The Costs and Cardiovascular Benefits in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease From a Fourth-Generation Synchronous Telehealth Program: Retrospective Cohort Study

2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.

2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.

Costs and Cardiovascular Benefits of a Fourth-Generation Synchronous Telehealth Program on Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) continues to increase in modern aging society. Patients with AF are at high risk for multiple adverse cardiovascular events, including heart failure, stroke, and mortality. Improved medical care is needed for patients with AF to enhance their quality of life and limit their medical resource utilization. With advances in the internet and technology, telehealth programs are now widely used in medical care. A fourth-generation telehealth program offers synchronous and continuous medical attention in response to physiological parameters measured at home. Although we have previously shown the benefits of this telehealth program for some patients with a high risk of cardiovascular disease, its benefits for patients with AF remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the benefits of participating in a fourth-generation telehealth program for patients with AF in relation to cardiovascular outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. We retrospectively searched the medical records database of a tertiary medical center in Northern Taiwan between January 2007 and December 2017. We screened 5062 patients with cardiovascular disease and enrolled 537 patients with AF, of which 279 participated in the telehealth program and 258 did not. Bias was reduced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment based on the propensity score. Outcomes were collected and analyzed, including all-cause readmission, admission for heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, bleeding events, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular death within the follow-up period. Total medical expenses and medical costs in different departments were also compared. Subgroup analyses were conducted on ischemic stroke stratified by several subgroup variables.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 3.0 (SD 1.7) years for the telehealth group and 3.4 (SD 1.9) years for the control group. After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, the patients in the telehealth program had significantly fewer ischemic strokes (2.0 vs 4.5 events per 100 person-years; subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.45, 95% CI 0.22-0.92) and cardiovascular deaths (2.5 vs 5.9 events per 100 person-years; SHR 0.43, 95% CI 0.18-0.99) at the follow-up. The telehealth program particularly benefited patients comorbid with vascular disease (SHR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.53 vs SHR 1.16, 95% CI 0.44-3.09; P=.01 for interaction). The total medical expenses during follow-up were similar in the telehealth and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the benefits of participating in the fourth-generation telehealth program for patients with AF by significantly reducing their ischemic stroke risk while spending the same amount on medical expenses.

Inconsistent Benefits From Mobile Information Communication Technology in Adults With Peripheral Arterial Disease

INTRODUCTION

Quality of evidence regarding telemedicine in adults with peripheral arterial disease has not been systematically appraised.

OBJECTIVES

To explore benefits and harms from mobile information communication technology devices and applications in peripheral arterial disease.

METHODS

Systematic rapid evidence review and appraisal with the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation working group approach.

RESULTS

Sixteen randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) examined various self-monitoring devices, telemedicine platforms, and individualized telephone counseling. Low-quality evidence suggested that the odds of treatment failure (pooled Peto odds ratio 0.8; 95% CI, 0.4-1.7; 5 RCTs), adverse effects (pooled Peto odds ratio 0.9; 95% CI, 0.5-1.5; 2 RCTs), and physical performance (standardized mean difference in 6-minute walking test 0.2; 95% CI, -0.3-0.7; 4 RCTs) did not differ between mobile interventions and usual care. Single RCTs suggested large but inconsistent improvement in the quality of life: EuroQol5D standardized mean difference = 5.0 (95% CI, 4.4-5.7; 1 RCT) after telehealth program for promoting patient self-management and standardized mean difference = 1.4 (95% CI, 0.4-2.3; 1 RCT) after structured rehabilitation with mobile self-monitoring. Inconsistent reporting of patient-centered outcomes and small sample sizes hampered the quality of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved quality of life after specific mobile applications should be confirmed in powered RCTs and large postmarketing studies.

A National Perspective of Telemedicine Use and Direct Medical Costs: Who Uses It and How Much It Costs

BACKGROUND

Telemedicine has the potential to reduce medical costs among health systems. However, there is a limited understanding of the use of telemedicine and its association with direct medical costs.

OBJECTIVES

Using nationally representative data, we investigated telemedicine use and the associated direct medical costs among respondents overall and stratified by medical provider type and patient insurance status.

RESEARCH DESIGN, SUBJECTS, AND MEASURES

We used the 2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey full-year consolidated file, and outpatient department (OP) and office-based (OB) medical provider event files. Outcomes included total and out-of-pocket costs per visit for OP and OB. The primary independent variable was a binary variable indicating visits made through any telemedicine modality. We used multivariable generalized linear models and 2-part models, adjusting for types of providers and care, patient characteristics, and survey design.

RESULTS

Among total OP (n = 2938) and OB (n = 20,204) visits, 47.6% and 24.7% of visits, respectively were made through telemedicine. For OP, telemedicine visits were associated with lower total costs (average marginal effect: -$228; 95% confidence interval -$362, -$95) and out-of-pocket costs for all visits and for visits to specialists and to nurse practitioners or physicians assistants. For OB, telemedicine visits were associated with lower total costs, but not with lower out-of-pocket costs, for visits to primary care physicians or nurse practitioners or physician assistants, and for visits by Medicare patients.

CONCLUSION

Telemedicine was associated with lower direct medical costs. Its potential for cost curbing should be proactively identified and integrated into clinical practice and health policy design.