1
|
O'Brien E, Vemuru S, Leonard L, Himelhoch B, Adams M, Taft N, Jaiswal K, Sams S, Cumbler E, Wolverton D, Ahrendt G, Yi J, Lin CT, Miles R, Hampanda K, Tevis S. Information transparency with immediate release: Oncology clinician and patient perceptions. Am J Surg 2024; 227:165-174. [PMID: 37863801 PMCID: PMC11112620 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As part of the 21st Century Cures Act (April 2021), electronic health information (EHI) must be immediately released to patients. In this study, we sought to evaluate clinician and patient perceptions regarding this immediate release. METHODS After surveying 33 clinicians and 30 patients, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a subset of the initial sample, comprising 8 clinicians and 12 patients. Open-ended questions explored clinicians' and patients' perceptions of immediate release of EHI and how they adjusted to this change. RESULTS Ten themes were identified: Interpreting Results, Strategies for Patient Interaction, Patient Experiences, Communication Strategies, Provider Limitations, Provider Experiences, Health Information Interfaces, Barriers to Patient Understanding, Types of Results, and Changes due to Immediate Release. Interviews demonstrated differences in perceived patient distress and comprehension, emphasizing the impersonal nature of electronic release and necessity for therapeutic clinician-patient communication. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians and patients have unique insights on the role of immediate release. Understanding these perspectives will help improve communication and develop patient-centered tools (glossaries, summary pages, additional resources) to aid patient understanding of complex medical information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth O'Brien
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 12631 East 17th Ave. 6th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| | - Sudheer Vemuru
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 12631 East 17th Ave. 6th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Laura Leonard
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 12631 East 17th Ave. 6th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Ben Himelhoch
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, 12401 East 17th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Monica Adams
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), 1890 N Revere Ct. 3rd Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Nancy Taft
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 12631 East 17th Ave. 6th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Kshama Jaiswal
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 12631 East 17th Ave. 6th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Sharon Sams
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, 12631 East 17th Ave. 2nd Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Ethan Cumbler
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, 12631 East 17th Ave. 8th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Dulcy Wolverton
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, 12401 East 17th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Gretchen Ahrendt
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 12631 East 17th Ave. 6th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Jeniann Yi
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 12631 East 17th Ave. 6th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Chen-Tan Lin
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, 12631 East 17th Ave. 8th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Randy Miles
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, 12401 East 17th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Karen Hampanda
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12631 East 17th Avenue. 4th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Sarah Tevis
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 12631 East 17th Ave. 6th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
This Viewpoint discusses the impersonalization of delivering bad news to patients through a patient portal rather than in person.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith M Bellizzi
- Department of Human Development and Family Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bruno B, Steele S, Carbone J, Schneider K, Posk L, Rose SL. Informed or anxious: patient preferences for release of test results of increasing sensitivity on electronic patient portals. HEALTH AND TECHNOLOGY 2022; 12:59-67. [PMID: 35036280 PMCID: PMC8741580 DOI: 10.1007/s12553-021-00628-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Worldwide, governments and healthcare systems are moving towards increased transparency to improve care quality, increase patient engagement, and decrease costs. For example, the American 21st Century Cures Act Final Rule requires providers to grant patients access to their electronic medical record. Unfortunately, limited research guides release of test results to online patient portals, especially concerning emotionally sensitive information. To address this gap, we surveyed the largest patient sample published to date. This cross-sectional survey project was conducted by the Market Research & Insights and Office of Patient Experience departments at a large academic medical center. Data were analyzed in SPSS using descriptive statistics and Z-tests. Of 8030 respondents, 74% and 57% accepted first learning their results online for cholesterol and strep throat tests, respectively. Most prefer in-person appointments for more serious tests detecting cancer (54%) and fetal miscarriage (53%). Excluding sexually transmitted disease (STD) testing, there are no clinically significant differences in preference between respondents previously diagnosed with the condition in question and respondents without such experience. When weighing the possibility of a 3-week wait to hear from their provider, most patients want automatic release of cholesterol (94%), strep throat (90%), genetic (68%), and STD (60%) test results, but the majority say it is unacceptable to receive Alzheimer’s (52%), fetal miscarriage (51%), and cancer (59%) test results this way. Electronic results release is acceptable for less serious tests, but not for more consequential tests. Providers should consider patient preferences when developing policies to increase healthcare transparency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany Bruno
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA.,Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
| | - Scott Steele
- Market Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
| | - Justin Carbone
- Market Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
| | | | - Lori Posk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Vero Beach, FL 32960 USA.,Clinic Informatics, Cleveland Clinic, Vero Beach, FL 32960 USA
| | - Susannah L Rose
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA.,Office of Patient Experience, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA.,Center for Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fritz Z, Griffiths FE, Slowther AM. Custodians of Information: Patient and Physician Views on Sharing Medical Records in the Acute Care Setting. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2021; 36:1879-1888. [PMID: 32814466 PMCID: PMC8601592 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1803553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
In the UK, in the acute in-patient setting, the only information that a patient receives about their medical care is verbal; there is no routine patient access to any part of the medical record. It has been suggested that this should change, so that patients can have real-time access to their notes, but no one has previously explored patient or clinician views on the impact this might have. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 patients and 13 doctors about their experience of information sharing in the context of the acute care setting, and their views on sharing all of the medical records, or a summary note. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, double coded and analyzed using the constant comparative method. Patients were not given written information and did not ask questions even when they wanted to know things. Patients and doctors supported increased sharing of written information, but the purpose of the medical record - and the risks and benefits of sharing it - were disputed. Concerns included disclosing uncertainty, changing what was written, and causing patient anxiety. Benefits included increased transparency. Use of a summary record was welcomed as a way to empower patients, while doctors felt they had a responsibility to curate what information was given and when. A clinical summary for patients would be of benefit to doctors, nurses, patients and their relatives. It should be designed to reflect the needs of all users, and evaluated to consider patient-relevant outcomes and resource implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Fritz
