1
|
Wilde LJ, Percy C, Ward G, Clark C, Wark PA, Sewell L. The experiences of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using activity monitors in everyday life: an interpretative phenomenological study. Disabil Rehabil 2024:1-11. [PMID: 38236066 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2304095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Understanding the experiences of people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) using activity monitors in daily life could support the utilisation of technology within healthcare to increase physical activity and support self-management. This qualitative study aimed to explore the experiences of people with COPD using activity monitors at home in everyday life. METHODS Semi-structured face-to-face or telephone interviews were conducted with seven people with COPD between August 2018 and June 2020. Participants had all used an activity monitor within the last year (Fitbit, Garmin, or Apple Watch). Interviews were analysed in-depth using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). RESULTS Four themes, developed using IPA, highlight participants' engagement with activity monitors and integrating them into their lives: (1) Motivational features to monitor activity, (2) Importance of setting achievable goals, (3) Developing knowledge and awareness, and (4) Integration into everyday life for self-management. CONCLUSION Activity monitors were perceived to be beneficial and useful to people with COPD, not just for monitoring their activity, but also helping to self-manage their condition. Activity monitors may be a useful tool within rehabilitation and healthcare services for COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gillian Ward
- Royal College of Occupational Therapists, London, UK
| | - Cain Clark
- Coventry University, Coventry, UK
- College of Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Farjami Rad Y, Shahmoradi L, Nakhostin Ansari N, Hasson S, Ebrahimi M, Rahmani Katigari M. Developing a Content Model of a Mobile-Based Application to Manage Patients with Low-Back and Neck Pain. Int J Telemed Appl 2024; 2024:8415777. [PMID: 38223335 PMCID: PMC10787052 DOI: 10.1155/2024/8415777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction As a complementary tool in health, the design of mobile applications to influence care and increase awareness of patients has grown a lot. The purpose of this study is to design and validate the content model of a mobile-based application for managing patients with low-back and neck pain. Methods This descriptive-analytical study was conducted in two main stages to determine the content model of the application. The first stage consisted of three steps: finding the right exercise, determining the right scale to assess the pain intensity, and determining the appropriate features of the application. In the second stage, data elements collected from the previous stage were prepared in the form of a questionnaire that was given to 12 experts in physical therapy and sports medicine for validation. After collecting the questionnaire, data elements in all parts were analyzed based on the content validity ratio (CVR) and descriptive statistics indicators. Result The content of the application was prepared in the three axes of exercises for low-back and neck pain, assessment of pain intensity, and features of the application. In the axis of sports exercises, 8 exercises for back pain and 3 exercises for neck pain were included according to the reference books. A Functional Rating Index (FRI) scale with 10 elements was selected in the axis of determining pain intensity. Also, 12 features such as the daily exercise section, using the animation, and using an audio file to explain how to do exercises were included in the model. Conclusion According to the gaps identified in the existing applications, determining the content model of the application that is based on evidence and according to the opinion of experts is useful in improving the apps. The content model of this study was presented in 3 axes to increase the patient's willingness to do exercises, the correct way to perform exercises, conservative treatment, and check the progress of the treatment. The software developers can use these findings as a basis for designing new apps to manage low-back pain and neck pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasaman Farjami Rad
- Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Health Professions Education Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Health Information Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Leila Shahmoradi
- Health Information Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Research Center for War-affected People, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Scott Hasson
- Department of Physical Therapy, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Maryam Ebrahimi
- Department of Health Information Technology, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran
| | - Meysam Rahmani Katigari
- Department of Health Information Technology, Saveh University of Medical Sciences, Saveh, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wilde LJ, Percy C, Clark C, Ward G, Wark PA, Sewell L. Views and experiences of healthcare practitioners supporting people with COPD who have used activity monitors: "More than just steps". Respir Med 2023; 218:107395. [PMID: 37633422 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Activity monitors (apps and wearables) are increasingly used by the general population, including people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). There is potential for activity monitors to support increases in physical activity for people with COPD and healthcare practitioners (HCPs) are likely to be key in supporting their use, but little is currently known about HCPs' views or experiences. This qualitative research aimed to explore HCPs' views and experiences of supporting people with COPD who have used activity monitors. METHODS Seventeen semi-structured telephone or online interviews were conducted with HCPs between September 2020 and May 2021. HCPs included two nurses, an occupational therapist, a physician, and 13 physiotherapists. Participants were recruited via social media advertisements. They all had experience of supporting people with COPD who had used activity monitors. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. FINDINGS Four themes were developed highlighting the challenges and benefits of HCPs supporting patients with using activity monitors and utilising patient-collected activity data; 1) Skills and experience are needed to increase accessibility and engagement, 2) Objectively monitored physical activity can support exercise prescription, 3) Applications of activity monitors vary across different settings, and 4) Support is needed for future use of activity monitors. DISCUSSION HCPs recognised the potential for activity monitors to impact patients' ability to self-manage their COPD. However, there is a lack of guidance and information to support integration within practice. Future research is needed to co-develop information and guidelines for people with COPD and HCPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L J Wilde
- Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
| | - C Percy
- Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | - C Clark
- Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | - G Ward
- Royal College of Occupational Therapists, London, UK
| | - P A Wark
- Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | - L Sewell
- Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK; School of Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quach S, Michaelchuk W, Benoit A, Oliveira A, Packham TL, Goldstein R, Brooks D. Mobile heath applications for self-management in chronic lung disease: a systematic review. NETWORK MODELING AND ANALYSIS IN HEALTH INFORMATICS AND BIOINFORMATICS 2023; 12:25. [PMID: 37305790 PMCID: PMC10242585 DOI: 10.1007/s13721-023-00419-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Integration of mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) into chronic lung disease management is becoming increasingly popular. MHealth apps may support adoption of self-management behaviors to assist people in symptoms control and quality of life enhancement. However, mHealth apps' designs, features, and content are inconsistently reported, making it difficult to determine which were the effective components. Therefore, this review aims to summarize the characteristics and features of published mHealth apps for chronic lung diseases. A structured search strategy across five databases (CINAHL, Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane) was performed. Randomized controlled trials investigating interactive mHealth apps in adults with chronic lung disease were included. Screening and full-text reviews were completed by three reviewers using Research Screener and Covidence. Data extraction followed the mHealth Index and Navigation Database (MIND) Evaluation Framework (https://mindapps.org/), a tool designed to help clinicians determine the best mHealth apps to address patients' needs. Over 90,000 articles were screened, with 16 papers included. Fifteen distinct apps were identified, 8 for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (53%) and 7 for asthma (46%) self-management. Different resources informed app design approaches, accompanied with varying qualities and features across studies. Common reported features included symptom tracking, medication reminders, education, and clinical support. There was insufficient information to answer MIND questions regarding security and privacy, and only five apps had additional publications to support their clinical foundation. Current studies reported designs and features of self-management apps differently. These app design variations create challenges in determining their effectiveness and suitability for chronic lung disease self-management. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021260205). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13721-023-00419-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirley Quach
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Respiratory Research, West Park Healthcare Center, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Wade Michaelchuk
- Respiratory Research, West Park Healthcare Center, Toronto, ON Canada
- Rehabilitation Science Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Adam Benoit
- Respiratory Research, West Park Healthcare Center, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Ana Oliveira
- Respiratory Research, West Park Healthcare Center, Toronto, ON Canada
- Lab3R–Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory, University of Aveiro (ESSUA), Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Tara L. Packham
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
| | - Roger Goldstein
- Respiratory Research, West Park Healthcare Center, Toronto, ON Canada
- Rehabilitation Science Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Dina Brooks
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Respiratory Research, West Park Healthcare Center, Toronto, ON Canada
- Rehabilitation Science Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schrijver J, Lenferink A, Brusse-Keizer M, Zwerink M, van der Valk PD, van der Palen J, Effing TW. Self-management interventions for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 1:CD002990. [PMID: 35001366 PMCID: PMC8743569 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002990.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-management interventions help people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to acquire and practise the skills they need to carry out disease-specific medical regimens, guide changes in health behaviour and provide emotional support to enable them to control their disease. Since the 2014 update of this review, several studies have been published. OBJECTIVES Primary objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of COPD self-management interventions compared to usual care in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and respiratory-related hospital admissions. To evaluate the safety of COPD self-management interventions compared to usual care in terms of respiratory-related mortality and all-cause mortality. Secondary objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of COPD self-management interventions compared to usual care in terms of other health outcomes and healthcare utilisation. To evaluate effective characteristics of COPD self-management interventions. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, trials registries and the reference lists of included studies up until January 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-randomised trials (CRTs) published since 1995. To be eligible for inclusion, self-management interventions had to include at least two intervention components and include an iterative process between participant and healthcare provider(s) in which goals were formulated and feedback was given on self-management actions by the participant. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed trial quality and extracted data. We resolved disagreements by reaching consensus or by involving a third review author. We contacted study authors to obtain additional information and missing outcome data where possible. Primary outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQoL), number of respiratory-related hospital admissions, respiratory-related mortality, and all-cause mortality. When appropriate, we pooled study results using random-effects modelling meta-analyses. MAIN RESULTS We included 27 studies involving 6008 participants with COPD. The follow-up time ranged from two-and-a-half to 24 months and the content of the interventions was diverse. Participants' mean age ranged from 57 to 74 years, and the proportion of male participants ranged from 33% to 98%. The post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio of participants ranged from 33.6% to 57.0%. The FEV1/FVC ratio is a measure used to diagnose COPD and to determine the severity of the disease. Studies were conducted on four different continents (Europe (n = 15), North America (n = 8), Asia (n = 1), and Oceania (n = 4); with one study