Stereotactic navigation using registration based on intra-abdominal landmarks in robotic-assisted lateral pelvic lymph node dissection.
Tech Coloproctol 2022;
26:735-743. [PMID:
35676544 DOI:
10.1007/s10151-022-02643-8]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
We carried out robot-assisted lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) for rectal cancer with a stereotactic navigation system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of the system.
METHODS
We constructed a navigation system based on the Polaris Spectra optical tracking device (Northern Digital Inc., Canada) and the open-source software 3D Slicer (version 3.8.1; http://www.slicer.org ). We used the landmark-based registration method for patient-to-image registration. Body surface landmarks and intra-abdominal landmarks were used. We evaluated the time required for registration and target registration error (TRE; the distance between corresponding points after registration) for the root of the superior gluteal artery the root of the obturator or superior vesical artery, and the obturator foramen during minimally invasive LPLND for rectal cancer. Five patients who had LPLND for rectal cancer at the University of Tokyo Hospital between September 2020 and May 2021 were enrolled.
RESULTS
The mean time required for registration was 49 s with the body surface landmarks and 88 s with the intra-abdominal landmarks. The mean TRE improved markedly when the registration was performed using intra-abdominal landmarks. The mean TRE of the root of the superior gluteal artery, the root of the obturator or superior vesical artery, and the obturator foramen were 55.8 mm, 53.4 mm, and 55.2 mm with the body surface landmarks and 11.8 mm, 10.0 mm, and 12.6 mm with the intra-abdominal landmarks, respectively. There were no adverse events related to the registration process.
CONCLUSIONS
When stereotactic navigation systems are used for minimally invasive LPLND, the use of intra-abdominal landmarks for registration is feasible and may allow simpler and more accurate navigation than the use of body surface landmarks.
Collapse