- THIS (The Healthcare Improvement Studies) Institute, University of Cambridge
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dahm MR, Li J, Thomas J, Smith P, Georgiou A. How is test-related information communicated in Australian Emergency Departments? - ED clinicians' and patients' perspectives. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:1970-1977. [PMID: 33500178 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the communication processes involving test-related information in Australian Emergency Departments (EDs); specifically what and how ED clinicians communicate test-related information to patients, what patients know and understand about the provided information, and how patients view the potential to access their test-results electronically. METHODS We conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with clinicians (n = 26) and patients (n = 32) across three Australian EDs. Interviews were transcribed and analysed iteratively, following principles of qualitative content analysis and grounded theory. RESULTS Depending on various contextual (e.g. time pressures) and patient factors (e.g. perceived health literacy), ED clinicians provided, and patients recalled receiving, test-related information along a continuum, ranging from "no or limited" information to "specific" information. Many patients were confused about how to access their test-results. Patients welcomed the potential for future electronic access to results but viewed their individual health and/or computer literacy skills and knowledge as potential barriers. CONCLUSIONS EDs are highly dynamic environments where contextual forces impinge on the amount and quality of test-related information that clinicians communicate to ED patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Systemic and patient factors need to be addressed to optimise the provision of test-related information in ED settings, improve patient understanding and foster patient empowerment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria R Dahm
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Macquarie University, NSW, 2109, Australia; Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Science, Australian National University, 110 Ellery Crescent, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
| | - Julie Li
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Macquarie University, NSW, 2109, Australia.
| | - Judith Thomas
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Macquarie University, NSW, 2109, Australia.
| | - Peter Smith
- Graduate School of Medicine, Building 28, University of Wollongong, Keiraville, NSW, 2522, Australia.
| | - Andrew Georgiou
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, Macquarie University, NSW, 2109, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wright B, Lennox A, Graber ML, Bragge P. Closing the loop on test results to reduce communication failures: a rapid review of evidence, practice and patient perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:897. [PMID: 32967682 PMCID: PMC7510293 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05737-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Communication failures involving test results contribute to issues of patient harm and sentinel events. This article aims to synthesise review evidence, practice insights and patient perspectives addressing problems encountered in the communication of diagnostic test results. Methods The rapid review identified ten systematic reviews and four narrative reviews. Five practitioner interviews identified insights into interventions and implementation, and a citizen panel with 15 participants explored the patient viewpoint. Results The rapid review provided support for the role of technology to ensure effective communication; behavioural interventions such as audit and feedback could be effective in changing clinician behaviour; and point-of-care tests (bedside testing) eliminate the communication breakdown problem altogether. The practice interviews highlighted transparency, and clarifying the lines of responsibility as central to improving test result communication. Enabling better information sharing, implementing adequate planning and utilising technology were also identified in the practice interviews as viable strategies to improve test result communication. The citizen panel highlighted technology as critical to improving communication of test results to both health professionals and patients. Patients also highlighted the importance of having different ways of accessing test results, which is particularly pertinent when ensuring suitability for vulnerable populations. Conclusions This paper draws together multiple perspectives on the problem of failures in diagnostic test results communication to inform appropriate interventions. Across the three studies, technology was identified as the most feasible option for closing the loop on test result communication. However, the importance of clear, consistent communication and more streamlined processes were also key elements that emerged. Review registration The protocol for the rapid review was registered with PROSPERO CRD42018093316.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Breanna Wright
- BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Clayton Campus, 8 Scenic Boulevard, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
| | - Alyse Lennox
- BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Clayton Campus, 8 Scenic Boulevard, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Mark L Graber
- Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine (SIDM), New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Bragge
- BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University, Clayton Campus, 8 Scenic Boulevard, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Information management in the emergency department (ED) is a challenge for all providers. The volume of information required to care for each patient and to keep the ED functioning is immense. It must be managed through varying means of communication and in connection with ED information systems. Management of information in the ED is imperfect; different modes and methods of identification, interpretation, action, and communication can be beneficial or harmful to providers, patients, and departmental flow. This article reviews the state of information management in the ED and proposes recommendations to improve the management of information in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan L Leventhal
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 1 Deaconess Road, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | - Kraftin E Schreyer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zayas-Cabán T, White PJ. The national health information technology human factors and ergonomics agenda. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2020; 86:103109. [PMID: 32342896 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Health information technology (IT) implementation has encompassed much of the United States health care system over the past decade, and user frustration with health IT has steadily increased. Human factors and ergonomics (HFE) methods and approaches can improve the design, implementation, and use of health IT for clinicians and consumers. To better understand the effect of federal HFE in health IT research funding, the authors conducted a review of several key, specific initiatives. The review focused on the goals and accomplishments of these initiatives. Findings to date show that HFE is improving the usefulness of health IT, but additional research and new methods are needed. Corresponding research funding and policy priorities are identified. New HFE work and innovative approaches are needed to capitalize on HFE knowledge, principles, and methods to improve the design, implementation, and use of health IT at a broader scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Zayas-Cabán
- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 330 C Street, SW, Floor 7, Washington, DC, 20201, USA.
