1
|
Fennell BS, Jones SR, Sutton SK, Hoogland CE, Cottrell-Daniels C, Wetter DW, Shih YCT, Simmons VN, Stephens YP, Vidrine DJ, Vidrine JI. In-clinic Versus Online Recruitment of Women With a History of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Cervical Cancer to a Smoking Cessation Trial: A Post hoc Comparison of Participant Characteristics, Study Retention, and Cessation Outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res 2024; 26:1264-1270. [PMID: 38452212 PMCID: PMC11339160 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntae049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recruiting special populations to smoking cessation trials is challenging and approaches beyond in-clinic recruitment may be beneficial. This secondary analysis of data from a smoking cessation RCT for individuals with a history of cervical cancer or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) explored differences associated with in-clinic vs. online recruitment. AIMS AND METHODS Participants were recruited from clinics within a university-based NCI-designated cancer center (n = 87) and online nationally via Facebook (n = 115). Baseline measures included sociodemographics, smoking history, and cancer or CIN history. Study retention and smoking abstinence were assessed 12 months post-baseline. Group differences in baseline characteristics were evaluated. Retention and abstinence were evaluated while controlling for group differences and predictors. RESULTS Participants recruited online (vs. in-clinic) had higher educational attainment (p = .01) and health literacy (p = .003). They were more likely to have CIN versus cancer, to be further from the time of diagnosis, and to have completed active treatment (p values < .001). While controlling for these group differences and independent predictors, retention was higher among participants recruited online (log-likelihood χ2(1) = 11.41, p < .001). There were no recruitment differences in self-reported (p = .90) or biochemically confirmed smoking abstinence (p = .18). CONCLUSIONS Compared to individuals recruited in-person, individuals recruited online were more educated, had higher health literacy, and presented with a different clinical profile (ie, more likely to have CIN vs. cancer and to have completed active treatment). There were few differences in participant characteristics between recruitment approaches, and no differences on any smoking-related variables. Online recruitment has the potential to improve enrollment of cancer survivors in smoking cessation trials. IMPLICATIONS People with a history of CIN or cervical cancer recruited to a smoking cessation RCT online (vs. in-clinic) were more likely to have a diagnosis of CIN versus cancer and were more educated and health literate. Participants recruited online were more likely to be retained in the study and there were no differences in smoking abstinence rates at 12 months. Incorporating online recruitment increased the reach of tobacco treatment efforts to a larger and more diverse sample. This could reduce the burden of tobacco-related disease, improve CIN and cancer treatment outcomes, and reduce secondary malignancies and morbidity among this underserved group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany Shorey Fennell
- Department of Family and Community Medicine and Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Sarah R Jones
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Steven K Sutton
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Charles E Hoogland
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - David W Wetter
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ya-Chen Tina Shih
- Program in Cancer Health Economics Research, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vani N Simmons
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Yesenia P Stephens
- Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine South Georgia, Moultrie, GA, USA
| | - Damon J Vidrine
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jennifer I Vidrine
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cottrell-Daniels C, Hoogland CE, Fennell BS, Simmons VN, Vidrine DJ, Vidrine JI. Smoking Cessation by Cancer Treatment Status Among Cervical Cancer Survivors. Am J Prev Med 2024; 66:1049-1053. [PMID: 38342477 PMCID: PMC11231988 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Continued smoking following a cancer diagnosis is associated with poorer cancer treatment outcomes and survival times. Little is known about how cancer treatment status at the time of tobacco treatment enrollment impacts long-term smoking cessation outcomes. Using data from a smoking cessation RCT, this study compared long-term cessation outcomes of women undergoing active treatment for cervical cancer at trial enrollment (n=40) to outcomes of women with a history of cervical cancer or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) who were not undergoing active cancer treatment at enrollment (n=154). METHODS Participants (n=194) were randomized to Standard Treatment (ST) or ST plus a 6-session Motivation And Problem Solving (MAPS) telephone counseling protocol (data collected: 2017-2021; analyzed: 2023). Sociodemographic differences between participants undergoing (versus not undergoing) active cancer treatment at enrollment were examined. Significant covariates were included in a logistic regression analysis comparing the 2 groups' smoking cessation outcomes at 12 months, the end of the tobacco treatment period. RESULTS Participants in active cancer treatment at enrollment were significantly younger and less educated than those not in active cancer treatment. Race/ethnicity, relationship status, household income, nicotine dependence, and tobacco treatment condition did not vary by cancer treatment status. After adjusting for tobacco treatment condition, age, and education, being in active cancer treatment at the time of enrollment was associated with lower odds of abstinence at 12 months (5% vs 20%, aOR=0.22, 95% CI [0.05-0.998]). CONCLUSIONS Further research is necessary to identify and overcome barriers to abstinence among cancer survivors undergoing active treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Charles E Hoogland
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Bethany Shorey Fennell
- Department of Family and Community Medicine and Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Vani N Simmons
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida; Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida; Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Damon J Vidrine
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida; Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jennifer I Vidrine
