Clinicopathological Characteristics of Gastric-type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Misdiagnosed as an Endometrial, Ovarian or Extragenital Malignancy, or Mistyped as Usual-type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma

Unusual spread of cervical adenocarcinoma to the endometrium and left fallopian tube: a case report and literature review

Introduction

The incidence of cervical adenocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma in situ are gradually increasing especially in younger women. However, unusual spread of cervical adenocarcinoma has rarely been reported.

Case presentation

The authors report a case of a 60-year-old woman who presented with postmenopausal bleeding. She was misdiagnosed to have endometrial adenocarcinoma on the lower uterine segment depending on curettage specimen. After hysterectomy, it was revealed depending on morphological features in histology accompanied with immunohistochemistry that the patient had cervical adenocarcinoma with endometrial and left fallopian tube extension.

Discussion

Distinguishing endocervical adenocarcinoma from endometroid adenocarcinoma poses many challenges especially when evaluating endometrial curettage specimens. Histological diagnosis based on morphological features combined with a panel of immunohistochemistry stains is crucial for accurate diagnosis and identifying the primary origin of the tumor.

Conclusion

Accurate distinction between cervical adenocarcinoma versus endometrial adenocarcinoma is important because of its significant effects on choosing the appropriate treatment option.

Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Analysis of Mesonephric Marker Expression in Low-grade Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma

Immunohistochemical markers shown to be useful in identifying/confirming mesonephric/mesonephric-like differentiation (MLD markers) include thyroid transcription factor (TTF1), GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3), and cluster of differentiation 10 (CD10). Only a few studies have examined the expression levels of MLD markers in endometrial endometrioid carcinomas (EECs). This study aimed to analyze the frequency and pattern of MLD marker expression in low-grade EECs. We performed immunostaining for the detection of TTF1, GATA3, and CD10 expression in 50 low-grade EEC tissue samples and evaluated their staining proportion and intensity. Nine tumors (18.0%) expressed at least one MLD marker in varying proportions and intensities, and 2 of these tumors were positive for 2 MLD markers (TTF1/GATA3 and GATA3/CD10, respectively). Three (6.0%) tumors showed moderate-to-strong nuclear TTF1 immunoreactivity in ≤5% of the tumor cells. Five tumors (10.0%) had at least moderate nuclear GATA3 staining, and three of them displayed a staining proportion of ≥15%. Three tumors (6.0%) were focal (mean proportion, 15%) but strongly positive for CD10. Our findings indicate that a subset of EEC can express one or more MLD markers with varying staining proportions and intensities. Given that a diagnosis of uterine mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma should be established based on a combination of characteristic histologic features, unique immunophenotypes, and confirmed molecular findings, pathologists should not exclude EEC based only on the presence of focal immunoreactivity for MLD markers. Awareness of the atypical expression patterns of MLD markers in EEC helps pathologists avoid misdiagnosing EEC as a uterine mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma.

Primary endometrial gastric (gastro-intestinal)-type carcinoma: A practical approach

The latest WHO classification of the female genital tract tumors introduces a new type of carcinoma: the primary gastric-type (or gastro-intestinal type) carcinoma of the endometrium. This type of neoplasm tends to have a poor outcome, making its correct diagnostic important. As little is known about this entity and given its quite challenging diagnosis, we aim to review existing data about it and propose a practical diagnostic approach. There are currently 11 cases published in 8 articles fitting the precise definition of a primary gastric-type carcinoma of the endometrium. Three main differential diagnoses must be excluded before considering this tumor: endometrioid adenocarcinoma with mucinous (Müllerian-type) differentiation, endocervical primary, and gastro-intestinal primary. Morphological aspects of this tumor can be heterogeneous and confusing; in this context, immunochemistry can be helpful to highlight the gastric or intestinal differentiation, but also to eliminate a mucinous endometrioid adenocarcinoma of Müllerian-type, by the constant negativity of estrogen receptors. A metastasis of a primary gastro-intestinal tract carcinoma must also be excluded by clinical, endoscopic and imaging work-up. Finally, an endometrial extension of a primary endocervical gastric-type carcinoma should be ruled out by complete sampling of the cervix. Intestinal type endocervical adenocarcinoma is easier to eliminate since this is an HPV-associated neoplasm.

Mesonephric-like Carcinosarcoma of the Uterine Corpus: Clinicopathological, Molecular and Prognostic Characteristics in Comparison With Uterine Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma and Conventional Endometrial Carcinosarcoma

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological, prognostic and molecular characteristics of uterine mesonephric-like carcinosarcoma (MLCS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected clinical, pathological, and genetic information from 12 MLCS patients, and analyzed their differences from mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) and conventional endometrial carcinosarcoma (CECS).

RESULTS

The epithelial component was exclusively MLA in all MLCS cases. Metastatic and recurrent tumors consisted predominantly or exclusively of MLA in the majority of MLCS cases. Patients with MLCS and MLA presented with more advanced-stage disease than those with CECS. They also exhibited post-treatment recurrence and lung metastases more frequently than CECS. Disease-free survival rates of MLCS and MLA were shorter than those of CECS. Tumor protein 53 gene mutations were detected in four MLCS cases.

CONCLUSION

The predominance or exclusive presence of MLA in metastatic and recurrent tumors highlights the possibility that MLA may determine the clinical outcomes of patients with MLCS. Further studies are required to provide direct molecular evidence of the monoclonal origin of uterine MLCS.