| | - P Jon White
- Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
van Kuppenveld SI, van Os-Medendorp H, Tiemessen NA, van Delden JJ. Real-Time Access to Electronic Health Record via a Patient Portal: Is it Harmful? A Retrospective Observational Study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e13622. [PMID: 32044753 PMCID: PMC7055752 DOI: 10.2196/13622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rapid implementation of patient portals, through which patients can view their electronic health record, creates possibilities for information exchange and communication between patients and health care professionals. However, real-time disclosure of test results and clinical reports poses a source of concern. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine negative experiences resulting from real-time disclosure of medical information through a patient portal. METHODS Data were collected over a 2-year period in 4 datasets consisting of incidents reported by health care professionals, complaints of patients, patient issues at a portal helpdesk, and a survey among health care professionals. Incidents, complaints, issues, and answers on the survey were counted and analyzed through an iterative process of coding. RESULTS Within the chosen time frame of 2 years, on average, 7978 patients per month logged into the portal at least once. The amount of negative incidents and complaints was limited. A total of 6 incidents, 4 complaints, and 2506 issues at the helpdesk concerning the patient portal were reported, of which only 2, 1, and 3 cases of these respective databases concerned real-time disclosure of medical information through the patient portal. Moreover, 32 out of 216 health care professionals reported patients that had negative experiences with real-time disclosure. Most negative consequences concerned confused and anxious patients when confronted with unexpected or incomprehensible results. CONCLUSIONS Real-time access through a patient portal did not substantially result in negative consequences. The negative consequences that did occur can be mitigated by adequate preparation and instruction of patients concerning the various functionalities of the patient portal, real-time disclosure of test results in particular, and can also be managed through educating health care professionals about the patient portal and making adjustments in the daily practice of health care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harmieke van Os-Medendorp
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Saxion University of Applied Sciences, School of Health, Deventer/Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Nicole Am Tiemessen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department Information Technology, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Johannes Jm van Delden
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Witteman HO, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Communicating laboratory results to patients and families. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019; 57:359-364. [PMID: 30407910 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2018-0634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
People are increasingly able to access their laboratory results via patient portals. The potential benefits provided by such access, such as reductions in patient burden and improvements in patient satisfaction, disease management, and medical decision making, also come with potentially valid concerns about such results causing confusion or anxiety among patients. However, it is possible to clearly convey the meaning of results and, when needed, indicate required action by designing systems to present laboratory results adapted to the people who will use them. Systems should support people in converting the potentially meaningless data of results into meaningful information and actionable knowledge. We offer 10 recommendations toward this goal: (1) whenever possible, provide a clear takeaway message for each result. (2) Signal whether differences are meaningful or not. (3) When feasible, provide thresholds for concern and action. (4) Individualize the frame of reference by allowing custom reference ranges. (5) Ensure the system is accessible. (6) Provide conversion tools along with results. (7) Design in collaboration with users. (8) Design for both new and experienced users. (9) Make it easy for people use the data as they wish. (10) Collaborate with experts from relevant fields. Using these 10 methods and strategies renders access to laboratory results into meaningful and actionable communication. In this way, laboratories and medical systems can support patients and families in understanding and using their laboratory results to manage their health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly O Witteman
- Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, 1050 avenue de la Médecine, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, Québec City, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
- Office of Education and Professional Development, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval (CERSSPL-UL), Quebec City, QC, Canada
- Research Centre of the CHU de Québec, Public Health and Optimal Health Practices Axis, Quebec City, QC, Canada, Phone: +418.656.2131 x3981, Fax: 418-656.2465
| | - Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alpert JM, Morris BB, Thomson MD, Matin K, Brown RF. Identifying How Patient Portals Impact Communication in Oncology. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2019; 34:1395-1403. [PMID: 29979886 PMCID: PMC6320725 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2018.1493418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Patient portals are becoming widespread throughout health-care systems. Initial research has demonstrated that they positively impact patient-provider communication and patients' health knowledge, but little is known about the impact of patient portals in the cancer setting, where highly complex and uncertain medical data are available for patients to view. To better understand communicative behaviors and perceptions of the patient portal and how it is utilized in oncology, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 48 participants: 35 patients and 13 oncologists. Thematic analysis identified that portals help to enhance participation during in-person consultations, increase patients' self-advocacy, and build rapport with providers. However, patients' comfort level with reviewing information via the portal depended upon the severity of the test. Oncologists worried about patient anxiety and widening health disparities, but acknowledged that the portal can motivate them to expedite communication about laboratory and scan results. As patient portals become more widely used in all medical settings, oncologists should become more engaged with how patients are viewing their medical information and consider the portal within the framework of patient-centered care by valuing patients' communication preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan M Alpert
