1
|
Ari A, Raghavan N, Diaz M, Rubin BK, Fink JB. Individualized aerosol medicine: Integrating device into the patient. Paediatr Respir Rev 2024; 49:14-23. [PMID: 37739833 DOI: 10.1016/j.prrv.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
Pulmonary drug delivery is complex due to several challenges including disease-, patient-, and clinicians-related factors. Although many inhaled medications are available in aerosol medicine, delivering aerosolized medications to patients requires effective disease management. There is a large gap in the knowledge of clinicians who select and provide instructions for the correct use of aerosol devices. Since improper device selection, incorrect inhaler technique, and poor patient adherence to prescribed medications may result in inadequate disease control, individualized aerosol medicine is essential for effective disease management and control. The components of individualized aerosol medicine include: (1) Selecting the right device, (2) Selecting the right interface, (3) Educating the patient effectively, and (4) Increasing patient adherence to therapy. This paper reviews each of these components and provides recommendations to integrate the device and interface into the patient for better clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arzu Ari
- Texas State University, Department of Respiratory Care, USA.
| | | | - Martha Diaz
- Latin American Board of Certification in Respiratory Therapy, Colombia
| | - Bruce K Rubin
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, USA.
| | - James B Fink
- Texas State University, Department of Respiratory Care, USA; Aerogen Pharma, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koyuncu A, Ari A. Filling the gaps in the evaluation and selection of mobile health technologies in respiratory medicine. Expert Rev Respir Med 2024; 18:159-174. [PMID: 38795074 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2024.2361048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/27/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mobile health (mHealth) technology in respiratory medicine is a fast-growing and promising digital technology that is popular among patients and healthcare providers (HCPs). They provide reminders and step-by-step instructions for the correct inhalation technique, monitor patients' adherence to treatment, and facilitate communication between patients and HCPs. AREAS COVERED While numerous mHealth apps have been developed over the years, most applications do not have supporting evidence. Selecting the best mHealth app in respiratory medicine is challenging due to limited studies carrying out mHealth app selection. Although mHealth technologies play an important part in the future of respiratory medicine, there is no single guide on the evaluation and selection of mHealth technologies for patients with pulmonary diseases. This paper aims to provide an overview of mHealth technologies, particularly emphasizing digital inhalers and standalone applications used in asthma. Additionally, it offers insights into the evaluation, selection, and pertinent considerations surrounding mHealth applications in respiratory medicine. EXPERT OPINION Evaluating mHealth apps will take time, resources, and collaboration between stakeholders such as governmental regulatory bodies, subject-matter experts, and industry representatives. Filling the gaps in the evaluation and selection of the mHealth app will improve clinical decision-making, personalized treatments, self-management and disease monitoring in respiratory medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayfer Koyuncu
- Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Bioengineering Department, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Arzu Ari
- College of Health Professions Department of Respiratory Care, Regent's Professor and Associate Dean for Research, Texas State University, Round Rock, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alsyouf A, Lutfi A, Alsubahi N, Alhazmi FN, Al-Mugheed K, Anshasi RJ, Alharbi NI, Albugami M. The Use of a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict Patients' Usage of a Personal Health Record System: The Role of Security, Privacy, and Usability. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:1347. [PMID: 36674105 PMCID: PMC9859518 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20021347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Personal health records (PHR) systems are designed to ensure that individuals have access and control over their health information and to support them in being active participants rather than passive ones in their healthcare process. Yet, PHR systems have not yet been widely adopted or used by consumers despite their benefits. For these advantages to be realized, adoption of the system is necessary. In this study, we examined how self-determination of health management influences individuals' intention to implement a PHR system, i.e., their ability to actively manage their health. Using an extended technology acceptance model (TAM), the researchers developed and empirically tested a model explaining public adoption of PHRs. In total, 389 Saudi Arabian respondents were surveyed in a quantitative cross-sectional design. The hypotheses were analysed using structural equation modelling-partial least squares (SEM-PLS4). Results indicate that PHR system usage was influenced by three major factors: perceived ease of use (PEOU), perceived usefulness (PU), and security towards intention to use. PHR PEOU and PHR intention to use were also found to be moderated by privacy, whereas usability positively moderated PHR PEOU and PHR intention to use and negatively moderated PHR PU and PHR intention to use. For the first time, this study examined the use of personal health records in Saudi Arabia, including the extension of the TAM model as well as development of a context-driven model that examines the relationship between privacy, security, usability, and the use of PHRs. Furthermore, this study fills a gap in the literature regarding the moderating effects of privacy influence on PEOU and intention to use. Further, the moderating effects of usability on the relationship between PEOU, PU, and intention to use. Study findings are expected to assist government agencies, health policymakers, and health organizations around the world, including Saudi Arabia, in understanding the adoption of personal health records.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adi Alsyouf
- Department of Managing Health Services & Hospitals, Faculty of Business Rabigh, College of Business (COB), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21991, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdalwali Lutfi
- Department of Accounting, College of Business (COB), King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
- Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Amman 11931, Jordan
| | - Nizar Alsubahi
- Department of Health Services and Hospitals Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Fahad Nasser Alhazmi
- Department of Health Services and Hospitals Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Rami J. Anshasi
- Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan
| | - Nora Ibrahim Alharbi
- Department of Business Administration, College of Business Administration (CBA), University of Business and Technology (UBT), Jeddah 23435, Saudi Arabia
| | - Moteb Albugami
- Department of Management Information Systems, College of Business (COB) Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 344, Jeddah 21991, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mavragani A, Gouw SC, Beestrum M, Cronin RM, Fijnvandraat K, Badawy SM. Patient-Centered Digital Health Records and Their Effects on Health Outcomes: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e43086. [PMID: 36548034 PMCID: PMC9816956 DOI: 10.2196/43086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND eHealth tools such as patient portals and personal health records, also known as patient-centered digital health records, can engage and empower individuals with chronic health conditions. Patients who are highly engaged in their care have improved disease knowledge, self-management skills, and clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE We aimed to systematically review the effects of patient-centered digital health records on clinical and patient-reported outcomes, health care utilization, and satisfaction among patients with chronic conditions and to assess the feasibility and acceptability of their use. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO databases between January 2000 and December 2021. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Eligible studies were those evaluating digital health records intended for nonhospitalized adult or pediatric patients with a chronic condition. Patients with a high disease burden were a subgroup of interest. Primary outcomes included clinical and patient-reported health outcomes and health care utilization. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction, feasibility, and acceptability. Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used for quality assessment. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Associations between health record use and outcomes were categorized as beneficial, neutral or clinically nonrelevant, or undesired. RESULTS Of the 7716 unique publications examined, 81 (1%) met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 1,639,556 participants across all studies. The most commonly studied diseases included diabetes mellitus (37/81, 46%), cardiopulmonary conditions (21/81, 26%), and hematology-oncology conditions (14/81, 17%). One-third (24/81, 30%) of the studies were randomized controlled trials. Of the 81 studies that met the eligibility criteria, 16 (20%) were of high methodological quality. Reported outcomes varied across studies. The benefits of patient-centered digital health records were most frequently reported in the category health care utilization on the "use of recommended care services" (10/13, 77%), on the patient-reported outcomes "disease knowledge" (7/10, 70%), "patient engagement" (13/28, 56%), "treatment adherence" (10/18, 56%), and "self-management and self-efficacy" (10/19, 53%), and on the clinical outcome "laboratory parameters," including HbA1c and low-density lipoprotein (LDL; 16/33, 48%). Beneficial effects on "health-related quality of life" were seen in only 27% (4/15) of studies. Patient satisfaction (28/30, 93%), feasibility (15/19, 97%), and acceptability (23/26, 88%) were positively evaluated. More beneficial effects were reported for digital health records that predominantly focus on active features. Beneficial effects were less frequently observed among patients with a high disease burden and among high-quality studies. No unfavorable effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS The use of patient-centered digital health records in nonhospitalized individuals with chronic health conditions is potentially associated with considerable beneficial effects on health care utilization, treatment adherence, and self-management or self-efficacy. However, for firm conclusions, more studies of high methodological quality are required. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42020213285; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=213285.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samantha C Gouw
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, Public Health, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Molly Beestrum
- Galter Health Sciences Library at Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Robert M Cronin
- Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Karin Fijnvandraat
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, Public Health, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Molecular Cellular Hemostasis, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sherif M Badawy
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.,Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplant, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chan A, De Simoni A, Wileman V, Holliday L, Newby CJ, Chisari C, Ali S, Zhu N, Padakanti P, Pinprachanan V, Ting V, Griffiths CJ. Digital interventions to improve adherence to maintenance medication in asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 6:CD013030. [PMID: 35691614 PMCID: PMC9188849 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013030.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma is the most common chronic lung condition worldwide, affecting 334 million adults and children globally. Despite the availability of effective treatment, such as inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), adherence to maintenance medication remains suboptimal. Poor ICS adherence leads to increased asthma symptoms, exacerbations, hospitalisations, and healthcare utilisation. Importantly, suboptimal use of asthma medication is a key contributor to asthma deaths. The impact of digital interventions on adherence and asthma outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of digital interventions for improving adherence to maintenance treatments in asthma. SEARCH METHODS We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, which contains studies identified through multiple electronic searches and handsearches of other sources. We also searched trial registries and reference lists of primary studies. We conducted the most recent searches on 1 June 2020, with no restrictions on language of publication. A further search was run in October 2021, but studies were not fully incorporated. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) including cluster- and quasi-randomised trials of any duration in any setting, comparing a digital adherence intervention with a non-digital adherence intervention or usual care. We included adults and children with a clinical diagnosis of asthma, receiving maintenance treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures for data collection. We used GRADE to assess quantitative outcomes where data were available. MAIN RESULTS We included 40 parallel randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults and children with asthma (n = 15,207), of which eight are ongoing studies. Of the included studies, 30 contributed data to at least one meta-analysis. The total number of participants ranged from 18 to 8517 (median 339). Intervention length ranged from two to 104 weeks. Most studies (n = 29) reported adherence to maintenance medication as their primary outcome; other outcomes such as asthma control and quality of life were also commonly reported. Studies had low or unclear risk of selection bias but high risk of performance and detection biases due to inability to blind the participants, personnel, or outcome assessors. A quarter of the studies had high risk of attrition bias and selective outcome reporting. We examined the effect of digital interventions using meta-analysis for the following outcomes: adherence (16 studies); asthma control (16 studies); asthma exacerbations (six studies); unscheduled healthcare utilisation (four studies); lung function (seven studies); and quality of life (10 studies). Pooled results showed that patients receiving digital interventions may have increased adherence (mean difference of 14.66 percentage points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.74 to 21.57; low-certainty evidence); this is likely to be clinically significant in those with poor baseline medication adherence. Subgroup analysis by type of intervention was significant (P = 0.001), with better adherence shown with electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) (23 percentage points over control, 95% CI 10.84 to 34.16; seven studies), and with short message services (SMS) (12 percentage points over control, 95% CI 6.22 to 18.03; four studies). No significant subgroup differences were seen for interventions having an in-person component versus fully digital interventions, adherence feedback, one or multiple digital components to the intervention, or participant age. Digital interventions were likely to improve asthma control (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.31 higher, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.44; moderate-certainty evidence) - a small but likely clinically significant effect. They may reduce asthma exacerbations (risk ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.91; low-certainty evidence). Digital interventions may result in a slight change in unscheduled healthcare utilisation, although some studies reported no or a worsened effect. School or work absence data could not be included for meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity in reporting and the low number of studies. They may result in little or no difference in lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)): there was an improvement of 3.58% predicted FEV1, 95% CI 1.00% to 6.17%; moderate-certainty evidence); however, this is unlikely to be clinically significant as the FEV1 change is below 12%. Digital interventions likely increase quality of life (SMD 0.26 higher, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.45; moderate-certainty evidence); however, this is a small effect that may not be clinically significant. Acceptability data showed positive attitudes towards digital interventions. There were no data on cost-effectiveness or adverse events. Our confidence in the evidence was reduced by risk of bias and inconsistency. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Overall, digital interventions may result in a large increase in adherence (low-certainty evidence). There is moderate-certainty evidence that digital adherence interventions likely improve asthma control to a degree that is clinically significant, and likely increase quality of life, but there is little or no improvement in lung function. The review found low-certainty evidence that digital interventions may reduce asthma exacerbations. Subgroup analyses show that EMDs may improve adherence by 23% and SMS interventions by 12%, and interventions with an in-person element and adherence feedback may have greater benefits for asthma control and adherence, respectively. Future studies should include percentage adherence as a routine outcome measure to enable comparison between studies and meta-analysis, and use validated questionnaires to assess adherence and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Chan
- Centre for Behavioural Medicine, Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Anna De Simoni
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Centre for Primary Care Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Vari Wileman
- Centre for Behavioural Medicine, Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lois Holliday
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Centre for Primary Care Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Chris J Newby
- Research Design Service, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Claudia Chisari
- Centre for Behavioural Medicine, Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sana Ali
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Natalee Zhu
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Victoria Ting
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Chris J Griffiths
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Almasi S, Shahbodaghi A, Asadi F. Efficacy of Telemedicine for the Management of Asthma: A Systematic Review. TANAFFOS 2022; 21:132-145. [PMID: 36879729 PMCID: PMC9985125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
Background Considering the increased prevalence of asthma and its consequences for individuals and society, its effective management and close monitoring is essential. Awareness of the effects of telemedicine can improve asthma management. The present study aimed to systematically review articles examining the effect of telemedicine on the management of asthma, including control of the symptom, patients' quality of life, costs, and adherence to treatment programs. Materials and Methods A systematic search was performed on four databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus. English language clinical trials investigating the effectiveness of telemedicine in asthma management published from 2005 to 2018 were selected and retrieved. The present study was designed and conducted based on the PRISMA guidelines. Results Out of 33 articles included in this research, telemedicine was employed by 23 studies for the promotion of patient adherence to treatment in the form of reminders and feedback, by 18 for telemonitoring and communicating with healthcare providers, by six for offering remote patient education, and by five for counseling. The most frequently used telemedicine approach was asynchronous (used in 21 articles), and the most commonly utilized tool was Web-based (utilized in 11 articles). Conclusion Telemedicine can improve symptom control, patients' quality of life, and adherence to treatment programs. However, little evidence exists confirming the effectiveness of telemedicine in decreasing costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohrab Almasi
- Department of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Azam Shahbodaghi
- Department of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farkhondeh Asadi
- Department of Health Information Technology and Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Paydar S, Emami H, Asadi F, Moghaddasi H, Hosseini A. Functions and Outcomes of Personal Health Records for Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review. PERSPECTIVES IN HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 2021; 18:1l. [PMID: 34345228 PMCID: PMC8314040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The personal health record (PHR) makes it possible for patients to access, manage, track, and share their health information. By engaging patients in chronic disease care, they will be active members in decision-making and healthcare management. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to identify the functions and outcomes of PHR for patients with four major groups of chronic diseases (cardiovascular diseases, cancers, diabetes, and chronic respiratory diseases). METHOD A systematic review was conducted on studies published in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. Searching and screening were performed using the keyword of "Personal Health Record" without time limitation, and ended in August 2018. RESULTS In total, 3742 studies were retrieved, 35 of which met the inclusion criteria. Out of these 35, 18 studies were conducted in the United States, 24 studies were related to patients with diabetes, and 32 studies focused on tethered PHRs. Moreover, in 25 studies, the function of viewing and reading medical records and personal health information was provided for three groups of chronic patients. Results showed that the use of PHRs helps the management and control of chronic diseases (10 studies). CONCLUSION It is recommended that integrated PHRs with comprehensive functions and features were designed in order to support patient independence and empowerment in self-management, decrease the number of referrals to health centers, and reduce the costs imposed on families and society.
