1
|
Ding JL, Ritchie CS, Vranceanu AM, Mace RA. Palliative Care Interventions for Persons With Neurodegenerative Disease: A Scoping Review of Clinical Trial Study Design Features. J Palliat Med 2024. [PMID: 38364178 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Within palliative care research, best practice guidelines to conduct scientifically rigorous clinical trials for neurodegenerative diseases are underexplored. This patient population experiences unique challenges, including fluctuations in cognitive capacity, care partner (CP) and proxy involvement, and high adverse events (AEs), that necessitate special consideration when designing clinical trials. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe and identify clinical trial design features that have been documented in studies involving a neuropalliative intervention for persons with neurodegenerative diseases, highlighting features that have been adapted for this unique patient population. Design: We conducted a scoping review of clinical trials with a neuropalliative intervention for persons with neurodegenerative disease. We searched Cochrane, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and PubMed (MEDLINE) databases for articles published in English between 1950 and 2023. Two reviewers screened, extracted, and synthesized data from the included articles. A third reviewer adjudicated instances of conflict. The data were analyzed using a thematic framework approach. Results: Of 1025 texts, 44 articles were included. Seven study design features were analyzed: (1) consent, (2) proxies and CPs, (3) recruitment strategies, (4) retention strategies, (5) choice of comparator, (6) AEs, and (7) internal validity. This scoping review found disparities in study design features around structured consent, proxies and CPs, comparators, and AEs. Conclusions: To date, neuropalliative care clinical trials have had varied study designs and the majority of research has focused on dementia. Research guideline development for high-quality neuropalliative care clinical trials is greatly needed across the range of neurodegenerative diseases. To increase the scientific rigor of clinical trials and neuropalliative care, we recommend a standardized capacity assessment for consent, defining conditions for the CP, proxy, and AEs, systematizing appropriate comparators, and outlining preemptive recruitment and retention strategies to address the broader unpredictable challenges of palliative care research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Ding
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Mongan Institute Center for Aging and Serious Illness, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- MD-PhD Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Christine S Ritchie
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Mongan Institute Center for Aging and Serious Illness, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ryan A Mace
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fleisher JE, Suresh M, Levin ME, Hess SP, Akram F, Dodson D, Tosin M, Stebbins GT, Woo K, Ouyang B, Chodosh J. Learning to PERSEVERE: A pilot study of peer mentor support and caregiver education in Lewy body dementia. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2023; 113:105492. [PMID: 37385161 PMCID: PMC10527787 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2023.105492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lewy Body Disease (LBD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder. Despite high family caregiver strain and adverse patient and caregiver outcomes, few interventions exist for LBD family caregivers. Based on a successful peer mentoring pilot study in advanced Parkinson's Disease, we revised the curriculum of this peer-led educational intervention incorporating LBD caregiver input. OBJECTIVE We assessed feasibility of a peer mentor-led educational intervention and its impact on LBD family caregivers' knowledge, dementia attitudes, and mastery. METHODS Using community-based participatory research, we refined a 16-week peer mentoring intervention and recruited caregivers online through national foundations. Experienced LBD caregiver mentors were trained and matched with newer caregiver mentees with whom they spoke weekly for 16 weeks, supported by the intervention curriculum. We measured intervention fidelity biweekly, program satisfaction, and change in LBD knowledge, dementia attitudes, and caregiving mastery before and after the 16-week intervention. RESULTS Thirty mentor-mentee pairs completed a median of 15 calls (range: 8-19; 424 total calls; median 45 min each). As satisfaction indicators, participants rated 95.3% of calls as useful, and at week 16, all participants indicated they would recommend the intervention to other caregivers. Mentees' knowledge and dementia attitudes improved by 13% (p < 0.05) and 7% (p < 0.001), respectively. Training improved mentors' LBD knowledge by 32% (p < 0.0001) and dementia attitudes by 2.5% (p < 0.001). Neither mentor nor mentee mastery changed significantly (p = 0.36, respectively). CONCLUSIONS This LBD caregiver-designed and -led intervention was feasible, well-received, and effective in improving knowledge and dementia attitudes in both seasoned and newer caregivers. TRIAL REGISTRATION https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04649164ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04649164; December 2, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jori E Fleisher
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Madhuvanthi Suresh
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Melissa E Levin
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA; Chicago Medical School - Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Serena P Hess
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Faizan Akram
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Michelle Tosin
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Glenn T Stebbins
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Katheryn Woo
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bichun Ouyang
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Joshua Chodosh
- Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Medicine Service, VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fleisher JE, Suresh M, Klostermann EC, Lee J, Hess SP, Myrick E, Mitchem D, Woo K, Sennott BJ, Witek NP, Chen SM, Beck JC, Ouyang B, Wilkinson JR, Hall DA, Chodosh J. IN-HOME-PDCaregivers: The effects of a combined home visit and peer mentoring intervention for caregivers of homebound individuals with advanced Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2023; 106:105222. [PMID: 36446676 PMCID: PMC9825655 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Family caregivers of people with advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) are at high risk of caregiver strain, which independently predicts adverse patient outcomes. We tested the effects of one year of interdisciplinary, telehealth-enhanced home visits (IN-HOME-PD) with 16 weeks of peer mentoring on caregiver strain compared with usual care. METHODS We enrolled homebound people with advanced PD (PWPD) and their primary caregiver as IN-HOME-PD dyads. We trained experienced PD family caregivers as peer mentors. Dyads received four structured home visits focused on advanced symptom management, home safety, medications, and psychosocial needs. Starting at approximately four months, caregivers spoke weekly with a peer mentor for 16 weeks. We compared one-year change in caregiver strain (MCSI, range 0-72) with historical controls, analyzed intervention acceptability, and measured change in anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy. RESULTS Longitudinally, IN-HOME-PD caregiver strain was unchanged (n = 51, 23.34 (SD 9.43) vs. 24.32 (9.72), p = 0.51) while that of controls worsened slightly (n = 154, 16.45 (10.33) vs. 17.97 (10.88), p = 0.01). Retention in peer mentoring was 88.2%. Both mentors and mentees rated 100% of mentoring calls useful, with mean satisfaction of 91/100 and 90/100, respectively. There were no clinically significant improvements in anxiety, depression, or self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS Interdisciplinary telehealth-enhanced home visits combined with peer mentoring mitigated the worsening strain observed in caregivers of less advanced individuals. Mentoring was met with high satisfaction. Future caregiver-led peer mentoring interventions are warranted given the growing, unmet needs of PD family caregivers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03189459.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jori E Fleisher
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Madhuvanthi Suresh
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Ellen C Klostermann
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Jeanette Lee
- Department of Social Work and Community Health, Rush University Medical Center, 710 South Paulina Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Serena P Hess
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Erica Myrick
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Daniela Mitchem
- Department of Social Work and Community Health, Rush University Medical Center, 710 South Paulina Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Katheryn Woo
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Brianna J Sennott
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Natalie P Witek
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Sarah Mitchell Chen
- Department of Social Work and Community Health, Rush University Medical Center, 710 South Paulina Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - James C Beck
- Parkinson's Foundation, 1359 Broadway, Suite 1509, New York, NY, 10018, USA.
| | - Bichun Ouyang
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Jayne R Wilkinson
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, 3900 Woodland Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Deborah A Hall
- Department of Neurological S,ciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| | - Joshua Chodosh
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 227 E. 30th Street, TRB 839, New York, NY, 10016, USA; VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, Medicine Service, 423 E. 23rd Street, New York, NY, 10010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Olvera CE, Levin ME, Fleisher JE. Community-based neuropalliative care. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2023; 191:49-66. [PMID: 36599515 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-824535-4.00001-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Community-based palliative care is defined as palliative care delivered outside of the hospital and outpatient clinics. These settings include the home, nursing homes, day programs, volunteer organizations, and support groups. There is strong evidence outside of the neuropalliative context that community-based palliative care can reduce hospital costs and admissions at the end of life. Research that focuses on specialized community-based palliative care for neurologic disease have similar findings, although with significant variability across conditions and geographic locations. Several of these studies have investigated home-based care for neurologic conditions including dementia, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, brain tumors, and motor neuron disease. Other work has focused on incorporating palliative care models into the treatment of patients with neurologic diseases within nursing home settings. Similar to nonneurologic community-based palliative care, little has been published on patient and caregiver quality-of-life outcomes in such models of care, although the emerging data are generally positive. Future studies should explore how best to provide comprehensive, cost-effective, scalable, and replicable models of community-based neuropalliative care, patient and caregiver outcomes in such models, and how care can be adapted between and within specific patient populations and healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline E Olvera
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Melissa E Levin
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States; Chicago Medical School-Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Jori E Fleisher
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hess SP, Levin M, Akram F, Woo K, Andersen L, Trenkle K, Brown P, Ouyang B, Fleisher JE. The impact and feasibility of a brief, virtual, educational intervention for home healthcare professionals on Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders: pilot study of I SEE PD Home. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:506. [PMID: 35761252 PMCID: PMC9238152 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03430-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) and Parkinson-related disorders (PRD) are frequently referred for home allied therapies and nursing care, yet home healthcare professionals have limited training in PD/PRD. While recognizing the need for such care, patients and families report home healthcare professionals are unfamiliar with these conditions, which may be driven by neurophobia and may contribute to suboptimal care and early termination of services. We sought to determine the feasibility and effects of a virtual, multimodal educational intervention on PD knowledge, confidence, and empathy among home health professionals. METHODS Home health nurses, occupational therapists, physical therapists and physical therapy assistants, and speech-language pathologists participated in a daylong, virtual symposium on advanced PD/PRD, combining focused lectures, discipline-specific breakout sessions, immersive virtual reality vignettes, and interactive panels with both patients and families, and movement disorders and home healthcare experts. Participants completed online pre- and