- Department of Advertising, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida
| | - Bonny B Morris
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine
| | - Maria D Thomson
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine
| | - Khalid Matin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine
| | - Richard F Brown
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Foster B, Krasowski MD. The Use of an Electronic Health Record Patient Portal to Access Diagnostic Test Results by Emergency Patients at an Academic Medical Center: Retrospective Study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e13791. [PMID: 31254335 PMCID: PMC6625217 DOI: 10.2196/13791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic health record (EHR) patient portals provide a means by which patients can access their health information, including diagnostic test results. Little is known about portal usage by emergency department (ED) patients. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to assess patient portal utilization by ED patients at an academic medical center using account activation rates along with the rates of access of diagnostic test results (laboratory results and radiology reports), analyzing the impact of age, gender, and self-reported patient race. METHODS This institutional review board-approved retrospective study was performed at a 60,000-visits-per-year university-based ED. We utilized EHR data reporting tools to examine EHR portal activation and utilization for all patients who had at least one ED encounter with one or more diagnostic tests performed between October 1, 2016, and October 1, 2017. The total dataset for laboratory testing included 208,635 laboratory tests on 25,361 unique patients, of which 9482 (37.39%) had active portal accounts. The total dataset for radiologic imaging included 23,504 radiology studies on 14,455 unique patients, of which 5439 (37.63%) had an active portal account. RESULTS Overall, 8.90% (18,573/208,635) of laboratory tests and 8.97% (2019/22,504) of radiology reports ordered in the ED were viewed in the patient portal. The highest rates of viewing of laboratory and radiology results were seen for those who were female, were aged 0 to 11 years (parent or guardian viewing by proxy) and 18 to 60 years, and self-reported their race as Caucasian or Asian. The lowest rates were for those who were teenagers, aged older than 81 years, African American/black, and Hispanic/Latino. Infectious disease, urinalysis, and pregnancy testing constituted the highest number of laboratory tests viewed. Magnetic resonance imaging reports were viewed at higher rates than computed tomography or x-ray studies (P<.001). Approximately half of all the diagnostic test results accessed by patients were reviewed within 72 hours of availability in the patient portal (laboratory results: 9904/18,573, 53.32% and radiology reports: 971/2019, 48.1%). On the other extreme, 19.9% (3701/18,573) of laboratory results and 31.6% (639/2019) of radiology reports were viewed more than 2 weeks after availability in the portal. CONCLUSIONS The data highlight the relatively low use of a patient portal by ED patients and existing disparities between patient groups. There can be wide lag time (months) between result/report availability and access by patients. Opportunities for improvement exist for both activation and more robust utilization of patient portals by ED patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brody Foster
- Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States
| | - Matthew David Krasowski
- Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kim E, Torous J, Horng S, Grossestreuer AV, Rodriguez J, Lee T, Nathanson LA. Mobile device ownership among emergency department patients. Int J Med Inform 2019; 126:114-117. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Revised: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
14
|
Comparison of Total Bilirubin Values Measured with ABL 735 Blood Gas Analyzer and Roche Cobas C8000 Chemistry Analyzer in Age-Segregated Pediatric Patients. REV ROMANA MED LAB 2019. [DOI: 10.2478/rrlm-2019-0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim: Measurement of blood bilirubin levels is a crucial analysis because of the toxic effects of bilirubin on brain tissue, particularly in preterm neonates. The aim of this study was to investigate the consistency of the total bilirubin values obtained by the blood gas analyzer and the autoanalyzer.
Material and Methods: In this study, we used total bilirubin data of 407 pediatric patients from Kocaeli University Medical Faculty Education and Research Hospital Central Laboratory System. Total bilirubin data, provided that it was measured simultaneously, was obtained from ABL 735 blood gas analyzer and Roche Cobas C8000 chemistry analyzer. Pediatric patients (neonates, infant and children under 17 years old) were selected retrospectively by year between 2015-2017.
Results: Under a cut-off value (14.6 mg/dL) ABL 735 blood gas analyzer and Roche COBAS C8000 chemistry analyzer had strong correlation (r = 0.939) for total bilirubin measurements. It was found that 2-15 days old neonates give more scattered total bilirubin data by Bland Altman analysis in two measurements. Statistical analysis performed to compare whole total bilirubin data identity between two measurements: correlation coefficient was found r = 0.949 a statistically significant positive correlation (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: According to our analysis which was supported by previous studies in the literature, we can say that the compatibility between the blood gas analyzer (multi-wave-length spectrophotometric technique) and the chemistry analyzer becomes weaker when the total bilirubin levels exceed 14.6 mg/dL.
