An interactive, bilingual touch screen program to promote breastfeeding among Hispanic rural women: usability study

Breastfeeding Disparities Among Rural Breastfeeding Dyads in High-Income Countries: A Scoping Study

Background/Objective: Low breastfeeding initiation and duration of exclusivity put rural mothers and infants at risk for morbidity and mortality and significant economic costs. This scoping study aimed to identify determinants of breastfeeding disparities among rural dyads in high-income countries and their modifiable factors. Methods: The Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework was used. A literature review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL Complete, Embase, and APA PsycInfo databases to identify studies related to rural breastfeeding that met criteria published between 2012 and 2022. Results: Twenty-five studies were included. Rural mothers from high-income countries are more likely to be younger, be unmarried, have lower educational attainment, have lower socioeconomic status, smoke, and have a higher prepregnancy body mass index than their urban counterparts. Rural mothers across White, Black, and Hispanic racial and ethnic groups have significantly lower breastfeeding rates compared to urban mothers. Maternal physiological preparedness, breastfeeding problems, lifestyle choices, support from family, evidence-based practice, workplace support, and policy development and implementation for breastfeeding promotion were identified as modifiable factors. Interventions using technology are an emerging field to overcome rurality. Conclusions: Although breastfeeding disparities are prevalent in rural dyads, the basic challenges mothers face when breastfeeding are universal, despite geographical locations in high-income countries. More specific support needs to be provided for breastfeeding dyads to continue breastfeeding. Resource allocation needs to be improved to increase access to care. Patient-centered technology interventions may decrease breastfeeding barriers in rural areas.

An intelligent decision support system for acute postoperative endophthalmitis: design, development and evaluation of a smartphone application

BACKGROUND

Today, clinical decision support systems based on artificial intelligence can significantly help physicians in the correct diagnosis and quick rapid treatment of endophthalmitis as the most important cause of blindness in emergency diseases. This study aimed to design, develop, and evaluate an intelligent decision support system for acute postoperative endophthalmitis.

METHODS

This study was conducted in 2020-2021 in three phases: analysis, design and development, and evaluation. The user needs and the features of the system were identified through interviews with end users. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The list of clinical signs of acute postoperative endophthalmitis was provided to ophthalmologists for prioritization. 4 algorithms support vector machine, decision tree classifier, k-nearest neighbors, and random forest were used in the design of the computing core of the system for disease diagnosis. The acute postoperative endophthalmitis diagnosis application was developed for using by physicians and patients. Based on the data of 60 acute postoperative endophthalmitis patients, 143 acute postoperative endophthalmitis records and 12 non-acute postoperative endophthalmitis records were identified. The learning process of the algorithm was performed on 70% of the data and 30% of the data was used for evaluation.

RESULTS

The most important features of the application for physicians were selecting clinical signs and symptoms, predicting diagnosis based on artificial intelligence, physician-patient communication, selecting the appropriate treatment, and easy access to scientific resources. The results of the usability evaluation showed that the application was good with a mean (± SD) score of 7.73 ± 0.53 out of 10.

CONCLUSION

A decision support system with accuracy, precision, sensitivity and specificity, negative predictive values, F-measure and area under precision-recall curve 100% was created thanks to widespread participation, the use of clinical specialists' experiences and their awareness of patients' needs, as well as the availability of a comprehensive acute postoperative endophthalmitis clinical dataset.

Design, development, and usability evaluation of a smartphone-based application for nutrition management in patients with type II diabetes

Purpose

Information technology (IT)-based interventions, especially mobile health (mHealth), possess a great potential for promoting self-management in patients with chronic diseases, including diabetes type II. The present study was aimed to design and develop a smartphone-based application (app) for nutrition management in patients with type II diabetes and evaluation of its usability.

Methods

In this study, a three-phase research approach was followed; (1) To determine the information content and functionalities of the app, a five-point Likert scale checklist including six parts was developed based on reviews of clinical practice guidelines and specialized databases. The checklist was then given to ten experts in endocrinology and metabolism, internal medicine, and nutrition, and those items with a mean score higher than 3.75 were approved. (2) In Android Studio, the app was designed and developed using Java language. (3) The Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (QUIS) was used to assess the app's usability by 21 patients with type II diabetes, ten IT experts, and seven endocrinologists, internal medicine practitioners, and nutritionists over one month. Mean scores were divided into three levels: weak (0-3), average (3-6), and good (6-9).

Results

According to experts' view, 17 out of 22 educational content and 17 out of 27 functionalities were approved. The app's most important educational content was the timing of meals for insulin patients and the definition of diabetes and its complications. The designed app had the following functionalities: providing educational information, recording information, performing calculations, representing data graphically, setting reminders, and communicating with physicians. The most important features of the app were the insulin dose calculation, reminders for doctors' appointments, setting times for tests and blood glucose measurements, and also tracking weight, blood glucose levels, and blood pressure. In terms of usability evaluation, the app was rated "good" level by diabetic patients (7.83 ± 0.74), IT experts (8.1 ± 0.66), and physicians (8.03 ± 0.95).

Conclusion

Given the desirable evaluation of the app by patients, physicians, and IT experts, it can be concluded that the developed app has the required functionalities for nutrition management of patients with type II diabetes. Smartphone-based apps appear to be able to improve self-management, the quality of care and health in patients with diabetes, and reduce many of their unnecessary visits to healthcare centers, and costs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-022-01140-x.

Enhancing Asthma Patients' Self-Management through Smartphone-Based Application: Design, Usability Evaluation, and Educational Intervention

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to design and evaluate a smartphone-based application for improving self-management in patients with asthma and evaluate its effects on their knowledge.

METHODS

In this applied research, based on the Clinical Practice Guideline and a systematic review, a questionnaire was designed to determine the application information content and functionality requirements by 15 pediatric and adult asthma and allergy specialist. Then the application was designed and developed using Adobe Air software on the Android operating system. Usability evaluation of the mobile application was performed using the standard questionnaire for user interaction satisfaction (QUIS), which completed by 30 patients with asthma, 8 information technology (IT) specialists, and 2 asthma and allergy specialists. Self-management knowledge of 30 asthma patients was measured using a researcher-made questionnaire before and after using the application.

RESULTS

The number of specialists in the both Delphi rounds was 15 and the mean work experiences were 17.6 years. The most important elements for asthma self-management were avoiding exposure to allergen and triggers (96%), drug treatment (94.6%), and how to use the therapeutic tools (92.4%), and the most important functionalities were alerting the patients when they did not control asthma (92%), setting reminders for timely drug use (85.4%) and therapeutic tools (82.6%), recording prescription drugs (82.6%), and peak flow meter values (82%). Usability evaluation showed that 30 patients with asthma, 8 IT specialists, and 2 physicians evaluated the application at a "good" level. The mean score of the patients' knowledge before intervention was 2.43 ± 0.95 which after intervention was significantly increased to 4.3 ± 0.56 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Considering the desirable outcomes of application evaluation and a positive impact of this educational intervention on asthma patients' knowledge, it is possible to use mobile-based self-management programs to help these patients to manage illness and gain knowledge and self-management skills.

[Health Technologies and their contributions to the promotion of breastfeeding: an integrative review of the literature]

Technologies can be promoters of breastfeeding. The scope of this review is therefore to identify health technologies and their contribution to the promotion of breastfeeding. A search was conducted in the following databases: Lilacs, SCOPUS, Medline and CINAHL, using the key words "breastfeeding," "technology" and "health promotion." The final sample consisted of 24 original articles, among which 19 technologies were identified and classified in managerial, educational and healthcare groupings. Educational technologies were predominant (12) and presented greater contributions to the promotion of breastfeeding. The combination of different technologies has revealed positive results in maintaining breastfeeding. The lack of studies with the use of managerial technologies during the lactation process, as well as the development of other research that prove the effects of each technology on increasing the prevalence of breastfeeding, was clearly detected in the review.

A Breastfeed-Promoting Mobile App Intervention: Usability and Usefulness Study

BACKGROUND

Breastfeeding is proven to have lasting health benefits for both mothers and infants; however, 6-month exclusive breastfeeding rate remains below 20% in Thailand. Although the number of research literature and commercial apps for breastfeeding women is significantly growing, they are country-specific and restricted to English-speaking users. There exists a major knowledge gap on how mobile health apps could support breastfeeding in Thailand. To address these gaps, MoomMae has been developed with the intention to support Thai women in breastfeeding outside of their homes and in keeping their feeding records.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usability and usefulness of MoomMae, a mobile phone app designed to support breastfeeding women.

METHODS

Our study was reviewed and approved by Thailand's National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA) ethics committee. A total of 21 breastfeeding women with at least one Android phone or tablet were recruited via convenience and snowball sampling. The study process for each participant was as follows: the participant was requested to attend a preuse interview and given the app to use for 4 weeks. Following this period, a postuse interview was conducted to examine the usability and usefulness of the app. Both sessions were held individually and audiorecorded for qualitative analysis.

RESULTS

The mean scores of usability and usefulness from the postuse survey were 4.33 (SD 0.87; range 1-5) and 4.60 (SD 0.74; range 2-5). Our qualitative analysis revealed a total of 137 feedbacks: 71 related to usability and 66 associated with usefulness. A further sentimental analysis showed that comments on usability were generally negative (59 negative, 11 positive, and 1 neutral), and comments on usefulness were relatively positive (56 positive, 9 negative, and 1 neutral). We discovered 26 unique design issues and proposed recommendations for future improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Our usability and usefulness assessment of MoomMae demonstrated that MoomMae has a great potential to be a useful self-management tool for breastfeeding mothers in Thailand. The qualitative analysis suggested that the app is supportive of breastfeeding on demand, but the flow and inputs of the app should be redesigned to be more intuitive. For future implementations, the most desirable feature is a pump-reminding notification system.

Recruitment and retention challenges and successes

OBJECTIVE

Addressing health disparities requires well designed, culturally adapted research. However, recruiting/retaining minority participants has often been challenging. We present strategies used to successfully recruit and retain rural Hispanic women during a breastfeeding education intervention.

DESIGN

This study involved a two-group repeated measures quasi-experimental design with assessments at seven intervals between enrollment and 6 months postpartum. Participants (Hispanic women ≥ 15 years old) were recruited through a regional hospital.

RESULTS

We successfully met our recruitment goals, most women contacted were enrolled (46 of 58), and 100% completed the study.

DISCUSSION

Research staff with ties within the community helped establish trust. Using bilingual study materials, simple language, and an interpreter addressed language/literacy concerns. Phone assessments facilitated participation as transportation was an issue. Accommodating requests to deliver or mail study materials and providing incentives were important. Extra effort was needed to maintain contact when phone service was disrupted or participants moved. Keys to success were persistence, flexibility, and alleviating barriers to participation.

Evaluation of a computer-based bilingual breastfeeding educational program on breastfeeding knowledge, self-efficacy and intent to breastfeed among rural Hispanic women

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of an interactive, computer based, bi-lingual breastfeeding educational program on breastfeeding knowledge, self-efficacy and intent to breastfeed among rural Hispanic women living in Scottsbluff, Nebraska.

METHODS

A two-group, repeated measures quasi-experimental study was conducted to evaluate the impact of a breastfeeding intervention. Forty six rural Hispanic women between ages 18 and 38 years were enrolled at the Regional West Medical Center in Scottsbluff, Nebraska. Study participants were randomized into intervention and control groups, with the intervention group (n=23) receiving bi-lingual (English and Spanish) breastfeeding education on a touch screen computer program, while the control group received printed educational material. Study participants were enrolled during their last six weeks of pregnancy, with follow up assessments conducted post-partum at days 3 and 7, weeks 2 and 6, and months 3 and 6. The study protocol was approved by the University of Nebraska Medical Center Institutional Review Board (IRB protocol #430-12-EP) and City University of New York Institutional Review Board (IRB protocol # 642980-1).

RESULTS

A significant improvement in the breastfeeding knowledge and intent to breastfeed scores was seen over a 6 month period among all the study participants (p<0.05). There was a gradual increase in the breastfeeding self-efficacy scores till week 6 followed by a decrease in self-efficacy scores at month 3 (p=0.46), and month 6 (P=0.54). Breastfeeding knowledge scores differed significantly between the study participants in the control and intervention groups at week 6 (p=0.03). There were no significant differences in the breastfeeding knowledge between the control and intervention groups at other time points. The control group showed gradual decline in their self-efficacy scores at month 3 and month 6 compared to the intervention group that showed a gradual increase in their self-efficacy scores at different time points during their follow up period. However, there were no significant differences in the self-efficacy scores between the intervention and control groups at different points. The control group showed significantly higher negative breastfeeding sentiment scores compared to the intervention group at days 3 (p=0.02) and 7 (p=0.03) indicating a lower intent to breastfeed.

CONCLUSION

Hispanic women living in rural settings showed improvement in breastfeeding knowledge, self-efficacy and intent to breastfeed using the computer based bi-lingual educational program. Results show week 6 and month 3 to be the critical time points of intervention so that women continue to breastfeed.

Evaluating motivational interviewing to promote breastfeeding by rural Mexican-American mothers: the challenge of attrition

Although most Hispanic/Latino-American mothers initiate breastfeeding, duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding remain low. We explored whether a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention could help rural Mexican-American mothers continue breastfeeding. We used a two-group (MI intervention n = 26, attention control [AC] n = 27) repeated measures experimental design. Assessments and interventions occurred at 3 days, 2 weeks, and 6 weeks postpartum (time points when mothers are particularly vulnerable to discontinuing breastfeeding), with a final phone assessment at 6 months postpartum. We collected demographic data and measured intent to breastfeed for 6 months (intent question), self-efficacy (Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form), and collected breastfeeding information (breastfeeding assessment questionnaire). Independent t-tests and Mann Whitney U non-parametric tests were used to evaluate group differences (α = 0.05). High levels of attrition by week 6 impaired our ability to evaluate the potential of our MI intervention. No significant differences were found between groups for any of the outcome variables (intent to breastfeed for 6 months, breastfeeding self-efficacy, and duration of breastfeeding). Though the mothers intended to breastfeed for 6 months and were confident in their ability to do so, most did not breastfeed for 6 months. At 6 months, mothers receiving the MI intervention had breastfed an average of 90 days compared to 82 days for those receiving the AC sessions and 22% of the mothers in each group were still breastfeeding at some level. Because of the impact of attrition during this study, we discuss factors that contributed to attrition and approaches to lessen this problem in future studies. Such efforts may require a greater investment of time and resources and should be budgeted accordingly. Culturally appropriate interventions are needed to help rural Mexican-American mothers meet their breastfeeding goals, thus providing an opportunity to reduce their children's risk of multiple diseases and obesity. Only when we address these considerations will we have an opportunity to decrease health disparities, promote healthy behaviors, and be trusted health care partners.