1
|
Simmons RG, Baayd J, Elliott S, Cohen SR, Turok DK. Improving access to highly effective emergency contraception: an assessment of barriers and facilitators to integrating the levonorgestrel IUD as emergency contraception using two applications of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:129. [PMID: 36494859 PMCID: PMC9737706 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00377-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emergency contraception prevents unwanted pregnancy after sexual intercourse. New evidence has demonstrated that the levonorgestrel 52 mg IUD is a highly effective method of emergency contraception. However, translating this research finding into clinical practice faces existing barriers to IUD access, including costs and provider training, novel barriers of providing IUDs for emergency contraception at unscheduled appointments. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to the utilization of the levonorgestrel IUD as emergency contraception from client, provider, and health systems perspectives. METHODS We conducted English and Spanish-speaking focus groups (n=5) of both contraceptive users (n=22) and providers (n=13) to examine how the levonorgestrel IUD as EC was perceived and understood by these populations and to determine barriers and facilitators of utilization. We used findings from our focus groups to design a high-fidelity in-situ simulation scenario around EC that we pilot tested with clinical teams in three settings (a county health department, a community clinic, and a midwifery clinic), to further explore structural and health systems barriers to care. Simulation scenarios examined health system barriers to the provision of the levonorgestrel IUD as EC. We coded both focus groups and in-clinic simulations using the modified Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We then applied our findings to the CFIR-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) Barrier Busting Tool and mapped results to implement recommendations provided by participants. RESULTS Ultimately, 9 constructs from the CFIR were consistently identified across focus groups and simulations. Main barriers included suboptimal knowledge and acceptability of the intervention itself, appropriately addressing knowledge and education needs among both providers and contraceptive clients, and adequately accounting for structural barriers inherent in the health system. The CFIR-ERIC Barrier Busting Tool identified eight strategies to improve levonorgestrel IUD as EC access: identifying implementation champions, conducting educational meetings, preparing educational toolkits, involving patients and their partners in implementation, conducting a local needs assessment, distributing educational materials, and obtaining patient feedback. CONCLUSIONS To sustainably incorporate the levonorgestrel IUD as EC into clinical practice, education, health systems strengthening, and policy changes will be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca G. Simmons
- Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
| | - Jami Baayd
- Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
| | - Sarah Elliott
- Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
| | - Susanna R. Cohen
- LIFT Simulation Design Lab, Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
| | - David K. Turok
- Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cohen SR, Baayd J, García G, Quade C, Gero A, Ekey M, Poggio C, Simmons R. Facility-based simulation as a programmatic tool for implementing a statewide contraceptive initiative. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:965. [PMID: 35906656 PMCID: PMC9335456 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08332-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessing implementation fidelity is highly recommended, but successful approaches can be challenging. Family Planning Elevated (FPE) is a statewide contraceptive initiative which partnered with 28 health clinics across Utah. To assess implementation fidelity, we developed in-situ high-fidelity simulation training to both determine clinic adherence to FPE and offer education to implementing teams. This study aimed to develop, pilot, and assess the use of simulation as a tool for measuring implementation fidelity. METHODS We developed two simulation scenarios to determine implementation fidelity: one scenario wherein a client is seeking a new method of contraception and another in which the same client has returned to discontinue the method. Both simulations contained multiple aspects of program implementation (e.g., determining program eligibility). We then offered simulations to all FPE partner organizations. To assess simulation training as a tool for determining implementation fidelity, we developed strategies aligned with each aspect of an adapted RE-AIM framework, including pre-post surveys, acceptability and self-efficacy testing, a checklist for programmatic adherence, field notes, action planning and analysis of monitoring data. RESULTS Fifteen clinical sites and 71 team members participated in the in-situ simulations. Assessment of the checklist showed that 90% of the clinics successfully demonstrated key program components, including person-centered counseling techniques such as sitting at the patient's level (95.8%); asking open-ended questions (100%); and explaining how to use the contraceptive method selected (91.7%). More than half of clinics fell short in programmatic areas including: confirmation that the FPE program covered same-day intrauterine device insertion (54.2%), and education on health risks associated with the selected contraceptive method (58.3%). After simulation, participants reported improved knowledge of how FPE works (p = < 0.001), increased ability to identify FPE-eligible clients (p = 0.02) and heightened self-efficacy in helping clients select a method (p = 0.03). Participants were satisfied with the simulations, with most (84.1%) reporting that the simulation exceeded their expectations. CONCLUSIONS Highly-realistic in-situ family planning simulations are acceptable to participants, positively change knowledge and clinical team confidence, and can identify systems gaps in clinical care and program implementation. Simulation offers a reciprocal way of monitoring implementation fidelity of a family planning access initiative. TRIAL REGISTRATION This project was determined to be exempt by the IRB of the University of Utah, the larger Family Planning Elevated program under which this pilot study was nested is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03877757 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna R Cohen
- LIFT Simulation Design Lab, Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
- Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
| | - Jami Baayd
- LIFT Simulation Design Lab, Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Gabriela García
- LIFT Simulation Design Lab, Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
- Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Caitlin Quade
- LIFT Simulation Design Lab, Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Alexandra Gero
- LIFT Simulation Design Lab, Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Madison Ekey
- LIFT Simulation Design Lab, Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Catherine Poggio
- LIFT Simulation Design Lab, Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Rebecca Simmons
- LIFT Simulation Design Lab, Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Simmons RG, Baayd J, Gero A, Quade C, Mullholand M, Torres E, Turok DK, Sanders JN. Implementation and Monitoring of the Family Planning Elevated Contraceptive Access Program, Utah, 2018‒2019. Am J Public Health 2022; 112:S528-S531. [PMID: 35767785 PMCID: PMC10461487 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2022.306935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Family Planning Elevated (FPE) is a contraceptive access initiative in Utah. FPE designed and utilized a comprehensive monitoring system to identify and respond to challenges implementing our initiative as they arose. Here, we describe the components of our monitoring system, and highlight how FPE's monitoring system successfully identified that Utah's Medicaid expansion was not widely adopted by eligible individuals. We then describe how FPE adapted to this challenge. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(S5):S528-S531. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306935).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca G Simmons
- All authors are affiliated with the Division of Family Planning in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Jami Baayd
- All authors are affiliated with the Division of Family Planning in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Alexandra Gero
- All authors are affiliated with the Division of Family Planning in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Caitlin Quade
- All authors are affiliated with the Division of Family Planning in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Madeline Mullholand
- All authors are affiliated with the Division of Family Planning in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Erica Torres
- All authors are affiliated with the Division of Family Planning in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - David K Turok
- All authors are affiliated with the Division of Family Planning in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| | - Jessica N Sanders
- All authors are affiliated with the Division of Family Planning in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| |
Collapse
|