Collapse
|
8
|
Mosnaim G, Safioti G, Brown R, DePietro M, Szefler SJ, Lang DM, Portnoy JM, Bukstein DA, Bacharier LB, Merchant RK. Digital Health Technology in Asthma: A Comprehensive Scoping Review. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:2377-2398. [PMID: 33652136 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.02.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A variety of digital intervention approaches have been investigated for asthma therapy during the past decade, with different levels of interactivity and personalization and a range of impacts on different outcome measurements. OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of digital interventions in asthma with regard to acceptability and outcomes and evaluate the potential of digital initiatives for monitoring or treating patients with asthma. METHODS We evaluated digital interventions using a scoping review methodology through a literature search and review. Of 871 articles identified, 121 were evaluated to explore intervention characteristics, the perception and acceptability of digital interventions to patients and physicians, and effects on asthma outcomes. Interventions were categorized by their level of interactivity with the patient. RESULTS Interventions featuring non-individualized content sent to patients appeared capable of promoting improved adherence to inhaled corticosteroids, but with no identified improvement in asthma burden; and data-gathering interventions appeared to have little effect on adherence or asthma burden. Evidence of improvement in both adherence and patients' impairment due to asthma were seen only with interactive interventions involving two-way responsive patient communication. Digital interventions were generally positively perceived by patients and physicians. Implementation was considered feasible, with certain preferences for design and features important to drive use. CONCLUSIONS Digital health interventions show substantial promise for asthma disease monitoring and personalization of treatment. To be successful, future interventions will need to include both inhaler device and software elements, combining accurate measurement of clinical parameters with careful consideration of ease of use, personalization, and patient engagement aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giselle Mosnaim
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, Ill
| | | | - Randall Brown
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, West Chester, Pa
| | - Michael DePietro
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, West Chester, Pa.
| | - Stanley J Szefler
- The Breathing Institute and Pulmonary Medicine Section, Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colo
| | - David M Lang
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jay M Portnoy
- Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Mo
| | - Don A Bukstein
- Allergy, Asthma and Sinus Center, Milwaukee, Greenfield, Wis
| | - Leonard B Bacharier
- Department of Pediatrics, Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn
| | - Rajan K Merchant
- Woodland Clinic Medical Group, Allergy Department, Dignity Health, Woodland, Calif
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ammenwerth E, Neyer S, Hörbst A, Mueller G, Siebert U, Schnell-Inderst P. Adult patient access to electronic health records. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 2:CD012707. [PMID: 33634854 PMCID: PMC8871105 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012707.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To support patient-centred care, healthcare organisations increasingly offer patients access to data stored in the institutional electronic health record (EHR). OBJECTIVES Primary objective 1. To assess the effects of providing adult patients with access to electronic health records (EHRs) alone or with additional functionalities on a range of patient, patient-provider, and health resource consumption outcomes, including patient knowledge and understanding, patient empowerment, patient adherence, patient satisfaction with care, adverse events, health-related quality of life, health-related outcomes, psychosocial health outcomes, health resource consumption, and patient-provider communication. Secondary objective 1. To assess whether effects of providing adult patients with EHR access alone versus EHR access with additional functionalities differ among patient groups according to age, educational level, or different status of disease (chronic or acute). SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus in June 2017 and in April 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials and cluster-randomised trials of EHR access with or without additional functionalities for adults with any medical condition. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. MAIN RESULTS We included 10 studies with 78 to 4500 participants and follow-up from 3 to 24 months. Nine studies assessed the effects of EHR with additional functionalities, each addressing a subset of outcomes sought by this review. Five studies focused on patients with diabetes mellitus, four on patients with specific diseases, and one on all patients. All studies compared EHR access alone or with additional functionalities plus usual care versus usual care only. No studies assessing the effects of EHR access alone versus EHR access with additional functionalities were identified. Interventions required a variety of data within the EHR, such as patient history, problem list, medication, allergies, and lab results. In addition to EHR access, eight studies allowed patients to share self-documented data, seven offered individualised disease management functions, seven offered educational disease-related information, six supported secure communication, and one offered preventive reminders. Only two studies were at low or unclear risk of bias across domains. Meta-analysis could not be performed, as participants, interventions, and outcomes were too heterogeneous, and most studies presented results based on different adjustment methods or variables. The quality of evidence was rated as low or very low across outcomes. Overall differences between intervention and control groups, if any, were small. The relevance of any small effects remains unclear for most outcomes because in most cases, trial authors did not define a minimal clinically important difference. Overall, results suggest that the effects of EHR access alone and with additional functionalities are mostly uncertain when compared with usual care. Patient knowledge and understanding: very low-quality evidence is available from one study, so we are uncertain about effects of the intervention on patient knowledge about diabetes and blood glucose testing. Patient empowerment: low-quality evidence from three studies suggests that the intervention may have little or no effect on patient empowerment measures. Patient adherence: low-quality evidence from two studies suggests that the intervention may slightly improve adherence to the process of monitoring risk factors and preventive services. Effects on medication adherence are conflicting in two studies; this may or may not improve to a clinically relevant degree. Patient satisfaction with care: low-quality evidence from three studies suggests that the intervention may have little or no effect on patient satisfaction, with conflicting results. Adverse events: two small studies reported on mortality; one of these also reported on serious and other adverse events, but sample sizes were too small for small differences to be detected. Therefore, low-quality evidence suggests that the intervention may have little to no effect on mortality and other adverse events. Health-related quality of life: only very low-quality evidence from one study is available. We are uncertain whether the intervention improves disease-specific quality of life of patients with asthma. Health-related outcomes: low-quality evidence from eight studies suggests that the intervention may have little to no effect on asthma control, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein or total cholesterol levels, body mass index or weight, or 10-year Framingham risk scores. Low-quality evidence from one study suggests that the composite scores of risk factors for diabetes mellitus may improve slightly with the intervention, but there is uncertainty about effects on ophthalmic medications or intraocular pressure. Psychosocial health outcomes: no study investigated psychosocial health outcomes in a more than anecdotal way. Health resource consumption: low-quality evidence for adult patients in three studies suggests that there may be little to no effect of the intervention on different measures of healthcare use. Patient-provider communication: very low-quality evidence is available from a single small study, and we are uncertain whether the intervention improves communication measures, such as the number of messages sent. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The effects of EHR access with additional functionalities in comparison with usual care for the most part are uncertain. Only adherence to the process of monitoring risk factors and providing preventive services as well as a composite score of risk factors for diabetes mellitus may improve slightly with EHR access with additional functionalities. Due to inconsistent terminology in this area, our search may have missed relevant studies. As the overall quality of evidence is very low to low, future research is likely to change these results. Further trials should investigate the impact of EHR access in a broader range of countries and clinical settings, including more patients over a longer period of follow-up, as this may increase the likelihood of detecting effects of the intervention, should these exist. More studies should focus on assessing outcomes such as patient empowerment and behavioural outcomes, rather than concentrating on health-related outcomes alone. Future studies should distinguish between effects of EHR access only and effects of additional functionalities, and investigate the impact of mobile EHR tools. Future studies should include information on usage patterns, and consider the potential for widening health inequalities with implementation of EHR access. A taxonomy for EHR access and additional functionalities should be developed to promote consistency and comparability of outcome measures, and facilitate future reviews by better enabling cross-study comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elske Ammenwerth
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Mechatronics, UMIT - Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Stefanie Neyer
- Department of Nursing Science and Gerontology, UMIT - Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Alexander Hörbst
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Mechatronics, UMIT - Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Gerhard Mueller
- Department of Nursing Science and Gerontology, UMIT - Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Petra Schnell-Inderst
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hind D, Drabble SJ, Arden MA, Mandefield L, Waterhouse S, Maguire C, Cantrill H, Robinson L, Beever D, Scott A, Keating S, Hutchings M, Bradley J, Nightingale J, Allenby MI, Dewar J, Whelan P, Ainsworth J, Walters SJ, Wildman MJ, O'Cathain A. Feasibility study for supporting medication adherence for adults with cystic fibrosis: mixed-methods process evaluation. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039089. [PMID: 33109661 PMCID: PMC7592300 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To undertake a process evaluation of an adherence support intervention for people with cystic fibrosis (PWCF), to assess its feasibility and acceptability. SETTING Two UK cystic fibrosis (CF) units. PARTICIPANTS Fourteen adult PWCF; three professionals delivering adherence support ('interventionists'); five multi-disciplinary CF team members. INTERVENTIONS Nebuliser with data recording and transfer capability, linked to a software platform, and strategies to support adherence to nebulised treatments facilitated by interventionists over 5 months (± 1 month). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MEASURES Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, assessed through semistructured interviews, questionnaires, fidelity assessments and click analytics. RESULTS Interventionists were complimentary about the intervention and training. Key barriers to intervention feasibility and acceptability were identified. Interventionists had difficulty finding clinic space and time in normal working hours to conduct review visits. As a result, fewer than expected intervention visits were conducted and interviews indicated this may explain low adherence in some intervention arm participants. Adherence levels appeared to be >100% for some patients, due to inaccurate prescription data, particularly in patients with complex treatment regimens. Flatlines in adherence data at the start of the study were linked to device connectivity problems. Content and delivery quality fidelity were 100% and 60%-92%, respectively, indicating that interventionists needed to focus more on intervention 'active ingredients' during sessions. CONCLUSIONS The process evaluation led to 14 key changes to intervention procedures to overcome barriers to intervention success. With the identified changes, it is feasible and acceptable to support medication adherence with this intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN13076797; Results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Hind
