1
|
Witte C, Schmidt DM, Cimiano P. Comparing generative and extractive approaches to information extraction from abstracts describing randomized clinical trials. J Biomed Semantics 2024; 15:3. [PMID: 38654304 PMCID: PMC11036632 DOI: 10.1186/s13326-024-00305-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are an important part of the evidence-based medicine paradigm. However, the creation of such systematic reviews by clinical experts is costly as well as time-consuming, and results can get quickly outdated after publication. Most RCTs are structured based on the Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework and there exist many approaches which aim to extract PICO elements automatically. The automatic extraction of PICO information from RCTs has the potential to significantly speed up the creation process of systematic reviews and this way also benefit the field of evidence-based medicine. RESULTS Previous work has addressed the extraction of PICO elements as the task of identifying relevant text spans or sentences, but without populating a structured representation of a trial. In contrast, in this work, we treat PICO elements as structured templates with slots to do justice to the complex nature of the information they represent. We present two different approaches to extract this structured information from the abstracts of RCTs. The first approach is an extractive approach based on our previous work that is extended to capture full document representations as well as by a clustering step to infer the number of instances of each template type. The second approach is a generative approach based on a seq2seq model that encodes the abstract describing the RCT and uses a decoder to infer a structured representation of a trial including its arms, treatments, endpoints and outcomes. Both approaches are evaluated with different base models on a manually annotated dataset consisting of RCT abstracts on an existing dataset comprising 211 annotated clinical trial abstracts for Type 2 Diabetes and Glaucoma. For both diseases, the extractive approach (with flan-t5-base) reached the best F 1 score, i.e. 0.547 ( ± 0.006 ) for type 2 diabetes and 0.636 ( ± 0.006 ) for glaucoma. Generally, the F 1 scores were higher for glaucoma than for type 2 diabetes and the standard deviation was higher for the generative approach. CONCLUSION In our experiments, both approaches show promising performance extracting structured PICO information from RCTs, especially considering that most related work focuses on the far easier task of predicting less structured objects. In our experimental results, the extractive approach performs best in both cases, although the lead is greater for glaucoma than for type 2 diabetes. For future work, it remains to be investigated how the base model size affects the performance of both approaches in comparison. Although the extractive approach currently leaves more room for direct improvements, the generative approach might benefit from larger models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Witte
- Semantic Computing Group, Center for Cognitive Interaction Technology, Bielefeld University, Inspiration 1, Bielefeld, 33619, NRW, Germany
| | - David M Schmidt
- Semantic Computing Group, Center for Cognitive Interaction Technology, Bielefeld University, Inspiration 1, Bielefeld, 33619, NRW, Germany.
| | - Philipp Cimiano
- Semantic Computing Group, Center for Cognitive Interaction Technology, Bielefeld University, Inspiration 1, Bielefeld, 33619, NRW, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Phatak A, Savage DW, Ohle R, Smith J, Mago V. Medical Text Simplification Using Reinforcement Learning (TESLEA): Deep Learning–Based Text Simplification Approach. JMIR Med Inform 2022; 10:e38095. [DOI: 10.2196/38095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
In most cases, the abstracts of articles in the medical domain are publicly available. Although these are accessible by everyone, they are hard to comprehend for a wider audience due to the complex medical vocabulary. Thus, simplifying these complex abstracts is essential to make medical research accessible to the general public.
Objective
This study aims to develop a deep learning–based text simplification (TS) approach that converts complex medical text into a simpler version while maintaining the quality of the generated text.
Methods
A TS approach using reinforcement learning and transformer–based language models was developed. Relevance reward, Flesch-Kincaid reward, and lexical simplicity reward were optimized to help simplify jargon-dense complex medical paragraphs to their simpler versions while retaining the quality of the text. The model was trained using 3568 complex-simple medical paragraphs and evaluated on 480 paragraphs via the help of automated metrics and human annotation.
Results
The proposed method outperformed previous baselines on Flesch-Kincaid scores (11.84) and achieved comparable performance with other baselines when measured using ROUGE-1 (0.39), ROUGE-2 (0.11), and SARI scores (0.40). Manual evaluation showed that percentage agreement between human annotators was more than 70% when factors such as fluency, coherence, and adequacy were considered.
Conclusions
A unique medical TS approach is successfully developed that leverages reinforcement learning and accurately simplifies complex medical paragraphs, thereby increasing their readability. The proposed TS approach can be applied to automatically generate simplified text for complex medical text data, which would enhance the accessibility of biomedical research to a wider audience.
