"Dualities of interest": the inter-organizational relationships between disease-specific nonprofits and the pharmaceutical industry

Exploiting Inter-Organizational Relationships in Health Care: A Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review

Inter-organizational relationships are high on the health policy agenda. Scholars and practitioners have provided heterogeneous views about the triggers of collaborative practices and the success factors that underpin the sustainability of inter-organizational relationships in the health care domain. The article proposes a literature review aimed at systematizing current scientific research that contextualizes inter-organizational relationships to health care. A mixed approach was undertaken, which consisted of a bibliometric analysis followed by a narrative literature review. A tailored search strategy on Elsevier’s Scopus yielded 411 relevant records, which were carefully screened for inclusion in this study. After screening, 105 papers were found to be consistent with the study purposes and included in this literature review. The findings emphasize that the establishment and implementation of inter-organizational relationships in health care are affected by several ambiguities, which concern both the governance and the structuring of collaborative relationships. The viability and the success of inter-organizational relationships depend on the ability of both central and peripheral partners to acknowledge and address such ambiguities. Failure to do so involves an opportunistic participation to inter-organizational relationships. This endangers conflicting behaviors rather than collaboration among partners.

Disputas inter-capitalistas, biomedicalización y modelo médico hegemónico

Este artículo se sitúa en el campo de estudio de los procesos productivos y de la transición tecnológica en el cuidado de salud. Examina la entrada del capital financiero en el sector salud y sus disputas con el complejo médico-industrial. Avanza en la comprensión de cómo los sectores capitalistas, que lideran la reestructuración productiva en salud, apuestan a la potencia de los procesos de creación de nuevas subjetividades en la transformación y consolidación del actual modelo médico hegemónico y en la producción/reproducción de modos de agenciamientos capitalísticos. Usamos el concepto de biomedicalización para entender la radicalización del proceso de medicalización, concepto que se viene mostrando insuficiente para comprender los cambios observados. Comprender estos fenómenos facilita reconocer resistencias y líneas de fuga que posibilitan apuestas no mercantilistas en salud, creadoras de autonomía y valorización de la vida individual y colectiva.

Assessment of the scope and practice of evaluation among medical donation programs

Background

Medical donation programs for drugs, other medical products, training and other supportive services can improve access to essential medicines in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and provide emergency and disaster relief. The scope and extent to which medical donation programs evaluate their impact on recipients and health systems is not well documented.

Methods

We conducted a survey of the member organizations of the Partnership for Quality Medical Donations (PQMD), a global alliance of non-profit and corporate organizations, to identify evaluations conducted in conjunction with donation programs.

Results

Twenty-five out of the 36 PQMD organizations that were members at the time of the survey participated in the study, for a response rate of 69 %. PQMD members provided information on 34 of their major medical donation programs. Half of the donation programs reported conducting trainings as a part of their donation program. Twenty-six (76 %) programs reported that they conduct routine monitoring of their donation programs. Less than 30 % of donation programs were evaluated for their impact on health. Lack of technical staff and lack of funding were reported as key barriers to conducting impact evaluations.

Conclusions

Member organizations of PQMD provide a broad range of medical donations, targeting a wide range of public health issues and events. While some level of monitoring and evaluation was conducted in nearly 80 % of the donation programs, a program’s impact was infrequently evaluated. Opportunities exist to develop consistent metrics for medical donation programs, develop a common framework for impact evaluations, and advocate for data collection and analysis plans that collect meaningful metrics.

Making time for reflexive dialogue in philosophical group discussion: extending the debate on the militarization of nursing

In the 2010 July-September issue of Advances in Nursing Science, Perron et al offered a persuasive and substantive account of the troubling incursion of military speech into nursing practice and education. The article proved contentious, resulting in accusations of fallacious misrepresentation. This article extends the philosophical debate initiated by Perron et al on the militarization of nursing and the war on terror and offers the perspectives of members of a philosophical discussion group who took up the challenge to engage in critical debate and dialogue on the ways in which external organizations penetrate nursing education, practice, and knowledge.