Usefulness of Nutrition and Inflammation Assessment Tools in Esophageal Cancer Treatment

A propensity‑matched analysis of the prognostic value of advanced lung cancer inflammation index in patients with gastric cancer after curative resection

The prognostic significance of inflammation, immune response and nutritional status in patients with cancer is well-documented. The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) has emerged as a novel prognostic indicator, reflecting both inflammation and nutritional status. This study aimed to assess the prognostic relevance of preoperative ALI in patients with gastric cancer (GC). Data of 459 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for GC between December 2013 and November 2017 at the Kanagawa Cancer Center (Yokohama, Japan) were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative ALI was calculated from blood tests. Patients were divided into the high- and low-ALI groups. This study investigated the association between preoperative ALI, clinicopathological features, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) after propensity-matched analysis. Comparative analysis revealed that patients in the low-ALI group tended to be older, were predominantly female, had lower body mass index and had a higher incidence of lymphatic invasion compared with those in the high-ALI group before propensity-matched analysis. Notably, the low-ALI group exhibited significantly reduced OS and RFS post-gastrectomy (85.5% vs. 93.8%, P=0.01; and 82.1% vs. 91.8%, P=0.02, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified low ALI as an independent prognostic factor for both OS and RFS. In conclusion, preoperative ALI could provide a valuable prognostic tool for patients with GC undergoing curative resection, offering insights into patient survival outcomes based on their inflammatory and nutritional status.

The Clinical Impact of the Pretreatment Albumin to Fibrinogen Ratio in Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment

BACKGROUND/AIM

The albumin to fibrinogen ratio (AFR) has been identified as a promising prognostic marker for some malignancies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical impact of AFR in esophageal cancer patients who received curative resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present study included 123 patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters were compared between patients with high and low AFRs.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) stratified by each clinical factor was compared using the log-rank test, and a significant difference was observed when using a pretreatment AFR of 1.23. When comparing the patient backgrounds between the high-AFR (AFR ≥12.3) and low-AFR (AFR<12.3) groups, significant differences were noted in the pathological T status. The high-AFR group had significantly higher OS rates at 3 years (70.8%) and 5 years (59.3%) after surgery in comparison to the low-AFR group (46.6% and 37.4%, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses for OS showed that the AFR was a significant prognostic factor. In addition, when comparing the site of first recurrence, a marginally significant difference was noted in hematological recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The AFR is a significant risk factor in patients with esophageal cancer, holding promise as a valuable prognostic factor.

Clinical Impact of the C-reactive Protein-albumin-lymphocyte Index in Post-gastrectomy Patients With Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Recently, preoperative inflammatory, immune, and nutritional statuses have attracted attention as prognostic factors in post-curative gastrectomy patients with gastric cancer (GC). The usefulness of the C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index as a prognostic factor in patients with various cancers, has been reported. However, reports on the clinical significance of the CALLY index in patients with GC after gastrectomy remain inadequate. In this prospective study, we focused on the preoperative CALLY index and investigated its usefulness as a prognostic factor in patients with GC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 459 patients who underwent gastrectomy for GC between December 2013 and November 2017 at Kanagawa Cancer Center, Kanagawa, Japan. The preoperative CALLY index was calculated based on the preoperative blood test data. Patients were divided into high- and low-CALLY groups. The associations of the preoperative CALLY scores with clinicopathological factors, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after gastrectomy for GC were evaluated.

RESULTS

The low-CALLY group was significantly older, had higher venous invasion, and a more progressive pStage than did the high-CALLY group. OS and RFS after gastrectomy in the low-CALLY group were significantly worse than those in the high-CALLY group (77.9% vs. 88.9%; p<0.001 and 73.8% vs. 87.1%; p<0.001, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, a low CALLY score was an independent prognostic factor of worse OS and RFS.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CALLY levels may be a useful prognostic predictor in patients with GC after curative gastrectomy.