Endometrioid Carcinomas of the Ovaries and Endometrium Involving Endocervical Polyps: Comprehensive Clinicopathological Analyses

While synchronous ovarian and endometrial endometrioid carcinomas (ECs) have long been described in the literature, ovarian or endometrial EC involving concomitant endocervical polyp (ECP) has not yet been reported. This study aimed to investigate the histological types and prevalence of gynecological tumors co-existing with ECP and to comprehensively analyze the clinicopathological characteristics of ovarian and endometrial ECs involving ECPs. We searched for ECP cases associated with premalignant lesions or malignancies of the female genital tract occurring between March 2019 and February 2022. We then investigated the histological types and prevalence of gynecological tumors co-existing with ECP. In addition, we reviewed electronic medical records and pathology slides to collect the clinicopathological features of four patients with ovarian or endometrial EC involving ECP. We found 429 ECPs over the three-year study period. Of these, 68 (15.9%) were associated with premalignant or malignant lesions occurring in the uterine cervix, endometrium, and ovaries. Four of these cases, including two (0.5%) ovarian grade 3 ECs and two (0.5%) endometrial grade 1 ECs, involved ECPs. In the former cases (cases 1 and 2), ECs involving ECPs exhibited similar morphology and immunohistochemical staining results to those of advanced-stage ovarian EC. In the latter cases (cases 3 and 4), the histological and immunophenotypical features of EC involving ECP were identical to those of primary endometrial EC, despite the lack of tumor involvement in the myometrium, lower uterine segment, and cervical stroma as well as the absence of lymphovascular invasion and lymph node metastasis. In all cases, no evidence of benign endometriosis, endometrial hyperplasia without atypia, or atypical hyperplasia/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasm within ECP or the adjacent endocervical tissue was noted. Considering our results, the involvement of ECP by EC may have been caused by an implantation metastasis from the ovarian (cases 1 and 2) or endometrial (cases 3 and 4) EC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first exploration of the synchronous occurrence of endometrial or ovarian EC and ECP involvement. Implantation metastasis via transtubal and trans-endometrial cavity migration may have been the pathogenic mechanism of ECP involvement.

Case Report: Gastric-Type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Mimicking Submucosal Myoma Under Hysteroscopy

Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (GAS) is considered a distinct and clinically important entity because it is unrelated to human papillomavirus infection and has aggressive behavior and worse clinical outcomes than the usual type of endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA). The preoperative diagnosis of GAS is often difficult because of its nonspecific clinical manifestations and special lesion location. We report the case of a 50-year-old Chinese woman who presented with intermittent left lower abdominal pain for 1 year. Preoperative images showed left hydrosalpinx and a lesion that was mainly located in the lower part of the uterine cavity. We considered the lesion to be a polyp before surgery. During hysteroscopic surgery, we suspected that it may be a submucosal myoma. However, pathology revealed that it was a GAS. GAS may be located in the upper endocervix or even reach the uterine cavity. The appearance is occasionally similar to that of submucosal myoma, resulting in difficult preoperative diagnosis and even misdiagnosis.

Extraskeletal Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma of the Uterus

Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma is an uncommon malignant mesenchymal tumor with an aggressive behavior. Diagnoses of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma are established based on histomorphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings. Only one case of extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (EMC) of the uterus has been reported. This article presents the second case of primary uterine EMC, occurring in a 33-year-old woman. We describe the histological and immunophenotypical features of EMC. Our observations will help pathologists and clinicians perform accurate histological diagnoses of uterine EMC and plan appropriate treatment strategies for this rare tumor.

Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Corpus: Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Analyses Using Markers for Mesonephric, Endometrioid and Serous Tumors

Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) of the uterine corpus is a rare but distinct malignant tumor of the female genital tract, demonstrating a characteristic morphology and unique immunohistochemical profiles and molecular alterations. We conducted immunohistochemical staining (IHC) to make precise differential diagnoses of uterine MLAs from common histological subtypes of endometrial carcinomas. We collected 25 uterine MLAs and performed IHC for GATA3, TTF1, CD10, ER, PR, p16, p53, and HER2. Seventeen cases (68.0%) showed at least moderate nuclear GATA3 immunoreactivity in ≥25% of tumor cells. Most cases expressed TTF1 (17/21, 81.0%) and CD10 (luminal; 17/21, 81.0%). Heterogeneous TTF1 expression was noted in 12 cases. An inverse pattern of GATA3 and TTF1 staining was observed in eight cases (32.0%). Three cases (12.0%) showed moderate-to-strong ER expression in ≥25% of tumor cells, and two cases (8.0%) showed moderate-to-strong PR expression in ≥5% of tumor cells. These hormone receptor-positive MLAs varied in intensity and proportion of GATA3 staining. None of the 25 cases exhibited either diffuse and strong p16 expression or aberrant p53 expression. Five cases (20.0%) showed equivocal HER2 immunoreactivity (score 2+), but HER2 FISH confirmed that none of them exhibited HER2 gene amplification. In summary, a small subset of uterine MLAs displayed atypical IHC results: focal but strong expression of ER or PR, the complete absence of GATA3 immunoreactivity, the concurrent expression of mesonephric and hormone receptors, and the inverse pattern of GATA3 and TTF1 staining. These unusual immunophenotypes may complicate the differential diagnosis of MLA. Moreover, pathologists should be encouraged to interpret the IHC results cautiously.