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sarah J Drabble
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Madelynne A Arden
- Centre for Behavioural Science and Applied Psychology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Simon Waterhouse
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Chin Maguire
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Hannah Cantrill
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Louisa Robinson
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Daniel Beever
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alex Scott
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sam Keating
- Clincal Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Marlene Hutchings
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Judy Bradley
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute For Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Julia Nightingale
- Wessex Adult Cystic Fibrosis Service, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Mark I Allenby
- Wessex Adult Cystic Fibrosis Service, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Jane Dewar
- Wolfson Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Pauline Whelan
- Health eResearch Centre - Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - John Ainsworth
- Health eResearch Centre - Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen J Walters
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Martin J Wildman
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alicia O'Cathain
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Himes BE, Leszinsky L, Walsh R, Hepner H, Wu AC. Mobile Health and Inhaler-Based Monitoring Devices for Asthma Management. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2020; 7:2535-2543. [PMID: 31706485 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.08.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Revised: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Mobile health and web applications (apps), wearables, and other personal monitoring devices have tremendous potential to improve the management of asthma. More than 500 asthma-related apps, whether standalone or paired with sensors on inhalers, are currently available for health education, symptom recording, tracking of inhaler use, displaying environmental alerts, and providing medication reminders. Benefits of these tools include the ability to longitudinally collect symptom, trigger, and inhaler usage data, allowing the detection of significant changes over time to help patients and their caregivers determine whether symptoms are worsening. In addition, data from external information sources, including weather, allergen, and air quality reports, can be integrated with user-specific data to enhance predictions on when patients may experience symptoms and/or need to avoid triggers. Barriers to adoption of asthma-related apps and inhaler-based devices include uncertain efficacy and effectiveness, potential high cost, sustained user engagement, and concerns about privacy. Moreover, ensuring the acceptability and utility of asthma management apps for individuals of all races/ethnicities, socioeconomic groups, ages, genders, and literacy levels is necessary. Based on studies thus far, mobile health apps and inhaler-based devices have great potential to serve as useful tools in the patient-doctor relationship and revolutionize asthma care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blanca E Himes
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
| | - Lena Leszinsky
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Ryan Walsh
- Center for Healthcare Research in Pediatrics (CHeRP) and PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Hannah Hepner
- Center for Healthcare Research in Pediatrics (CHeRP) and PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Ann Chen Wu
- Center for Healthcare Research in Pediatrics (CHeRP) and PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Redfern J, Coorey G, Mulley J, Scaria A, Neubeck L, Hafiz N, Pitt C, Weir K, Forbes J, Parker S, Bampi F, Coenen A, Enright G, Wong A, Nguyen T, Harris M, Zwar N, Chow CK, Rodgers A, Heeley E, Panaretto K, Lau A, Hayman N, Usherwood T, Peiris D. A digital health intervention for cardiovascular disease management in primary care (CONNECT) randomized controlled trial. NPJ Digit Med 2020; 3:117. [PMID: 32964140 PMCID: PMC7484809 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-020-00325-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Digital health applications (apps) have the potential to improve health behaviors and outcomes. We aimed to examine the effectiveness of a consumer web-based app linked to primary care electronic health records (EHRs). CONNECT was a multicenter randomized controlled trial involving patients with or at risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) recruited from primary care (Clinical Trial registration ACTRN12613000715774). Intervention participants received an interactive app which was pre-populated and refreshed with EHR risk factor data, diagnoses and, medications. Interactive risk calculators, motivational messages and lifestyle goal tracking were also included. Control group received usual health care. Primary outcome was adherence to guideline-recommended medications (≥80% of days covered for blood pressure (BP) and statin medications). Secondary outcomes included attainment of risk factor targets and eHealth literacy. In total, 934 patients were recruited; mean age 67.6 (±8.1) years. At 12 months, the proportion with >80% days covered with recommended medicines was low overall and there was no difference between the groups (32.8% vs. 29.9%; relative risk [RR] 1.07 [95% CI, 0.88-1.20] p = 0.49). There was borderline improvement in the proportion meeting BP and LDL targets in intervention vs. control (17.1% vs. 12.1% RR 1.40 [95% CI, 0.97-2.03] p = 0.07). The intervention was associated with increased attainment of physical activity targets (87.0% intervention vs. 79.7% control, p = 0.02) and e-health literacy scores (72.6% intervention vs. 64.0% control, p = 0.02). In conclusion, a consumer app integrated with primary health care EHRs was not effective in increasing medication adherence. Borderline improvements in risk factors and modest behavior changes were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Redfern
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead Applied Research Centre, Sydney, NSW Australia
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Genevieve Coorey
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - John Mulley
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Anish Scaria
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Lis Neubeck
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Nashid Hafiz
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead Applied Research Centre, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Chris Pitt
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Kristie Weir
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Joanna Forbes
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Sharon Parker
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Fiona Bampi
- Fiona Bampi - Cancer Australia, Australian Government, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alison Coenen
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Gemma Enright
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead Applied Research Centre, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Annette Wong
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW Australia
| | - Theresa Nguyen
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Mark Harris
- Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, UNSW, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Nick Zwar
- Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD Australia
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Clara K. Chow
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead Applied Research Centre, Sydney, NSW Australia
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Anthony Rodgers
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Emma Heeley
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Katie Panaretto
- Centre for Chronic Disease, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD Australia
| | - Annie Lau
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | | | - Tim Usherwood
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead Applied Research Centre, Sydney, NSW Australia
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW Australia
- Department of General Practice, Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - David Peiris
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Expectant mothers/couples often report planning for early parenting is overwhelming. Lack of anticipatory planning makes evident the need for providers, like childbirth educators, to assist expectant parents in minimizing or eliminating the problems associated with the transition to the fourth trimester, early parenthood. Planning for birth should extend beyond labor and birth to include the weeks following. The author's purpose is to explore the problems associated with the fourth trimester, to review the current health-related literature, and to propose an integrated behavioral action plan as an effective strategy. Self-efficacy constructs support a wellness plan approach to enable expectant mothers/couples to be proactive in preparing for their physical and emotional needs after the arrival of their newborn.
Collapse
|
14
|
Denecke K, Gabarron E, Grainger R, Konstantinidis ST, Lau A, Rivera-Romero O, Miron-Shatz T, Merolli M. Artificial Intelligence for Participatory Health: Applications, Impact, and Future Implications. Yearb Med Inform 2019; 28:165-173. [PMID: 31022749 PMCID: PMC6697496 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective
: Artificial intelligence (AI) provides people and professionals working in the field of participatory health informatics an opportunity to derive robust insights from a variety of online sources. The objective of this paper is to identify current state of the art and application areas of AI in the context of participatory health.
Methods
: A search was conducted across seven databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, ACM Digital Library, IEEExplore, and SCOPUS), covering articles published since 2013. Additionally, clinical trials involving AI in participatory health contexts registered at clinicaltrials.gov were collected and analyzed.
Results
: Twenty-two articles and 12 trials were selected for review. The most common application of AI in participatory health was the secondary analysis of social media data: self-reported data including patient experiences with healthcare facilities, reports of adverse drug reactions, safety and efficacy concerns about over-the-counter medications, and other perspectives on medications. Other application areas included determining which online forum threads required moderator assistance, identifying users who were likely to drop out from a forum, extracting terms used in an online forum to learn its vocabulary, highlighting contextual information that is missing from online questions and answers, and paraphrasing technical medical terms for consumers.
