1
|
Park S, Lee S, Howard S, Yi J. Technology-Based Music Interventions to Reduce Anxiety and Pain Among Patients Undergoing Surgery or Procedures: Systematic Review of the Literature. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024; 12:e48802. [PMID: 38976863 PMCID: PMC11263896 DOI: 10.2196/48802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitalized patients undergoing surgery or procedures may experience negative symptoms. Music is a nonpharmacological complementary approach and is used as an intervention to reduce anxiety, stress, and pain in these patients. Recently, music has been used conveniently in clinical situations with technology devices, and the mode of providing music is an important factor in technology-based music interventions. However, many reviews have focused only on the effectiveness of music interventions. OBJECTIVE We aimed to review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of technology-based music interventions for reducing anxiety and pain among patients undergoing surgery or procedures. We examined the clinical situation, devices used, delivery methods, and effectiveness of technology-based music interventions in primary articles. METHODS The search was performed in the following 5 electronic databases: PubMed, MEDLINE (OvidSP), CINAHL complete, PSYCINFO, and Embase. This systematic review focused on technology-based music interventions. The following articles were included: (1) RCTs, (2) studies using interactive technology (eg, smartphones, mHealth, tablets, applications, and virtual reality), (3) empirical studies reporting pain and anxiety outcomes, and (4) English articles published from 2018 to 2023 (as of January 18, 2023). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2. RESULTS Among 292 studies identified, 21 met the inclusion criteria and were included. Of these studies, 9 reported that anxiety scores decreased after music interventions and 7 reported that pain could be decreased before, during, and after procedures. The methodology of the music intervention was important to the results on anxiety and pain in the clinical trials. More than 50% (13/21, 62%) of the studies included in this review allowed participants to select themes themselves. However, it was difficult to distinguish differences in effects depending on the device or software used for the music interventions. CONCLUSIONS Technology-based music interventions could help reduce anxiety and pain among patients undergoing surgery or procedures. The findings of this review could help medical teams to choose a practical methodology for music interventions. Future studies should examine the effects of advanced technology-based music interventions using smart devices and software that promote interactions between medical staff and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunghee Park
- Nursing Department, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Republic of Korea
- College of Nursing, Ajou University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sohye Lee
- Loewenberg College of Nursing, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Sheri Howard
- Loewenberg College of Nursing, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Jeeseon Yi
- College of Nursing & Sustainable Health Research Institute, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Molenaar CJ, van Rooijen SJ, Fokkenrood HJ, Roumen RM, Janssen L, Slooter GD. Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 5:CD013259. [PMID: 37162250 PMCID: PMC10171468 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013259.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery is the cornerstone in curative treatment of colorectal cancer. Unfortunately, surgery itself can adversely affect patient health. 'Enhanced Recovery After Surgery' programmes, which include multimodal interventions, have improved patient outcomes substantially. However, these are mainly applied peri- and postoperatively. Multimodal prehabilitation includes multiple preoperative interventions to prepare patients for surgery with the aim of increasing resilience, thereby improving postoperative outcomes. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of multimodal prehabilitation programmes on functional capacity, postoperative complications, and quality of life in adult patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO in January 2021. We also searched trial registries up to March 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adult patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer, scheduled for surgery, comparing multimodal prehabilitation programmes (defined as comprising at least two preoperative interventions) with no prehabilitation. We focused on the following outcomes: functional capacity (i.e. 6-minute walk test, VO2peak, handgrip strength), postoperative outcomes (i.e. complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, emergency department visits, re-admissions), health-related quality of life, compliance, safety of prehabilitation, and return to normal activities. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. Any disagreements were solved with discussion and consensus. We pooled data to perform meta-analyses, where possible. MAIN RESULTS We included three RCTs that enrolled 250 participants with non-metastatic colorectal cancer, scheduled for elective (mainly laparoscopic) surgery. Included trials were conducted in tertiary care centres and recruited patients during periods ranging from 17 months to 45 months. A total of 130 participants enrolled in a preoperative four-week trimodal prehabilitation programme consisting of exercise, nutritional intervention, and anxiety reduction techniques. Outcomes of these participants were compared to those of 120 participants who started an identical but postoperative programme. Postoperatively, prehabilitation may improve functional capacity, determined with the 6-minute walk test at four and eight weeks (mean difference (MD) 26.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) -13.81 to 65.85; 2 studies; n = 131; and MD 26.58, 95% CI -8.88 to 62.04; 2 studies; n = 140); however, the certainty of evidence is low and very low, respectively, due to serious risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency. After prehabilitation, the functional capacity before surgery improved, with a clinically relevant mean difference of 24.91 metres (95% CI 11.24 to 38.57; 3 studies; n = 225). The certainty of evidence was moderate due to downgrading for serious risk of bias. The effects of prehabilitation on the number of complications (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.29; 3 studies; n = 250), emergency department visits (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.32; 3 studies; n = 250) and re-admissions (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.65; 3 studies; n = 250) were small or even trivial. The certainty of evidence was low due to downgrading for serious risk of bias and imprecision. The effects on VO2peak, handgrip strength, length of hospital stay, mortality rate, health-related quality of life, return to normal activities, safety of the programme, and compliance rate could not be analysed quantitatively due to missing or insufficient data. The included studies did not report a difference between groups for health-related quality of life and length of hospital stay. Data on remaining outcomes were not reported or were reported inadequately in the included studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Prehabilitation may result in an improved functional capacity, determined with the 6-minute walk test both preoperatively and postoperatively. A solid effect on the number of omplications, postoperative emergency department visits and re-admissions could not be established. The certainty of evidence ranges from moderate to very low, due to downgrading for serious risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency. In addition, only three heterogeneous studies were included in this review. Therefore, the findings of this review should be interpreted with caution. Numerous relevant RCTs are ongoing and will be included in a future update of this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rudi Mh Roumen