conducted in both Europe and Oceania). Self-management interventions likely improve HRQoL, as measured by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (lower score represents better HRQoL) with a mean difference (MD) from usual care of -2.86 points (95% confidence interval (CI) -4.87 to -0.85; 14 studies, 2778 participants; low-quality evidence). The pooled MD of -2.86 did not reach the SGRQ minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of four points. Self-management intervention participants were also at a slightly lower risk for at least one respiratory-related hospital admission (odds ratio (OR) 0.75, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.98; 15 studies, 3263 participants; very low-quality evidence). The number needed to treat to prevent one respiratory-related hospital admission over a mean of 9.75 months' follow-up was 15 (95% CI 8 to 399) for participants with high baseline risk and 26 (95% CI 15 to 677) for participants with low baseline risk. No differences were observed in respiratory-related mortality (risk difference (RD) 0.01, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.04; 8 studies, 1572 participants ; low-quality evidence) and all-cause mortality (RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.01; 24 studies, 5719 participants; low-quality evidence). We graded the evidence to be of 'moderate' to 'very low' quality according to GRADE. All studies had a substantial risk of bias, because of lack of blinding of participants and personnel to the interventions, which is inherently impossible in a self-management intervention. In addition, risk of bias was noticeably increased because of insufficient information regarding a) non-protocol interventions, and b) analyses to estimate the effect of adhering to interventions. Consequently, the highest GRADE evidence score that could be obtained by studies was 'moderate'. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Self-management interventions for people with COPD are associated with improvements in HRQoL, as measured with the SGRQ, and a lower probability of respiratory-related hospital admissions. No excess respiratory-related and all-cause mortality risks were observed, which strengthens the view that COPD self-management interventions are unlikely to cause harm. By using stricter inclusion criteria, we decreased heterogeneity in studies, but also reduced the number of included studies and therefore our capacity to conduct subgroup analyses. Data were therefore still insufficient to reach clear conclusions about effective (intervention) characteristics of COPD self-management interventions. As tailoring of COPD self-management interventions to individuals is desirable, heterogeneity is and will likely remain present in self-management interventions. For future studies, we would urge using only COPD self-management interventions that include iterative interactions between participants and healthcare professionals who are competent using behavioural change techniques (BCTs) to elicit participants' motivation, confidence and competence to positively adapt their health behaviour(s) and develop skills to better manage their disease. In addition, to inform further subgroup and meta-regression analyses and to provide stronger conclusions regarding effective COPD self-management interventions, there is a need for more homogeneity in outcome measures. More attention should be paid to behavioural outcome measures and to providing more detailed, uniform and transparently reported data on self-management intervention components and BCTs. Assessment of outcomes over the long term is also recommended to capture changes in people's behaviour. Finally, information regarding non-protocol interventions as well as analyses to estimate the effect of adhering to interventions should be included to increase the quality of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jade Schrijver
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
- Section Cognition, Data and Education, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Anke Lenferink
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
- Section Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Brusse-Keizer
- Section Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
- Medical School Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Marlies Zwerink
- Value-Based Health Care, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | | | - Job van der Palen
- Section Cognition, Data and Education, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
- Medical School Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Tanja W Effing
- College of Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marklund S, Tistad M, Lundell S, Östrand L, Sörlin A, Boström C, Wadell K, Nyberg A. Experiences and Factors Affecting Usage of an eHealth Tool for Self-Management Among People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e25672. [PMID: 33929327 PMCID: PMC8122287 DOI: 10.2196/25672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Self-management strategies are regarded as highly prioritized in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment guidelines. However, individual and structural barriers lead to a staggering amount of people with COPD that are not offered support for such strategies, and new approaches are urgently needed to circumvent these barriers. A promising way of delivering health services such as support for self-management strategies is the use of eHealth tools. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the usage of, and factors affecting the use of, eHealth tools over time in people with COPD. Objective This study aimed, among people with COPD, to explore and describe the experiences of an eHealth tool over time and factors that might affect usage. Methods The eHealth tool included information on evidence-based self-management treatment for people with COPD, including texts, pictures, videos as well as interactive components such as a step registration function with automatized feedback. In addition to the latter, automated notifications of new content and pedometers were used as triggers to increase usage. After having access to the tool for 3 months, 16 individuals (12 women) with COPD were individually interviewed. At 12 months’ access to the tool, 7 (5 women) of the previous 16 individuals accepted a second individual interview. