1
|
Thorhauge KAL, Hansen JB, Jensen J, Nalepa IF, Burcharth J. Feasibility of app-based home monitoring after abdominal surgery: A systematic review. Am J Surg 2024:115764. [PMID: 38830790 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abdominal surgery presents great challenges postoperatively. Considering financial healthcare constraints, the use of mobile applications has received increased interest. This systematic review was conducted to assess and report the feasibility of app-based home monitoring after abdominal surgery. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched on the October 17, 2023. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS Thirty-six articles were included, 17 of these originating from USA or Canada. The response rate varied between 11.9 % and 100 %. Bariatric, upper gastrointestinal, and colorectal surgery reported the highest response rates. All included studies had a degree of bias. CONCLUSION This study found varying response rates. The data indicated that the response rates were high within bariatric surgery, with additional factors potentially affecting this. The degree of bias was generally high, and the quality of the included studies limits the conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klara Amalie Linde Thorhauge
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark; Emergency Surgery Research Group Copenhagen (EMERGE Cph), Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark.
| | - Jannick Brander Hansen
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark; Emergency Surgery Research Group Copenhagen (EMERGE Cph), Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark.
| | - Julie Jensen
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark; Emergency Surgery Research Group Copenhagen (EMERGE Cph), Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark.
| | - Isabella Flor Nalepa
- Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Nørre Campus, Universitetsparken, 2100 København Ø, Denmark.
| | - Jakob Burcharth
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark; Emergency Surgery Research Group Copenhagen (EMERGE Cph), Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kinsey D, Carrieri D, Briscoe S, Febrey S, Kneale D, Lovegrove C, Nunns M, Coon JT, McGrath J, Hemsley A, Shaw L. Experiences of interventions to reduce hospital stay for older adults following elective treatment: Qualitative evidence-synthesis. Int J Older People Nurs 2024; 19:e12602. [PMID: 38403945 DOI: 10.1111/opn.12602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Hospitals streamline treatment pathways to reduce the length of time older adults admitted for planned procedures spend in hospital. However patient perspectives have been poorly evaluated. This systematic review aimed to understand the experiences of older patients, carers, families and staff of multi-component interventions intended to improve recovery following elective treatment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Bibliographic databases searched in June 2021 included MEDLINE ALL, HMIC, CENTRAL, CINAHL, AMED and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. We conducted citation searching and examined reference lists of reviews. Two reviewers independently undertook screening and data extraction, resolving disagreements through discussion. We used an adapted Wallace checklist for quality appraisal and meta-ethnography to synthesise data. Clinician, carer and patient views were incorporated throughout the review. RESULTS Thirty-five papers were included in the synthesis. Thirteen studies were conducted in the UK, with patient views the most frequently represented. We identified six overarching constructs: 'Home as preferred environment for recovery', 'Feeling safe', 'Individualisation of structured programme', 'Taking responsibility', 'Essential care at home' and 'Outcomes'. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS Findings explore the support patients, families and carers need throughout hospital admission, and may inform commissioning of services to ensure patients and carers receive appropriate follow-up support after hospital discharge. The findings may help hospital and community-based health and social care staff provide person-centred care based upon assessments of emotional and physical wellbeing of patients and family/carers. Research is needed to establish a core-set of patient-reported outcome measures which capture aspects of recovery which are meaningful to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Kinsey
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Daniele Carrieri
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Simon Briscoe
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Sam Febrey
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Dylan Kneale
- EPPI-Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Chris Lovegrove
- School of Health Professions, Faculty of Health & Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Michael Nunns
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jo Thompson Coon
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - John McGrath
- Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Anthony Hemsley
- Department of Healthcare for Older People, Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Liz Shaw
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Husebø ALM, Søreide JA, Kørner H, Storm M, Wathne HB, Richardson A, Morken IM, Urstad KH, Nordfonn OK, Karlsen B. eHealth interventions to support colorectal cancer patients' self-management after discharge from surgery-an integrative literature review. Support Care Cancer 2023; 32:11. [PMID: 38055087 PMCID: PMC10700211 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08191-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) creates elevated self-management demands and unmet support needs post-discharge. Follow-up care through eHealth post-primary surgery may be an effective means of supporting patients' needs. This integrative review describes the evidence regarding eHealth interventions post-hospital discharge focusing on delivery mode, user-interface and content, patient intervention adherence, impact on patient-reported outcomes and experiences of eHealth. METHODS A university librarian performed literature searches in 2021 using four databases. After screening 1149 records, the authors read 30 full-text papers and included and extracted data from 26 papers. Two authors analysed the extracted data using the 'framework synthesis approach'. RESULTS The 26 papers were published between 2012 and 2022. The eHealth interventions were mainly delivered by telephone with the assistance of healthcare professionals, combined with text messages or video conferencing. The user interfaces included websites, applications and physical activity (PA) trackers. The interventions comprised the monitoring of symptoms or health behaviours, patient information, education and counselling. Evidence showed a better psychological state and improved PA. Patients reported high satisfaction with eHealth. However, patient adherence was inadequately reported. CONCLUSIONS eHealth interventions may positively impact CRC patients' anxiety and PA regardless of the user interface. Patients prefer technology combined with a human element.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Lunde Marie Husebø
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway.
- Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
| | - Jon Arne Søreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hartwig Kørner
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Marianne Storm
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
- Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, Molde University College, Molde, Norway
| | - Hege Bjøkne Wathne
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
- Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Alison Richardson
- NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 67, Highfield Campus, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Mailpoint 11, Clinical Academic Facility (Room AA102), South Academic Block, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Ingvild Margreta Morken
- Research Group of Nursing and Health Sciences, Research Department, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Quality and Health Technologies, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kristin Hjorthaug Urstad
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
- Faculty of Health Studies, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Oda Karin Nordfonn
- Department of Health and Caring Science, Western Norway University of Applied Science, Stord, Norway
| | - Bjørg Karlsen
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kinsey D, Febrey S, Briscoe S, Kneale D, Thompson Coon J, Carrieri D, Lovegrove C, McGrath J, Hemsley A, Melendez-Torres GJ, Shaw L, Nunns M. Impact of interventions to improve recovery of older adults following planned hospital admission on quality-of-life following discharge: linked-evidence synthesis. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2023; 11:1-164. [PMID: 38140881 DOI: 10.3310/ghty5117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To understand the impact of multicomponent interventions to improve recovery of older adults following planned hospital treatment, we conducted two systematic reviews, one of quantitative and one of qualitative evidence, and an overarching synthesis. These aimed to: • understand the effect of multicomponent interventions which aim to enhance recovery and/or reduce length of stay on patient-reported outcomes and health and social care utilisation • understand the experiences of patients, carers and staff involved in the delivery of interventions • understand how different aspects of the content and delivery of interventions may influence patient outcomes. Review methods We searched bibliographic databases including MEDLINE ALL, Embase and the Health Management Information Consortium, CENTRAL, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, conducted forward and backward citation searching and examined reference lists of topically similar qualitative reviews. Bibliographic database searches were completed in May/June 2021 and updated in April 2022. We sought primary research from high-income countries regarding hospital inpatients with a mean/median age of minimum 60 years, undergoing planned surgery. Patients experienced any multicomponent hospital-based intervention to reduce length of stay or improve recovery. Quantitative outcomes included length of stay and any patient-reported outcome or experience or service utilisation measure. Qualitative research focused on the experiences of patients, carers/family and staff of interventions received. Quality appraisal was undertaken using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool or an adapted version of the Wallace checklist. We used random-effects meta-analysis to synthesise quantitative data where appropriate, meta-ethnography for qualitative studies and qualitative comparative analysis for the overarching synthesis. Results Quantitative review: Included 125 papers. Forty-nine studies met criteria for further synthesis. Enhanced recovery protocols resulted in improvements to length of stay, without detriment to other outcomes, with minimal improvement in patient-reported outcome measures for patients admitted for lower-limb or colorectal surgery. Qualitative review: Included 43 papers, 35 of which were prioritised for synthesis. We identified six themes: 'Home as preferred environment for recovery', 'Feeling safe', 'Individualisation of structured programme', 'Taking responsibility', 'Essential care at home' and 'Outcomes'. Overarching synthesis: Intervention components which trigger successful interventions represent individualised approaches that allow patients to understand their treatment, ask questions and build supportive relationships and strategies to help patients monitor their progress and challenge themselves through early mobilisation. Discussion Interventions to reduce hospital length of stay for older adults following planned surgery are effective, without detriment to other patient outcomes. Findings highlight the need to reconsider how to evaluate patient recovery from the perspective of the patient. Trials did not routinely evaluate patient mid- to long-term outcomes. Furthermore, when they did evaluate patient outcomes, reporting is often incomplete or conducted using a narrow range of patient-reported outcome measures or limited through asking the wrong people the wrong questions, with lack of longer-term evaluation. Findings from the qualitative and overarching synthesis will inform policy-making regarding commissioning and delivering services to support patients, carers and families before, during and after planned admission to hospital. Study registration This trial is registered as PROSPERO registration number CRD42021230620. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 130576) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 11, No. 23. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Kinsey
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Samantha Febrey
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Simon Briscoe
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Dylan Kneale