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands
| | - Loes Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands
| | - Gerrit D Slooter
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Molenaar CJ, van Rooijen SJ, Fokkenrood HJ, Roumen RM, Janssen L, Slooter GD. Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 5:CD013259. [PMID: 35588252 PMCID: PMC9118366 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013259.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery is the cornerstone in curative treatment of colorectal cancer. Unfortunately, surgery itself can adversely affect patient health. 'Enhanced Recovery After Surgery' programmes, which include multimodal interventions, have improved patient outcomes substantially. However, these are mainly applied peri- and postoperatively. Multimodal prehabilitation includes multiple preoperative interventions to prepare patients for surgery with the aim of increasing resilience, thereby improving postoperative outcomes. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of multimodal prehabilitation programmes on functional capacity, postoperative complications, and quality of life in adult patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO in January 2021. We also searched trial registries up to March 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adult patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer, scheduled for surgery, comparing multimodal prehabilitation programmes (defined as comprising at least two preoperative interventions) with no prehabilitation. We focused on the following outcomes: functional capacity (i.e. 6-minute walk test, VO2peak, handgrip strength), postoperative outcomes (i.e. complications, mortality, length of hospital stay, emergency department visits, re-admissions), health-related quality of life, compliance, safety of prehabilitation, and return to normal activities. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. Any disagreements were solved with discussion and consensus. We pooled data to perform meta-analyses, where possible. MAIN RESULTS We included three RCTs that enrolled 250 participants with non-metastatic colorectal cancer, scheduled for elective (mainly laparoscopic) surgery. Included trials were conducted in tertiary care centres and recruited patients during periods ranging from 17 months to 45 months. A total of 130 participants enrolled in a preoperative four-week trimodal prehabilitation programme consisting of exercise, nutritional intervention, and anxiety reduction techniques. Outcomes of these participants were compared to those of 120 participants who started an identical but postoperative programme. Postoperatively, prehabilitation may improve functional capacity, determined with the 6-minute walk test at four and eight weeks (mean difference (MD) 26.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) -13.81 to 65.85; 2 studies; n = 131; and MD 26.58, 95% CI -8.88 to 62.04; 2 studies; n = 140); however, the certainty of evidence is low and very low, respectively, due to serious risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency. After prehabilitation, the functional capacity before surgery improved, with a clinically relevant mean difference of 24.91 metres (95% CI 11.24 to 38.57; 3 studies; n = 225). The certainty of evidence was moderate due to downgrading for serious risk of bias. Prehabilitation may also result in fewer complications (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.29; 3 studies; n = 250) and fewer emergency department visits (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.32; 3 studies; n = 250). The certainty of evidence was low due to downgrading for serious risk of bias and imprecision. On the other hand, prehabilitation may also result in a higher re-admission rate (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.65; 3 studies; n = 250). The certainty of evidence was again low due to downgrading for risk of bias and imprecision. The effect on VO2peak, handgrip strength, length of hospital stay, mortality rate, health-related quality of life, return to normal activities, safety of the programme, and compliance rate could not be analysed quantitatively due to missing or insufficient data. The included studies did not report a difference between groups for health-related quality of life and length of hospital stay. Data on remaining outcomes were not reported or were reported inadequately in the included studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Prehabilitation may result in an improved functional capacity, determined with the 6-minute walk test both preoperatively and postoperatively. Complication rates and the number of emergency department visits postoperatively may also diminish due to a prehabilitation programme, while the number of re-admissions may be higher in the prehabilitation group. The certainty of evidence ranges from moderate to very low, due to downgrading for serious risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency. In addition, only three heterogeneous studies were included in this review. Therefore, the findings of this review should be interpreted with caution. Numerous relevant RCTs are ongoing and will be included in a future update of this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rudi Mh Roumen
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands
| | - Loes Janssen
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands
| | - Gerrit D Slooter
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
IMPROV-ED trial: eHealth programme for faster recovery and reduced healthcare utilisation after CABG. Neth Heart J 2020; 29:80-87. [PMID: 33141398 PMCID: PMC7843857 DOI: 10.1007/s12471-020-01508-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background After coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), healthcare utilisation is high and is partly unplanned. eHealth applications have been proposed to reduce healthcare consumption and to enable patients to get actively involved in their recovery. This way, healthcare expenses can be reduced and the quality of care can be improved. Objectives We aim to evaluate whether the use of an eHealth programme can reduce unplanned healthcare utilisation and improve mental and physical health in the first 6 weeks after discharge in patients who underwent CABG. In addition, patient satisfaction and use of the eHealth programme will be evaluated. Methods For this single-centre randomised controlled trial, at least 280 patients referred for CABG will be included at the preoperative outpatient clinic and randomised to an intervention or control group. The intervention group will have access to an eHealth programme, which consists of online educational videos developed by the Dutch Heart Foundation and postoperative video consultations with a physician. The control group will receive standard care and will not have access to the eHealth programme. The primary endpoint is healthcare utilisation; other endpoints include anxiety, duration of recovery, quality of life and patient satisfaction. Participants will complete several questionnaires at 6 time points during the study. Results Patient enrolment started in February 2020 and completion of the follow-up period is expected in August 2021. Conclusion This randomised trial was initiated to test the hypothesis that patients who are partaking in our eHealth programme use less unplanned care and experience a better quality of life, less anxiety and a faster recovery than controls.