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. User frequency was considered in the analysis, and participants were divided into users and nonusers/seldom users depending on the number of logins and minutes of usage per month. Results Three main categories, namely, ambiguous impact, basic conditions for usage, and approaching capability emerged from the analysis, which, together with their subcategories, reflect the participants’ experiences of using the eHealth tool. Nonusers/seldom users (median 1.5 logins and 1.78 minutes spent on the site per month) reported low motivation, a higher need for technical support, a negative view about the disease and self-management, and had problematic health literacy as measured by the Communicative and Critical Health Literacy Scale (median [range] 154 [5-2102]). Users (median 10 logins and 43 minutes per month) felt comfortable with information technology (IT) tools, had a positive view on triggers, and had sufficient health literacy (median [range] 5 [5-1400]). Benefits including behavior changes were mainly expressed after 12 months had passed and mainly among users. Conclusions Findings of this study indicate that the level of motivation, comfortability with IT tools, and the level of health literacy seem to affect usage of an eHealth tool over time. Besides, regarding behavioral changes, gaining benefits from the eHealth tool seems reserved for the users and specifically after 12 months, thus suggesting that eHealth tools can be suitable media for supporting COPD-specific self-management skills, although not for everyone or at all times. These novel findings are of importance when designing new eHealth tools as well as when deciding on whether or not an eHealth tool might be appropriate to use if the goal is to support self-management among people with COPD. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02696187; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02696187 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016851
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Marklund
- Section of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Malin Tistad
- School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.,Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sara Lundell
- Section of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Lina Östrand
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ann Sörlin
- Section of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Carina Boström
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| | - Karin Wadell
- Section of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Andre Nyberg
- Section of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Seppen BF, Wiegel J, L'ami MJ, Duarte Dos Santos Rico S, Catarinella FS, Turkstra F, Boers M, Bos WH. Feasibility of Self-Monitoring Rheumatoid Arthritis With a Smartphone App: Results of Two Mixed-Methods Pilot Studies. JMIR Form Res 2020; 4:e20165. [PMID: 32955447 PMCID: PMC7536594 DOI: 10.2196/20165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Several mobile apps that monitor symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) exist, but a recent systematic review indicated that high-quality apps are lacking. When patients self-monitor their own disease with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and self-initiate care at the right moment, it may be possible to reduce the frequency of their clinic visits, which would reduce health care burden and costs. We developed an app, that is, the MijnReuma Reade app, for this purpose and performed 2 pilot tests with weekly self-monitoring. Objective The primary objective of this study was to design, develop, and evaluate the usability, satisfaction, and usage of the MijnReuma Reade app—an app that allows patients with RA to monitor their own disease. The secondary objective was to review the patients’ perspectives on app usage and its intended purpose. Methods This app was designed in collaboration with patients with RA, rheumatologists, and information technology experts. Two 1-month pilot studies were performed, after which satisfaction (0-10 scale), usability (system usability scale, 0-100), and usage (proportion of completed questionnaires) of this app were assessed. After the second pilot study, semistructured interviews were performed to determine patients’ perspectives and the promoters and barriers of app usage. Results In the first and second pilot study, 42 and 27 patients were included, respectively. Overall, the patients were satisfied (medians, 8 and 7) and found the app usable (mean system usability scores, 76 and 71) in pilot studies 1 and 2, respectively. App usage declined over time in both the pilot studies; 61% (17/28) and 37% (10/27) of the patients who disclosed their usage statistics completed the final weekly questionnaire in pilot study 1 and pilot study 2, respectively. Approximately 81% (25/31) of the patients indicated they would like to skip hospital visits if the self-monitored disease activity is low. In the semistructured interviews, technical problems, internal resistance (respondent fatigue, the app reminded them of their disease), and a lack of symptoms were identified as barriers for usage. Patients reported that “experiencing more grip on their disease” and “improved communication with their physician” were promoters for usage. Patients reported that pain positively mediated usage, that is, more pain promoted and less pain discouraged app usage. Conclusions This study illustrates the feasibility of the MijnReuma Reade app that enables self-monitoring of the disease activity in patients with RA with the overarching aim to allocate clinical consultations according to need. Satisfaction with the app and usability of the app were found to be high; however, app usage declined over time. Patients acknowledged the potential of the app to self-monitor their own disease and would like to be able to skip clinic visits if the monitored disease activity is low. To evaluate this strategy, a randomized controlled trial is underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart F Seppen
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jimmy Wiegel
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Merel J L'ami
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Franktien Turkstra
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Maarten Boers
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wouter H Bos
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Reade, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alwashmi MF, Fitzpatrick B, Farrell J, Gamble JM, Davis E, Nguyen HV, Farrell G, Hawboldt J. Perceptions of Patients Regarding Mobile Health Interventions for the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8:e17409. [PMID: 32706697 PMCID: PMC7413289 DOI: 10.2196/17409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Using a mobile health (mHealth) intervention consisting of a smartphone and compatible medical device has the potential to enhance chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment outcomes while mitigating health care costs. Objective This study aims to describe the demographics, use, and access to smartphones of patients with COPD. It also aims to explore and develop an understanding of potential facilitators and barriers that might influence patients using mHealth interventions for COPD management. Methods This was an explanatory, sequential mixed methods study. Patients who attended respirology clinics completed a questionnaire on technology access and use. We conducted semistructured individual interviews with the patients. Interview topics included the following: demographics, mHealth use, perceptions toward challenges of mHealth adoption, factors facilitating mHealth adoption, and preferences regarding features of mHealth interventions for COPD management. Results A total of 100 adults completed the survey but 22 participants were excluded because they were not