- EPPI-Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jo Thompson Coon
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Daniele Carrieri
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Christopher Lovegrove
- School of Health Professions, Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - John McGrath
- Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Anthony Hemsley
- Department of Healthcare for Older People, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Liz Shaw
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Michael Nunns
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
den Bakker CM, Schaafsma FG, Consten ECJ, Schraffordt Koops SE, van der Meij E, van de Ven PM, Bonjer HJ, Huirne JAF, Anema JR. Personalised electronic health programme for recovery after major abdominal surgery: a multicentre, single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Digit Health 2023:S2589-7500(23)00084-5. [PMID: 37419843 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00084-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the adoption of minimally invasive techniques, recovery after abdominal surgery takes a long time. Electronic health (eHealth) modalities can provide guidance to patients, facilitating early return to normal activities. We aimed to assess the impact of a personalised eHealth programme on patients' return to normal activities after major abdominal surgery. METHODS This single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was done at 11 teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Eligible participants were aged 18-75 years who underwent a laparoscopic or open colectomy or hysterectomy. An independent researcher randomly allocated participants (in a 1:1 ratio) to either the intervention or control group by use of computer-based randomisation lists, with stratification by sex, type of surgery, and hospital. Participants in the intervention group had access to a perioperative, personalised eHealth programme consisting of both standard face-to-face care and eHealth, that comprised interactive tools offering goal attainment and a personalised outcome measurement, which managed recovery expectations and provided postoperative guidance tailored to each patient. Patients were provided with an activity tracker and had access to a website and mobile app with an electronic consultation (eConsult) functionality. The control group received standard care and access to a placebo website containing recovery advice provided by the hospital. The primary outcome was the number of days between surgery and personalised return to normal activities, assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were done with a Cox regression model. This trial is registered with the Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR5686). FINDINGS Between Feb 11, 2016, and Aug 9, 2017, 355 participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (n=178) or control (n=177) groups. 342 participants were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The median time until return to normal activities was 52 days (IQR 33-111) in the intervention group, and 65 days (39-152) in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio 1·30 [95% CI 1·03-1·64]; p=0·027). The frequency of postoperative complications did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION This eHealth programme, delivering personalised care based on goal attainment scaling, enabled patients to return to their normal activities 13 days earlier than those who received standard care. FUNDING ZonMw.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal M den Bakker
- Department of Occupational and Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frederieke G Schaafsma
- Department of Occupational and Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Esther C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Eva van der Meij
- Department of Occupational and Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Peter M van de Ven
- Department of Data Science and Biostatistics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hendrik J Bonjer
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Judith A F Huirne
- Department of Occupational and Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Johannes R Anema
- Department of Occupational and Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van der Storm SL, Bektaş M, Barsom EZ, Schijven MP. Mobile applications in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-10007-y. [PMID: 37016081 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10007-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile applications can facilitate or improve gastrointestinal surgical care by benefiting patients, healthcare providers, or both. The extent to which applications are currently in use in gastrointestinal surgical care is largely unknown, as reported in literature. This systematic review was conducted to provide an overview of the available gastrointestinal surgical applications and evaluate their prospects for surgical care provision. METHODS The PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for articles up to October 6th 2022. Articles were considered eligible if they assessed or described mobile applications used in a gastrointestinal surgery setting for healthcare purposes. Two authors independently evaluated selected studies and extracted data for analysis. Descriptive data analysis was conducted. The revised Cochrane risk of bias (RoB-2) tool and ROBINS-I assessment tool were used to determine the methodological quality of studies. RESULTS Thirty-eight articles describing twenty-nine applications were included. The applications were classified into seven categories: monitoring, weight loss, postoperative recovery, education, communication, prognosis, and clinical decision-making. Most applications were reported for colorectal surgery, half of which focused on monitoring. Overall, a low-quality evidence was found. Most applications have only been evaluated on their usability or feasibility but not on the proposed clinical benefits. Studies with high quality evidence were identified in the areas of colorectal (2), hepatopancreatobiliary (1) and bariatric surgery (1), reporting significantly positive outcomes in terms of postoperative recovery, complications and weight loss. CONCLUSIONS The interest for applications and their use in gastrointestinal surgery is increasing. From our study, it appears that most studies using applications fail to report adequate clinical evaluation, and do not provide evidence on the effectiveness or safety of applications. Clinical evaluation of objective outcomes is much needed to evaluate the efficacy, quality and safety of applications being used as a medical device across user groups and settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan L van der Storm
