The Effect of Core Stabilization Exercise on the Kinematics and Joint Coordination of the Lumbar Spine and Hip During Sit-to-Stand and Stand-to-Sit in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain (COSCIOUS): Study Protocol for a Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

Relationship of Impaired Lumbar Spine-Hip Coordination During Sit To Stand and Stand To Sit with Functional Disability in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain Patients

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the relationships of lumbar spine-hip discoordination during sit-to-stand (STD) and stand-to-sit (SIT) with pain and functional disability in chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in a biomechanics laboratory of the physical therapy department located at the School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences (Tehran-Iran). A total of 16 CNLBP patients (men 9, female 7) aged 18-40 years (mean 31.48) were selected according to our eligibility criteria. Furthermore, ten reflective markers were placed on the spinous processes of T12 and S2, posterior and anterior superior iliac spines, greater trochanters, and lateral epicondyles. The patients were instructed to perform STD and SIT tasks at a preferred speed without using their hands. Relative phase angle was used as an indicator of coordination and was identified as the inverse tangent of angular displacement/angular velocity. Moreover, the relative phase angle between the lumbar spine and right and left hip joints was measured by subtracting the phase angle of the hip joint from the lumbar spine joint. The ratios of the total movements of the lumbar spine to the total movements of the right and left hip joints were also calculated in the sagittal plane. Finally, Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were utilized to assess the association between variables.

RESULTS

The results of this study indicated that kinematic parameters of the pain had statistically significant direct relationships with functional disability in CNLBP participants during STD and SIT with r values ranging from 0.57 (Pvalue = 0.021) to 0.85 (Pvalue<0.001) and 0.54 (Pvalue=0.053) to 0.82 (Pvalue<0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Out of the results of this study, it could be stated that pain and functional disability play a major role in lumber spine-hip discoordination, and it altered the movement ratio in CNLBP patients during STD and SIT. In clinical practice, clinicians should improve lumber spine-hip discoordination in patients with CNLBP since there is a linear relationship between kinematic parameters of the pain and functional disability in patients with CNLBP.

The Effectiveness of Trunk Stabilization Exercise Combined with Vibration for Adolescent Patients with Nonspecific Low Back Pain

There are many adolescent patients complaining of low back pain, but research on it is lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of trunk stabilization exercise combined with vibration on the pain, proprioception, and kinematics of the lumbar spine (LS) during sit to stand (STS) in adolescent patients with nonspecific low back pain (LBP). Fifty LBP patients were recruited and were randomly divided into two groups: Vibration group (n = 25) and placebo group (n = 25). All participants underwent 36-sessions of training consisting of six exercises. The Vibration group provided vibration stimulation during exercise, but the placebo group did not. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and digital dual inclinometer were used to measure pain intensity and proprioception. The kinematics of the lumbar spine during STS were measured by motion capture system. After training, the pain and proprioception in the vibration group improved significantly greater than the placebo group (p < 0.05). The mobility of LS (maximum range of motion, angular velocity, lumbar to hip movement ratios) and lumbar-hip coordination during STS in the vibration group were significantly improved compared to the placebo group (p < 0.05). Thus, trunk stabilization exercise combined with vibration may be used to improve the pain, proprioception, and kinematic of the lumbar spine during sit to stand in adolescent patients with LBP.

Effect of Chronic Low Back Pain on Lumbar Spine Lordosis During Sit-to-Stand and Stand-to-Sit

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate lumbar lordosis during sit-to-stand (STS) and stand-to-sit (SIT) in individuals with and without chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP). The second objective was to investigate sex-related differences in lumbar lordosis.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with CNLBP and 26 controls were recruited. Controls were matched with cases using a frequency matching method. Reflective markers were placed over the spinous process of T₁₂, L₃, S₂, and the anterior and posterior superior iliac spines. The participants were instructed to stand up at a self-selected pace and maintain their normal upright standing posture for 3 seconds, and then sit down. Kinematic data were recorded at a sampling frequency of 100 Hz using a motion capture system. Lumbar lordosis angle was calculated from the intersection between the line joining T₁₂ and L₃, and the line joining L₃ to S₂.

