1
|
Smayda KE, Lavanture J, Bourque M, Jayawardena N, Kane S, Roberts H, Heikens B. One-year budget impact of InTandem™: a novel neurorehabilitation system for individuals with chronic stroke walking impairment. J Comp Eff Res 2024; 13:e240010. [PMID: 39224948 PMCID: PMC11426287 DOI: 10.57264/cer-2024-0010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim: Chronic stroke walking impairment is associated with high healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) costs. InTandem™ is a neurorehabilitation system that autonomously delivers a rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS)-based intervention for the at-home rehabilitation of walking impairment in adults in the chronic phase of stroke recovery. This study was conducted to estimate the budget impact of InTandem in comparison with currently available intervention strategies for improvement of gait/ambulation in individuals with chronic stroke walking impairment. Methods & materials: A budget impact analysis (BIA) for InTandem was conducted based on a 1-million-member US third-party payer perspective over a 1-year time horizon. Key inputs for the budget impact model were: costs for each intervention strategy (InTandem, physical therapy, self-directed walking and no treatment), HCRU costs for persons with chronic stroke and anticipated HCRU cost offsets due to improvements in gait/ambulatory status as measured by self-selected comfortable walking speed (based on functional ability). In addition to the reference case analysis, a sensitivity analysis was conducted. Results: Based on the reference case, introduction of InTandem was projected to result in overall cost savings of $439,954 in one year. Reduction of HCRU costs (-$2,411,778) resulting from improved walking speeds with InTandem offset an increase in intervention costs (+$1,971,824). Demonstrations of cost savings associated with InTandem were robust and were consistently evident in nearly all scenarios evaluated in the sensitivity analysis (e.g., with increased/decreased patient shares, increased HCRU cost or increased InTandem rental duration). Conclusion: The InTandem system is demonstrated to improve walking and ambulation in adults in the chronic phase of stroke recovery after a five-week intervention period. The BIA predicts that introduction of InTandem will be associated with overall cost savings to the payer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Megan Bourque
- Value & Evidence, Eversana, Burlington, ON L7N 3H8, Canada
| | | | - Sarah Kane
- Value & Evidence, Eversana, Burlington, ON L7N 3H8, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Awad LN, Jayaraman A, Nolan KJ, Lewek MD, Bonato P, Newman M, Putrino D, Raghavan P, Pohlig RT, Harris BA, Parker DA, Taylor SR. Efficacy and safety of using auditory-motor entrainment to improve walking after stroke: a multi-site randomized controlled trial of InTandem TM. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1081. [PMID: 38332008 PMCID: PMC10853163 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-44791-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Walking slowly after stroke reduces health and quality of life. This multi-site, prospective, interventional, 2-arm randomized controlled trial (NCT04121754) evaluated the safety and efficacy of an autonomous neurorehabilitation system (InTandemTM) designed to use auditory-motor entrainment to improve post-stroke walking. 87 individuals were randomized to 5-week walking interventions with InTandem or Active Control (i.e., walking without InTandem). The primary endpoints were change in walking speed, measured by the 10-meter walk test pre-vs-post each 5-week intervention, and safety, measured as the frequency of adverse events (AEs). Clinical responder rates were also compared. The trial met its primary endpoints. InTandem was associated with a 2x larger increase in speed (Δ: 0.14 ± 0.03 m/s versus Δ: 0.06 ± 0.02 m/s, F(1,49) = 6.58, p = 0.013), 3x more responders (40% versus 13%, χ2(1) ≥ 6.47, p = 0.01), and similar safety (both groups experienced the same number of AEs). The auditory-motor intervention autonomously delivered by InTandem is safe and effective in improving walking in the chronic phase of stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis N Awad
- Dept. of Physical Therapy, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
- Dept. of PM&R, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Arun Jayaraman
- Dept. of PM&R, Northwestern University, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Karen J Nolan
- Center for Mobility and Rehabilitation Engineering, Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA
- Dept. of PM&R, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Kessler Rehabilitation, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Michael D Lewek
- Dept. of Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Division of Physical Therapy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Paolo Bonato
- Dept. of PM&R, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark Newman
- Dept. of PM&R, Carolinas Rehabilitation, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - David Putrino
- Abilities Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Preeti Raghavan
- Depts. of PM&R & Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ryan T Pohlig
- College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|