Impact of Immune-related Adverse Events on Nivolumab Efficacy in Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer

Serious Immune-related Adverse Events Are Associated With Greater Efficacy of Nivolumab Therapy Against Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate possible association between adverse events of nivolumab therapy and the effectiveness of treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Focusing on serious adverse events (i.e., those of grade ≥3), we evaluated overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), as well as objective response rate (ORR) to treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a set of patients from the TULUNG database of NSCLC treated with nivolumab in eight oncology centers. We evaluated OS data based upon this set. To reduce possible bias, we further evaluated a subgroup of patients treated at the University Hospital in Pilsen, where the occurrence of adverse events, PFS, and ORR were independently examined by two experienced physicians. Survival statistics were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis.

RESULTS

We observed significantly greater OS, PFS, and ORR in the group of patients experiencing adverse events upon nivolumab treatment versus in those patients without such events. Although the univariable model analyzing the data set of all patients demonstrated higher OS in patients with serious adverse events, only a nonsignificant trend was observed in the Cox multivariable model. In a subgroup of patients with PFS and ORR evaluation, we did observe significant, favorable effects for patients having had serious adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Patients experiencing severe adverse events show a tendency toward better OS, PFS, and ORR compared to patients without or having only mild adverse events with nivolumab treatment.

Immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising efficacy in treatment and clinical management of advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. However, the inhibitors also cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The current systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to investigate the incidence and nature of irAEs caused by ICIs.

AIM

To investigate the incidence and nature of irAEs in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

METHODS

This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (Reg. number: CRD42020152291). Data included in this study were collected from patients diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer and treated with ICIs. A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Meta-analysis was carried out using the single sample rate method. Synthesis and analysis of the data was conducted using Stata/SE and Review Manager Software.

RESULTS

The patients enrolled in the present study included 14 patients from 14 case reports, 326 patients from 6 case series, and 1249 patients from 8 clinical trials. It was found that the overall incidence of irAEs was 16% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11-20] for all grades and 3% (95%CI: 2-4) for the severe grade. It was evident that the incidence of irAEs varied with the type of inhibitor and organs. A comparative study of the anti-programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed death receptor-ligand 1 (PD-L1) treatments showed that the anti-PD-1 group had a higher overall incidence of irAEs (20%) as compared with that of the anti-PD-L1 group (13%). Results of this study showed that the endocrine system experienced the highest incidence of organ-specific irAEs (7.4%), including hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, thyroiditis, diabetes, and adrenal insufficiency, followed by gastroenterology (2.2%), pulmonology (1.8%), neurology (1.4%), dermatology (1.4%), hematology (0.8%), and hepatology (0.7%). In clinical trials, it was found that the incidence of death related to irAEs was 1% (95%CI: 0-2.0), whereby colitis and interstitial lung diseases were the leading causes of death.

CONCLUSION

It was evident that the incidence and nature of irAEs are both organ- and inhibitor-specific. The anti-PD-1 group had the highest incidence of all irAEs grades including the severe grades of irAEs. Early identification and management of irAEs allows clinical oncologists to effectively consider the pros and cons and hence enables them to strike a balance.

Impact of Patient Characteristics on the Outcomes of Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancers Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are a group of malignancies that globally account for a significant portion of cancer incidence and cancer-related death. Survival outcomes for esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary cancers remain poor, but new treatment paradigms are emerging with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. This review characterizes patient-related prognostic factors that influence the response to ICI therapy. We performed an analysis of the landmark randomized clinical trials in esophageal, gastric, colorectal, hepatocellular, pancreatic, and biliary tract cancers in terms of patient demographic factors. A literature review of smaller retrospective studies investigating patient-related factors was completed. The immunological bases for these associations were further explored. The key predictive factors identified include age, sex, performance status, geography, body mass index, sarcopenia, gut microbiome, various biochemical factors, and disease distribution.

Immune-related adverse events and prognosis in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer treated with nivolumab

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly being used for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal cancers [esophageal cancer and gastric cancer (GC)]. They cause imbalances in immunological tolerance, resulting in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Although irAEs have been reported to be associated with the efficacy of ICIs in some cancers, the relationship between irAEs and prognosis of upper gastrointestinal cancers remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of irAEs in patients with advanced or recurrent upper gastrointestinal cancer treated with nivolumab.

Methods

We retrospectively divided the patients (n=96) who received nivolumab into two groups: the irAEs group (n=41) and non-irAEs group (n=55), according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ver. 5.0.

Results

irAEs were significantly associated with good performance status and high serum albumin levels (all P<0.05). The irAEs group had a significantly longer overall survival (OS) than the non-irAEs group [log-rank P=0.003; univariate hazard ratio (HR) =0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) =0.21-0.65, P<0.01; multivariate HR =0.47, 95% CI =0.26-0.88, P=0.018]. Importantly, in both esophageal cancer and GC, the irAEs group experienced favorable clinical outcomes compared with the non-irAEs group. In the multivariate analysis, male sex (P<0.01), presence of irAEs (P=0.018), and good pretreatment performance status (P<0.01) were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions

Among patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer treated with nivolumab, the prognosis of patients who developed irAEs was better than that of patients who did not develop irAEs. Long-term continuation of nivolumab by early detection of irAEs and an appropriate response to irAEs are important.