1
|
Tignanelli CJ, Shah S, Vock D, Siegel L, Serrano C, Haut E, Switzer S, Martin CL, Rizvi R, Peta V, Jenkins PC, Lemke N, Thyvalikakath T, Osheroff JA, Torres D, Vawdrey D, Callcut RA, Butler M, Melton GB. A pragmatic, stepped-wedge, hybrid type II trial of interoperable clinical decision support to improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for patients with traumatic brain injury. Implement Sci 2024; 19:57. [PMID: 39103955 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01386-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable medical condition which has substantial impact on patient morbidity, mortality, and disability. Unfortunately, adherence to the published best practices for VTE prevention, based on patient centered outcomes research (PCOR), is highly variable across U.S. hospitals, which represents a gap between current evidence and clinical practice leading to adverse patient outcomes. This gap is especially large in the case of traumatic brain injury (TBI), where reluctance to initiate VTE prevention due to concerns for potentially increasing the rates of intracranial bleeding drives poor rates of VTE prophylaxis. This is despite research which has shown early initiation of VTE prophylaxis to be safe in TBI without increased risk of delayed neurosurgical intervention or death. Clinical decision support (CDS) is an indispensable solution to close this practice gap; however, design and implementation barriers hinder CDS adoption and successful scaling across health systems. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) informed by PCOR evidence can be deployed using CDS systems to improve the evidence to practice gap. In the Scaling AcceptabLE cDs (SCALED) study, we will implement a VTE prevention CPG within an interoperable CDS system and evaluate both CPG effectiveness (improved clinical outcomes) and CDS implementation. METHODS The SCALED trial is a hybrid type 2 randomized stepped wedge effectiveness-implementation trial to scale the CDS across 4 heterogeneous healthcare systems. Trial outcomes will be assessed using the RE2-AIM planning and evaluation framework. Efforts will be made to ensure implementation consistency. Nonetheless, it is expected that CDS adoption will vary across each site. To assess these differences, we will evaluate implementation processes across trial sites using the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) implementation framework (a determinant framework) using mixed-methods. Finally, it is critical that PCOR CPGs are maintained as evidence evolves. To date, an accepted process for evidence maintenance does not exist. We will pilot a "Living Guideline" process model for the VTE prevention CDS system. DISCUSSION The stepped wedge hybrid type 2 trial will provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of CDS based on the Berne-Norwood criteria for VTE prevention in patients with TBI. Additionally, it will provide evidence regarding a successful strategy to scale interoperable CDS systems across U.S. healthcare systems, advancing both the fields of implementation science and health informatics. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov - NCT05628207. Prospectively registered 11/28/2022, https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS gov/ct2/show/NCT05628207 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Tignanelli
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 195, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
- Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- Center for Learning Health Systems Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- Center for Quality Outcomes, Discovery and Evaluation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Surbhi Shah
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - David Vock
- Division of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Lianne Siegel
- Division of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Carlos Serrano
- Division of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Elliott Haut
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Rubina Rizvi
- Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Center for Learning Health Systems Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Vincent Peta
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 195, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Peter C Jenkins
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Nicholas Lemke
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 195, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Thankam Thyvalikakath
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Denise Torres
- Department of Surgery, Geisinger Health, Danville, PA, USA
| | - David Vawdrey
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Geisinger Health, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Rachael A Callcut
- Department of Surgery, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Mary Butler
- Center for Learning Health Systems Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- School of Publish Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Genevieve B Melton
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 195, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
- Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Center for Learning Health Systems Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vazquez SR, Yates NY, Beavers CJ, Triller DM, McFarland MM. Differences in quality of anticoagulation care delivery according to ethnoracial group in the United States: A scoping review. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2024; 57:1076-1091. [PMID: 38733515 PMCID: PMC11315726 DOI: 10.1007/s11239-024-02991-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
Anticoagulation therapy is standard for conditions like atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, and valvular heart disease, yet it is unclear if there are ethnoracial disparities in its quality and delivery in the United States. For this scoping review, electronic databases were searched for publications between January 1, 2011 - March 30, 2022. Eligible studies included all study designs, any setting within the United States, patients prescribed anticoagulation for any indication, outcomes reported for ≥ 2 distinct ethnoracial groups. The following four research questions were explored: Do ethnoracial differences exist in 1) access to guideline-based anticoagulation therapy, 2) quality of anticoagulation therapy management, 3) clinical outcomes related to anticoagulation care, 4) humanistic/educational outcomes related to anticoagulation therapy. A total of 5374 studies were screened, 570 studies received full-text review, and 96 studies were analyzed. The largest mapped focus was patients' access to guideline-based anticoagulation therapy (88/96 articles, 91.7%). Seventy-eight articles made statistical outcomes comparisons among ethnoracial groups. Across all four research questions, 79 articles demonstrated favorable outcomes for White patients compared to non-White patients, 38 articles showed no difference between White and non-White groups, and 8 favored non-White groups (the total exceeds the 78 articles with statistical outcomes as many articles reported multiple outcomes). Disparities disadvantaging non-White patients were most pronounced in access to guideline-based anticoagulation therapy (43/66 articles analyzed) and quality of anticoagulation management (19/21 articles analyzed). Although treatment guidelines do not differentiate anticoagulant therapy by ethnoracial group, this scoping review found consistently favorable outcomes for White patients over non-White patients in the domains of access to anticoagulation therapy for guideline-based indications and quality of anticoagulation therapy management. No differences among groups were noted in clinical outcomes, and very few studies assessed humanistic or educational outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara R Vazquez
- University of Utah Health Thrombosis Service, 6056 Fashion Square Drive, Suite 1200, Murray, UT, 84107, USA.
