Writing Practices Associated With Electronic Progress Notes and the Preferences of Those Who Read Them: Descriptive Study

Competing discourses, contested roles: Electronic health records in medical education

INTRODUCTION

The integration of electronic health records (EHRs) into medical education remains contested despite their widespread use in clinical practice. For medical trainees, this has resulted in idiosyncratic and often ad hoc methods of instruction on EHR use. The purpose of this study was to understand the currently fragmented nature of EHR instruction by examining discourses of EHR use within the medical education literature.

METHODS

We conducted a Foucauldian critical discourse analysis to identify discourses of EHRs in the medical education literature. We found our texts through a systematic search of widely cited medical education journals from 2013-2023. Each text was analysed for recurring truth statements-claims framed as self-evidently true and thus not needing supporting evidence-about the role of EHRs in medical education.

RESULTS

We identified three major discourses: (1) EHRs as a clinical skill and competency, emphasising training of physical interactions between learners, patients and computers; (2) EHRs as a system, emphasising the creation and facilitation of networks of people, technologies, institutions and standards; and (3) EHRs as a cognitive process, framed as a method to shape processes like clinical reasoning and bias. Each discourse privileged certain stakeholders over others and served to rationalise educational interventions that could be seen as beneficial in isolation yet were often disjointed in combination.

CONCLUSIONS

Competing discourses of EHR use in medical education produce divergent interventions that exacerbate their contested role in contemporary medical education. Identifying different claims for the benefits of EHR use in these settings allows educators to make rational choices between competing educational directions.

Your note, your way: how to write an inpatient progress note accurately and efficiently as an intern

A physician's progress note is an essential piece of documentation regarding key events and the daily status of patients during their hospital stay. It serves not only as a communication tool between care team members, but also chronicles clinical status and pertinent updates to their medical care. Despite the importance of these documents, little literature exists on how to help residents to improve the quality of their daily progress notes. A narrative literature review of English language literature was performed and summated to provide recommendations on how to write an inpatient progress note more accurately and efficiently. In addition, the authors will also introduce a method to build a personal template with the goal of extracting relevant data automatically to reduce clicks for an inpatient progress note in the electronic medical record system.

The Voice of the Patient and the Electronic Health Record

The patient's voice, which we define as the words the patient uses found in notes and messages and other sources, and their preferences for care and its outcomes, is too small a part of the electronic health record (EHR). To address this shortcoming will require innovation, research, funding, perhaps architectural changes to commercial EHRs, and that we address barriers that have resulted in this state, including clinician burden and financial drivers for care. Advantages to greater patient voice may accrue to many groups of EHR users and to patients themselves. For clinicians, the patient's voice, including symptoms, is invaluable in identifying new serious illness that cannot be detected by screening tests, and as an aid to accurate diagnosis. Informaticians benefit from greater patient voice in the EHR because it provides clues not found elsewhere that aid diagnostic decision support, predictive analytics, and machine learning. Patients benefit when their treatment priorities and care outcomes considered in treatment decisions. What patient voice there is in the EHR today can be found in locations not usually used by researchers. Increasing the patient voice needs be accomplished in equitable ways available to people with less access to technology and whose primary language is not well supported by EHR tools and portals. Use of direct quotations, while carrying potential for harm, permits the voice to be recorded unfiltered. If you are a researcher or innovator, collaborate with patient groups and clinicians to create new ways to capture the patient voice, and to leverage it for good.

Using event logs to observe interactions with electronic health records: an updated scoping review shows increasing use of vendor-derived measures

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to compare the aims, measures, methods, limitations, and scope of studies that employ vendor-derived and investigator-derived measures of electronic health record (EHR) use, and to assess measure consistency across studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed for articles published between July 2019 and December 2021 that employed measures of EHR use derived from EHR event logs. We coded the aims, measures, methods, limitations, and scope of each article and compared articles employing vendor-derived and investigator-derived measures.

RESULTS

One hundred and two articles met inclusion criteria; 40 employed vendor-derived measures, 61 employed investigator-derived measures, and 1 employed both. Studies employing vendor-derived measures were more likely than those employing investigator-derived measures to observe EHR use only in ambulatory settings (83% vs 48%, P = .002) and only by physicians or advanced practice providers (100% vs 54% of studies, P < .001). Studies employing vendor-derived measures were also more likely to measure durations of EHR use (P < .001 for 6 different activities), but definitions of measures such as time outside scheduled hours varied widely. Eight articles reported measure validation. The reported limitations of vendor-derived measures included measure transparency and availability for certain clinical settings and roles.

DISCUSSION

Vendor-derived measures are increasingly used to study EHR use, but only by certain clinical roles. Although poorly validated and variously defined, both vendor- and investigator-derived measures of EHR time are widely reported.

CONCLUSION

The number of studies using event logs to observe EHR use continues to grow, but with inconsistent measure definitions and significant differences between studies that employ vendor-derived and investigator-derived measures.

Using Electronic Health Record Meta-Data to Identify Variation in Trainee Progress Note Writing Patterns: Opportunity to Enhance Systems-Based Care

OBJECTIVE

Daily progress notes are the backbone of all inpatient hospitalizations. Progress notes serve as a lasting record of a patient's diagnoses, condition, and planned interventions and are essential communication tools. We designed a study to identify patterns in progress note filing and use on general surgical services.

METHODS

The electronic health record (EHR) data warehouse was queried for general surgical progress notes signed between July 1, 2020, and July 1, 2021. Only notes authored by resident physicians or advanced practice providers (APPs) were included, and those filed on the day of a surgery were excluded. 10 am was identified as a target for note completion as it coincided with multidisciplinary discharge rounds. Physician, case managers pharmacist, physical therapist, dietician, nurse (and collaborating disciplines) progress note views were measured using EHR access log data.

RESULTS

A total of 8384 progress notes were analyzed; 4146 notes (49%) were authored by 81 trainees. A total of 4433 (53%) progress notes were filed before 10 am, 3673 (44%) were filed between 10 am and 6 pm, and 278 (3%) were filed after 6 pm. Variation in progress note file time was observed and associated with individual habits, residents vs APPs, day-of-week, and service structure. Surgery progress notes are viewed by collaborating disciplines throughout the workday, with high-volume viewership occurring by mid-morning. Each individual progress note received an average of 17.6 lifetime views with a range of 1 to 76. An average of 10.2 of those views occurred on the same day that the note was written. Notes that were filed after 10 am received a significantly lower number of same-day views compared to notes filed before 10am (8.4 vs 11.8, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Progress notes are identified as a significant burden by trainees and even considered to contribute to duty hour violations, yet they are used regularly as a source of information for collaborating disciplines. Progress notes filed earlier are viewed more frequently. Efforts to identify barriers to timeliness may help communication and efficiency of inpatient surgical care.