A Survival Score Based on Symptoms and Performance Status for Patients with High-grade Gliomas Receiving Radiochemotherapy

Reconfiguration from emergency to urgent elective neurosurgery for glioblastoma patients improves length of stay, surgical adjunct use and extent of resective surgery

Background

Glioblastoma (GB) is the most common intrinsic brain cancer and is notorious for its aggressive nature. Despite widespread research and optimization of clinical management, the improvement in overall survival has been limited. The aim of this study was to characterize the impact of service reconfiguration on GB outcomes in a single centre.

Methods

Patients with a histopathological confirmation of a diagnosis of GB between 01/01/2014 and 31/12/2019 were retrospectively identified. Demographic and tumour characteristics, survival, treatment (surgical and oncological), admission status, use of surgical adjunct (5-aminolevulinic acid, intra-operative neuro-monitoring), the length of stay, extent of resection, and surgical complications were recorded from the hospital databases.

Results

From August 2018 the neurosurgical oncology service was reconfigured to manage high-grade tumours on an urgent outpatient basis by surgeons specializing in oncology. We demonstrate that these changes resulted in an increase in elective admissions, greater use of intra-operative adjuncts resulting in the improved extent of tumour resection, and a reduction in median length of stay and associated cost-savings.

Conclusions

Optimizing neuro-oncology patient management through service reconfiguration resulted in increased use of intra-operative adjuncts, improved surgical outcomes, and reduced hospital costs. These changes also have the potential to improve survival and disease-free progression for patients with GB.

Surgical and oncological score to estimate the survival benefit of resection and chemoradiotherapy in elderly (≥70 years) glioblastoma patients: a preliminary analysis

Background

Elderly patients with glioblastoma are perceived to face a poor prognosis with perceptions surrounding older age and a relative lack of randomized data contributing. This study evaluated survival prognosticators in elderly glioblastoma patients to more accurately guide their treatment.

Methods

The records of 169 elderly (≥70 years) patients with a new diagnosis of glioblastoma who had undergone neurosurgical intervention were retrospectively examined for patient sex, age, performance status, comorbidities, MGMT promoter methylation, surgical intervention, and chemoradiation regime. The adjusted survival impact of these factors was determined using Cox proportional hazards model and used to devise a two-stage scoring system to estimate patient survival at the stage of surgical (Elderly Glioblastoma Surgical Score, EGSS) and oncological management (Elderly Glioblastoma Oncological Score, EGOS).

Results

The median overall survival (mOS) of the cohort was 28.8 weeks. Gross-total and subtotal resection were associated with improved survival compared to biopsy alone (respective mOS 65.3 and 28.1 vs 15.7 weeks, P < .001). Hypofractionated radiotherapy (40Gy in 15 fractions) with Temozolomide was noninferior to the Stupp protocol, P = .72. Exploratory subgroup analysis revealed a significant benefit of Temozolomide-based approaches in MGMT-methylated patients as well as a trend towards improved survival in MGMT-unmethylated patients. Our EGSS and EGOS scores successfully estimated survival in this retrospective cohort with 65% and 73% accuracy.

Conclusions

Where appropriate and safe, elderly glioblastoma patients may benefit from surgical resection and combined chemoradiotherapy with Temozolomide. The proposed EGSS and EGOS scores take into account important prognostic factors to help guide which patients should receive such treatment.