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida; Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida; Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vidrine JI, Fennell BS, Simmons VN, Sutton SK, Jones SR, Woodward HW, Hoogland CE, Vidrine DJ. Enhancing long-term smoking abstinence among individuals with a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cervical cancer (Project ACCESS): protocol for a randomized clinical trial. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1284. [PMID: 37403057 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16189-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of smoking among cervical cancer survivors is high and evidence-based smoking cessation interventions are critically needed. This paper describes the study design, methods, and data analysis plans for a randomized clinical trial (RCT) designed to evaluate the efficacy of a novel, personally tailored SMS-delivered text-based digital treatment adjuvant designed to enhance the long-term efficacy of a "Motivation And Problem-Solving" (MAPS) approach for smoking cessation among individuals with a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or cervical cancer. MAPS is a phone counseling approach designed to facilitate long-term abstinence that comprises 6 counseling calls over 12 months. The current trial is evaluating the efficacy of MAPS+, which comprises all MAPS components plus a 24-month digital treatment adjuvant. This trial represents a logical extension of our previous RCT, which compared the efficacy of MAPS to a quitline control condition and found that MAPS resulted in greater than a 2-fold increase in smoking abstinence at 12 months (i.e., 26.4% vs. 11.9%). This treatment effect was no longer significant at 18 months, suggesting that efficacy dissipated as time from the end of treatment increased. The primary aim of the current trial is to compare the efficacy of MAPS + and ST in facilitating long-term abstinence. METHODS Individuals who smoke and have a history of cervical cancer or CIN (N = 340) are recruited throughout Florida and randomly assigned to Standard Treatment [ST] or MAPS+. ST participants are electronically connected with the Florida Quitline. MAPS + consists of 6 proactive MAPS-based counseling calls over 12 months plus the novel, personally tailored, text message-based treatment adjuvant delivered over 24 months. All participants receive 12 weeks of combination nicotine replacement therapy (patch and lozenge) and are followed for 24 months. Participant recruitment commenced in December 2022 and is ongoing. DISCUSSION This study builds on promising results from our recent trial which found that MAPS was associated with substantially higher abstinence from smoking at the end of the 12-month treatment period. Finding that this low-burden, personally tailored digital treatment adjuvant improves the long-term efficacy of MAPS would have important clinical and public health implications. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials Registry NCT05645146; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05645146 ; Registered on December 9, 2022.
Collapse
Grants
- 22K02, Principal Investigator JIV James and Esther King Florida Biomedical Research Program
- P30CA076292, awarded to Moffitt Cancer Center NCI Cancer Center Support Grant
- P30CA076292, awarded to Moffitt Cancer Center NCI Cancer Center Support Grant
- P30CA076292, awarded to Moffitt Cancer Center NCI Cancer Center Support Grant
- P30CA076292, awarded to Moffitt Cancer Center NCI Cancer Center Support Grant
- P30CA076292, awarded to Moffitt Cancer Center NCI Cancer Center Support Grant
- P30CA076292, awarded to Moffitt Cancer Center NCI Cancer Center Support Grant
- P30CA076292, awarded to Moffitt Cancer Center NCI Cancer Center Support Grant
- P30CA076292, awarded to Moffitt Cancer Center NCI Cancer Center Support Grant
- T32CA090314-18, MPIs: Vadaparampil, Simmons National Institutes of Health Training Grant in Behavioral Oncology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer I Vidrine
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
- Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Bethany Shorey Fennell
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Vani N Simmons
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Steven K Sutton
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sarah R Jones
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Honor W Woodward
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Charles E Hoogland
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Damon J Vidrine
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vidrine JI, Sutton SK, Wetter DW, Shih YCT, Ramondetta LM, Elting LS, Walker JL, Smith KM, Frank-Pearce SG, Li Y, Jones SR, Kendzor DE, Simmons VN, Vidrine DJ. Efficacy of a Smoking Cessation Intervention for Survivors of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Cervical Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2779-2788. [PMID: 36921237 PMCID: PMC10414739 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Women who smoke and have a history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or cervical cancer represent a vulnerable subgroup at elevated risk for recurrence, poorer cancer treatment outcomes, and decreased quality of life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of Motivation And Problem Solving (MAPS), a novel treatment well-suited to meeting the smoking cessation needs of this population. METHODS Women who were with a history of CIN or cervical cancer, age 18 years and older, spoke English or Spanish, and reported current smoking (≥100 lifetime cigarettes plus any smoking in the past 30 days) were eligible. Participants (N = 202) were recruited in clinic in Oklahoma City and online nationally and randomly assigned to (1) standard treatment (ST) or (2) MAPS. ST consisted of repeated referrals to a tobacco cessation quitline, self-help materials, and combination nicotine replacement therapy (patch plus lozenge). MAPS comprised all ST components plus up to six proactive telephone counseling sessions over 12 months. Logistic regression and generalized estimating equations evaluated the intervention. The primary outcome was self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence from tobacco at 18 months, with abstinence at 3, 6, and 12 months and biochemically confirmed abstinence as secondary outcomes. RESULTS There was no significant effect for MAPS over ST at 18 months (14.2% v 12.9%, P = .79). However, there was a significant condition × assessment interaction (P = .015). Follow-up analyses found that MAPS (v ST) abstinence rates were significantly greater at 12 months (26.4% v 11.9%, P = .017; estimated OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.19 to 5.89). CONCLUSION MAPS led to a greater than two-fold increase in smoking abstinence among survivors of CIN and cervical cancer at 12 months. At 18 months, abstinence in MAPS declined to match the control condition and the treatment effect was no longer significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer I. Vidrine
- Tobacco Research and Intervention Program and Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Steven K. Sutton
- Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - David W. Wetter
- Center for Health Outcomes and Population Equity (HOPE), Huntsman Cancer Institute and the Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Ya-Chen Tina Shih
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lois M. Ramondetta
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Linda S. Elting
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joan L. Walker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Katie M. Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Summer G. Frank-Pearce
- TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Yisheng Li
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sarah R. Jones
- Tobacco Research and Intervention Program and Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Darla E. Kendzor
- TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Vani N. Simmons
- Tobacco Research and Intervention Program and Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Damon J. Vidrine
- Tobacco Research and Intervention Program and Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|