Collapse
|
5
|
Rauwerdink A, Jansen M, de Borgie CAJM, Bemelman WA, Daams F, Schijven MP, Buskens CJ. Improving enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): ERAS APPtimize study protocol, a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of a patient-centred mobile application on patient participation in colorectal surgery. BMC Surg 2019; 19:125. [PMID: 31477107 PMCID: PMC6719362 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-019-0588-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative care in colorectal surgery is systematically defined in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. The ERAS protocol improves perioperative care in a multimodal way to enhance early and safe release from the hospital. Adequate compliance to the elements of the ERAS protocol is multifactorial. There are still opportunities to improve compliance of the protocol by actively involving the patient. The main objective of this study is to investigate whether compliance of selected items in the ERAS protocol can be improved through actively involving patients in the ERAS care pathway through the use of a patient-centred mobile application. METHODS A multicentre randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, who are 18 years or older and in possession of an eligible smartphone, will be included. Patients assigned to the intervention group will install a patient-centred mobile application to be guided through the ERAS care pathway. Patients in the control group will receive care as usual. Both groups will wear an activity tracker. The primary outcome is overall compliance to selected active elements of the ERAS protocol, as registered by the patient. Secondary outcomes include Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) such as health-related quality of life, physical activity, and patient satisfaction of received care. Care-related outcomes, such as length of hospital stay, number of complications, re-intervention, and readmission rates, will also be assessed. RESULTS The enrolment of patients will start in the second quarter of 2019. Data collection had not begun by the time this protocol was submitted. CONCLUSION We hypothesize that by providing patients with a patient-centred mobile application, compliance to the active elements of ERAS protocol can be improved, resulting in an increased health-related quality of life, physical activity, and patient satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register, NTR7314 , prospectively registered on the 9th of November 2017 ( http://www.trialregister.nl ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Rauwerdink
- Department of surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - M. Jansen
- Department of surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - C. A. J. M. de Borgie
- Clinical Research Unit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - W. A. Bemelman
- Department of surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - F. Daams
- Department of surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - M. P. Schijven
- Department of surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - C. J. Buskens
- Department of surgery, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brickwood KJ, Watson G, O'Brien J, Williams AD. Consumer-Based Wearable Activity Trackers Increase Physical Activity Participation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019. [PMID: 30977740 DOI: 10.2196/11819.7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The range of benefits associated with regular physical activity participation is irrefutable. Despite the well-known benefits, physical inactivity remains one of the major contributing factors to ill-health throughout industrialized countries. Traditional lifestyle interventions such as group education or telephone counseling are effective at increasing physical activity participation; however, physical activity levels tend to decline over time. Consumer-based wearable activity trackers that allow users to objectively monitor activity levels are now widely available and may offer an alternative method for assisting individuals to remain physically active. OBJECTIVE This review aimed to determine the effects of interventions utilizing consumer-based wearable activity trackers on physical activity participation and sedentary behavior when compared with interventions that do not utilize activity tracker feedback. METHODS A systematic review was performed searching the following databases for studies that included the use of a consumer-based wearable activity tracker to improve physical activity participation: Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, SPORTDiscus, and Health Technology Assessments. Controlled trials of adults comparing the use of a consumer-based wearable activity tracker with other nonactivity tracker-based interventions were included. The main outcome measures were physical activity participation and sedentary behavior. All studies were assessed for risk of bias, and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to rank the quality of evidence. The guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement were followed. A random-effects meta-analysis was completed on the included outcome measures to estimate the treatment effect of interventions that included an activity tracker compared with a control group. RESULTS There was a significant increase in daily step count (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.24; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.33; P<.001), moderate and vigorous physical activity (SMD 0.27; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.39; P<.001), and energy expenditure (SMD 0.28; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.54; P=.03) and a nonsignificant decrease in sedentary behavior (SMD -0.20; 95% CI -0.43 to 0.03; P=.08) following the intervention versus control comparator across all studies in the meta-analyses. In general, included studies were at low risk of bias, except for performance bias. Heterogeneity varied across the included meta-analyses ranging from low (I2=3%) for daily step count through to high (I2=67%) for sedentary behavior. CONCLUSIONS Utilizing a consumer-based wearable activity tracker as either the primary component of an intervention or as part of a broader physical activity intervention has the potential to increase physical activity participation. As the effects of physical activity interventions are often short term, the inclusion of a consumer-based wearable activity tracker may provide an effective tool to assist health professionals to provide ongoing monitoring and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie-Jane Brickwood
- School of Health Science, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Newnham, Australia
| | - Greig Watson
- School of Health Science, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Newnham, Australia
| | - Jane O'Brien
- School of Health Science, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Newnham, Australia
| | - Andrew D Williams