Collapse
|
3
|
Increasing Women’s Knowledge about HPV Using BERT Text Summarization: An Online Randomized Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19138100. [PMID: 35805761 PMCID: PMC9265758 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19138100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Despite the availability of online educational resources about human papillomavirus (HPV), many women around the world may be prevented from obtaining the necessary knowledge about HPV. One way to mitigate the lack of HPV knowledge is the use of auto-generated text summarization tools. This study compares the level of HPV knowledge between women who read an auto-generated summary of HPV made using the BERT deep learning model and women who read a long-form text of HPV. We randomly assigned 386 women to two conditions: half read an auto-generated summary text about HPV (n = 193) and half read an original text about HPV (n = 193). We administrated measures of HPV knowledge that consisted of 29 questions. As a result, women who read the original text were more likely to correctly answer two questions on the general HPV knowledge subscale than women who read the summarized text. For the HPV testing knowledge subscale, there was a statistically significant difference in favor of women who read the original text for only one question. The final subscale, HPV vaccination knowledge questions, did not significantly differ across groups. Using BERT for text summarization has shown promising effectiveness in increasing women’s knowledge and awareness about HPV while saving their time.
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang K, Nambudiri VE. Anticipating Ambulatory Automation: Potential Applications of Administrative and Clinical Automation in Outpatient Healthcare Delivery. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12:1157-1160. [PMID: 34965607 PMCID: PMC8716189 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Yang
- Department of Dermatology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Vinod E. Nambudiri
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States,Address for correspondence Vinod E. Nambudiri, MD, MBA Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang M, Wang M, Yu F, Yang Y, Walker J, Mostafa J. A systematic review of automatic text summarization for biomedical literature and EHRs. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:2287-2297. [PMID: 34338801 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Biomedical text summarization helps biomedical information seekers avoid information overload by reducing the length of a document while preserving the contents' essence. Our systematic review investigates the most recent biomedical text summarization researches on biomedical literature and electronic health records by analyzing their techniques, areas of application, and evaluation methods. We identify gaps and propose potential directions for future research. MATERIALS AND METHODS This review followed the PRISMA methodology and replicated the approaches adopted by the previous systematic review published on the same topic. We searched 4 databases (PubMed, ACM Digital Library, Scopus, and Web of Science) from January 1, 2013 to April 8, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened title, abstract, and full-text for all retrieved articles. The conflicts were resolved by the third reviewer. The data extraction of the included articles was in 5 dimensions: input, purpose, output, method, and evaluation. RESULTS Fifty-eight out of 7235 retrieved articles met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-nine systems used single-document biomedical research literature as their input, 17 systems were explicitly designed for clinical support, 47 systems generated extractive summaries, and 53 systems adopted hybrid methods combining computational linguistics, machine learning, and statistical approaches. As for the assessment, 51 studies conducted an intrinsic evaluation using predefined metrics. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION This study found that current biomedical text summarization systems have achieved good performance using hybrid methods. Studies on electronic health records summarization have been increasing compared to a previous survey. However, the majority of the works still focus on summarizing literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengqian Wang
- Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Manhua Wang
- iSchool, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Fei Yu
- iSchool, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Yue Yang
- Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer Walker
- Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Javed Mostafa
- Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,iSchool, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Biomedical Research Imaging Center, the School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schmidt L, Finnerty Mutlu AN, Elmore R, Olorisade BK, Thomas J, Higgins JPT. Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: Update of a living systematic review. F1000Res 2021; 10:401. [PMID: 34408850 PMCID: PMC8361807 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.51117.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The reliable and usable (semi)automation of data extraction can support the field of systematic review by reducing the workload required to gather information about the conduct and results of the included studies. This living systematic review examines published approaches for data extraction from reports of clinical studies. Methods: We systematically and continually search PubMed, ACL Anthology, arXiv, OpenAlex via EPPI-Reviewer, and the dblp computer science bibliography. Full text screening and data extraction are conducted within an open-source living systematic review application created for the purpose of this review. This living review update includes publications up to December 2022 and OpenAlex content up to March 2023. Results: 76 publications are included in this review. Of these, 64 (84%) of the publications addressed extraction of data from abstracts, while 19 (25%) used full texts. A total of 71 (93%) publications developed classifiers for randomised controlled trials. Over 30 entities were extracted, with PICOs (population, intervention, comparator, outcome) being the most frequently extracted. Data are available from 25 (33%), and code from 30 (39%) publications. Six (8%) implemented publicly available tools Conclusions: This living systematic review presents an overview of (semi)automated data-extraction literature of interest to different types of literature review. We identified a broad evidence base of publications describing data extraction for interventional reviews and a small number of publications extracting epidemiological or diagnostic accuracy data. Between review updates, trends for sharing data and code increased strongly: in the base-review, data and code were available for 13 and 19% respectively, these numbers increased to 78 and 87% within the 23 new publications. Compared with the base-review, we observed another research trend, away from straightforward data extraction and towards additionally extracting relations between entities or automatic text summarisation. With this living review we aim to review the literature continually.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Schmidt
- NIHR Innovation Observatory, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE4 5TG, UK
- Sciome LLC, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27713, USA
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | | | - Rebecca Elmore
- Sciome LLC, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27713, USA
| | - Babatunde K. Olorisade
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
- Evaluate Ltd, London, SE1 2RE, UK
- Cardiff School of Technologies, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, CF5 2YB, UK
| | - James Thomas
- UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, WC1H 0AL, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|