RESULTS

Lumbar lordosis was decreased in patients with CNLBP during STS and SIT compared with the asymptomatic group (mean difference = 2.68°-9.32°; P ≤ .005). Furthermore, no differences were seen in lumbar lordosis at starting position between CNLBP and asymptomatic groups during STS and SIT (mean difference = 2.68°-3.75°; P ≥ .099). Interestingly, the magnitude of the effect size suggested that the difference in lumbar lordosis values between female and male participants was relatively large (Cohen's d = -1.81 to 0.20).

CONCLUSION

Decreased lumbar lordosis in patients with CNLBP during STS and SIT could be considered as an important point during rehabilitation. Moreover, the present study showed that there is a sex-related difference among women and men in lumbar lordosis during STS and SIT tasks.

The reliability and concurrent validity of a new iPhone® application for measuring active lumbar spine flexion and extension range of motion in patients with low back pain

Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of an iPhone® application (iHandy® Level) for measuring active lumbar flexion-extension range of motion (ROM) in chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) patients. Methods: Fifteen CNLBP patients were recruited. The participants stood in a relaxed position and the T12-L1 and S1-S2 spinal levels were identified through palpation and were marked on the skin. Two blinded examiners used a gravity-based inclinometer and the application in order to measure ROM. The instruments were lined up appropriately and the participants were asked to perform maximum lumbar flexion following by maximum extension. First, each examiner placed the instruments over the T12-L1 level and then over the S1-S2 level during the movements. In order to calculate flexion-extension ROM, the measurement which was obtained from T12-L1 was subtracted from S1-S2. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) models (3, k) and (2, k) were used in order to determine the intrarater and inter-rater reliability, respectively. The Spearman's correlation coefficients (r_s ) and Bland-Altman plots were used in order to examine the validity. Results: Fair-to-excellent intrarater (ICC = 0.39-0.89) and moderate-to-good inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.55-0.77) were observed using the inclinometer. Moreover, poor-to-good intrarater (ICC = 0.30-70) and inter-rater (ICC = 0.13-0.70) reliability were found with the application. The Spearman's correlation coefficients demonstrated low-to-moderate associations between the measures of the two instruments (r_s ≥ 0.22). The Bland-Altman plots indicated that there was a significant difference between the instruments for measuring flexion ROM. The difference was not significant for measuring extension ROM. Conclusion: The iHandy® Level application does not have sufficient validity for measuring active lumbar flexion ROM in CNLBP patients.

Test-retest reliability of sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit analysis in people with and without chronic non-specific low back pain

BACKGROUND

Sit-to-stand (STD) and stand-to-sit (SIT) analysis can provide information on functional independence in daily activities in patients with low back pain (LBP). However, in order for measurements to be clinically useful, data on psychometric properties should be available.

OBJECTIVES

The main purpose was to investigate intra-rater reliability of STD and SIT tasks in participants with and without chronic non-specific LBP (CNLBP). The second purpose was to detect any differences in lumbar spine and hips sagittal plane kinematics and coordination between asymptomatic individuals and CNLBP patients during STD and SIT.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHOD

Twenty-three CNLBP patients and 23 demographically-matched controls were recruited. Ten markers were placed on specific anatomical landmarks. Participants were asked to perform STD and SIT at a preferred speed. Peak flexion angles, mean angular velocities, lumbar to hip movement ratios, and relative phase angles were measured. The procedure was repeated after 2 h and 6-8 days. Differences between two groups were analyzed using independent t-test. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 3,k), standard error of measurement (SEM), and limits of agreement (LOAs) were also estimated.

RESULTS

The ICC values showed moderate to excellent intra-rater reliability, with relatively low SEM values (≤10.17°). The 95% LOAs demonstrated that there were no differences between the measured parameters. Furthermore, CNLBP patients had limited sagittal plane angles, smaller angular velocities, and lumbar-hip dis-coordination compared to asymptomatic participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated moderate to excellent test-retest reliability of STD and SIT analysis. Moreover, CNLBP patients had altered kinematics during STD and its reverse.