- School of Health Science, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Newnham, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brickwood KJ, Watson G, O'Brien J, Williams AD. Consumer-Based Wearable Activity Trackers Increase Physical Activity Participation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019; 7:e11819. [PMID: 30977740 PMCID: PMC6484266 DOI: 10.2196/11819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 280] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Revised: 11/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The range of benefits associated with regular physical activity participation is irrefutable. Despite the well-known benefits, physical inactivity remains one of the major contributing factors to ill-health throughout industrialized countries. Traditional lifestyle interventions such as group education or telephone counseling are effective at increasing physical activity participation; however, physical activity levels tend to decline over time. Consumer-based wearable activity trackers that allow users to objectively monitor activity levels are now widely available and may offer an alternative method for assisting individuals to remain physically active. OBJECTIVE This review aimed to determine the effects of interventions utilizing consumer-based wearable activity trackers on physical activity participation and sedentary behavior when compared with interventions that do not utilize activity tracker feedback. METHODS A systematic review was performed searching the following databases for studies that included the use of a consumer-based wearable activity tracker to improve physical activity participation: Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, SPORTDiscus, and Health Technology Assessments. Controlled trials of adults comparing the use of a consumer-based wearable activity tracker with other nonactivity tracker-based interventions were included. The main outcome measures were physical activity participation and sedentary behavior. All studies were assessed for risk of bias, and the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to rank the quality of evidence. The guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement were followed. A random-effects meta-analysis was completed on the included outcome measures to estimate the treatment effect of interventions that included an activity tracker compared with a control group. RESULTS There was a significant increase in daily step count (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.24; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.33; P<.001), moderate and vigorous physical activity (SMD 0.27; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.39; P<.001), and energy expenditure (SMD 0.28; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.54; P=.03) and a nonsignificant decrease in sedentary behavior (SMD -0.20; 95% CI -0.43 to 0.03; P=.08) following the intervention versus control comparator across all studies in the meta-analyses. In general, included studies were at low risk of bias, except for performance bias. Heterogeneity varied across the included meta-analyses ranging from low (I2=3%) for daily step count through to high (I2=67%) for sedentary behavior. CONCLUSIONS Utilizing a consumer-based wearable activity tracker as either the primary component of an intervention or as part of a broader physical activity intervention has the potential to increase physical activity participation. As the effects of physical activity interventions are often short term, the inclusion of a consumer-based wearable activity tracker may provide an effective tool to assist health professionals to provide ongoing monitoring and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie-Jane Brickwood
- School of Health Science, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Newnham, Australia
| | - Greig Watson
- School of Health Science, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Newnham, Australia
| | - Jane O'Brien
- School of Health Science, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Newnham, Australia
| | - Andrew D Williams
- School of Health Science, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Newnham, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Debono B, Corniola MV, Pietton R, Sabatier P, Hamel O, Tessitore E. Benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for fusion in degenerative spine surgery: impact on outcome, length of stay, and patient satisfaction. Neurosurg Focus 2019; 46:E6. [DOI: 10.3171/2019.1.focus18669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVEEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) proposes a multimodal, evidence-based approach to perioperative care. Thanks to the improvement in care protocols and the fluidity of the patient pathway, the first goal of ERAS is the improvement of surgical outcomes and patient experience, with a final impact on a reduction in the hospital length of stay (LOS). The implementation of ERAS in spinal surgery is in the early stages. The authors report on their initial experience in applying an ERAS program to several degenerative spinal fusion procedures.METHODSThe authors selected two 2-year periods: the first from before any implementation of ERAS principles (pre-ERAS years 2012–2013) and the second corresponding to a period when the paradigm was applied widely (post-ERAS years 2016–2017). Patient groups in these periods were retrospectively compared according to three degenerative conditions requiring fusion: anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), and posterior lumbar fusion. Data were collected on patient demographics, operative and perioperative data, LOSs, 90-day readmissions, and morbidity. ERAS-trained nurses were involved to support patients at each pre-, intra-, and postoperative step with the help of a mobile application (app). A satisfaction survey was included in the app.RESULTSThe pre-ERAS group included 1563 patients (159 ALIF, 749 ACDF, and 655 posterior fusion), and the post-ERAS group included 1920 patients (202 ALIF, 612 ACDF, and 1106 posterior fusion). The mean LOS was significantly shorter in the post-ERAS group than in the pre-ERAS group for all three conditions. It was reduced from 6.06 ± 1.1 to 3.33 ± 0.8 days for the ALIF group (p < 0.001), from 3.08 ± 0.9 to 1.3 ± 0.7 days for the ACDF group (p < 0.001), and from 6.7 ± 4.8 to 4.8 ± 2.3 days for posterior fusion cases (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in overall complications between the two periods for the ALIF (11.9% pre-ERAS vs 11.4% post-ERAS, p = 0.86) and ACDF (6.0% vs 8.2%, p = 0.12) cases, but they decreased significantly for lumbar fusions (14.8% vs 10.9%, p = 0.02). Regarding satisfaction with overall care among 808 available responses, 699 patients (86.5%) were satisfied or very satisfied, and regarding appreciation of the mobile e-health app in the perceived optimization of care management, 665 patients (82.3%) were satisfied or very satisfied.CONCLUSIONSThe introduction of the ERAS approach at the authors’ institution for spinal fusion for three studied conditions resulted in a significant decrease in LOS without causing increased postoperative complications. Patient satisfaction with overall management, upstream organization of hospitalization, and the use of e-health was high. According to the study results, which are consistent with those in other studies, the whole concept of ERAS (primarily reducing complications and pain, and then reducing LOS) seems applicable to spinal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Debono
