease with a dismal prognosis. Prognosis is particularly poor in cases involving vessels or lymph nodes. Hepatobiliary pancreatic surgeons worldwide have consistently focused on improving surgical treatment, perioperative management, and chemotherapy to improve the outcomes of these diseases. There has been significant progress even in the last 2 years (2017 and 2018), such as promising findings reported by studies on the optimal extent of surgical treatment and multi-institutional randomized controlled trials on adjuvant chemotherapy. We overview the current trends and advancements made in surgical treatment in 2017 and 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Matsukuma
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| | - Yukio Tokumitsu
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| | - Yoshitaro Shindo
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| | - Hiroto Matsui
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| |
Collapse
|