1
|
Ayorinde A, Ghosh I, Shaikh J, Adetunji V, Brown A, Jordan M, Gilham E, Todkill D, Ashiru-Oredope D. Improving healthcare professionals' interactions with patients to tackle antimicrobial resistance: a systematic review of interventions, barriers, and facilitators. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1359790. [PMID: 38841670 PMCID: PMC11150712 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1359790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major public health threat. With the growing emphasis on patient-centred care/ shared decision making, it is important for healthcare professionals' (HCPs) who prescribe, dispense, administer and/or monitor antimicrobials to be adequately equipped to facilitate appropriate antimicrobial use. We systematically identified existing interventions which aim to improve HCPs interaction with patients and examined barriers and facilitators of appropriate the use of such interventions and appropriate antimicrobial use among both HCPs and patientsantimicrobial use while using these interventions. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and internet (via Google search engine). We included primary studies, published in English from 2010 to 2023 [PROSPERO (CRD42023395642)]. The protocol was preregistered with PROSPERO (CRD42023395642). We performed quality assessment using mixed methods appraisal tool. We applied narrative synthesis and used the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation -Behaviour) as a theoretical framework for barriers and facilitators at HCP and patient levels. Results Of 9,172 citations retrieved from database searches, From 4,979 citations remained after removal of duplicates. We included 59 studies spanning over 13 countries. Interventions often involved multiple components beyond HCPs' interaction with patients. From 24 studies reporting barriers and facilitators, we identified issues relating to capability (such as, knowledge/understanding about AMR, diagnostic uncertainties, awareness of interventions and forgetfulness); opportunity (such as, time constraint and intervention accessibility) and motivation (such as, patient's desire for antibiotics and fear of litigation). Conclusion The findings of this review should be considered by intervention designers/adopters and policy makers to improve utilisation and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abimbola Ayorinde
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Iman Ghosh
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Junaid Shaikh
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Victoria Adetunji
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Brown
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Jordan
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Ellie Gilham
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Todkill
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Diane Ashiru-Oredope
- UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
- School of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Armas Freire PI, Gaspar GG, Zurita J, Salazar G, Velez JW, Bollela VR. E-Learning versus Face-to-Face Methodology for Learning Antimicrobial Resistance and Prescription Practice in a Tertiary Hospital of a Middle-Income Country. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11121829. [PMID: 36551486 PMCID: PMC9774894 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11121829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a growing health problem worldwide. One strategy to face this problem in a reasonable way is training health personnel for the rational use of antimicrobials. There are some difficulties associated with medical staff to receiving training with E-learning education, but there is a lack of studies and insufficient evidence of the effectiveness of this method compared to face-to-face learning. Methods: An educational intervention on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and antimicrobial prescription practice (APP) was designed and implemented using two approaches: face-to-face and E-learning among physicians of the intensive care unit (ICU) and internal medicine ward (IMW) at Eugenio Espejo Hospital in Quito. Modalities of interventions were compared to propose a strategy of continuous professional development (CPD) for all hospital staff. An interventional study was proposed using a quasi-experimental approach that included 91 physicians, of which 49 belong to the IMW and 42 to the ICU. All of them received training on AMR—half in a face-to-face mode and the other half in an asynchronous E-learning mode. They then all participated on APP training but with switched groups; those who previously participated in the face-to-face experience participated in an E-learning module and vice-versa. We evaluated self-perception about basic knowledge, attitudes and referred practices towards AMR and APP before and after the intervention. A review of medical records was conducted before and after training by checking antimicrobial prescriptions for all patients in the ICU and IMW with bacteremia, urinary tract infection (UTI), pneumonia, and skin and soft tissue infection. The study received IRB clearance, and we used SPSS for statistical analysis. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between the E-learning and the face-to-face methodology for AMR and APP. Both methodologies improved knowledge, attitudes and referred practices. In the case of E-learning, there was a self-perception of improved attitudes (p < 0.05) and practices (p < 0.001) for both AMR and APP. In face-to-face, there was a perception of improvement only in attitudes (p < 0.001) for APP. In clinical practice, the use of antimicrobials significantly improved in all domains after training, including empirical and targeted treatment of bacteremia and pneumonia (p < 0.001) and targeted treatment of UTI (p < 0.05). For the empirical treatment of pneumonia, the mean number of antibiotics was reduced from 1.87 before to 1.05 after the intervention (p = 0.003), whereas in the targeted management of bacteremia, the number of antibiotics was reduced from 2.19 to 1.53 (p = 0.010). Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference between the effect of E-learning and face-to-face strategy in terms of teaching AMR and APP. Adequate self-reported attitudes and practices in E-learning exceed those of the face-to-face approach. The empiric and targeted use of antimicrobials improved in all reviewed cases, and we observed an overall decrease in antibiotic use. Satisfaction with training was high for both methods, and participants valued the flexibility and accessibility of E-learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gilberto Gambero Gaspar
- Infection Control Service, University Hospital of Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Jeannete Zurita
- Biomedical Research Unit, Zurita & Zurita Laboratories and Medical School, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Quito 170104, Ecuador
| | - Grace Salazar
- Infection Service, Oncologic Solca Hospital, Quito 170138, Ecuador
| | - Jorge Washington Velez
- Division of Education and Research, Hospital de Especialidades Eugenio Espejo, Central University of Ecuador, Quito 170136, Ecuador
| | - Valdes Roberto Bollela
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guo L, Guo Y, Booth J, Wei M, Wang L, Zhu Y, He Y, Liu Y. Experiences of health management among people at high risk of stroke in China: A qualitative study. Nurs Open 2022; 10:613-622. [PMID: 36054680 PMCID: PMC9834500 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective health management of people at high risk of stroke in China is challenging. AIM To explore and identify the experiences of health management among people at high risk of stroke in order to provide a foundation for a targeted health management strategy for this special group. DESIGN A qualitative, descriptive study based on interviews. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with 31 people at high risk of stroke. The interviews were collated and analysed using Colaizzi's seven-step method. RESULTS A total of 31 people at high risk of stroke were included, and the ages ranged from 40 to 86, with an average age of 60.71 (SD = 11.55). The experiences of health management were categorized into three themes. Theme 1: Facing many ongoing problems in health management, limited knowledge, lack of confidence and poor compliance. Theme 2: Accumulated some value experiences of coping with problems of health management, becoming active learners, promoting social interaction and enhancing self-health management. Theme 3: Sensitivity to multiple influencing factors, the severity of disease and complexity of disease management, family income and economic burden and the value of social support. CONCLUSIONS This study explored the experiences of health management among people at high risk of stroke, and these findings are of great significance in the primary prevention of stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Guo
- Department of Neurology, National Advanced Stroke CenterThe first Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
| | - Yuanli Guo
- Department of Neurology, National Advanced Stroke CenterThe first Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
| | - Jo Booth
- Centre for Living, School of Health & Life SciencesGlasgow Caledonian UniversityGlasgowUK
| | - Miao Wei
- Department of Neurology, National Advanced Stroke CenterThe first Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
| | - Lin Wang
- College of Medicine & AgricultureHenan Radio & Television UniversityZhengzhouChina
| | - Yiru Zhu
- Department of Neurology, National Advanced Stroke CenterThe first Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
| | - Yu He
- Department of Neurology, National Advanced Stroke CenterThe first Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
| | - Yanjin Liu
- Department of NursingThe first Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
eHealthResp, a Digital Intervention to Improve Antibiotic Prescribing in Respiratory Infections: A Pilot Study. LIFE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 12:life12081160. [PMID: 36013339 PMCID: PMC9410258 DOI: 10.3390/life12081160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The emergence of antibiotic resistance (ABR) is one of the most serious public health threats worldwide. The inappropriate use of antibiotics is considered the main determinant for the increase and development of ABR, contributing to a greater risk of therapeutic ineffectiveness, particularly within primary care context. Therefore, this pilot study aims to raise awareness and promote an adequate antibiotic use among physicians, through the evaluation of the eHealthResp platform, a digital intervention composed by an online course and a mobile application, to aid in the management of respiratory tract infections. The global validation of the eHealthResp platform was carried out by 12 physicians who explored and performed a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the contents of the online course and mobile app. The global evaluation of the analyzed parameters was very positive, with the highest median scores being attributed to adequacy, correction, format, and trust of the eHealthResp platform. The qualitative feedback enhanced the contents’ relevance, clarity, and consolidation, as well as the effectiveness of the educational intervention against ABR. Overall, this study revealed that the eHealthResp may be regarded as an important e-health tool for the management of respiratory tract infections and improvement of antibiotic prescription practices among physicians.