diagnosed with COPD. Of these, 10 patients with COPD participated in the interview. The quantitative component revealed that many patients with COPD owned a mobile phone, but only about one-fourth of the participants (18/77, 23%) owned a smartphone. The likelihood of owning a smartphone was not associated with age, sex, marital status, or geographical location, but patients with high educational status were more likely to own a smartphone. The qualitative component found that patients with COPD, in general, had a positive attitude toward mHealth adoption for COPD management, but several facilitators and barriers were identified. The main facilitators of mHealth adoption are possible health benefits for patients, ease of use, educating patients, and credibility. Alternatively, the barriers to adoption are technical issues, lack of awareness, potential limited uptake from older adults, privacy and confidentiality issues, finances, and lack of interest in mHealth Conclusions It is important to understand the perceptions of patients with COPD regarding the adoption of innovative mHealth interventions for COPD management. This study identifies some potential facilitators and barriers that may inform the successful development and implementation of mHealth interventions for COPD management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meshari F Alwashmi
- Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | | | - Jamie Farrell
- Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - John-Michael Gamble
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Erin Davis
- Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - Hai Van Nguyen
- Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - Gerard Farrell
- Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, NL, Canada
| | - John Hawboldt
- Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, NL, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Davies A, Mueller J, Hennings J, Caress AL, Jay C. Recommendations for Developing Support Tools With People Suffering From Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Co-Design and Pilot Testing of a Mobile Health Prototype. JMIR Hum Factors 2020; 7:e16289. [PMID: 32410730 PMCID: PMC7260664 DOI: 10.2196/16289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gaps exist between developers, commissioners, and end users in terms of the perceived desirability of different features and functionalities of mobile apps. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to co-design a prototype mobile app for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We present lessons learned and recommendations from working on a large project with various stakeholders to develop a mobile app for patients with COPD. METHODS We adopted a user-centered, participatory approach to app development. Following a series of focus groups and interviews to capture requirements, we developed a prototype app designed to enable daily symptom recording (experience sampling). The prototype was tested in a usability study applying the think aloud protocol with people with COPD. It was then released via the Android app store, and experience sampling data and event data were captured to gather further usability data. RESULTS A total of 5 people with COPD participated in the pilot study. Identified themes include familiarity with technology, appropriate levels for feeding back information, and usability issues such as manual dexterity. Moreover, 37 participants used the app over a 4-month period (median age 47 years). The symptoms most correlated to perceived well-being were tiredness (r=0.61; P<.001) and breathlessness (r=0.59; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS Design implications for COPD apps include the need for clearly labeled features (rather than relying on colors or symbols that require experience using smartphones), providing weather information, and using the same terminology as health care professionals (rather than simply lay terms). Target users, researchers, and developers should be involved at every stage of app development, using an iterative approach to build a prototype app, which should then be tested in controlled settings as well as in the wild (ie, when deployed and used in real-world settings) over longer periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Davies
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Mueller
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jean Hennings
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ann-Louise Caress
- School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Jay
- Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Burge AT, Cox NS, Abramson MJ, Holland AE. Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 4:CD012626. [PMID: 32297320 PMCID: PMC7160071 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012626.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Escalating awareness of the magnitude of the challenge posed by low levels of physical activity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) highlights the need for interventions to increase physical activity participation. The widely-accepted benefits of physical activity, coupled with the increasing availability of wearable monitoring devices to objectively measure participation, has led to a dramatic rise in the number and variety of studies that aimed to improve the physical activity of people with COPD. However, little was known about the relative efficacy of interventions tested so far. OBJECTIVES In people with COPD, which interventions are effective at improving objectively-assessed physical activity? SEARCH METHODS We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register Register, which contains records identified from bibliographic databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, and PsycINFO. We also searched PEDro, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform portal and the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (from inception to June 2019). We checked reference lists of all primary studies and review articles for additional references, as well as respiratory journals and respiratory meeting abstracts, to identify relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials of interventions that used objective measures for the assessment of physical activity in people with COPD. Trials compared an intervention with no intervention or a sham/placebo intervention, an intervention in addition to another standard intervention common to both groups, or two different interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methods recommended by Cochrane. Subgroup analyses were possible for supervised compared to unsupervised pulmonary rehabilitation programmes in clinically-stable COPD for a range of physical activity outcomes. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, exercise capacity, adverse events and adherence. Insufficient data were available to perform prespecified subgroup analyses by duration of intervention or disease severity. We undertook sensitivity analyses by removing studies that were at high or unclear risk of bias for the domains of blinding and incomplete outcome data. MAIN RESULTS We included 76 studies with 8018 participants. Most studies were funded by government bodies, although some were sponsored by equipment or drug manufacturers. Only 38 studies had physical activity as a primary outcome. A diverse range of interventions have been assessed, primarily in single studies, but improvements have not been systematically demonstrated following any particular interventions. Where improvements were demonstrated, results were confined to single studies, or data for maintained improvement were not provided. Step count was the most frequently reported outcome, but it was commonly assessed using devices with documented inaccuracy for this variable. Compared to no intervention, the mean difference (MD) in time in moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) following pulmonary rehabilitation was four minutes per day (95% confidence interval (CI) -2 to 9; 3 studies, 190 participants; low-certainty evidence). An improvement was demonstrated following high-intensity interval exercise training (6 minutes per day, 95% CI 4 to 8; 2 studies, 275 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). One study demonstrated an improvement following six months of physical activity counselling (MD 11 minutes per day, 95% CI 7 to 15; 1 study, 280 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but we found mixed results for the addition of physical activity counselling to pulmonary rehabilitation. There was an improvement following three to four weeks of pharmacological treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting beta2-agonist (LAMA/LABA) compared to placebo (MD 10 minutes per day, 95% CI 4 to 15; 2 studies, 423 participants; high-certainty evidence). These interventions also demonstrated improvements in other measures of physical activity. Other interventions included self-management strategies, nutritional supplementation, supplemental oxygen, endobronchial valve surgery, non-invasive ventilation, neuromuscular electrical stimulation and inspiratory muscle training. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS A diverse range of interventions have been assessed, primarily in single studies. Improvements in physical activity have not been systematically demonstrated following any particular intervention. There was limited evidence for improvement in physical activity with strategies including exercise training, physical activity counselling and pharmacological management. The optimal timing, components, duration and models for interventions are still unclear. Assessment of quality was limited by a lack of methodological detail. There was scant evidence for a continued effect over time following completion of interventions, a likely requirement for meaningful health benefits for people with COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela T Burge
- La Trobe UniversityDepartment of Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and SportMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Institute for Breathing and SleepMelbourneAustralia
- Alfred HealthPhysiotherapyPO Box 315MelbourneAustraliaPrahran VIC 3181
- Monash UniversityDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Respiratory MedicineMelbourneAustralia
| | - Narelle S Cox
- Institute for Breathing and SleepMelbourneAustralia
- Monash UniversityDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Respiratory MedicineMelbourneAustralia
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe UniversityDepartment of Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Prosthetics and OrthoticsMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3004
| | - Michael J Abramson
- Monash UniversitySchool of Public Health & Preventive MedicineMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3004
| | - Anne E Holland
- La Trobe UniversityDepartment of Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and SportMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Institute for Breathing and SleepMelbourneAustralia
- Alfred HealthPhysiotherapyPO Box 315MelbourneAustraliaPrahran VIC 3181
- Monash UniversityDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Respiratory MedicineMelbourneAustralia
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gaveikaite V, Grundstrom C, Lourida K, Winter S, Priori R, Chouvarda I, Maglaveras N. Developing a strategic understanding of telehealth service adoption for COPD care management: A causal loop analysis of healthcare professionals. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0229619. [PMID: 32134958 PMCID: PMC7058286 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telehealth services can improve the quality of health services for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management, but the clinical benefits for patients yet not clear. It is crucial to develop a strategy that supports the engagement of healthcare professionals to promote the sustainable adoption of telehealth services further. The aim of the study was to show how variables related to the perception of telehealth services for COPD by different healthcare professionals interact to influence its adoption and to generate advice for future telehealth service implementation. METHODS Data was thematically synthesized from published qualitative studies to create causal loop diagrams, further validated by expert interviews. These diagrams visualize dependencies and their polarity between different variables. RESULTS Adoption of telehealth services from the nurse's perspective is directly affected by change management and autonomous decision making. From the physician's perspective, perceived value is the most important variable. Physical activity management and positive user experience are considered affecting perceived value for physiotherapists. There is no consensus where self-management services should be positioned in the COPD care pathway. CONCLUSION Our results indicate how complex interactions between multiple variables influence the adoption of telehealth services. Consequently, there is a need for multidimensional interventions to achieve adoption. Moreover, key variables were identified that require attention to ensure success of telehealth services. Furthermore, it is necessary to explore where self-management services are best positioned in the care pathway of COPD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Violeta Gaveikaite
- Laboratory of Computing, Medical Informatics and Biomedical Imaging Technologies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Department of Chronic Disease Management, Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Casandra Grundstrom
- M3S, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Katerina Lourida
- Laboratory of Computing, Medical Informatics and Biomedical Imaging Technologies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Stefan Winter
- Department of Chronic Disease Management, Philips Research, Aachen, Germany
| | - Rita Priori
- Department of Chronic Disease Management, Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ioanna Chouvarda
- Laboratory of Computing, Medical Informatics and Biomedical Imaging Technologies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nicos Maglaveras