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, CAPIO-Clinique des Cèdres, Cornebarrieu, France; and
| | - Marco V. Corniola
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Raphael Pietton
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, CAPIO-Clinique des Cèdres, Cornebarrieu, France; and
| | - Pascal Sabatier
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, CAPIO-Clinique des Cèdres, Cornebarrieu, France; and
| | - Olivier Hamel
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, CAPIO-Clinique des Cèdres, Cornebarrieu, France; and
| | - Enrico Tessitore
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
den Bakker CM, Schaafsma FG, van der Meij E, Meijerink WJ, van den Heuvel B, Baan AH, Davids PH, Scholten PC, van der Meij S, van Baal WM, van Dalsen AD, Lips DJ, van der Steeg JW, Leclercq WK, Geomini PM, Consten EC, Schraffordt Koops SE, de Castro SM, van Kesteren PJ, Cense HA, Stockmann HB, Ten Cate AD, Bonjer HJ, Huirne JA, Anema JR. Electronic Health Program to Empower Patients in Returning to Normal Activities After General Surgical and Gynecological Procedures: Intervention Mapping as a Useful Method for Further Development. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e9938. [PMID: 30724740 PMCID: PMC6381532 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Revised: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Support for guiding and monitoring postoperative recovery and resumption of activities is usually not provided to patients after discharge from the hospital. Therefore, a perioperative electronic health (eHealth) intervention (“ikherstel” intervention or “I recover” intervention) was developed to empower gynecological patients during the perioperative period. This eHealth intervention requires a need for further development for patients who will undergo various types of general surgical and gynecological procedures. Objective This study aimed to further develop the “ikherstel” eHealth intervention using Intervention Mapping (IM) to fit a broader patient population. Methods The IM protocol was used to guide further development of the “ikherstel” intervention. First, patients’ needs were identified using (1) the information of a process evaluation of the earlier performed “ikherstel” study, (2) a review of the literature, (3) a survey study, and (4) focus group discussions (FGDs) among stakeholders. Next, program outcomes and change objectives were defined. Third, behavior change theories and practical tools were selected for the intervention program. Finally, an implementation and evaluation plan was developed. Results The outcome for an eHealth intervention tool for patients recovering from abdominal general surgical and gynecological procedures was redefined as “achieving earlier recovery including return to normal activities and work.” The Attitude-Social Influence-Self-Efficacy model was used as a theoretical framework to transform personal and external determinants into change objectives of personal behavior. The knowledge gathered by needs assessment and using the theoretical framework in the preparatory steps of the IM protocol resulted in additional tools. A mobile app, an activity tracker, and an electronic consultation (eConsult) will be incorporated in the further developed eHealth intervention. This intervention will be evaluated in a multicenter, single-blinded randomized controlled trial with 18 departments in 11 participating hospitals in the Netherlands. Conclusions The intervention is extended to patients undergoing general surgical procedures and for malignant indications. New intervention tools such as a mobile app, an activity tracker, and an eConsult were developed. Trial Registration Netherlands Trial Registry NTR5686; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=5686
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal M den Bakker
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Occupational and Public Health, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frederieke G Schaafsma
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Occupational and Public Health, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eva van der Meij
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Occupational and Public Health, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Baukje van den Heuvel
- Department of Operation Rooms, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Astrid H Baan
- Department of Surgery, Amstelland Ziekenhuis, Amstelveen, Netherlands
| | - Paul Hp Davids
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Petrus C Scholten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - W Marchien van Baal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, Netherlands
| | | | - Daniel J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem van der Steeg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
| | | | - Peggy Maj Geomini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medisch Centrum, Veldhoven, Netherlands
| | - Esther Cj Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | | | - Steve Mm de Castro
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Paul Jm van Kesteren
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Huib A Cense
- Department of Surgery, Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis, Beverwijk, Netherlands
| | | | - A Dorien Ten Cate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, Netherlands
| | - Hendrik J Bonjer
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Judith Af Huirne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Johannes R Anema
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Occupational and Public Health, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
den Bakker CM, Huirne JA, Schaafsma FG, de Geus C, Bonjer HJ, Anema JR. Electronic Health Program to Empower Patients in Returning to Normal Activities After Colorectal Surgical Procedures: Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e10674. [PMID: 30694205 PMCID: PMC6371072 DOI: 10.2196/10674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Revised: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term recovery takes longer than expected despite improved surgical techniques and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs. An electronic health (eHealth) care program ("ikherstel") was developed to partially substitute perioperative care for patients undergoing colorectal surgical procedures. Successfully tested eHealth programs are not always implemented in usual care, and it is, therefore, important to evaluate the process to optimize future implementation. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the eHealth intervention was executed as planned. METHODS A mixed-methods process evaluation was carried out alongside a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). This evaluation was performed using the Linnan and Steckler framework for the quantitative part of this study, measuring the components reach, dose delivered, dose received, fidelity, and participants' attitudes. Total implementation scores were calculated using the averaging approach, in which the sum of all data points is divided by the number of data points and the total adherence to the protocol is measured. For the qualitative part, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology framework was used. The quantitative data were based on participants' questionnaires, a logistic database, a weblog, and participants' medical files and were obtained by performing semistructured interviews with participants of the RCT. RESULTS A total of 151 participants of 340 eligible patients were included in the RCT, of which 73 participants were allocated to the intervention group. On the basis of the quantitative process data, total implementation scores for the website, mobile app, electronic consult, and activity tracker were 64%, 63%, 44%, and 67%, respectively. Participants in the qualitative part experienced the program as supportive and provided guidance on their recovery process after colorectal surgery. Most frequently mentioned barriers were the limited interaction with and feedback from health care professionals and the lack of tailoring of the convalescence plan in case of a different course of recovery. CONCLUSIONS The intervention needs more interaction with and feedback from health care professionals and needs more tailored guidance in case of different recovery or treatment courses. To ensure a successful implementation of the program in daily practice, some adjustments are required to optimize the program in a blended care form. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Registry NTR5686; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC= 5686 (Archieved by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/75LrJaHrr).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal M den Bakker
- Department of Occupational and Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Judith Af Huirne
- Department of Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frederieke G Schaafsma
- Department of Occupational and Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Charlotte de Geus
- Department of Occupational and Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hendrik J Bonjer
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Johannes R Anema
- Department of Occupational and Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
den Bakker CM, Anema JR, Zaman AGNM, de Vet HCW, Sharp L, Angenete E, Allaix ME, Otten RHJ, Huirne JAF, Bonjer HJ, de Boer AGEM, Schaafsma FG. Prognostic factors for return to work and work disability among colorectal cancer survivors; A systematic review. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0200720. [PMID: 30110333 PMCID: PMC6093640 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 07/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer is diagnosed progressively in employed patients due to screening programs and increasing retirement age. The objective of this study was to identify prognostic factors for return to work and work disability in patients with colorectal cancer. Methods The research protocol was published at PROSPERO with registration number CRD42017049757. A systematic review of cohort and case-control studies in colorectal cancer patients above 18 years, who were employed when diagnosed, and who had a surgical resection with curative intent were included. The primary outcome was return to work or work disability. Potentially prognostic factors were included in the analysis if they were measured in at least three studies. Risk of bias was assessed according to the QUality In Prognosis Studies tool. A qualitative synthesis analysis was performed due to heterogeneity between studies. Quality of evidence was evaluated according to Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Results Eight studies were included with a follow-up period of 26 up to 520 weeks. (Neo)adjuvant therapy, higher age, and more comorbidities had a significant negative influence on return to work. A previous period of unemployment, extensive surgical resection and postoperative complications significantly increased the risk of work disability. The quality of evidence for these prognostic factors was considered very low to moderate. Conclusion Health care professionals need to be aware of these prognostic factors to select patients eligible for timely intensified rehabilitation in order to optimize the return to work process and prevent work disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal M. den Bakker
- Department of Occupational and Public Health, VU University medical center, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, VU University medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Johannes R. Anema
- Department of Occupational and Public Health, VU University medical center, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - AnneClaire G. N. M. Zaman
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henrika C. W. de Vet
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Sharp
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Eva Angenete
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Göteburg, Sweden
| | - Marco E. Allaix
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Judith A. F. Huirne
- Department of Gynaecology, VU University medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik J. Bonjer
- Department of Surgery, VU University medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Angela G. E. M. de Boer
- Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederieke G. Schaafsma
- Department of Occupational and Public Health, VU University medical center, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
van der Meij E, Anema JR, Leclercq WKG, Bongers MY, Consten ECJ, Schraffordt Koops SE, van de Ven PM, Terwee CB, van Dongen JM, Schaafsma FG, Meijerink WJHJ, Bonjer HJ, Huirne JAF. Personalised perioperative care by e-health after intermediate-grade abdominal surgery: a multicentre, single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2018; 392:51-59. [PMID: 29937195 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31113-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 04/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Instructing and guiding patients after surgery is essential for successful recovery. However, the time that health-care professionals can spend with their patients postoperatively has been reduced because of efficiency-driven, shortened hospital stays. We evaluated the effect of a personalised e-health-care programme on return to normal activities after surgery. METHODS A multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial was done at seven teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients aged 18-75 years who were scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia surgery, or laparoscopic adnexal surgery for a benign indication were recruited. An independent researcher randomly allocated participants to either the intervention or control group using computer-based randomisation lists, with stratification by sex, type of surgery, and hospital. Participants in the intervention group had access to a perioperative, personalised, e-health-care programme, which managed recovery expectations and provided postoperative guidance tailored to the patient. The control group received usual care and access to a placebo website containing standard general recovery advice. Participants were unaware of the study hypothesis and were asked to complete questionnaires at five timepoints during the 6-month period after surgery. The primary outcome was time between surgery and return to normal activities, measured using personalised patient-reported outcome measures. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were done. This trial is registered in the Netherlands National Trial Register, number NTR4699. FINDINGS Between Aug 24, 2015, and Aug 12, 2016, 344 participants were enrolled and randomly allocated to either the intervention (n=173) or control (n=171) group. 14 participants (4%) were lost to follow-up, with 330 participants included in the primary outcome analysis. Median time until return to normal activities was 21 days (95% CI 17-25) in the intervention group and 26 days (20-32) in the control group (hazard ratio 1·38, 95% CI 1·09-1·73; p=0·007). Complications did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION A personalised e-health intervention after abdominal surgery speeds up the return to normal activities compared with usual care. Implementation of this e-health programme is recommended in patients undergoing intermediate-grade abdominal, gynaecological, or general surgical procedures. FUNDING ZonMw.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva van der Meij
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Johannes R Anema
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | | | - Marlies Y Bongers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University, Grow Research School, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Peter M van de Ven
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Johanna M van Dongen
- Department of Health Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health, Faculty of Science, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frederieke G Schaafsma
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Hendrik J Bonjer
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Judith A F Huirne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wei S, Kao LS. Personalised recovery after general and gynaecologic surgery. Lancet 2018; 392:6-7. [PMID: 29937194 PMCID: PMC6383563 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31306-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shuyan Wei
- McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Lillian S Kao
- McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kühlmann AYR, de Rooij A, Kroese LF, van Dijk M, Hunink MGM, Jeekel J. Meta-analysis evaluating music interventions for anxiety and pain in surgery. Br J Surg 2018; 105:773-783. [PMID: 29665028 PMCID: PMC6175460 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2017] [Revised: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 02/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate anxiety and pain following perioperative music interventions compared with control conditions in adult patients. METHODS Eleven electronic databases were searched for full-text publications of RCTs investigating the effect of music interventions on anxiety and pain during invasive surgery published between 1 January 1980 and 20 October 2016. Results and data were double-screened and extracted independently. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate effect sizes as standardized mean differences (MDs). Heterogeneity was investigated in subgroup analyses and metaregression analyses. The review was registered in the PROSPERO database as CRD42016024921. RESULTS Ninety-two RCTs (7385 patients) were included in the systematic review, of which 81 were included in the meta-analysis. Music interventions significantly decreased anxiety (MD -0·69, 95 per cent c.i. -0·88 to -0·50; P < 0·001) and pain (MD -0·50, -0·66 to -0·34; P < 0·001) compared with controls, equivalent to a decrease of 21 mm for anxiety and 10 mm for pain on a 100-mm visual analogue scale. Changes in outcome corrected for baseline were even larger: MD -1·41 (-1·89 to -0·94; P < 0·001) for anxiety and -0·54 (-0·93 to -0·15; P = 0·006) for pain. Music interventions provided during general anaesthesia significantly decreased pain compared with that in controls (MD -0·41, -0·64 to -0·18; P < 0·001). Metaregression analysis found no significant association between the effect of music interventions and age, sex, choice and timing of music, and type of anaesthesia. Risk of bias in the studies was moderate to high. CONCLUSION Music interventions significantly reduce anxiety and pain in adult surgical patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Y R Kühlmann
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A de Rooij
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - L F Kroese
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M van Dijk
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G M Hunink
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - J Jeekel
- Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
van der Meij E, Anema JR, Huirne JAF, Terwee CB. Using PROMIS for measuring recovery after abdominal surgery: a pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:128. [PMID: 29458373 PMCID: PMC5819257 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2929-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess the construct validity and responsiveness of the PROMIS Physical Function v1.2 short form 8b (PROMIS-PF), and the PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities v2.0 short form 8a (PROMIS-APS) in postoperative recovery. METHODS An observational pilot study was conducted in which 30 patients participated, undergoing various forms of abdominal surgery. Patients completed the PROMIS-PF and PROMIS-APS, the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS) at several time points before and after surgery. The construct validity and responsiveness of the two PROMIS short forms were evaluated by testing pre-defined hypotheses and were considered adequate when at least 75% of the data was consistent with the hypotheses. Construct validity was evaluated by calculating Spearman correlations and the responsiveness by calculating effect sizes. RESULTS 6/7 (85.7%) of the results were consistent with the hypotheses supporting the construct validity of the PROMIS-PF. For the PROMIS-APS this was the case in 7/15 (46.7%) of the results. For the PROMIS-PF, 6/7 (85.7%) of the results were consistent with the hypotheses, supporting responsiveness. Regarding the responsiveness of the PROMIS-APS, only 7 out of 13 (53.8%) of these results were consistent with the hypotheses. CONCLUSIONS This study supported the construct validity and the responsiveness of the PROMIS-PF v1.2 short form 8b for measuring recovery in abdominal surgery. Considering the major advantages of PROMIS, we recommend the use of the PROMIS-PF in abdominal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva van der Meij
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, van der Boechorsstraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes R. Anema