Collapse
|
15
|
Metting E, Schrage AJ, Kocks JW, Sanderman R, van der Molen T. Assessing the Needs and Perspectives of Patients With Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Patient Web Portals: Focus Group Study. JMIR Form Res 2018; 2:e22. [PMID: 30684436 PMCID: PMC6334706 DOI: 10.2196/formative.8822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Revised: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As accessibility to the internet has increased in society, many health care organizations have developed patient Web portals (PWPs), which can provide a range of self-management options to improve patient access. However, the available evidence suggests that they are used inefficiently and do not benefit patients with low health literacy. Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common chronic diseases that require ongoing self-management. Moreover, patients with COPD are typically older and have lower health literacy. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to obtain and present an overview of patients' perspectives of PWPs to facilitate the development of a portal that better meets the needs of patients with asthma and COPD. METHODS We performed a focus group study using semistructured interviews in 3 patient groups from the north of the Netherlands who were recruited through the Dutch Lung Foundation. Each group met 3 times for 2 hours each at a 1-week interval. Data were analyzed with coding software, and patient descriptors were analyzed with nonparametric tests. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research were followed when conducting the study. RESULTS We included 29 patients (16/29, 55% male; mean age 65 [SD 10] years) with COPD (n=14), asthma-COPD overlap (n=4), asthma (n=10), or other respiratory disease (n=1). There was a large variation in the internet experience; some patients hardly used the internet (4/29, 14%), whereas others used internet >3 times a week (23/29, 79%). In general, patients were positive about having access to a PWP, considering access to personal medical records as the most important option, though only after discussion with their physician. A medication overview was considered a useful option. We found that communication between health care professionals could be improved if patients could use the PWP to share information with their health care professionals. However, as participants were worried about the language and usability of portals, it was recommended that language should be adapted to the patient level. Another concern was that disease monitoring through Web-based questionnaire use would only be useful if the results were discussed with health care professionals. CONCLUSIONS Participants were positive about PWPs and considered them a logical step. Today, most patients tend to be better educated and have internet access, while also being more assertive and better informed about their disease. A PWP could support these patients. Our participants also provided practical suggestions for implementation in current and future PWP developments. The next step will be to develop a portal based on these recommendations and assess whether it meets the needs of patients and health care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Metting
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Aaltje Jantine Schrage
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Janwillem Wh Kocks
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Robbert Sanderman
- GZW-Health Psychology-GZW-General, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Thys van der Molen
- Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD, Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hoogenbosch B, Postma J, de Man-van Ginkel JM, Tiemessen NA, van Delden JJ, van Os-Medendorp H. Use and the Users of a Patient Portal: Cross-Sectional Study. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e262. [PMID: 30224334 PMCID: PMC6231740 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2017] [Revised: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient portals offer patients access to their medical information and tools to communicate with health care providers. It has been shown that patient portals have the potential to positively impact health outcomes and efficiency of health care. It is therefore important that health care organizations identify the patients who use or do not use the patient portal and explore the reasons in either case. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) is a frequently used theory for explaining the use of information technology. It consists of the following constructs: performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and behavioral intention to use. Objective This study aimed to explore the prevalence of patient portal use and the characteristics of patients who use or do not use a patient portal. The main constructs of UTAUT, together with demographics and disease- and care-related characteristics, have been measured to explore the predictive factors of portal use. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in the outpatient departments for adult patients of a university hospital in the Netherlands. Following outcomes were included: self-reported portal use, characteristics of users such as demographics, disease- and care-related data, eHealth literacy (modified score), and scores of UTAUT constructs. Descriptive analyses and univariate and multivariate logistic regression were also conducted. Results In the analysis, 439 adult patients were included. Furthermore, 32.1% (141/439) identified as being a user of the patient portal; 31.2% (137/439) indicated as nonusers, but being aware of the existence of the portal; and 36.6% (161/439) as being nonusers not aware of the existence of the portal. In the entire study population, the factors of being chronically ill (odds ratio, OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.04-2.52) and eHealth literacy (modified score; OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.18) best predicted portal use. In users and nonusers who were aware of the portal, UTAUT constructs were added to the multivariate logistic regression, with chronically ill and modified eHealth literacy sum score. Effort expectancy (OR 13.02, 95% CI 5.68-29.87) and performance expectancy (OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.65-4.90) are shown to significantly influence portal use in this group. Conclusions Approximately one-third of the patients of a university hospital self-reported using the patient portal; most expressed satisfaction. At first sight, being chronically ill and higher scores on the modified eHealth literacy scale explained portal use. Adding UTAUT constructs to the model revealed that effort expectancy (ease of use and knowledge and skills related to portal use) and performance expectancy (perceived usefulness) influenced portal use. Interventions to improve awareness of the portal and eHealth literacy skills of patients and further integration of the patient portal in usual face-to-face care are needed to increase use and potential subsequent patient benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas Hoogenbosch
- Department of Information Technology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Postma
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Nicole Am Tiemessen
- Department of Information Technology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Johannes Jm van Delden
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ronda MCM, Dijkhorst-Oei LT, Vos RC, Rutten GEHM. Diabetes care providers' opinions and working methods after four years of experience with a diabetes patient web portal; a survey among health care providers in general practices and an outpatient clinic. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2018; 19:94. [PMID: 29929483 PMCID: PMC6013979 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0781-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To gain insight into the opinions and working methods of diabetes care providers after using a diabetes web portal for 4 years in order to understand the role of the provider in patients' web portal use. METHODS Survey among physicians and nurses from general practices and an outpatient clinic, correlated with data from the common web portal. RESULTS One hundred twenty-eight questionnaires were analysed (response rate 56.6%). Responders' mean age was 46.2 ± 9.8 years and 43.8% were physicians. The majority was of opinion that the portal improves patients' diabetes knowledge (90.6%) and quality of care (72.7%). Although uploading glucose diary (93.6%) and patient access to laboratory and clinical notes (91.2 and 71.0%) were considered important, these features were recommended to patients in only 71.8 and 19.5% respectively. 64.8% declared they informed their patients about the portal and 45.3% handed-out the information leaflet and website address. The portal was especially recommended to type 1 diabetes patients (78.3%); those on insulin (84.3%) and patients aged< 65 years (72.4%). Few found it timesaving (21.9%). Diabetes care providers' opinions were not associated with patients' portal use. CONCLUSIONS Providers are positive about patients web portals but still not recommend or encourage the use to all patients. There seems room for improvement in their working methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike C M Ronda
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, Netherlands.
