A Risk-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Patient-Specific Antimicrobial Therapy (iBiogram): Design and Retrospective Analysis

Estimating antibiotic coverage from linked microbiological and clinical data from the Swiss Paediatric Sepsis Study to support empiric antibiotic regimen selection

In light of rising antibiotic resistance, better methods for selection of empiric antibiotic treatment based on clinical and microbiological data are needed. Most guidelines target specific clinical infections, and variably adjust empiric antibiotic selection by certain patient characteristics. Coverage estimates reflect the probability that an antibiotic regimen will be active against the causative pathogen once confirmed and can provide an objective basis for empiric regimen selection. Coverage can be estimated for specific infections using a weighted incidence syndromic combination antibiograms (WISCAs) framework. However, no comprehensive data combining clinical and microbiological data for specific clinical syndromes are available in Switzerland. We therefore describe estimating coverage from semi-deterministically linked routine microbiological and cohort data of hospitalised children with sepsis. Coverage estimates were generated for each hospital and separately pooling data across ten contributing hospitals for five pre-defined patient risk groups. Data from 1,082 patients collected during the Swiss Paediatric Sepsis Study (SPSS) 2011-2015 were included. Preterm neonates were the most commonly represented group, and half of infants and children had a comorbidity. 67% of neonatal sepsis cases were hospital-acquired late-onset whereas in children 76% of infections were community-acquired. Escherichia coli, Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and Staphylococcus aureus were the most common pathogens. At all hospitals, ceftazidime plus amikacin regimen had the lowest coverage, and coverage of amoxicillin plus gentamicin and meropenem were generally comparable. Coverage was improved when vancomycin was included in the regimen, reflecting uncertainty about the empirically targeted pathogen spectrum. Children with community-acquired infections had high coverage overall. It is feasible to estimate coverage of common empiric antibiotic regimens from linked data. Pooling data by patient risk groups with similar expected pathogen and susceptibility profiles may improve coverage estimate precision, supporting better differentiation of coverage between regimens. Identification of data sources, selection of regimens and consideration of pathogens to target for improved empiric coverage is important.

Effect of clinical decision support systems on emergency medicine physicians' decision-making: A pilot scenario-based simulation study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) are predisposed to rapid deterioration in the face of common childhood illnesses. When they present to their local emergency departments (ED) with acute illness, rapid and accurate diagnosis and treatment is crucial to recovery and survival. Previous studies have shown that ED physicians are uncomfortable caring for patients with CHD and there is a lack of actionable guidance to aid in their decision making. To support ED physicians' key decision components (sensemaking, anticipation, and managing complexity) when managing CHD patients, a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) was previously designed. This pilot study evaluates the effect of this CDSS on ED physicians' decision making compared to usual care without clinical decision support.

METHODS

In a pilot scenario-based simulation study with repeated measures, ED physicians managed mock CHD patients with and without the CDSS. We compared ED physicians' CHD-specific and general decision-making processes (e.g., recognizing sepsis, starting antibiotics, and managing symptoms) with and without the use of CDSS. The frequency of participants' utterances related to each key decision components of sensemaking, anticipation, and managing complexity were coded and statistically analyzed for significance.

RESULTS

Across all decision-making components, the CDSS significantly increased ED physicians' frequency of "CHD specific utterances" (Mean = 5.43, 95%CI: 3.7-7.2) compared to the without CDSS condition (Mean = 2.05, 95%CI: 0.3-3.8) whereas there was no significant difference in frequencies of "general utterances" when using CDSS (Mean = 4.62, 95%CI: 3.1-6.1) compared to without CDSS (Mean = 5.14 95%CI: 4.4-5.9).

CONCLUSION

A CDSS that integrates key decision-making components (sensemaking, anticipation, and managing complexity) can trigger and enrich communication between clinicians and enhance the clinical management of CHD patients. For patients with complex and subspecialized diseases such as CHD, a well-designed CDSS can become part of a multifaceted solution that includes knowledge translation, broader communication around interpretation of information, and access to additional expertise to support CHD specific decision-making.