Development of a Social Network for People Without a Diagnosis (RarePairs): Evaluation Study

Genome access and other web-based IT solutions: Genetic counseling in the digital era

Genetic counselors are healthcare professionals who are trained in both medical genetics and counseling to help guide individuals through what is known about genetic predispositions toward a variety of diseases, how they are inherited, and what impact this information can have on them and their partners and families. The range and scope of practice of GC has greatly expanded beyond where it started and now, it is employed in a variety of clinical and research settings. The traditional approach to GC involves meeting with a counselor in person. However, with the increasing availability of online resources, more people are seeking information about genetic disorders online. This shift has led to the development of online GC services. Indeed, genetic counselors are no strangers to improvements in terms of adopting digital solutions in their clinical routine, however, there are few studies assessing genetic counselors' attitudes regarding existing digital tools. Genome Access^® is a digital platform that improves patient knowledge in the field of genetic diseases and supports specialists throughout different stages of counseling. This study aims to present Genome Access and discuss the importance of adopting digital technologies designed specifically for GC and what tools these solutions should include.

Needs of people with rare diseases that can be supported by electronic resources: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Rare diseases are characterised by low incidence, often with little evidence for effective treatments. Isolated patients and specialist centres for rare diseases are increasingly connected, thanks to the internet. This scoping review aimed to identify issues facing people with a rare disease that authors report may be addressed by electronic resources (mobile applications, websites, social media platforms, telehealth and online portals).

DESIGN

Scoping review guided by the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase and PsycInfo were searched, supplemented by hand searches of selected journals, in July 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Peer-reviewed literature in English was searched using terms for rare disease (incidence <1:2000), electronic modalities (eg, mobile phone) and patient support terms. No date limit was set. Conference abstracts were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extracted: rare disease/group of diseases, name of the e-resource, need identified in the patient cohort, features of the e-resource, any other findings or observations of interest. From this, a framework was developed synthesising features across diseases and resources.

RESULTS

Seventy-two papers were found (from 383). Fifty-six electronic resources were described in 64 papers, while 12 papers were exploratory studies. Cystic fibrosis (n=28) was the most frequently addressed, followed by haemophilia (n=16).Four domains and 23 subdomains of needs were extracted from the papers. The domains of needs were: support for self-management, access to high-quality information, access to appropriate specialist services, and social support. Subdomains are sometimes related to needs of individual rare diseases (eg, social isolation due to infection risk in people with cystic fibrosis). Fifteen electronic resources were identified that supported parents of children with rare disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

While it can be argued that rare diseases, per se, may be no less distressing or onerous to care for than a high prevalence disease, rare diseases have unique features: the lengthy odyssey to find a diagnosis, then appropriate specialists, the lack of evidence around effective treatments, guidelines or access to knowledgeable general health service providers. Designers of electronic resources are urged to consult key stakeholders to enhance the effectiveness and usability of resources for people with a rare disease.

Group intervention programs and their impact on well-being and quality-of-life for adults living with a rare or orphan disease - realist review of literature

PURPOSE

Adults living with a rare or orphan diseases (ROD) experience common psychosocial difficulties that are often poorly addressed in usual care. This realist literature review aims to inform the development, evaluation and implementation of evidence based group therapy programs adapted to shared needs of patients living with various ROD.

METHOD

The review is based on an analysis of Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations. It included 21 primary studies published between 2010 and April 2022 and used a PRISMA process for study selection and inclusion.

RESULTS

Our results show that group psychosocial interventions can help reduce perception of symptoms and psychological impacts of disease, improve social functioning and support and quality of life in patients.

CONCLUSION

Group therapy programs seem promising for ROD-patients and should be considered within comprehensive treatment and support plans. However, more comprehensive studies of group therapies in context should aim to identify core active components of these interventions with ROD-patients. Implications for Rehabilitation:Rare or Orphan Diseases are varied, difficult to diagnose and have a major impact on all aspects of the patients' lives (physical, emotional, psychological, social, professional).Psychosocial support is a key but underdeveloped component to support the recovery trajectory for these patients.In this review of group interventions, we identified a few promising practices adaptable to patients living with Rare or Orphan Diseases (Acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive behavioural therapies, psychoeducational programs).Patients who received psychosocial group interventions are likely to experience improvement in their quality of life.

Opportunities and pitfalls of social media research in rare genetic diseases: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Social media may be particularly valuable in research in rare genetic diseases because of the low numbers of patients and the rare disease community's robust online presence. The goal of this systematic review was to understand how social media is currently used in rare disease research and the characteristics of the participants in these studies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of six databases to identify studies published in English between January 2004 and November 2020, of which 120 met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Most studies were observational (n = 114, 95.0%) and cross-sectional (n = 107, 89.2%), and more than half (n = 69, 57.5%) utilized only surveys. Only 101 rare diseases were included across all studies. Participant demographics, when reported, were predominantly female (70.1% ± 22.5%) and white (85.0% ± 11.0%) adult patients and caregivers.

CONCLUSION

Despite its potential benefits in rare disease research, the use of social media is still methodologically limited and the participants reached may not be representative of the rare disease population by gender, race, age, or rare disease type. As scholars explore using social media for rare disease research, careful attention should be paid to representativeness when studying this diverse patient community.

The Odyssey from Symptom to Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension from the Patients and Spouses Perspective

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE

Diagnostic delays in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are related to increased morbidity and mortality. The risk of a delayed, or even a missed, diagnosis is high as the conditions are rare. The aim was to describe patients' and spouses' experiences of the journey from the first symptom to an established diagnosis.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of 31 transcripts, based on 2 primary datasets containing interviews with 17 patients and 14 spouses, was carried out and analyzed according to qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

One overarching category was revealed from the content analysis; "The journey from doubt and hope to receive the diagnosis." Five subcategories were identified as: overall experiences; ignoring symptoms; seeking primary care/hospital specialty care; blame and stigma; and finding a pulmonary hypertension specialist clinic. The main finding was that both patients and spouses experienced that waiting for a diagnosis and the deteriorating state of health led to anxiety and frustration. The knowledge about rare diseases among health professionals needs to be improved to enable a timelier diagnosis and initiation of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Patients' and spouses' lives were negatively affected by having to search for a correct diagnosis. In order for health care to identify rare diseases earlier, a well-functioning and responsive health care system, in primary care as well as in specialist care, is needed. Symptoms like breathlessness and fatigue are often unspecific but should not be ignored. Keeping the patient and spouse in the loop, and providing information that the search for an answer might take time is essential for health care providers to create trust.