Conclusions
: While AI for supporting participatory health is still in its infancy, there are a number of important research priorities that should be considered for the advancement of the field. Further research evaluating the impact of AI in participatory health informatics on the psychosocial wellbeing of individuals would help in facilitating the wider acceptance of AI into the healthcare ecosystem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elia Gabarron
- Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Norway
| | | | | | - Annie Lau
- Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Australia
| | | | - Talya Miron-Shatz
- Ono Academic College, Israel, and Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, Cambridge University, England
| | - Mark Merolli
- Swinburne University of Technology, and University of Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hind D, Drabble SJ, Arden MA, Mandefield L, Waterhouse S, Maguire C, Cantrill H, Robinson L, Beever D, Scott AJ, Keating S, Hutchings M, Bradley J, Nightingale J, Allenby MI, Dewar J, Whelan P, Ainsworth J, Walters SJ, O’Cathain A, Wildman MJ. Supporting medication adherence for adults with cystic fibrosis: a randomised feasibility study. BMC Pulm Med 2019; 19:77. [PMID: 30975206 PMCID: PMC6458785 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-019-0834-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preventative medication reduces hospitalisations in people with cystic fibrosis (PWCF) but adherence is poor. We assessed the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention, which combines display of real time adherence data and behaviour change techniques. METHODS Design: Pilot, open-label, parallel-group RCT with concurrent semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS PWCF at two Cystic Fibrosis (CF) units. Eligible: aged 16 or older; on the CF registry. Ineligible: post-lung transplant or on the active list; unable to consent; using dry powder inhalers. INTERVENTIONS Central randomisation on a 1:1 allocation to: (1) intervention, linking nebuliser use with data recording and transfer capability to a software platform, and behavioural strategies to support self-management delivered by trained interventionists (n = 32); or, (2) control, typically face-to-face meetings every 3 months with CF team (n = 32). OUTCOMES RCT feasibility defined as: recruitment of ≥ 48 participants (75% of target) in four months (pilot primary outcome); valid exacerbation data available for ≥ 85% of those randomised (future RCT primary outcome); change in % medication adherence; FEV1 percent predicted (key secondaries in future RCT); and perceptions of trial procedures, in semi-structured interviews with intervention (n = 14) and control (n = 5) participants, interventionists (n = 3) and CF team members (n = 5). RESULTS The pilot trial recruited to target, randomising 33 to intervention and 31 to control in the four-month period, June-September 2016. At study completion (30th April 2017), 60 (94%; Intervention = 32, Control =28) participants contributed good quality exacerbation data (intervention: 35 exacerbations; control: 25 exacerbation). The mean change in adherence and baseline-adjusted FEV1 percent predicted were higher in the intervention arm by 10% (95% CI: -5.2 to 25.2) and 5% (95% CI -2 to 12%) respectively. Five serious adverse events occurred, none related to the intervention. The mean change in adherence was 10% (95% CI: -5.2 to 25.2), greater in the intervention arm. Interventionists delivered insufficient numbers of review sessions due to concentration on participant recruitment. This left interventionists insufficient time for key intervention procedures. A total of 10 key changes that were made to RCT procedures are summarised. CONCLUSIONS With improved research processes and lower monthly participant recruitment targets, a full-scale trial is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN13076797 . Prospectively registered on 07/06/2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Hind
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Sarah J. Drabble
- School of Health and Related Research, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Madelynne A. Arden
- Centre for Behavioural Science and Applied Psychology, Sheffield Hallam University, Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2BQ UK
| | - Laura Mandefield
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Simon Waterhouse
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Chin Maguire
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Hannah Cantrill
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Louisa Robinson
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Daniel Beever
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Alexander J. Scott
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Sam Keating
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Marlene Hutchings
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Unit Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU UK
| | - Judy Bradley
- Centre for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL UK
| | - Julia Nightingale
- Wessex Adult Cystic Fibrosis Service, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire SO16 6YD UK
| | - Mark I. Allenby
- Wessex Adult Cystic Fibrosis Service, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire SO16 6YD UK
| | - Jane Dewar
- Wolfson Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB UK
| | - Pauline Whelan
- Health eResearch Centre - Farr Institute, Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - John Ainsworth
- Health eResearch Centre - Farr Institute, Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephen J. Walters
- School of Health and Related Research, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Alicia O’Cathain
- School of Health and Related Research, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Martin J. Wildman
- Sheffield Adult Cystic Fibrosis Unit Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7AU UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lycett HJ, Raebel EM, Wildman EK, Guitart J, Kenny T, Sherlock JP, Cooper V. Theory-Based Digital Interventions to Improve Asthma Self-Management Outcomes: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e293. [PMID: 30541741 PMCID: PMC6306620 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2018] [Revised: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma is a chronic disease requiring effective self-management to control it and prevent mortality. The use of theory-informed digital interventions promoting asthma self-management is increasing. However, there is limited knowledge concerning how and to what extent psychological theory has been applied to the development of digital interventions, or how using theory impacts outcomes. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to examine the use and application of theory in the development of digital interventions to enhance asthma self-management and to evaluate the effectiveness of theory-based interventions in improving adherence, self-management, and clinical outcomes. METHODS Electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO) were searched systematically using predetermined terms. Additional studies were identified by scanning references within relevant studies. Two researchers screened titles and abstracts against predefined inclusion criteria; a third resolved discrepancies. Full-text review was undertaken for relevant studies. Those meeting inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Study outcomes were classified as medication adherence, self-management, asthma control, clinical markers of health, quality of life, other quality of life outcomes, and health care utilization. Effectiveness was calculated as an average outcome score based on the study's reported significance. The Theory Coding Scheme (TCS) was used to establish the extent to which each intervention had applied theory and which theoretical constructs or behavioral determinants were addressed. Associations between TCS scores and asthma outcomes were described within a narrative synthesis. RESULTS Fourteen studies evaluating 14 different digital interventions were included in this review. The most commonly cited theories were Social Cognitive Theory, Health Belief Model, and Self-Efficacy Theory. A greater use of theory in the development of interventions was correlated with effective outcomes (r=.657; P=.01): only the 3 studies that met >60% of the different uses of theory assessed by the TCS were effective on all behavioral and clinical outcomes measured. None of the 11 studies that met ≤60% of the TCS criteria were fully effective; however, 3 interventions were partially effective (ie, the intervention had a significant impact on some, but not all, of the outcomes measured). Most studies lacked detail on the theoretical constructs and how they were applied to the development and application of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that greater use of theory in the development and application of digital self-management interventions for asthma may increase their effectiveness. The application of theory alone may not be enough to yield a successful intervention, and other factors (eg, the context in which the intervention is used) should be considered. A systematic approach to the use of theory to guide the design, selection, and application of intervention techniques is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Jon-Paul Sherlock
- Pharmaceutical Technology & Development, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom
| | - Vanessa Cooper
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bousquet J, Arnavielhe S, Bedbrook A, Bewick M, Laune D, Mathieu-Dupas E, Murray R, Onorato GL, Pépin JL, Picard R, Portejoie F, Costa E, Fonseca J, Lourenço O, Morais-Almeida M, Todo-Bom A, Cruz AA, da Silva J, Serpa FS, Illario M, Menditto E, Cecchi L, Monti R, Napoli L, Ventura MT, De Feo G, Larenas-Linnemann D, Fuentes Perez M, Huerta Villabolos YR, Rivero-Yeverino D, Rodriguez-Zagal E, Amat F, Annesi-Maesano I, Bosse I, Demoly P, Devillier P, Fontaine JF, Just J, Kuna TP, Samolinski B, Valiulis A, Emuzyte R, Kvedariene V, Ryan D, Sheikh A, Schmidt-Grendelmeier P, Klimek L, Pfaar O, Bergmann KC, Mösges R, Zuberbier T, Roller-Wirnsberger RE, Tomazic P, Fokkens WJ, Chavannes NH, Reitsma S, Anto JM, Cardona V, Dedeu T, Mullol J, Haahtela T, Salimäki J, Toppila-Salmi S, Valovirta E, Gemicioğlu B, Yorgancioglu A, Papadopoulos N, Prokopakis EP, Bosnic-Anticevich S, O'Hehir R, Ivancevich JC, Neffen H, Zernotti E, Kull I, Melen E, Wickman M, Bachert C, Hellings P, Palkonen S, Bindslev-Jensen C, Eller E, Waserman S, Sova M, De Vries G, van Eerd M, Agache I, Casale T, Dykewickz M, Naclerio RN, Okamoto Y, Wallace DV. MASK 2017: ARIA digitally-enabled, integrated, person-centred care for rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity using real-world-evidence. Clin Transl Allergy 2018; 8:45. [PMID: 30386555 PMCID: PMC6201545 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-018-0227-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
