The Assessment of Left Ventricle Function and Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

A penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer rapidly growing into a saccular aortic aneurysm during treatment of leukaemia: a case report

Background

The clinical course of penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers is variable and can be complicated with intramural haematomas, dissection, pseudoaneurysms, or aortic rupture. Because it can lead to life-threatening conditions, it needs to be managed carefully.

Case summary

A 68-year-old woman, who was treated for acute myeloid leukaemia (subtype: M0-FAB) approximately 1 year before presentation, visited the hospital with complaints of a headache and lumbar pain. After hospitalization, investigations revealed miliary tuberculosis. On the same day, she developed a Stanford type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) with cardiac tamponade; during the course of the previous leukaemia treatment, a small ulcerative lesion at the distal aortic arch grew into a small saccular aortic aneurysm (SAA) that expanded rapidly and finally developed into a Stanford type A AAD. However, the relationship between the SAA and aortic dissection could not be confirmed.

Discussion

The chronological changes in the atherosclerotic lesion at the distal aortic arch could be clearly observed because computed tomography scans were repeatedly obtained until just before the onset of AAD. The rapid progression of atherosclerotic lesions in the unique context of leukaemia treatment and miliary tuberculosis was considered to be a pathological characteristic, and the mechanism underlying this process was investigated. Clinicians should be aware of the aortic complications that may progress under special circumstances, such as anthracycline use or immunodeficiency. Careful observation is mandatory for patients with aortic disease.

Dynamic Changes of Blood Lipids in Breast Cancer Patients After (Neo)adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Observational Study

Background

Previous studies indicated that the (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer can cause significant dyslipidemia in patients, but how long this abnormality can persist is unclear so far. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy has a long-term effect on blood lipids in breast cancer patients.

Methods

A total of 159 newly diagnosed female breast cancer patients receiving the (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy subsequently and 159 female healthy controls were enrolled into the observational study. All participants' blood lipid profiles which included TC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C before and at the end of the 1st and 12th month after chemotherapy were retrieved from the electronic medical record system. The blood lipid profiles and the percentage of dyslipidemia before and after chemotherapy in breast cancer patients and controls were compared.

Results

Compared with the baseline before chemotherapy, TC, LDL-C, and TG increased significantly at the end of the 1st month after chemotherapy, but only the abnormal increase in TG (2.98±0.71 mmol/L vs 2.82±0.63 mmol/L, P<0.05) and LDL-C (1.82±0.42 mmol/L vs 1.59±0.42 mmol/L, P<0.05) continued until the 12th month after chemotherapy. Levels of HDL-C in breast cancer patients and all the blood lipid parameters in controls remained stable during the observation period. The percentage of dyslipidemia in breast cancer patients rose from 41.5% at baseline to 54.1% at the 12th month after chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the increase in dyslipidemia percentage was more pronounced in patients with low body mass index and aged over 50 years.

Conclusion

The (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy used for treating breast cancers can cause significant abnormalities in blood lipid profiles, and the abnormal increase in LDL-C and TG can last at least 12 months after chemotherapy, which indicates long-term management of blood lipid is necessary for those patients.

Anticancer Therapy-Related Increases in Arterial Stiffness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Cardio‐oncology is a clinical discipline focused primarily on the early detection of anticancer therapy–related cardiomyopathy. However, there is growing evidence that the direct adverse consequences extend beyond the myocardium to affect the vasculature, but this evidence remains limited. In addition, there remains a paucity of clinically based strategies for monitoring vascular toxicity in these patients. Importantly, arterial stiffness is increasingly recognized as a surrogate end point for cardiovascular disease and may be an important vascular outcome to consider. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to summarize evidence of increased arterial stiffening with anticancer therapy and evaluate the effect of treatment modifiers.

Methods and Results

A total of 19 longitudinal and cross‐sectional studies that evaluated arterial stiffness both during and following anticancer therapy were identified using multiple databases. Two separate analyses were performed: baseline to follow‐up (12 studies) and control versus patient groups (10 studies). Subgroup analysis evaluated whether stiffness differed as a function of treatment type and follow‐up time. Standard mean differences and mean differences were calculated using random effect models. Significant increases in arterial stiffness were identified from baseline to follow‐up (standard mean difference, 0.890; 95% CI, 0.448–1.332; P<0.0001; mean difference, 1.505; 95% CI, 0.789–2.221; P≤0.0001) and in patient versus control groups (standard mean difference, 0.860; 95% CI, 0.402–1.318; P=0.0002; mean difference, 1.437; 95% CI, 0.426–2.448; P=0.0052). Subgroup analysis indicated differences in arterial stiffness between anthracycline‐based and non‐anthracycline‐based therapies (standard mean difference, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.001–0.41; P=0.048), but not follow‐up time.

Conclusions

Significant arterial stiffening occurs following anticancer therapy. Our findings support the use of arterial stiffness as part of a targeted vascular imaging strategy for the identification of early cardiovascular injury during treatment and for the detection of long‐term cardiovascular injury into survivorship.

Long-term cardiac-specific mortality among 44,292 acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with chemotherapy: a population-based analysis

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a common hematological malignancy treated with regimens containing anthracycline, an agent with cardiotoxicity. However, the cardiac-specific mortality in AML patients receiving chemotherapy remains unknown.

Methods: In this population-based study, patients diagnosed with AML between 1973 and 2015 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cumulative mortality by cause of death was calculated. To quantify the excessive cardiac-specific death compared with the general population, standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with cardiac-specific death and AML-specific death.

Results: A total of 64,679 AML patients were identified between 1973 and 2015; 68.48% of patients (44,292) received chemotherapy. Among all possible competing causes of death, AML was associated with the highest cumulative mortality. The AML patients who received chemotherapy showed excessive cardiac-specific mortality compared with the general population, with an SMR of 6.35 (95% CI: 5.89-6.82). Age, year of diagnosis, sex, and marital status were independently associated with patient prognosis.

Conclusion: Cardiac-specific mortality in AML patients receiving chemotherapy is higher than that in the general population.