- Laboratory of Computing, Medical Informatics and Biomedical Imaging Technologies, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Department of IEMS, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alwashmi MF, Fitzpatrick B, Davis E, Gamble JM, Farrell J, Hawboldt J. Perceptions of Health Care Providers Regarding a Mobile Health Intervention to Manage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Qualitative Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019; 7:e13950. [PMID: 31199330 PMCID: PMC6592475 DOI: 10.2196/13950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Revised: 05/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Using a mobile health (mHealth) intervention, consisting of a smartphone and compatible medical device, has the potential to enhance chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment outcomes while mitigating health care costs. Objective The aim of this study was to explore the potential facilitators and barriers among health care providers (HCPs) regarding the use of mHealth interventions for COPD management. Methods This was a qualitative study. Semistructured individual interviews were conducted with HCPs, including nurses, pharmacists, and physicians who work directly with patients with COPD. A flexible prompts guide was used to facilitate discussions. Interview topics included the following: demographics, mHealth usage, perceptions toward challenges of mHealth adoption, factors facilitating mHealth adoption, and preferences regarding features of the mHealth intervention for COPD management. Interviews were conversational in nature, and items were not asked verbatim or in the order presented. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and compared against the digital recordings to ensure the accuracy of the content. After creating a codebook for analysis, 2 researchers independently coded the remaining interview data using pattern coding. They discussed commonalities and differences in coding until a consensus was reached. Results A total of 30 nurses, physicians, and pharmacists participated. The main facilitators to mHealth adoption are possible health benefits for patients, ease of use, educating patients and their HCPs, credibility, and reducing cost to the health care system. Alternatively, the barriers to adoption are technical issues, privacy and confidentiality issues, lack of awareness, potential limited uptake from the elderly, potential limited connection between patients and HCPs, and finances. Conclusions It is important to understand the perceptions of HCPs regarding the adoption of innovative mHealth interventions for COPD management. This study identifies some potential facilitators and barriers that may inform the successful development and implementation of mHealth interventions for COPD management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Erin Davis
- Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada
| | - John-Michael Gamble
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Jamie Farrell
- Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada
| | - John Hawboldt
- Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Slevin P, Kessie T, Cullen J, Butler MW, Donnelly SC, Caulfield B. Exploring the potential benefits of digital health technology for the management of COPD: a qualitative study of patient perceptions. ERJ Open Res 2019; 5:00239-2018. [PMID: 31111039 PMCID: PMC6513035 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00239-2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Engaging chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients to actively participate in self-management has proven difficult. Digital health technology (DHT) promises to facilitate a patient-centred care model for the management of COPD by empowering patients to self-manage effectively. However, digital health studies in COPD have yet to demonstrate significant patient outcomes, suggesting that this research has still to adequately address the needs of patients in the intervention development process. The current study explored COPD patients' perceptions of the potential benefits of DHT in the self-management and treatment of their disease. A sample of convenience was chosen and participants (n=30) were recruited from two Dublin university hospitals and each underwent a qualitative semi-structured interview. Thematic analysis of the data was completed using NVivo 12 software. Six themes were identified: symptom management, anxiety management, interaction with physician, care management, personalising care and preventative intervention. In our findings, patients reported a willingness to take a more active role in self-management using DHT. They perceived DHT potentially enhancing their self-management by improving self-efficacy and engagement and by supporting healthcare professionals to practise preventative care provision. The findings can be used to inform patient-centred COPD digital interventions for researchers and clinicians who wish to develop study aims that align with the needs and preferences of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Slevin
- The Insight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Threase Kessie
- The Insight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John Cullen
- Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Marcus W. Butler
- University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Seamas C. Donnelly
- Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Brian Caulfield
- The Insight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Loeckx M, Rabinovich RA, Demeyer H, Louvaris Z, Tanner R, Rubio N, Frei A, De Jong C, Gimeno-Santos E, Rodrigues FM, Buttery SC, Hopkinson NS, Büsching G, Strassmann A, Serra I, Vogiatzis I, Garcia-Aymerich J, Polkey MI, Troosters T. Smartphone-Based Physical Activity Telecoaching in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed-Methods Study on Patient Experiences and Lessons for Implementation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018; 6:e200. [PMID: 30578215 PMCID: PMC6320438 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.9774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Telecoaching approaches can enhance physical activity (PA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, their effectiveness is likely to be influenced by intervention-specific characteristics. Objective This study aimed to assess the acceptability, actual usage, and feasibility of a complex PA telecoaching intervention from both patient and coach perspectives and link these to the effectiveness of the intervention. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods study based on the completers of the intervention group (N=159) included in an (effective) 12-week PA telecoaching intervention. This semiautomated telecoaching intervention consisted of a step counter and a smartphone app. Data from a project-tailored questionnaire (quantitative data) were combined with data from patient interviews and a coach focus group (qualitative data) to investigate patient and coach acceptability, actual usage, and feasibility of the intervention. The degree of actual usage of the smartphone and step counter was also derived from app data. Both actual usage and perception of feasibility were linked to objectively measured change in PA. Results The intervention was well accepted and perceived as feasible by all coaches present in the focus group as well by patients, with 89.3% (142/159) of patients indicating that they enjoyed taking part. Only a minority of patients (8.2%; 13/159) reported that they found it difficult to use the smartphone. Actual usage of the step counter was excellent, with patients wearing it for a median (25th-75th percentiles) of 6.3 (5.8-6.8) days per week, which did not change over time (P=.98). The smartphone interface was used less frequently and actual usage of all daily tasks decreased significantly over time (P<.001). Patients needing more contact time had a smaller increase in PA, with mean (SD) of +193 (SD 2375) steps per day, +907 (SD 2306) steps per day, and +1489 (SD 2310) steps per day in high, medium, and low contact time groups, respectively; P for-trend=.01. The overall actual usage of the different components of the intervention was not associated with change in step count in the total group (P=.63). Conclusions The 12-week semiautomated PA telecoaching intervention was well accepted and feasible for patients with COPD and their coaches. The actual usage of the step counter was excellent, whereas actual usage of the smartphone tasks was lower and decreased over time. Patients who required more contact experienced less PA benefits. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02158065; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02158065 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/73bsaudy9)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Loeckx
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Respiratory Division, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Physiotherapy, LUNEX International University of Health, Exercise and Sports, Differdange, Luxembourg
| | - Roberto A Rabinovich
- ELEGI Colt Laboratory, Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Heleen Demeyer
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Respiratory Division, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Zafeiris Louvaris
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Rebecca Tanner
- National Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Services Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Noah Rubio
- ELEGI Colt Laboratory, Centre for Inflammation Research, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Anja Frei
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Corina De Jong
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-Primary Care, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Elena Gimeno-Santos
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fernanda M Rodrigues
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Respiratory Division, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sara C Buttery
- National Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Services Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas S Hopkinson
- National Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Services Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gilbert Büsching
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alexandra Strassmann
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ignasi Serra
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ioannis Vogiatzis
- Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.,Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Judith Garcia-Aymerich
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael I Polkey
- National Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Services Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thierry Troosters
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Respiratory Division, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tistad M, Lundell S, Wiklund M, Nyberg A, Holmner Å, Wadell K. Usefulness and Relevance of an eHealth Tool in Supporting the Self-Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Explorative Qualitative Study of a Cocreative Process. JMIR Hum Factors 2018; 5:e10801. [PMID: 30368440 PMCID: PMC6229513 DOI: 10.2196/10801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Revised: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND New strategies are urgently needed to support self-management for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary care. The use of electronic health (eHealth) solutions is promising. However, there is a lack of knowledge about how such eHealth tools should be designed in order to be perceived as relevant and useful and meet the needs and expectations of the health professionals as well as people with COPD and their relatives. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to explore the aspects of an eHealth tool design and content that make it relevant and useful for supporting COPD-related self-management strategies from the perspective of health care professionals, people with COPD and their relatives, and external researchers. METHODS Data were collected during the development of an eHealth tool. A cocreation process was carried out with participants from two primary care units in northern Sweden and external researchers. Individual interviews were performed with health care professionals (n=13) as well as people with COPD (n=6) and their relatives (n=2), and focus group discussions (n=9) were held with all groups of participants. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS The overarching theme, reinforcing existing support structures, reflects participant views that the eHealth tool needs to be directly applicable and create a sense of commitment in users. Moreover, participants felt that the tool needs to fit with existing routines and contexts and preferably should not challenge existing hierarchies between health care professionals and people with COPD. Important content for health care professionals and people with COPD included knowledge about self-management strategies. Videos were regarded as the most effective method for communicating such knowledge. CONCLUSIONS The cocreation in the development process enables participant perspectives and priorities to be built into the eHealth tool. This is assumed to contribute to a tool that is useful and relevant and, therefore, adopted into clinical practice and everyday life. Findings from this study can inform the development of eHealth tools for people with COPD in other contexts, as well as the development of eHealth tools for self-management support of other chronic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malin Tistad
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.,School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
| | - Sara Lundell
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Maria Wiklund
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - André Nyberg
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Åsa Holmner
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Karin Wadell
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.,Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|