1
|
Andrews B, Klein B, Van Nguyen H, Corboy D, McLaren S, Watson S. Efficacy of a digital mental health biopsychosocial transdiagnostic intervention with or without therapist-assistance for adults with anxiety and depression: An adaptive randomised clinical trial (Preprint). J Med Internet Res 2022. [DOI: 10.2196/45135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
|
2
|
Terpstra JA, van der Vaart R, van Beugen S, van Eersel RA, Gkika I, Erdős D, Schmidt J, Radstake C, Kloppenburg M, van Middendorp H, Evers AW. Guided internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with chronic pain: A meta-analytic review. Internet Interv 2022; 30:100587. [PMID: 36406977 PMCID: PMC9672957 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic pain has a large individual and societal burden. Previous reviews have shown that internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (iCBT) can support patients' pain coping. However, factors related to participant experience of iCBT and effective and safe iCBT delivery for chronic pain have not recently been summarized. Objective The aim of this review was to give an overview of the efficacy of guided iCBT for chronic pain on psychological, physical, and impact on daily life outcomes, including factors that inform optimal delivery. Methods Cochrane, Emcare, Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase were systematically searched from inception to 11 February 2022. Randomized controlled trials on guided iCBTs for adults with chronic pain were included with a broad range of outcomes. Results The search yielded 7406 studies of which 33 studies were included totaling 5133 participants. ICBT was more effective than passive control conditions for psychological (ES = 0.34-0.47), physical (ES = 0.26-0.29), and impact outcomes (ES = 0.38-0.41). ICBT was more effective than active control conditions for distress (ES = 0.40), pain acceptance (ES = 0.15), and pain interference after outlier removal (ES = 0.30). Longer treatments were associated with larger effects for anxiety and quality of life than shorter treatments. Mode of therapist contact (synchronous, asynchronous or a mix of both) was not related to differences in effect sizes in most outcomes. However, studies with mixed and synchronous contact modes had higher effects on pain self-efficacy than studies with asynchronous contact modes. Treatment satisfaction was high and adverse events were minor. Dropout was related to time, health, technical issues, and lack of computer skills. Conclusions Guided iCBT is an effective and potentially safe treatment for chronic pain. Future research should more consistently report on iCBT safety and detail the effectiveness of individual treatment components to optimize iCBT in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessy A. Terpstra
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Rheumatology, C1-R, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rosalie van der Vaart
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sylvia van Beugen
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Roxy A. van Eersel
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ioanna Gkika
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Dorottya Erdős
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jana Schmidt
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Caroline Radstake
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Margreet Kloppenburg
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Rheumatology, C1-R, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Henriët van Middendorp
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea W.M. Evers
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, Unit, Leiden University, PO Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, B1-P, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
- Medical Delta, Huismansingel 4, 2629 JH Delft, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|