mHealth, such as apps running on consumer smart devices is becoming increasingly popular and has the potential to profoundly affect healthcare and health outcomes. However, it may be disruptive and results achieved are not always reaching the goals. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) has evolved from a guideline using the best evidence-based approach to care pathways suited to real-life using mobile technology in allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma multimorbidity. Patients largely use over-the-counter medications dispensed in pharmacies. Shared decision making centered around the patient and based on self-management should be the norm. Mobile Airways Sentinel networK (MASK), the Phase 3 ARIA initiative, is based on the freely available MASK app (the Allergy Diary, Android and iOS platforms). MASK is available in 16 languages and deployed in 23 countries. The present paper provides an overview of the methods used in MASK and the key results obtained to date. These include a novel phenotypic characterization of the patients, confirmation of the impact of allergic rhinitis on work productivity and treatment patterns in real life. Most patients appear to self-medicate, are often non-adherent and do not follow guidelines. Moreover, the Allergy Diary is able to distinguish between AR medications. The potential usefulness of MASK will be further explored by POLLAR (Impact of Air Pollution on Asthma and Rhinitis), a new Horizon 2020 project using the Allergy Diary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Bousquet
- MACVIA-France, Fondation Partenariale FMC VIA-LR, CHRU Arnaud de Villeneuve, 371 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, Montpellier, France.,INSERM U 1168, VIMA: Ageing and Chronic Diseases Epidemiological and Public Health Approaches, Villejuif, Université Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, UMR-S 1168, Montigny le Bretonneux, France.,Euforea, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - A Bedbrook
- MACVIA-France, Fondation Partenariale FMC VIA-LR, CHRU Arnaud de Villeneuve, 371 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, Montpellier, France
| | - M Bewick
- iQ4U Consultants Ltd, London, UK
| | - D Laune
- KYomed-INNOV, Montpellier, France
| | | | - R Murray
- MedScript Ltd, Dundalk, Co Louth Ireland
| | - G L Onorato
- MACVIA-France, Fondation Partenariale FMC VIA-LR, CHRU Arnaud de Villeneuve, 371 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, Montpellier, France
| | - J L Pépin
- 7Laboratoire HP2, Grenoble, INSERM, U1042, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,8CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - R Picard
- Conseil Général de l'Economie Ministère de l'Economie, de l'Industrie et du Numérique, Paris, France
| | - F Portejoie
- MACVIA-France, Fondation Partenariale FMC VIA-LR, CHRU Arnaud de Villeneuve, 371 Avenue du Doyen Gaston Giraud, Montpellier, France
| | - E Costa
- 10UCIBIO, REQUINTE, Faculty of Pharmacy and Competence Center on Active and Healthy Ageing, University of Porto (Porto4Ageing), Porto, Portugal
| | - J Fonseca
- 11Center for Health Technology and Services Research- CINTESIS, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Medida, Lda, Porto, Portugal
| | - O Lourenço
- 13Faculty of Health Sciences and CICS - UBI, Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
| | | | - A Todo-Bom
- 15Imunoalergologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra and Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - A A Cruz
- 16ProAR - Nucleo de Excelencia em Asma, Federal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Brazil.,WHO GARD Planning Group, Salvador, Brazil
| | - J da Silva
- 18Allergy Service, University Hospital of Federal University of Santa Catarina (HU-UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil
| | - F S Serpa
- 19Asthma Reference Center, Escola Superior de Ciencias da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Vitoria, Vitória, Esperito Santo Brazil
| | - M Illario
- Division for Health Innovation, Campania Region and Federico II University Hospital Naples (R&D and DISMET), Naples, Italy
| | - E Menditto
- 21CIRFF, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - L Cecchi
- SOS Allergology and Clinical Immunology, USL Toscana Centro, Prato, Italy
| | - R Monti
- 23Department of Medical Sciences, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, University of Torino & Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - L Napoli
- Consortium of Pharmacies and Services COSAFER, Salerno, Italy
| | - M T Ventura
- 25Unit of Geriatric Immunoallergology, University of Bari Medical School, Bari, Italy
| | - G De Feo
- 26Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy
| | - D Larenas-Linnemann
- 27Center of Excellence in Asthma and Allergy, Hospital Médica Sur, México City, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | - F Amat
- 31Allergology Department, Centre de l'Asthme et des Allergies Hôpital d'Enfants Armand-Trousseau (APHP), Paris, France.,32UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Sorbonne Universités, Equipe EPAR, 75013 Paris, France
| | - I Annesi-Maesano
- 33Epidemiology of Allergic and Respiratory Diseases, Department Institute Pierre Louis of Epidemiology and Public Health, INSERM, UPMC Sorbonne Université, Medical School Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| | | | - P Demoly
- 35Department of Respiratory Diseases, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - P Devillier
- 36UPRES EA220, Pôle des Maladies des Voies Respiratoires, Hôpital Foch, Université Paris-Saclay, Suresnes, France
| | | | - J Just
- 31Allergology Department, Centre de l'Asthme et des Allergies Hôpital d'Enfants Armand-Trousseau (APHP), Paris, France.,32UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Sorbonne Universités, Equipe EPAR, 75013 Paris, France
| | - T P Kuna
- 38Division of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Barlicki University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - B Samolinski
- 39Department of Prevention of Environmental Hazards and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - A Valiulis
- 40Clinic of Children's Diseases, and Institute of Health Sciences Department of Public Health, Vilnius University Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania.,European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP/UEMS-SP), Brussels, Belgium
| | - R Emuzyte
- 42Clinic of Children's Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - V Kvedariene
- 43Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - D Ryan
- Woodbrook Medical Centre, Loughborough, UK.,45Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Medical School, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Sheikh
- 46Centre of Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - P Schmidt-Grendelmeier
- 47Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - L Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany.,49Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - O Pfaar
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology, Wiesbaden, Germany.,49Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - K C Bergmann
- 50Comprehensive Allergy-Centre-Charité, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA2LEN), Berlin, Germany
| | - R Mösges
- 52Institute of Medical Statistics, and Computational Biology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,CRI-Clinical Research International-Ltd, Hamburg, Germany
| | - T Zuberbier
- 50Comprehensive Allergy-Centre-Charité, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA2LEN), Berlin, Germany
| | | | - P Tomazic
- 55Department of ENT, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - W J Fokkens
- 56Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N H Chavannes
- 57Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - S Reitsma
- 56Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J M Anto
- ISGlobAL, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), Barcelona, Spain.,59IMIM (Hospital del Mar Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,60CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.,61Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - V Cardona
- 62Allergy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Vall 'dHebron & ARADyAL Research Network, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Dedeu
- 63AQuAS, Barcelona, Spain.,EUREGHA, European Regional and Local Health Association, Brussels, Belgium
| | - J Mullol
- 65Rhinology Unit and Smell Clinic, ENT Department, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,66Clinical and Experimental Respiratory Immunoallergy, IDIBAPS, CIBERES, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Haahtela
- 67Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - J Salimäki
- Association of Finnish Pharmacists, Helsinki, Finland
| | - S Toppila-Salmi
- 67Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - E Valovirta
- 69Department of Lung Diseases and Clinical Immunology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.,Terveystalo Allergy Clinic, Turku, Finland
| | - B Gemicioğlu
- 71Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - A Yorgancioglu
- 72Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.,GARD Executive Committee, Manisa, Turkey
| | - N Papadopoulos
- 74Center for Pediatrics and Child Health, Institute of Human Development, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,75Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, Athens General Children's Hospital "P&A Kyriakou", University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - E P Prokopakis
- 76Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece
| | - S Bosnic-Anticevich
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Glebe, NSW Australia
| | - R O'Hehir
- 78Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC Australia.,79Department of Immunology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - J C Ivancevich
- Servicio de Alergia e Immunologia, Clinica Santa Isabel, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - H Neffen
- Director of Center of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Diseases, Santa Fe, Argentina Center for Allergy and Immunology, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - E Zernotti
- 82Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - I Kull
- 83Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Melen
- 84Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.,85Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Wickman
- 86Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden
| | - C Bachert
- 87Upper Airways Research Laboratory, ENT Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - P Hellings
- Euforea, Brussels, Belgium.,88Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Univ Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.,89Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Palkonen
- 90EFA European Federation of Allergy and Airways Diseases Patients' Associations, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Bindslev-Jensen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense, Denmark
| | - E Eller
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Odense, Denmark
| | - S Waserman
- 92Department of Medicine, Clinical Immunology and Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
| | - M Sova