| | - Lioe-Ting Dijkhorst-Oei
- Department of Internal Medicine, Meander Medical Centre, Maatweg 3, 3813, Amersfoort, TZ, Netherlands
| | - Rimke C Vos
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, Netherlands
| | - Guy E H M Rutten
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, STR 6.131, PO Box 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Maillet É, Paré G, Currie LM, Raymond L, Ortiz de Guinea A, Trudel MC, Marsan J. Laboratory testing in primary care: A systematic review of health IT impacts. Int J Med Inform 2018; 116:52-69. [PMID: 29887235 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2017] [Revised: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 05/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laboratory testing in primary care is a fundamental process that supports patient management and care. Any breakdown in the process may alter clinical information gathering and decision-making activities and can lead to medical errors and potential adverse outcomes for patients. Various information technologies are being used in primary care with the goal to support the process, maximize patient benefits and reduce medical errors. However, the overall impact of health information technologies on laboratory testing processes has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVES To synthesize the positive and negative impacts resulting from the use of health information technology in each phase of the laboratory 'total testing process' in primary care. METHODS We conducted a systematic review. Databases including Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched. Studies eligible for inclusion reported empirical data on: 1) the use of a specific IT system, 2) the impacts of the systems to support the laboratory testing process, and were conducted in 3) primary care settings (including ambulatory care and primary care offices). Our final sample consisted of 22 empirical studies which were mapped to a framework that outlines the phases of the laboratory total testing process, focusing on phases where medical errors may occur. RESULTS Health information technology systems support several phases of the laboratory testing process, from ordering the test to following-up with patients. This is a growing field of research with most studies focusing on the use of information technology during the final phases of the laboratory total testing process. The findings were largely positive. Positive impacts included easier access to test results by primary care providers, reduced turnaround times, and increased prescribed tests based on best practice guidelines. Negative impacts were reported in several studies: paper-based processes employed in parallel to the electronic process increased the potential for medical errors due to clinicians' cognitive overload; systems deemed not reliable or user-friendly hampered clinicians' performance; and organizational issues arose when results tracking relied on the prescribers' memory. DISCUSSION The potential of health information technology lies not only in the exchange of health information, but also in knowledge sharing among clinicians. This review has underscored the important role played by cognitive factors, which are critical in the clinician's decision-making, the selection of the most appropriate tests, correct interpretation of the results and efficient interventions. CONCLUSIONS By providing the right information, at the right time to the right clinician, many IT solutions adequately support the laboratory testing process and help primary care clinicians make better decisions. However, several technological and organizational barriers require more attention to fully support the highly fragmented and error-prone process of laboratory testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Éric Maillet
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Sherbrooke, 150, place Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Québec, Canada, J4K 0A8.
| | - Guy Paré
- Information Technology Department, HEC Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Leanne M Currie
- School of Nursing University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| | - Louis Raymond
- Institut de recherche sur les PME, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada.
| | - Ana Ortiz de Guinea
- Information Technology Department, HEC Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Strategy and Information Systems Deusto Business School, Universidad de Deusto (Spain).
