Lithium side effects in the medically ill

Mortality associated with lithium and valproate treatment of US Veterans Health Administration patients with mental disorders

BackgroundThe mood stabilisers lithium and valproate might plausibly have differing associations with mortality because of differing effects on mental health and various physiological indicators.AimsTo assess associations between lithium, valproate and non-suicide mortality.MethodIntention-to-treat, propensity score-matched cohort study.ResultsLithium was associated with significantly reduced non-suicide mortality in the intent-to-treat cohort over 0-90 days (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.87) but not longer. In secondary analyses, a sizeable reduction in mortality was observed during active treatment with lithium across all time periods studied (for example 365-day HR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.84), but significantly increased risks were observed among patients discontinuing lithium by 180 days (HR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.01-2.37).ConclusionsPatients initiating lithium had lower non-suicide mortality over 0-90 days than patients initiating valproate and consistently lower non-suicide mortality among patients maintaining treatment, but elevated risk among patients discontinuing treatment by 180 days. Although residual confounding or selection effects cannot be excluded, this study suggests potential benefits to enhancing lithium treatment persistence and the monitoring of patients discontinuing lithium. There is a need for further research.

Management of treatment resistance in the depressed geriatric patient

The treatment of depression in geriatric patients is challenging on all levels. Recognition, compliance, medical comorbidity, tolerance of drug regimens, and accessibility of the patient to therapy all represent major clinical problems. Treating depression in elderly, disabled patients requires patience, keen observation skills, and much flexibility. It is critical that these patients trust their physicians and have ready access if problematic side effects develop. In general, when treating patients with a history of failure to respond, the clinician should choose a medication with a tolerable side-effect profile, and persist with it as long as steady, slow gains are being made. Dosages should be maximized to clinical tolerance prior to considering switching agents or augmentation strategies. It is probably wiser to augment than switch if a partial response has been obtained. Particularly among the medically ill elderly, any "lost ground" may be very difficult to replace. All available psychosocial resources should be assessed and brought to bear productively in the treatment context. We are quite far from a full clinical understanding of "treatment resistance" in elderly depressive patients, but the eminent treatability of depression in elderly patients encourages creative exploration of treatment regimens. Rigorous, placebo-controlled studies of representative samples of elderly patients are needed to clarify the diverse interactions among the many pharmacologic agents available to treat resistant/refractory depression in the elderly.