- 93University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - G De Vries
- Peercode BV, Geldermalsen, The Netherlands
| | - M van Eerd
- Peercode BV, Geldermalsen, The Netherlands
| | - I Agache
- 95Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University, Brasov, Romania
| | - T Casale
- 96Division of Allergy/Immunology, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA
| | - M Dykewickz
- 97Section of Allergy and Immunology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO USA
| | - R N Naclerio
- 98Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA
| | - Y Okamoto
- 99Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - D V Wallace
- 100Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fylan F, Caveney L, Cartwright A, Fylan B. Making it work for me: beliefs about making a personal health record relevant and useable. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:445. [PMID: 29898730 PMCID: PMC6001055 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3254-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A Personal Health Record (PHR) is an electronic record that individuals use to manage and share their health information, e.g. data from their medical records and data collected by apps. However, engagement with their record can be low if people do not find it beneficial to their health, wellbeing or interactions with health and other services. We have explored the beliefs potential users have about a PHR, how it could be made personally relevant, and barriers to its use. Methods A qualitative design comprising eight focus groups, each with 6–8 participants. Groups included adults with long-term health conditions, young people, physically active adults, data experts, and members of the voluntary sector. Each group lasted 60–90 min, was audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. We analysed the data using thematic analysis to address the question “What are people’s beliefs about making a Personal Health Record have relevance and impact?” Results We found four themes. Making it work for me is about how to encourage individuals to actively engage with their PHR. I control my information is about individuals deciding what to share and who to share it with. My concerns is about individuals’ concerns about information security and if and how their information will be acted upon. Potential impact shows the potential benefits of a PHR such as increasing self-efficacy, uptake of health-protective behaviours, and professionals taking a more holistic approach to providing care and facilitating behaviour change. Conclusions Our research shows the functionality that a PHR requires in order for people to engage with it. Interactive functions and integration with lifestyle and health apps are particularly important. A PHR could increase the effectiveness of behaviour change apps by specifying evidence-based behaviour change techniques that apps should incorporate. A PHR has the potential to increase health-protective behaviours and facilitate a more person-driven health and social care system. It could support patients to take responsibility for self-managing their health and treatment regimens, as well as helping patients to play a more active role when care transfers across boundaries of responsibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Fylan
- Brainbox Research, 46 Town Street, Gildersome, Leeds, LS27 7AA, UK. .,Leeds Sustainability Institute, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK.
| | - Lauren Caveney
- Brainbox Research, 46 Town Street, Gildersome, Leeds, LS27 7AA, UK
| | - Alastair Cartwright
- NHS Leeds North Clinical Commissioning Group, Leafield House, 107-109 King Lane, Leeds, LS17 5BP, UK
| | - Beth Fylan
- Brainbox Research, 46 Town Street, Gildersome, Leeds, LS27 7AA, UK.,School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
|
20
|
Granja C, Janssen W, Johansen MA. Factors Determining the Success and Failure of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of the Literature. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e10235. [PMID: 29716883 PMCID: PMC5954232 DOI: 10.2196/10235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 274] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background eHealth has an enormous potential to improve healthcare cost, effectiveness, and quality of care. However, there seems to be a gap between the foreseen benefits of research and clinical reality. Objective Our objective was to systematically review the factors influencing the outcome of eHealth interventions in terms of success and failure. Methods We searched the PubMed database for original peer-reviewed studies on implemented eHealth tools that reported on the factors for the success or failure, or both, of the intervention. We conducted the systematic review by following the patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome framework, with 2 of the authors independently reviewing the abstract and full text of the articles. We collected data using standardized forms that reflected the categorization model used in the qualitative analysis of the outcomes reported in the included articles. Results Among the 903 identified articles, a total of 221 studies complied with the inclusion criteria. The studies were heterogeneous by country, type of eHealth intervention, method of implementation, and reporting perspectives. The article frequency analysis did not show a significant discrepancy between the number of reports on failure (392/844, 46.5%) and on success (452/844, 53.6%). The qualitative analysis identified 27 categories that represented the factors for success or failure of eHealth interventions. A quantitative analysis of the results revealed the category quality of healthcare (n=55) as the most mentioned as contributing to the success of eHealth interventions, and the category costs (n=42) as the most mentioned as contributing to failure. For the category with the highest unique article frequency, workflow (n=51), we conducted a full-text review. The analysis of the 23 articles that met the inclusion criteria identified 6 barriers related to workflow: workload (n=12), role definition (n=7), undermining of face-to-face communication (n=6), workflow disruption (n=6), alignment with clinical processes (n=2), and staff turnover (n=1). Conclusions The reviewed literature suggested that, to increase the likelihood of success of eHealth interventions, future research must ensure a positive impact in the quality of care, with particular attention given to improved diagnosis, clinical management, and patient-centered care. There is a critical need to perform in-depth studies of the workflow(s) that the intervention will support and to perceive the clinical processes involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conceição Granja
- Future Journal, Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Wouter Janssen
- Telemedicine and E-health Research Group, University of Tromsø-The Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Monika Alise Johansen
- Future Journal, Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, Tromsø, Norway.,Telemedicine and E-health Research Group, University of Tromsø-The Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ghandour EK, Gagnon MP, Fortin JP. [Factors influencing electronic personal health record (ePHR) adoption by Primary Health Care providers in Quebec: Professional and organizational perspective]. SANTE PUBLIQUE 2018; 29:837-850. [PMID: 29473398 DOI: 10.3917/spub.176.0837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to describe and analyse the factors and conditions influencing ePHR adoption by primary healthcare professionals for the follow-up and management of chronic diseases, as perceived by healthcare professionals and health organization managers. METHODS A qualitative study was conducted in the context of an ePHR experimentation project in Quebec. In-depth semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with 11 professionals and three managers directly involved in ePHR implementation in a primary healthcare organization. RESULTS The results highlight the emergence of themes comprising facilitators or barriers to ePHR adoption. The main factors identified were the clinicians' leadership and previous involvement in organizational transformations, the context of practice, technology maturity providing a useful, additional and relevant content, integration with the available clinical information systems facilitating two-way communication and supporting the development of patient-professional partnerships and patients' use and adherence. The organizational precursors identified refer to the organizational receptivity to change, adjustment to participants' values, and the policies and practices set up to support ePHR adoption by professionals and their patients. Cost is a major issue determining ePHR implementation. CONCLUSION The factors and conditions identified will be useful strategically and operationally to design and implement new clinical and organizational practices and develop adapted technologies facilitating ePHR adoption by professionals.
Collapse
|
22
|
Rudin RS, Fanta CH, Predmore Z, Kron K, Edelen MO, Landman AB, Zimlichman E, Bates DW. Core Components for a Clinically Integrated mHealth App for Asthma Symptom Monitoring. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8:1031-1043. [PMID: 29241243 DOI: 10.4338/aci-2017-06-ra-0096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background mHealth apps may be useful tools for supporting chronic disease management.
Objective Our aim was to apply user-centered design principles to efficiently identify core components for an mHealth-based asthma symptom–monitoring intervention using patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Methods We iteratively combined principles of qualitative research, user-centered design, and “gamification” to understand patients' and providers' needs, develop and refine intervention components, develop prototypes, and create a usable mobile app to integrate with clinical workflows. We identified anticipated benefits and burdens for stakeholders.
Results We conducted 19 individual design sessions with nine adult patients and seven clinicians from an academic medical center (some were included multiple times). We identified four core intervention components: (1) Invitation—patients are invited by their physicians. (2) Symptom checks—patients receive weekly five-item questionnaires via the app with 48 hours to respond. Depending on symptoms, patients may be given the option to request a call from a nurse or receive one automatically. (3) Patient review—in the app, patients can view their self-reported data graphically. (4) In-person visit—physicians have access to patient-reported symptoms in the electronic health record (EHR) where they can review them before in-person visits. As there is currently no location in the EHR where physicians would consistently notice these data, recording a recent note was the best option. Benefits to patients may include helping decide when to call their provider and facilitating shared decision making. Benefits to providers may include saving time discussing symptoms. Provider organizations may need to pay nurses extra, but those costs may be offset by reduced visits and hospitalizations.