| | | | - Josianne Marsan
- Department of Management Information Systems, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Alpert JM, Morris BB, Thomson MD, Matin K, Brown RF. Implications of Patient Portal Transparency in Oncology: Qualitative Interview Study on the Experiences of Patients, Oncologists, and Medical Informaticists. JMIR Cancer 2018; 4:e5. [PMID: 29581090 PMCID: PMC5891668 DOI: 10.2196/cancer.8993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2017] [Revised: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 12/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Providing patients with unrestricted access to their electronic medical records through patient portals has impacted patient-provider communication and patients’ personal health knowledge. However, little is known about how patient portals are used in oncology. Objective The aim of this study was to understand attitudes of the portal’s adoption for oncology and to identify the advantages and disadvantages of using the portal to communicate and view medical information. Methods In-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with 60 participants: 35 patients, 13 oncologists, and 12 medical informaticists. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed to identify critical incidents and general attitudes encountered by participants. Results Two primary themes were discovered: (1) implementation practices influence attitudes, in which the decision-making and execution process of introducing portals throughout the hospital did not include the input of oncologists. Lack of oncologists’ involvement led to a lack of knowledge about portal functionality, such as not knowing the time period when test results would be disclosed to patients; (2) perceptions of portals as communication tools varies by user type, meaning that each participant group (patients, oncologists, and medical informaticists) had varied opinions about how the portal should be used to transmit and receive information. Oncologists and medical informaticists had difficulty understanding one another’s culture and communication processes in their fields, while patients had preferences for how they would like to receive communication, but it largely depended upon the type of test being disclosed. Conclusions The majority of patients (54%, 19/35) who participated in this study viewed lab results or scan reports via the portal before being contacted by a clinician. Most were relatively comfortable with this manner of disclosure but still preferred face-to-face or telephone communication. Findings from this study indicate that portal education is needed for both patients and oncologists, especially when portals are implemented across entire health systems since highly specialized areas of medicine may have unique needs and uses. Patient portals in oncology can potentially alter the way diagnoses are delivered and how patients and oncologists communicate. Therefore, communication about the portal should be established during initial consultations so patients can decide whether they want to be informed in such a manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan M Alpert
- Department of Advertising, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Bonny B Morris
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Maria D Thomson
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Khalid Matin
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Richard F Brown
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Watson ID, Oosterhuis WP, Jorgensen PE, Dikmen ZG, Siodmiak J, Jovicic S, Aakre KM, Palicka V, Kutt M. A survey of patients' views from eight European countries of interpretive support from Specialists in Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017; 55:1496-1500. [PMID: 28593928 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2017-0080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2016] [Accepted: 04/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing interest in direct patient engagement including receiving their laboratory medicine results. We previously established an appetite for Specialists in Laboratory Medicine to support patients in understanding results. The aim of this study was to establish whether patients agreed with such an approach, determined through surveying views in eight European countries. METHODS A standardized five-question survey was administered across eight European countries to a total of 1084 individuals attending medical outpatient clinics, with 100 patients each in Poland, Serbia, Netherlands, Turkey and Czech Republic, 101 in Estonia, 116 in Denmark and 367 in Norway. The responses across countries were compared using the chi-square test (p<0.05). RESULTS Patients wanting their results ranged from 50% to 94% (mean 65%) of those responding positively, a mean of 72% wanted additional information with their results; direct receipt was preferred over referral to a website. Specialists in Laboratory Medicine providing such information were acceptable to a mean of 62% of those respondents wishing their results; in countries where payment was possible, there was little interest in making additional payment for such a service. CONCLUSIONS A clear proportion of patients are interested in receiving their laboratory medicine results, the majority with explanatory notes; a role for Specialists in Laboratory Medicine is acceptable and raises the potential for direct engagement by such specialists with patients offering a new paradigm for the provision of laboratory medicine activities.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cassell BE, Walker T, Alghamdi S, Bill J, Blais P, Boutté H, Brown JW, Sayuk GS, Gyawali CP. Do Consultants Follow Up on Tests They Recommend? Insights from an Academic Inpatient Gastrointestinal Consult Service. Dig Dis Sci 2017; 62:1448-1454. [PMID: 28391419 PMCID: PMC5890923 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-017-4563-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inpatient care is a fundamental part of gastroenterology training and involves the recommendation, performance, and interpretation of diagnostic tests. However, test results are not always communicated to patients or treating providers. We determined the process of communication of test results and recommendations in our inpatient gastroenterology (GI) consult service. METHODS Test recommendations on 304 consecutive new GI consults (age 60.2 ± 1.0 year) over a 2-month period were recorded. Demographic factors (age, race, gender, zip code, insurance status) were extracted from the electronic medical record (EMR). Charts were independently reviewed 6 months later to determine results of recommended tests, follow-up of actionable test results, 30-day readmission rates, and predictors of suboptimal communication. RESULTS Of 490 recommended tests, 437 (89.2%) were performed, and 199 (45.5%) had actionable findings. Of these, 48 (24.1%) did not have documented follow-up. Failure of follow-up was higher for upper endoscopy (31.9%) compared to colonoscopy (18.0%, p = 0.07). Women (p = 0.07), patients on Medicare (p = 0.05), and procedures supervised by advanced GI fellows (p = 0.06) were less likely to receive follow-up. Median income and identification of a primary provider did not influence follow-up rates; 30-day readmission rates were not impacted. Female gender, insurance (Medicare) status, and attending type remained independent predictors of failure of follow-up on multivariate regression (p ≤ 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Failure to follow up test results on inpatient services at a large academic center was unacceptably high. Maximizing personnel participation together with diligence and technology (EMR) will be required to improve communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin E. Cassell
