Impact of Smoking History on Pulmonary Metastasis-free Survival in Patients With Soft-tissue Sarcoma

Survival outcomes in non-operative cases of localized extremity sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a diverse group of malignancies challenging to treat when surgery is not an option. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival of non-surgical cases in STSs, and to examine the impact of radiation therapy (RT) on survival within this group of cases.

METHODS

Utilizing the SEER database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of localized extremity non-small round cell sarcoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2019. A total of 444 non-operative cases were identified and analyzed for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among the non-operative cohort, the median age at diagnosis was 72 years. The median survival was 10 months, with AJCC 8th edition clinical stage-specific 5-year CSS rates of 80 % for Stage 1B, 53 % for Stage 2, 47 % for Stage 3A, and 22 % for Stage 3B. The 5-year OS rates were 56 % for Stage 1B, 31 % for Stage 2, 26 % for Stage 3A, and 14 % for Stage 3B. Nearly half of the patients received RT, which was more prevalent in higher clinical stages. RT was associated with improved survival rates for both CSS and OS in patients who are unable to undergo surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

RT is associated with improved survival in non-operative localized extremity non-small round cell sarcoma patients. These insights are vital for clinical decision-making, emphasizing the need for personalized, non-surgical interventions to improve outcomes for patients where surgery is not feasible.

Evaluating the Alignment of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Recommendations With Clinical Guidelines Focused on Soft Tissue Tumors

BACKGROUND

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly, in oncology, has significantly shifted the paradigms of medical diagnostics and treatment planning. However, the utility of AI, specifically OpenAI's ChatGPT, in soft tissue sarcoma treatment, remains unclear.

METHODS

We evaluated ChatGPT's alignment with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of soft tissue tumors 2020. Twenty-two clinical questions (CQs) were formulated to encompass various aspects of sarcoma diagnosis, treatment, and management. ChatGPT's responses were classified into "Complete Alignment," "Partial Alignment," or "Nonalignment" based on the recommendation and strength of evidence.

RESULTS

ChatGPT demonstrated an 86% alignment rate with the JOA guidelines. The AI provided two instances of complete alignment and 17 instances of partial alignment, indicating a strong capability to match guideline criteria for most questions. However, three discrepancies were identified in areas concerning the treatment of atypical lipomatous tumors, perioperative chemotherapy for synovial sarcoma, and treatment strategies for elderly patients with malignant soft tissue tumors. Reassessment with guideline input led to some adjustments, revealing both the potential and limitations of AI in complex sarcoma care.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that AI, specifically ChatGPT, can align with clinical guidelines for soft tissue sarcoma treatment. It also underscores the need for continuous refinement and cautious integration of AI in medical decision-making, particularly in the context of treatment for soft tissue sarcoma.

Radiation therapy improves survival in elderly patients with localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of radiation therapy in enhancing survival outcomes among elderly patients diagnosed with localized extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). Furthermore, it seeks to explore whether the survival benefits conferred by radiation therapy differ according to tumor characteristics and treatment modalities.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify patients aged 80 years and older diagnosed with localized extremity STSs. The study assessed 1498 eligible patients, analyzing cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Propensity score matching was employed to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Among the analyzed patients, 773 patients underwent radiation therapy (Radiation group), while 725 patients either did not receive radiation therapy or it was unknown if they had (No-Radiation group). The 5-year OS rate was 40% in the radiation group compared to 38% in the no-radiation group. After propensity score matching, radiation therapy was associated with a significant improvement in OS (P = 0.005, HR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9). Subgroup analyses indicated that patients undergoing primary tumor resection benefited most from radiation therapy in terms of OS.

CONCLUSION

Radiation therapy is associated with improved overall survival in elderly patients with localized extremity STSs. These findings suggest that radiation therapy should be considered as a key component of the treatment strategy for this patient population, taking into account individual patient characteristics and comorbidities.

Amputation surgery associated with shortened survival in patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to clarify whether localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients who underwent amputation surgery experienced worsened survival and to identify those patients for whom amputation surgery worsened survival.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified 8897 patients with localized extremity STS between 1983 and 2016. Of these 6431 patients, 733 patients underwent amputation surgery (Amputation group), and 5698 underwent limb-sparing surgery (Limb-sparing group).

RESULTS

After adjusting for patient background by propensity score matching, a total of 1346 patients were included. Patients in the Amputation group showed worsened survival (cancer-specific survival (CSS): hazard ratio (HR) = 1.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.75, overall survival (OS): HR = 1.41, 95%CI 1.20-1.65). In subclass analysis, patients with high-grade STS, spindle cell sarcoma and liposarcoma in the Amputation group showed shortened survival (high-grade-CSS: HR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.16-1.77, OS: HR = 1.38, 95%CI 1.18-1.62; spindle cell sarcoma-CSS: HR = 4.75, 95%CI 1.56-14.4, OS: HR = 2.32, 95%CI 1.45-3.70; liposarcoma-CSS: HR = 2.91, 95%CI 1.54-5.50, OS: HR = 2.32, 95%CI 1.45-3.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival was shortened in localized extremity STS patients who received amputation surgery.

Comparison of clinical features between patients with bone and soft tissue fibrosarcomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Fibrosarcomas predominantly arise in soft tissues, but can also develop in bone. Because of their rarity, whether bone development has an impact on clinical features has not been addressed.

METHODS

We included fibrosarcoma patients diagnosed between 1983 and 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Differences in clinical features between fibrosarcoma of bone (FS-B) and fibrosarcoma of soft tissue (FS-ST) were investigated.

RESULTS

After excluding patients without information regarding cause of death, site of origin, distant tumor or survival, 1443 patients were included. Of those, 98 patients had FS-B. Patients with FS-B were younger, more frequently male, with fibrosarcomas that more often developed in an extremity and were histologically high-grade. In contrast, no difference in potential to metastasize was observed. Survival was almost equal between FS-B and FS-ST (FS-B/FS-ST: cancer-specific survival, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8-1.7; overall survival, HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 0.9-1.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results clearly indicated that patient backgrounds differed, such as younger age and greater tendencies to affect males, develop in an extremity and show high-grade tumor in patients with FS-B. In contrast, no differences were observed in distant metastatic potential or survival.

Descriptive epidemiology of soft tissue and bone sarcomas in Lebanon

OBJECTIVES

Most epidemiologic studies on soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and bone sarcomas (BS) are performed in western countries, with few in the Middle East and North Africa region. We describe the epidemiology of sarcomas in Lebanon using the medical records database at the American University of Beirut Medical Center (AUBMC).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with sarcomas registered in the database between 2015 and 2019. Their charts were reviewed for baseline characteristics, tumor biology and location, treatment modalities, recurrence, metastasis, and death.

RESULTS

The cohort included 234 patients with STS and 99 patients with BS. Most tumors were <10 cm in size. The most common subtypes were liposarcoma for STS and osteosarcoma for BS. The most common location of STS was the thigh. The most frequent sites of STS metastasis were the lungs. Histological subtype, smoking status, and tumor size and grade were significant for progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with STS. By multivariable analysis, smoking was significantly associated with poorer PFS in STS. For BS, only tumor grade was significant for PFS.

CONCLUSION

The epidemiology of sarcomas at AUBMC is similar to that previously reported. Smoking history was associated with poorer survival in patients with STS.