Collapse
|
5
|
Poß-Doering R, Kuehn L, Kamradt M, Glassen K, Fleischhauer T, Kaufmann-Kolle P, Koeppen M, Wollny A, Altiner A, Wensing M. Converting habits of antibiotic use for respiratory tract infections in German primary care (CHANGE-3) - process evaluation of a complex intervention. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2020; 21:274. [PMID: 33341114 PMCID: PMC7749701 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01351-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial resistance remains a global challenge. In Germany, the national health agenda supports measures that enhance the appropriate, guideline-oriented use of antibiotics. The study "Converting Habits of Antibiotic Use for Respiratory Tract Infections in German Primary Care (CHANGE-3)" aimed at a sustainable reduction of antimicrobial resistance through converting patterns of prescribing practice and use of antibiotics and an increase in health literacy in primary care patients, practice teams, and in the general public. Embedded in a cluster-randomized trial of a multifaceted implementation program, a process evaluation focused on the uptake of program components to assess the fidelity of the implementation program in the CHANGE-3 study and to understand utilization of its educational components. METHODS A mix of qualitative and quantitative methods was used. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with General Practitioners, Medical Assistants, patients treated for respiratory tract infection and outreach visitors who had carried out individual outreach visits. A two-wave written survey (T1: 5 months after start, T2: 16 months after start) was conducted in general practitioners and medical assistants. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic framework analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey data. RESULTS Uptake of intervention components was heterogenous. Across all components, the uptake reported by General Practitioners varied from 20 to 88% at T1 and 31 to 63% at T2. Medical Assistants reported uptake from 22 to 70% at T1 and 6 to 69% at T2. Paper-based components could by and large be integrated in daily practice (64 to 90% in T1; 41 to 93% in T2), but uptake of digital components was low. A one-time outreach visit provided thematic information and feedback regarding actual prescribing, but due to time constraints were received with reluctance by practice teams. Patients were largely unaware of program components, but assumed that information and education could promote health literacy regarding antibiotics use. CONCLUSIONS The process evaluation contributed to understanding the applicability of the delivered educational components with regards to the appropriate use of antibiotics. Future research efforts need to identify the best mode of delivery to reach the targeted population. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN, ISRCTN15061174 . Registered 13 July 2018 - Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Poß-Doering
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - L. Kuehn
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M. Kamradt
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K. Glassen
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Th. Fleischhauer
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - M. Koeppen
- aQua Institut, Maschmuehlenweg 8-10, 37073 Goettingen, Germany
| | - A. Wollny
- University Medical Center Rostock, Institute of General Practice, Doberaner Str. 142, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - A. Altiner
- University Medical Center Rostock, Institute of General Practice, Doberaner Str. 142, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - M. Wensing
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Poss-Doering R, Kühn L, Kamradt M, Stürmlinger A, Glassen K, Andres E, Kaufmann-Kolle P, Wambach V, Bader L, Szecsenyi J, Wensing M. Fostering Appropriate Antibiotic Use in a Complex Intervention: Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation Alongside the Cluster-Randomized Trial ARena. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020; 9:E878. [PMID: 33302559 PMCID: PMC7764260 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics9120878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The cluster randomized trial ARena (sustainable reduction of antibiotic-induced antimicrobial resistance, 2017-2020) promoted appropriate use of antibiotics for acute non-complicated infections in primary care networks (PCNs) in Germany. A process evaluation assessed determinants of practice and explored factors associated with antibiotic prescribing patterns. This work describes its findings on uptake and impacts of the complex intervention program and indicates potential implementation into routine care. In a nested mixed-methods approach, a three-wave study-specific survey for participating physicians and medical assistants assessed potential impacts and uptake of the complex intervention program. Stakeholders received a one-time online questionnaire to reflect on network-related aspects. Semi-structured, open-ended interviews, with a purposive sample of physicians, medical assistants and stakeholders, explored program component acceptance for daily practice and perceived sustainability of intervention component effects. Intervention components were perceived to be smoothly integrable into practice routines. The highest uptake was reported for educational components: feedback reports, background information, e-learning modules and disease-specific quality circles (QCs). Participation in PCNs was seen as the motivational factor for guideline-oriented patient care and adoption of new routines. Future approaches to fostering appropriate antibiotics use by targeting health literacy competencies and clinician's therapy decisions should combine evidence-based information sources, audit and feedback reports and QCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina Poss-Doering
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.K.); (M.K.); (A.S.); (K.G.); (J.S.); (M.W.)
| | - Lukas Kühn
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.K.); (M.K.); (A.S.); (K.G.); (J.S.); (M.W.)
| | - Martina Kamradt
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.K.); (M.K.); (A.S.); (K.G.); (J.S.); (M.W.)
| | - Anna Stürmlinger
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.K.); (M.K.); (A.S.); (K.G.); (J.S.); (M.W.)
| | - Katharina Glassen
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.K.); (M.K.); (A.S.); (K.G.); (J.S.); (M.W.)
| | - Edith Andres
- aQua Institut, Maschmuehlenweg 8-10, 37073 Goettingen, Germany; (E.A.); (P.K.-K.)
| | - Petra Kaufmann-Kolle
- aQua Institut, Maschmuehlenweg 8-10, 37073 Goettingen, Germany; (E.A.); (P.K.-K.)
| | - Veit Wambach
- Agentur deutscher Arztnetze e.V., Friedrichstraße 171, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Lutz Bader
- Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Bayerns (KVB), 80684 München, Germany;
| | - Joachim Szecsenyi
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.K.); (M.K.); (A.S.); (K.G.); (J.S.); (M.W.)
- aQua Institut, Maschmuehlenweg 8-10, 37073 Goettingen, Germany; (E.A.); (P.K.-K.)
| | - Michel Wensing
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (L.K.); (M.K.); (A.S.); (K.G.); (J.S.); (M.W.)
| |
Collapse
|