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado, 1055 Clermont St MS 111-E, Denver, CO 80218, USA
| | - Ted Walker
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Saad Alghamdi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jason Bill
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Pierre Blais
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Harold Boutté
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jeffrey W. Brown
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Gregory S. Sayuk
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA,Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA,John Cochran VA Medical Center, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - C. Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Manyazewal T, Oosthuizen MJ, Matlakala MC. Proposing evidence-based strategies to strengthen implementation of healthcare reform in resource-limited settings: a summative analysis. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e012582. [PMID: 27650769 PMCID: PMC5051438 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many resource-limited countries have adopted and implemented healthcare reform to improve the quality of healthcare, but few have had much impact and strategies in support of these efforts remain limited. We aimed to explore and propose evidence-based strategies to strengthen implementation of healthcare reform in resource-limited settings. DESIGN Descriptive and exploratory designs in two phases. Phase I involved assessing the effectiveness of the healthcare reform implemented in Ethiopia in the form of business process reengineering, with evidence compiled from healthcare professionals through a self-administered questionnaire; and phase II involved proposing strategies and seeking consensus from experts using Delphi method. SETTING Public hospitals in central Ethiopia. PARTICIPANTS 406 healthcare professionals and 10 senior health policy experts. FINDINGS The healthcare reform that we evaluated was able to restructure hospital departments into case teams, with the goal of adopting a 'one-stop shopping' approach. However, shortages of critical infrastructure, furniture and supplies and job dissatisfaction continued to hamper the system. The most important predictors that influenced implementation of the reform were financial resources, top management commitment and support, collaborative working environment and information technology (IT). Five strategies with 14 operational objectives and 67 potential interventions that could strengthen the reform are proposed based on their strategic priority, which are as follows: reinforce patient-centred quality of care services; foster a healthy and respectful workforce environment; efficient and accountable leadership and governance; efficient use of hospital financing and maximise innovations and the use of health technologies. CONCLUSIONS Effective implementation of healthcare reform remained a challenge for governments in resource-limited settings. Resilient operational, clinical and governance functions of health systems, as well as a motivated and committed health workforce, are important to move healthcare reform processes forward. Political commitments at this juncture might be critical though there need to be a clear demarcation between political and technical engagements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsegahun Manyazewal
- Department of Health Studies, College of Human Science, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
- Ethiopian Public Health Association, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Martha J Oosthuizen
- Department of Health Studies, College of Human Science, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Mokgadi C Matlakala
- Department of Health Studies, College of Human Science, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Winget M, Haji-Sheikhi F, Brown-Johnson C, Rosenthal EL, Sharp C, Buyyounouski MK, Asch SM. Electronic Release of Pathology and Radiology Results to Patients: Opinions and Experiences of Oncologists. J Oncol Pract 2016; 12:e792-9. [PMID: 27382001 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2016.011098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is an emerging standard to provide patients rapid electronic access to elements of their medical records. Although surveys of patients generally support it, this practice is controversial among oncologists, because few empiric data are available for scenarios of potentially life-threatening conditions like cancer. We report the views of oncologists about patient electronic access to radiology and pathology results that could potentially indicate disease progression. METHODS Four months before oncologists were surveyed, final results of radiology/pathology reports were routinely made available to patients online through a secure portal after a 7-day, hold to provide clinicians time to review and communicate results with the patients. Mixed methods were used to assess physician attitudes and experiences toward this change. RESULTS One hundred twenty-nine oncologists were surveyed, and 82 (64%) responded. A small majority (54%) responded that the release of reports was somewhat or very beneficial for patients who received normal radiology/pathology results before discussion with a physician, but 87% said it was somewhat or very harmful for patients to receive abnormal results before discussion. Forty-nine percent reported that release of reports had a somewhat or very negative impact on communication with their patients. CONCLUSION Almost half of oncologists reported that sharing digital radiology and pathology records had a negative impact on their communication with patients. Patient surveys in similar cancer populations would complement the physician perspective. Efforts are needed to improve consensus among oncologists and patients on how to best communicate such results in a timely fashion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcy Winget
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Steven M Asch
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Callen J, Georgiou A, Li J, Westbrook JI. The Impact for Patient Outcomes of Failure to Follow Up on Test Results. How Can We Do Better? EJIFCC 2015; 26:38-46. [PMID: 27683480 PMCID: PMC4975222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization-World Alliance for Patient Safety has identified test result management as a priority area. Poor test result follow-up can have major consequences for the quality of care, including missed diagnoses and suboptimal patient outcomes. Over the last three decades there has been considerable growth in the number of requests for pathology and radiology services which has added to the complexity of how patient care is delivered and test results are managed. This can contribute to a lack of clarity about where and with whom responsibility for test follow-up should reside: a problem that is compounded by a lack of clear definitions about what are critical, unexpected or significantly abnormal results. AIM OF THIS PAPER This paper will present a narrative review highlighting key issues related to the problem of failure to follow up laboratory test results, and outline potential solutions. CONCLUSIONS Information technology (IT) has the potential to enhance the performance and safety of test result management processes. Effective solutions must engage all stakeholders, including consumers, in arriving at decisions about who needs to receive results, how and when they are communicated, and how they are acknowledged and acted upon and the documentation of these actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Callen
- Associate Professor, Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research Australian Institute of Health Innovation Macquarie University Level 6, 75 Talavera Road Sydney, 2109 Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|