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Box 22660, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mustafa Bektaş
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Box 22660, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Z Barsom
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Box 22660, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies P Schijven
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Box 22660, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Blount E, Davey MG, Joyce WP. Patient reported satisfaction levels with the use of telemedicine for general surgery-A systematic review of randomized control trials. SURGERY IN PRACTICE AND SCIENCE 2023; 12:100152. [PMID: 36570642 PMCID: PMC9769022 DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As healthcare continues to evolve in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic, surgeons are presented with the opportunity to integrate telemedicine into healthcare in tandem with in-person consultations. We aimed to perform a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to assess patient satisfaction with telemedicine interventions in general surgery. Methods A systematic review was performed in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines. Randomized control trials (RCTs) were included. The risk of bias 2.0 assessment was used to determine potential bias. Results In total, 11 prospective, randomized trials involving 1,598 patients (mean age: 49.1 years) were included. Overall 45.5% (5/11) of the trials compared videoconferencing or telephone follow up to traditional in person follow up. Three studies used smart technologies which include activity tracking devices in combination with a website and mobile application (27.3%). The other 3 interventions involved accelerated discharge on post operative day (POD) 1 with tele videoconferencing on POD 2, Post-operative daily text messages with education videos and video calling capability, and supportive text messages post-operatively. Telemedicine was shown to provide similar levels of patient satisfaction compared to controls in all 11 included RCTs. Conclusion Patient reported satisfaction with the use of telemedicine is similar to standard of care models in general surgery. With several shortcomings confounding the results in support of telemedicine, further experimentation with telemedicine interventions will likely improve patient reported satisfaction with using telemedicine for peroperative surgical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eoghan Blount
- Department of Surgery, Galway Clinic, Co. Galway H91 HHT0, Ireland
| | - Matthew G Davey
- Department of Surgery, Galway Clinic, Co. Galway H91 HHT0, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, D02 YN77, Ireland
| | - William P Joyce
- Department of Surgery, Galway Clinic, Co. Galway H91 HHT0, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, 123 St. Stephens Green, Dublin 2, D02 YN77, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Leung T, Nahar van Venrooij LMW, Verdaasdonk EGG. Personal Devices to Monitor Physical Activity and Nutritional Intake After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Feasibility Study. JMIR Perioper Med 2022; 5:e40352. [PMID: 36512385 PMCID: PMC9795396 DOI: 10.2196/40352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of self-monitoring devices is promising for improving perioperative physical activity and nutritional intake. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of a physical activity tracker and digital food record in persons scheduled for colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. METHODS This observational cohort study was conducted at a large training hospital between November 2019 and November 2020. The study population consisted of persons with CRC between 18- and 75 years of age who were able to use a smartphone or tablet and scheduled for elective surgery with curative intent. Excluded were persons not proficient in Dutch or following a protein-restricted diet. Participants used an activity tracker (Fitbit Charge 3) from 4 weeks before until 6 weeks after surgery. In the week before surgery (preoperative) and the fifth week after surgery (postoperative), participants also used a food record for 1 week. They shared their experience regarding usability (system usability scale, range 0-100) and acceptability (net promoter score, range -100 to +100). RESULTS In total, 28 persons were included (n=16, 57% male, mean age 61, SD 8 years), and 27 shared their experiences. Scores regarding the activity tracker were as follows: preoperative median system usability score, 85 (IQR 73-90); net promoter score, +65; postoperative median system usability score, 78 (IQR 68-85); net promotor score, +67. The net promoter scores regarding the food record were +37 (preoperative) and-7 (postoperative). CONCLUSIONS The perioperative use of a physical activity tracker is considered feasible, usable, and acceptable by persons with CRC in this study. Preoperatively, the use of a digital food record was acceptable, and postoperatively, the acceptability decreased.
