An educational intervention using the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Depression Guidelines among internal medicine residents

Interventions to improve the detection of depression in primary healthcare: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several studies have been conducted on the effect of interventions on the detection of depression in primary healthcare (PHC). Systematic reviews have also been done on the effectiveness of separate interventions. However, systematic reviews are not done on the comparative effectiveness of several interventions. This study, therefore, aimed at synthesizing the global evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to improve the detection of depression in PHC.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Global Index Medicus, African Index Medicus, and African Journals Online, from the inception of the databases to until the 4th week of April 2020. We also searched references of the included articles. We included randomized trials, cluster randomized trials, or quasi-experimental studies, which evaluated the effectiveness of an intervention to improve detection of depression in the PHC setting. Two of the review authors independently extracted data from the included studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies developed by the Effective Public Health Practice Project. The protocol for the review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020166291).

RESULTS

Of 23,305 records identified, we included 58 articles in the review. Diverse types of interventions were evaluated to improve clinician diagnosis of depression in the PHC setting. Interventions related to implementation of guidelines, screening with feedback, educational interventions which incorporated active learning and clinical practice, and disclosure of screening results were found to be mostly effective. Interventions which combined education, screening, and feedback were particularly more effective. Most of the included studies were weak or moderate in their methodological quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review indicates that implementation of a single type of intervention does not improve the detection of depression in PHC. Combining aspects of each type of intervention which are more effective may be useful. Education and training interventions which include more simulation and role playing are found to be effective over time. Most of the studies conducted in the area are from high-income countries and are weak in their methodological quality. There is need to conduct more number of studies in low-income settings.

Major depressive disorders in the general hospital: how to implement guidelines

OBJECTIVE

An implementation study that evaluated the impact of previously adopted guidelines on the clinical practice of medical residents was conducted to improve the recognition and treatment of major depressive disorders (MDDs) in hospitalized patients with somatic diseases.

METHODS

Guidelines were implemented in two wards (ENT and oncology) using intranet diffusion, interactive sessions with medical residents, and support material. Discharge letters of 337 and 325 patients, before and after the intervention, respectively, were checked for statement of diagnosis or treatment of MDDs and, in a post hoc analysis, for any mention about psychiatric management.

RESULTS

No difference was found in the number of diagnosed or treated MDDs before and after the intervention. However, significantly more statements about psychological status (29/309 vs. 13/327) and its management (36/309 vs. 19/327) were observed after the intervention (P<.01).

CONCLUSION

The intervention was not successful in improving the management of MDDs. However, a possible effect on general psychological aspects of medical diseases was observed.

Early antidepressant therapy for elderly patients

PURPOSE

We studied factors affecting the management of depression in older patients, especially the use of early antidepressant therapy.

METHODS

We recruited 128 primary care physicians to view one version of a 5-minute videotape of an elderly patient with somatic symptoms that were suggestive of depression, and to complete an interview that assessed decision making. Using an experimental factorial design, 16 versions of the videotape were produced, holding constant the clinical features of the case, while varying the patient's age, race, sex, and socioeconomic status. Dependent variables were the physicians' probability assessment of depression and the recommendation of antidepressant medication after the first visit.

RESULTS

Depression was considered a possible diagnosis by 121 physicians (95%) and the most likely diagnosis by 69 (54%). Sixteen physicians (13%) recommended antidepressant therapy after the first visit, and they were less likely than other physicians to order initial laboratory tests to assess the possibility of other conditions. Recommendations for antidepressant therapy was not associated with patient age, sex, race, or socioeconomic status, or with physician sex, race, or experience. Family physicians were more likely than internists to recommend an antidepressant (19% [12/64] vs. 6% [4/64], P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Based on a 5-minute vignette, physicians were likely to recognize depression, independent of patient characteristics. Those recommending early antidepressant therapy were more likely to be in family medicine and less likely to investigate other diagnoses initially.

Evaluating the Impact of an Educational Program on Practice Patterns of Canadian Family Physicians Interested in Depression Treatment

BACKGROUND: Depression is frequently unrecognized and undertreated. Therefore, there is a need to increase the knowledge and skills of primary care physicians regarding the diagnosis and treatment of depression. The aim of this study was to provide, and evaluate the impact of, a brief educational program with a number of practice tools and resources in order to improve family physicians' knowledge, diagnosis, and treatment of depression. METHODS: Two educational programs (general and enhanced) were delivered to family physicians interested in depression treatment. The enhanced program focused on more practical clinical issues such as use of diagnostic and symptom assessment tools, recommended dosing of citalopram, how to initiate and discontinue treatment, and relapse prevention. Physicians' knowledge of depression was assessed pretraining and posttraining. Chart audits were conducted for 6 months. Primary endpoints were recognition of depression and pharmacologic management (initial dose, maximum dose, length of treatment, adverse events, and concomitant psychotropic drugs). Secondary endpoints were patient satisfaction with treatment, compliance, withdrawal from the study, treatment outcome, use of adjunctive psychotherapy, and number of office visits. RESULTS: There was a global increase in physicians' knowledge of depression in the short term. Physicians in the enhanced group were more likely to use a symptom-based diagnostic checklist, record the diagnosis of depression, and prescribe the recommended initial dose of citalopram, and they referred less frequently for adjunctive psychotherapy. No difference between educational intervention groups was found in patient satisfaction, compliance, and treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: A well-designed brief, simple, and low-cost educational program can increase family physicians' knowledge of depression, improve their diagnostic skills, and optimize their treatment of depression.

Implementing practice guidelines for depression: applying a new framework to an old problem

We discuss the challenges of implementing clinical practice guidelines for depression in the primary care setting. Multiple potential barriers can limit physician guideline adherence and translation of research into improved patient outcomes. Six primary barriers relate to providers (lack of awareness, lack of familiarity, lack of agreement, lack of self efficacy, lack of outcome expectancy, and inertia of previous practice). In addition, factors related to patient, guideline, and practice environment factors encompass external barriers to adherence. By delineating the underlying barriers to adherence, different interventions that are tailored to improve physician adherence to guidelines can be utilized. We review examples of these barriers, as well as interventions to improve guideline adherence. We also review characteristics of successful interventions to improve physician adherence to guidelines for depression. Since different physicians and practice settings may encounter a variety of barriers, multifaceted interventions that are not focused exclusively on the physician tend to be most effective.