post-symposium surveys including: demographics; PD/PRD knowledge (0-10 points possible); empathy (Interpersonal Reactivity Index); and 10-point scales of confidence with and attitudes towards individuals with PD/PRD, respectively. Pre-post intervention changes and effect sizes were evaluated with paired t-tests and Cohen's d. We performed qualitative analyses of post-symposium free-text feedback using a grounded theory approach to identify participants' intentions to change their practice. RESULTS Participants had a mean improvement of 3.1 points on the PD/PRD knowledge test (p < 0.001, d = 1.97), and improvement in confidence managing individuals with PD/PRD (p = 0.0003, d = .36), and no change in empathy. The interactive, virtual format was rated as effective by 95%. Common themes regarding symposium-motivated practice change included: interdisciplinary collaboration; greater involvement and weighting of the patient and caregiver voice in care plans; attention to visit scheduling in relation to patient function; recognition and practical management of the causes of sudden change in PD/PRD, including infections and orthostatic hypotension. CONCLUSIONS A virtual, multimodal, brief educational pilot intervention improved PD/PRD-specific knowledge and confidence among home healthcare nurses and allied health professionals. Future studies are necessary to test the short- and long-term effects of this intervention more broadly and to investigate the impact of this education on patient and caregiver outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena P Hess
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Section of Movement Disorders, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Melissa Levin
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Section of Movement Disorders, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
- Chicago Medical School - Rosalind Franklin University, 3333 Green Bay Road, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA
| | - Faizan Akram
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Section of Movement Disorders, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Katheryn Woo
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Section of Movement Disorders, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
- Loyola University Chicago College of Arts and Sciences, 1032 W. Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL, 60660, USA
| | - Lauren Andersen
- Department of Physical Therapy, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 440, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
- Rush Physical Therapy, Select Medical, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Kristie Trenkle
- Rush Physical Therapy, Select Medical, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 440, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Patricia Brown
- Memorycare Corporation, 634 Brooklyn Drive, Aurora, IL, 60502, USA
| | - Bichun Ouyang
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Section of Movement Disorders, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Jori E Fleisher
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Section of Movement Disorders, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 755, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leung T, Akram F, Lee J, Klostermann EC, Hess SP, Myrick E, Levin M, Ouyang B, Wilkinson J, Hall D, Chodosh J. Peer Mentoring Program for Informal Caregivers of Homebound Individuals With Advanced Parkinson Disease (Share the Care): Protocol for a Single-Center, Crossover Pilot Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e34750. [PMID: 35481819 PMCID: PMC9185354 DOI: 10.2196/34750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Homebound individuals with advanced Parkinson disease (PD) require intensive caregiving, the majority of which is provided by informal, family caregivers. PD caregiver strain is an independent risk factor for institutionalization. There are currently no effective interventions to support advanced PD caregivers. Studies in other neurologic disorders, however, have demonstrated the potential for peer mentoring interventions to improve caregiver outcomes. In the context of an ongoing trial of interdisciplinary home visits, we designed and piloted a nested trial of caregiver peer mentoring for informal caregivers of individuals with advanced PD. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of peer mentoring for caregivers of homebound individuals with advanced PD and to evaluate its effects on anxiety, depression, and caregiver strain. METHODS This was a single-center, 16-week pilot study of caregiver peer mentoring nested within a year-long controlled trial of interdisciplinary home visits. We recruited 34 experienced former or current family caregivers who completed structured mentor training. Caregivers enrolled in the larger interdisciplinary home visit trial consented to receive 16 weeks of weekly, one-to-one peer mentoring calls with a trained peer mentor. Weekly calls were guided by a curriculum on advanced PD management and caregiver support. Fidelity to and satisfaction with the intervention were gathered via biweekly study diaries. Anxiety, depression, and caregiver strain were measured pre- and postmentoring intervention at home visits 2 and 3. RESULTS Enrollment and peer-mentor training began in 2018, and 65 caregivers enrolled in the overarching trial. The majority of mentors and mentees were White, female spouses or partners of individuals with PD; mentors had a mean of 8.7 (SD 6.4) years of caregiving experience, and 33 mentors were matched with at least 1 mentee. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study of caregiver peer mentoring in PD and may establish an adaptable and sustainable model for disease-specific caregiver interventions in PD and other neurodegenerative diseases. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03189459; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03189459. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/34750.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Erica Myrick
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, Chicago, US.,Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, US
| | - Melissa Levin
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, 1725 w Harrison St., Chicago, US.,Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, US
| | - Bichun Ouyang
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, 1725 w Harrison St., Chicago, US
| | - Jayne Wilkinson
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, 1725 w Harrison St., Chicago, US.,Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, US
| | - Deborah Hall
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, 1725 w Harrison St., Chicago, US
| | - Joshua Chodosh
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 227 E. 30th St.TRB 839, New York, US.,VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, Medicine Service, New York, US
| |
Collapse
|