Collapse
|
9
|
van Deursen L, Versluis A, van der Vaart R, Standaar L, Struijs J, Chavannes N, Aardoom JJ. eHealth Interventions for Dutch Cancer Care: Systematic Review Using the Triple Aim Lens. JMIR Cancer 2022; 8:e37093. [PMID: 35699991 PMCID: PMC9240931 DOI: 10.2196/37093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Globally, the burden of cancer on population health is growing. Recent trends such as increasing survival rates have resulted in a need to adapt cancer care to ensure a good care experience and manageable expenditures. eHealth is a promising way to increase the quality of cancer care and support patients and survivors. Objective The aim of this systematic review was 2-fold. First, we aimed to provide an overview of eHealth interventions and their characteristics for Dutch patients with and survivors of cancer. Second, we aimed to provide an overview of the empirical evidence regarding the impact of eHealth interventions in cancer care on population health, quality of care, and per capita costs (the Triple Aim domains). Methods The electronic databases Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane, and Ovid PsycINFO were searched using 3 key search themes: eHealth interventions, cancer care, and the Netherlands. The identified interventions were classified according to predetermined criteria describing the intervention characteristics (eg, type, function, and target population). Their impact was subsequently examined using the Triple Aim framework. Results A total of 38 interventions were identified. Most of these were web portals or web applications functioning to inform and self-manage, and target psychosocial factors or problems. Few interventions have been tailored to age, disease severity, or gender. The results of this study indicate that eHealth interventions could positively affect sleep quality, fatigue, and physical activity of patients with and survivors of cancer. Inconclusive results were found regarding daily functioning and quality of life, psychological complaints, and psychological adjustment to the disease. Conclusions eHealth can improve outcomes in the Triple Aim domains, particularly in the population health and quality of care domains. Cancer-related pain and common symptoms of active treatment were not targeted in the included interventions and should receive more attention. Further research is needed to fully understand the impact of eHealth interventions in cancer care on participation, accessibility, and costs. The latter can be examined in economic evaluations by comparing eHealth interventions with care as usual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liza van Deursen
- Department of Quality of Care and Health Economics, Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.,National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Anke Versluis
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Rosalie van der Vaart
- Department of Quality of Care and Health Economics, Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Lucille Standaar
- Department of Quality of Care and Health Economics, Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.,Department of Quality and Organization of Care, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Struijs
- Department of Quality of Care and Health Economics, Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.,Health Campus The Hague, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Niels Chavannes
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jiska J Aardoom
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tong A, Scholes-Robertson N, Hawley C, Viecelli AK, Carter SA, Levin A, Hemmelgarn BR, Harris T, Craig JC. Patient-centred clinical trial design. Nat Rev Nephrol 2022; 18:514-523. [PMID: 35668231 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-022-00585-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Patient involvement in clinical trial design can facilitate the recruitment and retention of participants as well as potentially increase the uptake of the tested intervention and the impact of the findings on patient outcomes. Despite these benefits, patients still have very limited involvement in designing and conducting trials in nephrology. Many trials do not address research questions and outcomes that are important to patients, including patient-reported outcomes that reflect how patients feel and function. This limitation can undermine the relevance, reliability and value of trial-based evidence for decision-making in clinical practice and health policy. However, efforts to involve patients with kidney disease are increasing across all stages of the trial process from priority setting, to study design (including selection of outcomes and approaches to improve participant recruitment and retention) and dissemination and implementation of the findings. Harnessing the patient voice in designing trials can ensure that efforts and resources are directed towards patient-centred trials that address the needs, concerns and priorities of patients living with kidney disease with the aim of achieving transformative improvements in care and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carmel Hawley
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Andrea K Viecelli
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Simon A Carter
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Adeera Levin
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Brenda R Hemmelgarn