Conclusion Recent systematic reviews show inconsistent outcomes and little insight into functionalities required for mHealth asthma interventions, highlighting the need for systematic intervention design. We identified specific features for adoption and engagement that meet the stated needs of users for asthma symptom monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christopher H Fanta
- Partners Asthma Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | | | - Kevin Kron
- Partners Asthma Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | | | - Adam B Landman
- Partners Asthma Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Eyal Zimlichman
- Central Management, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - David W Bates
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lau AY, Piper K, Bokor D, Martin P, Lau VS, Coiera E. Challenges During Implementation of a Patient-Facing Mobile App for Surgical Rehabilitation: Feasibility Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2017; 4:e31. [PMID: 29217504 PMCID: PMC5740262 DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.8096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Revised: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 09/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Translating research into practice, especially the implementation of digital health technologies in routine care, is increasingly important. Yet, there are few studies examining the challenges of implementing patient-facing digital technologies in health care settings. Objective The aim of this study was to report challenges experienced when implementing mobile apps for patients to support their postsurgical rehabilitation in an orthopedic setting. Methods A mobile app was tailored to the needs of patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. A 30-min usability session and a 12-week feasibility study were conducted with patients to evaluate the app in routine care. Implementation records (observation reports, issues log, and email correspondence) explored factors that hindered or facilitated patient acceptance. Interviews with clinicians explored factors that influenced app integration in routine care. Results Participant completion was low (47%, 9/19). Factors that affected patient acceptance included digital literacy, health status, information technology (IT) infrastructure at home, privacy concerns, time limitations, the role of a caregiver, inconsistencies in instruction received from clinicians and the app, and app advice not reflective of patient progress over time. Factors that negatively influenced app integration in routine care included competing demands among clinicians, IT infrastructure in health care settings, identifying the right time to introduce the app to patients, user interface complexity for older patients, lack of coordination among multidisciplinary clinicians, and technical issues with app installation. Conclusions Three insights were identified for mobile app implementation in routine care: (1) apps for patients need to reflect their journey over time and in particular, postoperative apps ought to be introduced as part of preoperative care with opportunities for patients to learn and adopt the app during their postoperative journey; (2) strategies to address digital literacy issues among patients and clinicians are essential; and (3) impact of the app on patient outcomes and clinician workflow needs to be communicated, monitored, and reviewed. Lastly, digital health interventions should supplement but not replace patient interaction with clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annie Ys Lau
- Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kalman Piper
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Desmond Bokor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paige Martin
- Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Victor Sl Lau
- Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Enrico Coiera
- Centre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Registries as useful tools in characterization of allergic manifestations. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2017; 16:250-6. [PMID: 27031675 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Registries are useful to discover the applicability of data generated from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) into daily practice, and to search for real-life data usually not covered by them. RECENT FINDINGS In allergy, registry research brought clues to important epidemiological and clinical problems hardly accessible with other methods. The increase in the asthma prevalence in Sweden in contrast with stabilization in Denmark; the association of the prevalence of asthma and environmental factors; the knowledge of existing rhinitis international guidelines, but the poorly complacence of some of their recommendations; the low epinephrine use in anaphylaxis and the difference among European and Latin American elicitors; the predominance of β lactams or NSAIDs as drug hypersensitivity reactions inducers in different regions; the fact that most of the hereditary angioedema patients were receiving long-term prophylaxis with attenuated androgens; all the mentioned are clear examples of relevant and important data provided by current registries. SUMMARY Registries in allergy enlighten knowledge in areas not covered by classical investigational methods. As the number and importance of registries is growing, its contribution to the knowledge and management of allergic diseases will increase in the near future.
Collapse
|
25
|
Assadi V, Hassanein K. Consumer Adoption of Personal Health Record Systems: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e270. [PMID: 28751301 PMCID: PMC5553007 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2017] [Revised: 06/02/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Personal Health Records (PHR) systems provide individuals with access and control over their health information and consequently can support individuals in becoming active participants, rather than passive recipients, in their own care process. In spite of numerous benefits suggested for consumers’ utilizing PHR systems, research has shown that such systems are not yet widely adopted or well known to consumers. Bearing in mind the potential benefits of PHRs to consumers and their potential interest in these systems—and that similar to any other type of information system, adoption is a prerequisite for realizing the potential benefits of PHR systems—research is needed to understand how to enhance the adoption rates for PHR systems. Objective This research seeks to understand how individuals’ intentions to adopt PHR systems are affected by their self-determination in managing their own health—the extent of their ability to take an active role in managing their own health. As such, this research aims to develop and empirically validate a theoretical model that explains PHR systems adoption by the general public through the integration of theories from the information systems and psychology literatures. Methods This research employs a cross-sectional survey method targeted at the Canadian general public without any prior experience in using PHR systems. A partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling was used to validate the proposed research model of this study (N=159). Results Individuals with higher levels of ability to manage their own health (self-determination) are more likely to adopt PHR systems since they have more positive perceptions regarding the use of such systems. Further, such self-determination is fueled by autonomy support from consumers’ physicians as well as the consumers’ personality trait of autonomy orientation. Conclusions This study advances our theoretical understanding of PHR systems adoption. It also contributes to practice by providing insightful implications for designing, promoting, and facilitating the use of PHR systems among consumers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vahid Assadi
- McMaster Digital Transformation Research Centre, DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Khaled Hassanein
- McMaster Digital Transformation Research Centre, DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bousquet J, Chavannes NH, Guldemond N, Haahtela T, Hellings PW, Sheikh A. Realising the potential of mHealth to improve asthma and allergy care: how to shape the future. Eur Respir J 2017; 49:49/5/1700447. [PMID: 28461306 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00447-2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Bousquet
- MACVIA-France (Contre les Maladies Chroniques pour un Vieillissement Actif en France) European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing Reference Site, Montpellier, France .,INSERM U 1168, VIMA: Ageing and Chronic Diseases Epidemiological and Public Health Approaches, Villejuif, France.,Université Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, UMR-S 1168, Montigny le Bretonneux, France
| | - Niels H Chavannes
- Dept of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nick Guldemond
- Institute of Health Policy and Management iBMG, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tari Haahtela
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Peter W Hellings
- Laboratory of Clinical Immunology, Dept of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Centre of Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fernandez-Luque L, Staccini P. All that Glitters Is not Gold: Consumer Health Informatics and Education in the Era of Social Media and Health Apps. Findings from the Yearbook 2016 Section on Consumer Health Informatics. Yearb Med Inform 2016:188-193. [PMID: 27830250 DOI: 10.15265/iy-2016-045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize the state of the art published during the year 2015 in the areas related to consumer health informatics and education with a special emphasis on unintended consequences of applying mobile and social media technologies in that domain. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of articles published in PubMed with a predefined set of queries, which lead to the selection of over 700 potential relevant articles. Section editors screened those papers on the title, abstract, and finally complete paper basis, taking into account the papers' relevance for the section topic. The 15 most representative papers were finally selected by consensus between the two section editors and submitted for full review and scoring to external reviewers and the yearbook editors. Based on the final scoring, section editors selected the best five papers. RESULTS The five best papers can be grouped in two major areas: 1) Digital health literacy and 2) Quality and safety concerns. Regarding health literacy issues of patients with chronic conditions such as asthma, online interventions should rather focus on changing patient beliefs about the disease than on supporting them in the management of their pathology since personally controlled health management systems do not show expected benefits,. Nevertheless, encouraging and training chronic patients for an active online health information-seeking behaviour substantially decreases state anxiety level. Regarding safety and privacy issues, even recommended health-related apps available on mobile phones do not guarantee personal data protection. Furthermore, the analysis indicated that patients undergoing Internet interventions experienced at least one adverse event that might be related to treatment. At least, predictive factors have been identified in order to credit or not a health rumour. CONCLUSIONS Trusting digital and connected health can be achieved if patients, health care professionals, and industrials build a shared model of health data management integrating ethics rules. Only increasing efforts in education with regards of digital health would help reach this goal., This would not resolve all frauds and security issues but at least improve their detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Fernandez-Luque
- Luis Fernandez-Luque, PhD, Qatar Computing Research Institute, Hamad Bin Khalifa, University, Qatar Foundation, HBKU Research Complex, Doha, Qatar, E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|