| | - Naomi Y Yates
- Kaiser Permanente Clinical Pharmacy Services, 200 Crescent Center Pkwy, Tucker, GA, 30084, USA
| | - Craig J Beavers
- Anticoagulation Forum, Inc, 17 Lincoln Street, Suite 2B, Newton, MA, 02461, USA
- University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, 789 S Limestone, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA
| | - Darren M Triller
- Anticoagulation Forum, Inc, 17 Lincoln Street, Suite 2B, Newton, MA, 02461, USA
| | - Mary M McFarland
- University of Utah Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library, 10 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hudelson C, Gunderson MA, Pestka D, Christiaansen T, Stotka B, Kissock L, Markowitz R, Badlani S, Melton GB. Selection and Implementation of Virtual Scribe Solutions to Reduce Documentation Burden: A Mixed Methods Pilot. AMIA JOINT SUMMITS ON TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE PROCEEDINGS. AMIA JOINT SUMMITS ON TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE 2024; 2024:230-238. [PMID: 38827085 PMCID: PMC11141854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
Electronic health record (EHR) documentation is a leading reason for clinician burnout. While technology-enabled solutions like virtual and digital scribes aim to improve this, there is limited evidence of their effectiveness and minimal guidance for healthcare systems around solution selection and implementation. A transdisciplinary approach, informed by clinician interviews and other considerations, was used to evaluate and select a virtual scribe solution to pilot in a rapid iterative sprint over 12 weeks. Surveys, interviews, and EHR metadata were analyzed over a staggered 30 day implementation with live and asynchronous virtual scribe solutions. Among 16 pilot clinicians, documentation burden metrics decreased for some but not all. Some clinicians had highly positive comments, and others had concerns regarding scribe training and quality. Our findings demonstrate that virtual scribes may reduce documentation burden for some clinicians and describe a method for a collaborative and iterative technology selection process for digital tools in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly Hudelson
- Departments of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Melissa A Gunderson
- Departments of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Debbie Pestka
- Center for Learning Health System Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Tori Christiaansen
- Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- M Health Fairview, Minneapolis MN
| | | | | | - Rebecca Markowitz
- Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- M Health Fairview, Minneapolis MN
| | - Sameer Badlani
- Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- M Health Fairview, Minneapolis MN
| | - Genevieve B Melton
- Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Institute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Center for Learning Health System Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- M Health Fairview, Minneapolis MN
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mlakar I, Smrke U, Flis V, Bergauer A, Kobilica N, Kampič T, Horvat S, Vidovič D, Musil B, Plohl N. A randomized controlled trial for evaluating the impact of integrating a computerized clinical decision support system and a socially assistive humanoid robot into grand rounds during pre/post-operative care. Digit Health 2022; 8:20552076221129068. [PMID: 36185391 PMCID: PMC9515524 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221129068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Although clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are increasingly emphasized as
one of the possible levers for improving care, they are still not widely used
due to different barriers, such as doubts about systems’ performance, their
complexity and poor design, practitioners’ lack of time to use them, poor
computer skills, reluctance to use them in front of patients, and deficient
integration into existing workflows. While several studies on CDSS exist, there
is a need for additional high-quality studies using large samples and examining
the differences between outcomes following a decision based on CDSS support and
those following decisions without this kind of information. Even less is known
about the effectiveness of a CDSS that is delivered during a grand round routine
and with the help of socially assistive humanoid robots (SAHRs). In this study,
200 patients will be randomized into a Control Group (i.e. standard care) and an
Intervention Group (i.e. standard care and novel CDSS delivered via a SAHR).
Health care quality and Quality of Life measures will be compared between the
two groups. Additionally, approximately 22 clinicians, who are also active
researchers at the University Clinical Center Maribor, will evaluate the
acceptability and clinical usability of the system. The results of the proposed
study will provide high-quality evidence on the effectiveness of CDSS systems
and SAHR in the grand round routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izidor Mlakar
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Urška Smrke
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Vojko Flis
- University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | | | - Nina Kobilica
- University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Tadej Kampič
- University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Samo Horvat
- University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | | | - Bojan Musil
- Faculty of Arts, Department of Psychology, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Nejc Plohl
- Faculty of Arts, Department of Psychology, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cross DA, Pestka DL, White KM, Shah S. Business Not As Usual: Implementation Strategies That Support Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2021; 5:1008-1011. [PMID: 34568766 PMCID: PMC8450062 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dori A. Cross
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Deborah L. Pestka
- Department of Pharmaceutical Care & Health Systems, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Katie M. White
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Surbhi Shah
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|