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry at University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Jonathan C Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wells CI, Xu W, Penfold JA, Keane C, Gharibans AA, Bissett IP, O’Grady G. OUP accepted manuscript. BJS Open 2022; 6:6564495. [PMID: 35388891 PMCID: PMC8988014 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Wearable devices have been proposed as a novel method for monitoring patients after surgery to track recovery, identify complications early, and improve surgical safety. Previous studies have used a heterogeneous range of devices, methods, and analyses. This review aimed to examine current methods and wearable devices used for monitoring after abdominal surgery and identify knowledge gaps requiring further investigation. Methods A scoping review was conducted given the heterogeneous nature of the evidence. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Studies of wearable devices for monitoring of adult patients within 30 days after abdominal surgery were eligible for inclusion. Results A total of 78 articles from 65 study cohorts, with 5153 patients were included. Thirty-one different wearable devices were used to measure vital signs, physiological measurements, or physical activity. The duration of postoperative wearable device use ranged from 15 h to 3 months after surgery. Studies mostly focused on physical activity metrics (71.8 per cent). Continuous vital sign measurement and physical activity tracking both showed promise for detecting postoperative complications earlier than usual care, but conclusions were limited by poor device precision, adherence, occurrence of false alarms, data transmission problems, and retrospective data analysis. Devices were generally well accepted by patients, with high levels of acceptance, comfort, and safety. Conclusion Wearable technology has not yet realized its potential to improve postoperative monitoring. Further work is needed to overcome technical limitations, improve precision, and reduce false alarms. Prospective assessment of efficacy, using an intention-to-treat approach should be the focus of further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron I. Wells
- Correspondence to: Cameron Wells, Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre 1142, New Zealand (e-mail:)
| | - William Xu
- Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - James A. Penfold
- Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Celia Keane
- Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Armen A. Gharibans
- Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ian P. Bissett
- Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Greg O’Grady
- Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Robinson A, Husband AK, Slight RD, Slight SP. Digital technology to support lifestyle and health behaviour changes in surgical patients: systematic review. BJS Open 2020; 5:6054048. [PMID: 33688953 PMCID: PMC7944850 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital technologies (such as smartphone applications, activity trackers, and e-learning platforms) have supported patients with long-term conditions to change their lifestyle health behaviours. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of digital technologies in supporting patients undergoing elective surgery to change their health behaviours. METHODS A systematic review was conducted of articles reporting a digital intervention supporting behaviour change in adult patients who underwent elective bariatric, oncological or orthopaedic surgery. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from inception to March 2019 for quantitative intervention studies with a specific focus on physical activity, dietary intake, and weight loss in patients before and after surgery (PROSPERO: CRD42019127972). The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist was used to assess study quality. RESULTS Of 3021 citations screened, 17 studies were included comprising 4923 surgical patients; these included experimental (pre-post design, feasibility studies, and RCTs) and observational studies. Three factors were identified as effective for supporting health behaviour change in elective surgical populations: digital technology delivery, implementation, and theoretical underpinning. Six of eight studies that referred to behaviour change theories observed significant improvements in health behaviour relating to reduced weight regain, and improved lifestyle choices for physical activity and diet. Meta-analysis was not possible because of heterogeneous outcome measures. CONCLUSION Digital technologies may effectively support behavioural change in patients undergoing elective surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Robinson
- School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - A K Husband
- School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - R D Slight
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - S P Slight
- School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chapman SJ, Helliwell JA, Lonsdale MDS, Tiernan JP, Jayne DG. Patient education about recovery after colorectal surgery: systematic scoping review. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:1842-1849. [PMID: 32865317 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 08/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to optimize recovery through a series of evidence-based recommendations. A key component of ERAS is the provision of patient education. Whilst the recommendation for this is strong, the evidence to inform its format, timing and delivery is unclear. The aim of this review was to describe previous educational interventions used to improve recovery after colorectal surgery and to explore opportunities for future research. METHODS A systematic scoping review was performed. MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched between 1 January 1990 and 12 February 2020. Studies which described or assessed the effectiveness of a patient education or information resource to improve recovery after colorectal surgery were eligible. Outcomes of interest included the format, timing and delivery of interventions, as well as key features of intervention and study design. A narrative synthesis of data was produced through a process of charting and summarizing key results. RESULTS A total of 1298 papers were inspected, and 11 were eligible for inclusion. Five papers were reports of randomized controlled trials, and others reported a mix of non-randomized and qualitative studies. The design of educational interventions included audio-visual resources (n = 3), smartphone device applications (n = 3) and approaches to facilitate person-to-person counselling (n = 5). Most of the counselling interventions reported positive outcomes (mainly in length of hospital stay), whereas the other types reported mixed results. Patients and the public were seldom involved as collaborators in the design of interventions. CONCLUSIONS Patient education is generally advantageous, but there is insufficient evidence to optimize its design and delivery in the setting of colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Chapman
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - J A Helliwell
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - J P Tiernan
- John Goligher Colorectal Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - D G Jayne
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Poss-Doering R, Kuehn L, Kamradt M, Glassen K, Wensing M. Applying Digital Information Delivery to Convert Habits of Antibiotic Use in Primary Care in Germany: Mixed-Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e18200. [PMID: 32960773 PMCID: PMC7578814 DOI: 10.2196/18200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial resistance is an important global health issue. In Germany, the national agenda supports various interventions to convert habits of antibiotic use. In the CHANGE-3 (Converting Habits of Antibiotic Use for Respiratory Tract Infections in German Primary Care) study, digital tools were applied for information delivery: tablet computers in primary care practices, e-learning platforms for medical professionals, and a public website to promote awareness and health literacy among primary care physicians, their teams, and their patients. OBJECTIVE This study is embedded in the process evaluation of the CHANGE-3 study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance and uptake of digital devices for the delivery of health-related information to enhance awareness and change habits of antibiotic use in primary care in Germany. METHODS This study used a convergent-parallel mixed-methods design. Audio-recorded semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with physicians, nonphysician health professionals, and patients in the CHANGE-3 program. Pseudonymized verbatim transcripts were coded using thematic analysis. In-depth analysis was performed based on the inductive category of information provision via digital information tools. Identified themes were related to the main postulates of Diffusion of Innovations theory (DIT) to provide an explanatory frame. In addition, data generated through a structured survey with physicians and nonphysician health professionals in the program were analyzed descriptively and integrated with the qualitative data to explore the complementarity of the findings. RESULTS Findings regarding the acceptance and uptake of digital devices were related to three postulates of DIT: innovation characteristics, communication channels, and unanticipated consequences. Participants considered the provided digital educative solutions to be supportive for promoting health literacy regarding conversion of habits of antibiotic use. However, health care professionals found it challenging to integrate these solutions into existing routines in primary care and to align them with their professional values. Low technology affinity was a major barrier to the use of digital information in primary care. Patients welcomed the general idea of introducing health-related information in digital formats; however, they expressed concerns about device-related hygiene and the appropriateness of the digital tools for older patients. CONCLUSIONS Patients and medical professionals in German primary care are reluctant to use digital devices for information and education. Using a Diffusion of Innovations approach can support assessment of existing barriers and provide information about setting-specific preconditions that are necessary for future tailoring of implementation strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 15061174; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15061174.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina Poss-Doering
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Kuehn
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martina Kamradt
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Glassen
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michel Wensing
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|