AVATAR: Analysis for Visual Acuity Prediction After Eye Interventional Radiotherapy

Central subfield thickness predicts visual acuity outcomes in plaque-irradiated eyes with choroidal melanoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between pre-operative central subfield thickness (CST) and post-radiotherapy visual acuity (VA), cystoid macular edema (CME), and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) requirement.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with plaque-irradiated extramacular choroidal melanoma treated between 11/11/2011 and 4/30/2021. Pre-operative CST difference between the affected and unaffected eye was used. Kaplan-Meier analysis and hazard ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 85 patients, pre-operative CST was greater in the melanoma-affected eye (vs. fellow eye) by mean of 20.4 μm (median 14.0, range - 60.0-182.0). Greater CST at presentation (vs. fellow eye) was associated with larger tumor diameter (p = 0.02), greater tumor thickness (p < 0.001), and more frequent tumor-related Bruch's membrane rupture (p = 0.006). On univariate analysis of outcome data, greater CST at presentation (vs. fellow eye) was associated with higher 5-year risk (1.09 [1.02-1.17], p = 0.02) of VA 20/200 or worse and increased (1.10 [1.01-1.20], p = 0.03) likelihood for anti-VEGF injections after plaque irradiation. There was no significant association with CME. The association between CST and VA outcome remained significant on multivariate analysis accounting for impact of tumor thickness and radiation dose to optic disc, while tumor distance to fovea was the only significant factor on multivariate analysis for anti-VEGF injections.

CONCLUSION

Greater CST at presentation (vs. fellow eye) was associated with worse VA outcome following plaque radiotherapy for choroidal melanoma. Large-sized tumors may contribute to a higher intraocular VEGF burden, potentially leading to greater preoperative CST, which correlates with poor VA outcome post-plaque radiotherapy.

Ocular Brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy): Preserving the Vision

Uveal melanoma represents the most common intraocular neoplasia among adults. Brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy; IRT) has a great advantage, when compared with enucleation, both in terms of organ and function sparing. The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study introduced into clinical practice a standardised procedure that allowed the equivalence of IRT with enucleation in terms of overall survival to be demonstrated. IRT is carried out by placing a plaque in direct contact with the sclera under the uveal melanoma. Several radioactive sources may be used, including 106-ruthenium, 125-iodine, 103-palladium and 90-strontium. It is a multidisciplinary procedure requiring the collaboration of interventional radiation oncologists and ophthalmologists in the operating theatre and medical physicists for an accurate treatment time calculation. It also relies on ultrasound imaging to identify the lesion and verifiy the correct plaque placement. An emerging tool of paramount importance could be the use of artificial intelligence and predictive models to identify those patients at higher risk of developing late side-effects and therefore who may deserve preventive and supportive therapies.

The Role of Radiotherapy in Orbital Pseudotumor: A Systematic Review of Literature

PURPOSE

Orbital pseudotumor (or pseudotumor orbitae) is a benign entity, also known as idiopathic orbital inflammatory syndrome (IOIS), which encompasses a wide range of non-tumoral, space occupying lesions of the orbit. In selected cases of refractory disease or presence of side effects or even comorbidities that limit systemic therapies, radiotherapy could play a role in the management because it has been demonstrated that irradiation is effective in suppressing the inflammatory process.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature about the main scientific databases was launched and the time interval included all published articles present in the databases from their inception until September 2020.

RESULTS

We were able to identify 19 studies eligible for inclusion in this review from 1978 to 2018. Overall the data of 241 patients were collected and are presented in this systematic review. The response rate varied between 74% and 100% with a median recurrence rate of 10%. The median total dose was 20 Gy whereas the mean total dose was 21 Gy with a range from 4 to 36 Gy. Regarding the fractionation, 2 Gy/fraction daily was the most widely used.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy seemed to achieve good response rates however, in most of the studies, inclusion criteria and outcome parameters are not uniform and therefore the results are difficult to compare. Often important parameters such as chronic pain and permanent functional deficits are not assessed in the outcome. Therefore, prospective studies, with good cohort characteristics and a clear definition of the outcome, are required.

Radiological and clinical findings in uveal melanoma treated by plaque interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy): Visual atlas and literature review on response assessment

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intra-ocular tumor in Caucasian adults and may derive from melanocytes. Historically, the first therapeutic approach to treat UM has been surgical removal of the eye, with obvious consequences in terms of function, cosmesis, and psychological impact on patients. Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) introduced the first uniform approach to perform interventional radiotherapy (IRT - brachytherapy) procedure in a standardized way that allowed to demonstrate equivalence of IRT with enucleation in terms of overall survival. Since this milestone, several international guidelines have been issued with regard to several technical aspects of this procedure, which has become the mainstream therapy worldwide. However, nowadays, there is still a lack of consensus about the criteria to definitively assess UM response after IRT. We present a collection of paradigmatic cases treated in our institution, and then discuss in detail the latest available evidence on the topic.

Outcomes for posterior uveal melanoma: Validation of American Brachytherapy Society Guidelines

PURPOSE

To assess outcomes of small and medium choroidal melanoma (less than 5.0 mm in height) following Iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with small and medium choroidal melanoma that underwent Iodine-125 brachytherapy with apical height of 1.0 mm to 5.0 mm and largest basal diameter of ≤16.0 mm were included. Data were extracted from the original dosimetry plans to determine doses to vision critical structures with the prescription point to the apical height (actual dose, ABS guidelines) and, after simulation, with the prescription point to the height of 5.0 mm (simulated dose, COMS protocol). Visual acuity (VA) outcomes with actual dose and that predicted with the simulated dose were estimated along with local recurrence, ocular survival, and survival at 5 years.

RESULTS

A total of 339 patients with a mean age of 61.5 years with a mean follow up duration of 43.4 months were included. The mean dose reduction for lens, optic disc, and fovea was 34%, 39.4%, and 41.4%, respectively with actual dose when compared with simulated dose. The Kaplan-Meier estimations for 3 year event free rate of VA of 20/50 or better were 56% and 31% for actual dose and simulated dose, respectively. Only 3 events of local recurrence were observed (enucleated) yielding 5 year local control and ocular survival rate of 98%. Overall survival (OS) and metastasis free survival (MFS) were 95% and 87.5% at 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Small and medium choroidal melanoma treated according to ABS has excellent outcomes. Brachytherapy planning using ABS guidelines as compared to COMS protocol may be associated with lower rates of radiation toxicity and vision loss.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy): state of art and future perspectives

Purpose

Artificial intelligence (AI) plays a central role in building decision supporting systems (DSS), and its application in healthcare is rapidly increasing. The aim of this study was to define the role of AI in healthcare, with main focus on radiation oncology (RO) and interventional radiotherapy (IRT, brachytherapy).

Artificial intelligence in interventional radiation therapy

AI in RO has a large impact in providing clinical decision support, data mining and advanced imaging analysis, automating repetitive tasks, optimizing time, and modelling patients and physicians' behaviors in heterogeneous contexts. Implementing AI and automation in RO and IRT can successfully facilitate all the steps of treatment workflow, such as patient consultation, target volume delineation, treatment planning, and treatment delivery.

Conclusions

AI may contribute to improve clinical outcomes through the application of predictive models and DSS optimization. This approach could lead to reducing time-consuming repetitive tasks, healthcare costs, and improving treatment quality assurance and patient's assistance in IRT.