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, van der Boechorsstraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith A. F. Huirne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, van der Boechorsstraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline B. Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van der Meij E, Huirne JA, Ten Cate AD, Stockmann HB, Scholten PC, Davids PH, Bonjer HJ, Anema JR. A Perioperative eHealth Program to Enhance Postoperative Recovery After Abdominal Surgery: Process Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20:e1. [PMID: 29295808 PMCID: PMC5770580 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2017] [Revised: 08/17/2017] [Accepted: 09/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic health (eHealth) interventions have proven effective, but implementation in clinical practice is difficult. More research focusing on the implementation process of eHealth interventions is necessary. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to describe the process evaluation of a perioperative eHealth intervention, aiming to enhance recovery after laparoscopic abdominal surgery. METHODS A process evaluation was carried out alongside a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients aged between 18 and 75 years who were scheduled for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hernia inguinal surgery, or laparoscopic adnexal surgery were included. The eHealth intervention comprised a website and mobile phone app with the possibility to develop a personalized convalescence plan, a section with information about the surgical procedure and the recovery period, the possibility to ask questions via an electronic consultation (eConsult), and an activity tracker. The process evaluation was carried out using the model of Linnan and Steckler, measuring components such as reach, dose delivered, dose received, fidelity, and participants' attitudes. Implementation scores were calculated based on the average of the four components. Quantitative data were collected by means of an electronic questionnaire, a logistic database, a weblog, and medical files. Qualitative data were collected by conducting interviews with a subsample of the study participants. RESULTS A total of 344 of the 863 eligible patients were included in the study, which accounted for a reach of 39.9%, and 173 participants were randomized to the intervention group. The implementation scores of the different functions of the intervention ranged between 60% and 65%. The website, mobile phone app, and activity tracker were rated 7.3 to 7.6 on a scale of 1 to 10. Almost all participants who were interviewed about the eConsult function rated it as being of additional value if combined with the usual care but not as a replacement for usual care. CONCLUSIONS Although participants were overall satisfied with the intervention, the implementation scores of the different functions of the intervention were fair. More research is needed to evaluate the barriers and facilitators for implementation of this perioperative eHealth intervention in normal practice outside study setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Registry NTR4699; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=4699 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6vr02V4KK).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva van der Meij
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Judith Af Huirne
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - A Dorien Ten Cate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, Netherlands
| | | | - Piet C Scholten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Paul Hp Davids
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - H Jaap Bonjer
- Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Johannes R Anema
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sanguansak T, Morley KE, Morley MG, Thinkhamrop K, Thuanman J, Agarwal I. Two-Way Social Media Messaging in Postoperative Cataract Surgical Patients: Prospective Interventional Study. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e413. [PMID: 29258973 PMCID: PMC5750422 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2017] [Revised: 10/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Social media offers a new way to provide education, reminders, and support for patients with a variety of health conditions. Most of these interventions use one-way, provider-patient communication. Incorporating social media tools to improve postoperative (postop) education and follow-up care has only been used in limited situations. Objective The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of two-way social media messaging to deliver reminders and educational information about postop care to cataract patients. Methods A total of 98 patients undergoing their first eye cataract surgery were divided into two groups: a no message group receiving usual pre- and postop care and a message group receiving usual care plus messages in a mobile social media format with standardized content and timing. Each patient in the message group received nine messages about hand and face hygiene, medication and postop visit adherence, and links to patient education videos about postop care. Patients could respond to messages as desired. Main outcome measures included medication adherence, postop visit adherence, clinical outcomes, and patients’ subjective assessments of two-way messaging. The number, types, content, and timing of responses by patients to messages were recorded. Results Medication adherence was better in the message group at postop day 7, with high adherence in 47 patients (96%, 47/49) versus 36 patients (73%, 36/49) in the no message group (P=.004), but no statistically significant differences in medication adherence between the groups were noted at preop and postop day 30. Visit adherence was higher at postop day 30 in the message group (100%, 49/49) versus the no message group (88%, 43/49; P=.03) but was 100% (49/49) in both groups at postop day 1 and 7. Final visual outcomes were similar between groups. A total of 441 standardized messages were sent to the message group. Out of 270 responses generated, 188 (70%) were simple acknowledgments or “thank you,” and 82 (30%) responses were questions that were divided into three general categories: administrative, postop care, and clinical issues. Out of the 82 question responses, 31 (11%) were about administrative issues, 28 (10%) about postop care, and 23 (9%) about clinical symptoms. All the messages about symptoms were triaged by nurses or ophthalmologists and only required reassurance or information. Patients expressed satisfaction with messaging. Conclusions Two-way social media messaging to deliver postop information to cataract patients is feasible and improves early medication compliance. Further design improvements can streamline work flow to optimize efficiency and patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thuss Sanguansak
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Katharine E Morley
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Michael G Morley
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kavin Thinkhamrop
- Data Management and Statistical Analysis Center, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Jaruwan Thuanman
- Data Management and Statistical Analysis Center, Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Isha Agarwal
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|