The Naples Prognostic Score Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Gastric Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of the Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) in patients with gastric cancer and to clarify the potential of the NPS as a nutritional and inflammation evaluation system.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 158 patients who underwent curative treatment for gastric cancer between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinical pathological parameters of the high-NPS (NPS >2) and low-NPS (NPS=0, 1) groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) rates at 3 and 5 years were 86.7% and 77.7%, respectively, in the low-NPS group and 55.4% and 47.4%, respectively, in the high-NPS group. There were significant differences in OS between the two groups. Uni- and multivariate analyses demonstrated that the NPS was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR=2.495, 95%CI=1.240-5.451). In addition, the 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 82.1% and 76.0%, respectively, in the NPS-low group, and 43.8% and 36.6% in the NPS-high group. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that the NPS was an independent prognostic factor for RFS (HR=2.739, 95%CI=1.509-4.972). When the first site of recurrence was compared between the low-NPS group and high-NPS group, there were significant differences in peritoneal recurrence (8.7% vs. 34.3%, p=0.001) and hematologic recurrence (5.6% vs. 21.9%, p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

The NPS was a significant prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer who received curative treatment. The NPS may be a promising biomarker for the treatment and management of gastric cancer.

Albumin-Globulin Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Gastric Cancer Patients who Received Curative Treatment

BACKGROUND/AIM

The albumin-globulin ratio (AGR) is a useful biomarker for predicting postoperative complications and a poor prognosis in patients with various types of cancer and can be evaluated without invasive testing or surgery. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the AGR in predicting the short- and long-term prognoses of patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical resection at our institution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective cohort analysis in which eligible patients were selected from the medical records of patients who underwent radical resection for gastric cancer at Yokohama City University from 2000 to 2020 and their medical records were reviewed. A total of 240 patients with gastric cancer were classified into high-AGR (>1.57) and low-AGR (≤1.57) groups and their overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and postoperative complication rates were compared.

RESULTS

Of the total 240 patients, 87 were classified into the high AGR group and 153 were classified into the low AGR group; the incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent (34.4% vs. 39.2%, p=0.491). The long-term findings showed that the 5-year OS and RFS rates were significantly better in the high AGR group [84.0% vs. 64.8% (p=0.005), 80.0% vs. 61.9% (p=0.015), respectively].

CONCLUSION

Preoperative low AGR is a risk factor for OS and DFS in patients with gastric cancer who undergo surgery. The AGR may be a useful biomarker that can be applied as a prognostic indicator for patients with gastric cancer.

Clinical Significance of Prealbumin Level Measurement Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

Radical esophagectomy after preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, careful treatment selection is required when considering organ function in elderly patients. Prealbumin, a rapid turnover protein, is a short-term dynamic nutritional index, and its relationship with long-term postoperative survival in various cancers has been previously reported. However, the association between serum prealbumin level before NAC and survival in elderly patients remains unclear. This study investigated the clinical significance of prealbumin level measurement before NAC in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent surgery after NAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty patients aged ≥65 years diagnosed with cStage II/III ESCC and undergoing radical esophagectomy after cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil therapy as NAC, were included. The cutoff value of the serum prealbumin level before NAC was set at 18.2 mg/dl using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and postoperative complications, recurrence, and overall survival were compared between the low and high prealbumin groups.

RESULTS

There were no differences in patient background, clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative complications, or recurrence-free survival between the two groups. Overall survival (OS) was significantly worse in the low prealbumin group than in the high prealbumin group (5-year survival, 33.3% vs. 67.0%; p=0.0341). Furthermore, on univariate and multivariate analysis, low prealbumin level was an independent poor OS factor (p=0.036).

CONCLUSION

In elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC, serum prealbumin level before NAC may be a useful prognostic factor and may be important in selecting a treatment strategy that considers individual organ function.

The Clinical Impact of the Pretreatment Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Gastric Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment

BACKGROUND/AIM

The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is a promising prognostic marker in some malignancies. The present study evaluated the clinical impact of the PLR in patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 258 patients who underwent curative treatment for gastric cancer between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters between the high- and low-PLR statuses were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) stratified by each clinical factor was compared using the log-rank test, and a significant difference was observed using a pretreatment PLR of 150. When comparing the patient backgrounds between the high-PLR (PLR≥150) and low-PLR (PLR<150) groups, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The OS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were significantly higher at 70.8% and 60.4%, respectively, for the high-PLR group than at 83.6% and 79.7%, respectively, for the low-PLR group. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the OS showed that the PLR was a significant prognostic factor. In addition, when comparing the first recurrence sites, there were significant differences in peritoneal recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The PLR is a significant risk factor for gastric cancer, making it a promising prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer.