A Multiview Model for Detecting the Inappropriate Use of Prescription Medication: Machine Learning Approach

Development of artificial intelligence powered apps and tools for clinical pharmacy services: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers potential opportunities to optimize clinical pharmacy services in community or hospital settings. The objective of this systematic literature review was to identify and analyse quantitative studies using or integrating AI for clinical pharmacy services.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using PubMed/Medline and Web of Science databases, including all articles published from 2000 to December 2021. Included studies had to involve pharmacists in the development or use of AI-powered apps and tools..

RESULTS

19 studies using AI for clinical pharmacy services were included in this review. 12 out of 19 articles (63.1%) were published in 2020 or 2021. Various methodologies of AI were used, mainly machine learning techniques and subsets (natural language processing and deep learning). The datasets used to train the models were mainly extracted from electronic medical records (6 studies, 32%). Among clinical pharmacy services, medication order review was the service most targeted by AI-powered apps and tools (9 studies), followed by health product dispensing (4 studies), pharmaceutical interviews and therapeutic education (2 studies). The development of these tools mainly involved hospital pharmacists (12/19 studies).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The development of AI-powered apps and tools for clinical pharmacy services is just beginning. Pharmacists need to keep abreast of these developments in order to position themselves optimally while maintaining their human relationships with healthcare teams and patients. Significant efforts have to be made, in collaboration with data scientists, to better assess whether AI-powered apps and tools bring value to clinical pharmacy services in real practice.

A digital physician peer to automatically detect erroneous prescriptions in radiotherapy

Appropriate dosing of radiation is crucial to patient safety in radiotherapy. Current quality assurance depends heavily on a physician peer-review process, which includes a review of the treatment plan's dose and fractionation. Potentially, physicians may not identify errors during this manual peer review due to time constraints and caseload. A novel prescription anomaly detection algorithm is designed that utilizes historical data from the past to predict anomalous cases. Such a tool can serve as an electronic peer who will assist the peer-review process providing extra safety to the patients. In our primary model, we create two dissimilarity metrics, R and F. R defining how far a new patient's prescription is from historical prescriptions. F represents how far away a patient's feature set is from that of the group with an identical or similar prescription. We flag prescription if either metric is greater than specific optimized cut-off values. We use thoracic cancer patients (n = 2504) as an example and extracted seven features. Our testing set f1 score is between 73%-94% for different treatment technique groups. We also independently validate our results by conducting a mock peer review with three thoracic specialists. Our model has a lower type II error rate compared to the manual peer-review by physicians.