Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio After Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Predicts Survival in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma associates with postoperative pulmonary complications following radical esophagectomy

OBJECTIVES

Esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy is associated with an increased risk of surgical complications. The significance of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio after chemoradiotherapy in predicting pulmonary complications following radical esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting the pulmonary complications of esophagectomy after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 111 consecutive patients with stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy between January 2009 and December 2017. Laboratory data were collected before the operation and surgical outcomes and complications were recorded. We calculated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and correlated them with the clinical parameters, postoperative complications, overall survival, and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications were observed in 75 (68%) patients, including 32 (29%) with pulmonary complications. The preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio of ≥ 3 (P = 0.008), clinical T4 classification (P = 0.007), and advanced stage IIIC (P = 0.012) were significantly associated with pulmonary complications. Pulmonary complication rates were 15% and 38% in patients with preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio of < 3 and ≥ 3, respectively. Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was not associated with the oncological stratification such as pathological T classification, pathological N classification, and pathological AJCC stage. The 3-year overall survival rates were 70% and 34% in patients with preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio of < 3 and ≥ 3, respectively (P = 0.0026). The 3-year disease-free survival rates were 57% and 29% in patients with preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio of < 3 and ≥ 3, respectively (P = 0.0055). The preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio of ≥ 3 was independently associated with more pulmonary complications, inferior overall survival, and worse disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after chemoradiotherapy is independently associated with higher pulmonary complication rate following radical esophagectomy and poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is routinely available in clinical practice and our findings suggest it can be used as a predictor for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Usefulness of Nutrition and Inflammation Assessment Tools in Esophageal Cancer Treatment

Multidisciplinary treatment for esophageal cancer leads to nutritional and inflammatory changes. Recent studies showed that nutritional and inflammatory changes during multidisciplinary treatment affect both short and long-term oncological outcomes in esophageal cancer treatment. Therefore, evaluation of the nutritional and inflammatory status during treatment is necessary in order to optimize and utilize multidisciplinary therapy for esophageal cancer. If patients with esophageal cancer are able to determine their nutritional and inflammatory status, they will be able to select the optimal esophageal cancer, anti-inflammation, and nutritional treatments. Various types of nutrition and inflammation assessment tools have been developed and reported for esophageal cancer, with each tool having its own clinical characteristics, which must be understood before being applied in clinical practice. This review summarizes the background, current status, and future perspectives on the application of nutrition and inflammation assessment tools in esophageal cancer treatment.

Esophageal stenosis as an independent factor of poor prognosis in patients with ESCC treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy

Aim: To evaluate the clinical outcome and elucidate the prognostic factors in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Patients: Data for patients newly diagnosed with ESCC receiving definitive CRT at our institution between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 201 patients were included. Severe stenosis after radiotherapy was an independent factor relevant to prognosis. Maximal esophageal wall thickness, short-term responses, severe stenosis at diagnosis and a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were independent risk factors for the occurrence of severe stenosis after radiotherapy. Conclusion: Severe stenosis after radiotherapy is a useful predictive indicator in patients with ESCC receiving definitive CRT. Further studies are needed to verify these findings.

Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the prognostic value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

The medical records of HCC patients treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The NLR and PLR were calculated from the serum complete blood count before and after SBRT, and the prognostic values of the NLR and PLR for the treatment outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients with 49 HCC lesions were included. After a median follow-up of 26.8 months (range, 8.4-80.0 months), three-year local control, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rate were 97.4%, 78.3%, and 35.2%, respectively. Both NLR and PLR increased significantly after SBRT and decreased slowly to the pre-SBRT value at 6 months. Univariable analysis showed that gross tumor volume (GTV) >14 cc, post-SBRT PLR >90, and PLR change >30 were associated with a poorer OS (p=0.002, p=0.011, and p=0.001, respectively), and the PLR change was significant in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 10.09; 95% CI, 1.15-88.40; p=0.037). For PFS, GTV >14 cc, post-SBRT NLR >2.5 and post-SBRT PLR >90 were predictive of a poorer PFS in univariable analysis (p=0.011, p=0.004 and p=0.041, respectively) and only post-SBRT NLR >2.5 remained significant in multivariable analysis (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.03-5.76; p=0.042, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The NLR and PLR increased transiently after SBRT, and the post-SBRT NLR and PLR were associated with the clinical outcomes of HCC patients.

Irradiation immunity interactions

The immune system can influence cancer development by both impeding and/or facilitating tumour growth and spread. A better understanding of this complex relationship is fundamental to optimise current and future cancer therapeutic strategies. Although typically regarded as a localised and immunosuppressive anti‐cancer treatment modality, radiation therapy has been associated with generating profound systemic effects beyond the intended target volume. These systemic effects are immune‐driven suggesting radiation therapy can enhance anti‐tumour immunosurveillance in some instances. In this review, we summarise how radiation therapy can positively and negatively affect local and systemic anti‐tumour immune responses, how co‐administration of immunotherapy with radiation therapy may help promote anti‐tumour immunity, and how the use of immune biomarkers may help steer radiation therapy‐immunotherapy personalisation to optimise clinical outcomes.