1
|
Clinical Impact of Electronic Monitoring Devices of Inhalers in Adults with Asthma or COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:ph16030414. [PMID: 36986513 PMCID: PMC10055893 DOI: 10.3390/ph16030414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to gain insight into the characteristics and clinical impact of electronic monitoring devices of inhalers (EMDs) and their clinical interventions in adult patients with asthma or COPD. The search included PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus and Embase databases, as well as official EMDs websites. We found eight observational studies and ten clinical trials, assessing a wide range of clinical outcomes. Results from the meta-analysis on adherence to inhalers in a period over three months were favourable in the EMD group (fixed effects model: SMD: 0.36 [0.25–0.48]; random effects model SMD: 0.41 [0.22–0.60]). An exploratory meta-analysis found an improvement in ACT score (fixed effect model SMD: 0.25 [0.11–0.39]; random effects model: SMD: 0.47 [−0.14–1.08]). Other clinical outcomes showed mixed results in the descriptive analyses. The findings of this review highlight the benefits of EMDs in the optimization of adherence to inhaled therapy as well as the potential interest in other clinical outcomes.
Collapse
|
2
|
Yousif A, Lemière C, Forget A, Beauchesne MF, Blais L. Feasibility of implementing a web-based tool built from pharmacy claims data (e-MEDRESP) to monitor adherence to respiratory medications in primary care. Curr Med Res Opin 2022; 38:2055-2067. [PMID: 36239574 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2135835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE e-MEDRESP is a novel web-based tool that provides easily interpretable information on patient adherence to asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) medications, using pharmacy claims data. This study investigated the feasibility of implementing e-MEDRESP in primary care. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this 16-month prospective cohort study, e-MEDRESP was integrated into electronic medical records. Nineteen family physicians and 346 of their patients were enrolled. Counters embedded in the tool tracked physician use during the follow-up. Patient/physician satisfaction with e-MEDRESP was evaluated though telephone interviews and online questionnaires. The capacity of e-MEDRESP to improve adherence was explored using a pre-post analysis. RESULTS Overall, 245 patients had at least one medical visit during follow-up. e-MEDRESP was consulted by 15 (79%) physicians for 85 (35%) patients during clinic visits. Seventy-three patients participated in telephone interviews; 84% reported discussing their medication use with their physician; 33% viewed their e-MEDRESP report and indicated that it was easy to interpret. The physicians reported that the tool facilitated their evaluation of their patients' medication adherence (mean ± standard deviation rating: 4.8 ± 0.7, on a 5-point Likert scale). Although the pre-post analysis did not reveal improved adherence in the overall cohort, adherence improved significantly in patients whose adherence level was <80% and who were prescribed inhaled corticosteroids (26.9% [95% CI 14.3-39.3%]) or long-acting muscarinic agents (26.4% [95% CI 12.4-40.2%]). CONCLUSIONS e-MEDRESP was successfully integrated in clinical practice. It could serve as a useful tool to help physicians monitor their patients' medication adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alia Yousif
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Research Centre, Centre Intégré Universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Catherine Lemière
- Research Centre, Centre Intégré Universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Amélie Forget
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Research Centre, Centre Intégré Universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Marie-France Beauchesne
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Research Centre, Centre Intégré Universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Research Centre, Centre Intégré Universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Lucie Blais
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Research Centre, Centre Intégré Universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Endowment Pharmaceutical Chair, Astra-Zeneca in Respiratory Health, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chan A, De Simoni A, Wileman V, Holliday L, Newby CJ, Chisari C, Ali S, Zhu N, Padakanti P, Pinprachanan V, Ting V, Griffiths CJ. Digital interventions to improve adherence to maintenance medication in asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 6:CD013030. [PMID: 35691614 PMCID: PMC9188849 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013030.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asthma is the most common chronic lung condition worldwide, affecting 334 million adults and children globally. Despite the availability of effective treatment, such as inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), adherence to maintenance medication remains suboptimal. Poor ICS adherence leads to increased asthma symptoms, exacerbations, hospitalisations, and healthcare utilisation. Importantly, suboptimal use of asthma medication is a key contributor to asthma deaths. The impact of digital interventions on adherence and asthma outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of digital interventions for improving adherence to maintenance treatments in asthma. SEARCH METHODS We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, which contains studies identified through multiple electronic searches and handsearches of other sources. We also searched trial registries and reference lists of primary studies. We conducted the most recent searches on 1 June 2020, with no restrictions on language of publication. A further search was run in October 2021, but studies were not fully incorporated. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) including cluster- and quasi-randomised trials of any duration in any setting, comparing a digital adherence intervention with a non-digital adherence intervention or usual care. We included adults and children with a clinical diagnosis of asthma, receiving maintenance treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures for data collection. We used GRADE to assess quantitative outcomes where data were available. MAIN RESULTS We included 40 parallel randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults and children with asthma (n = 15,207), of which eight are ongoing studies. Of the included studies, 30 contributed data to at least one meta-analysis. The total number of participants ranged from 18 to 8517 (median 339). Intervention length ranged from two to 104 weeks. Most studies (n = 29) reported adherence to maintenance medication as their primary outcome; other outcomes such as asthma control and quality of life were also commonly reported. Studies had low or unclear risk of selection bias but high risk of performance and detection biases due to inability to blind the participants, personnel, or outcome assessors. A quarter of the studies had high risk of attrition bias and selective outcome reporting. We examined the effect of digital interventions using meta-analysis for the following outcomes: adherence (16 studies); asthma control (16 studies); asthma exacerbations (six studies); unscheduled healthcare utilisation (four studies); lung function (seven studies); and quality of life (10 studies). Pooled results showed that patients receiving digital interventions may have increased adherence (mean difference of 14.66 percentage points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.74 to 21.57; low-certainty evidence); this is likely to be clinically significant in those with poor baseline medication adherence. Subgroup analysis by type of intervention was significant (P = 0.001), with better adherence shown with electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) (23 percentage points over control, 95% CI 10.84 to 34.16; seven studies), and with short message services (SMS) (12 percentage points over control, 95% CI 6.22 to 18.03; four studies). No significant subgroup differences were seen for interventions having an in-person component versus fully digital interventions, adherence feedback, one or multiple digital components to the intervention, or participant age. Digital interventions were likely to improve asthma control (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.31 higher, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.44; moderate-certainty evidence) - a small but likely clinically significant effect. They may reduce asthma exacerbations (risk ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.91; low-certainty evidence). Digital interventions may result in a slight change in unscheduled healthcare utilisation, although some studies reported no or a worsened effect. School or work absence data could not be included for meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity in reporting and the low number of studies. They may result in little or no difference in lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)): there was an improvement of 3.58% predicted FEV1, 95% CI 1.00% to 6.17%; moderate-certainty evidence); however, this is unlikely to be clinically significant as the FEV1 change is below 12%. Digital interventions likely increase quality of life (SMD 0.26 higher, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.45; moderate-certainty evidence); however, this is a small effect that may not be clinically significant. Acceptability data showed positive attitudes towards digital interventions. There were no data on cost-effectiveness or adverse events. Our confidence in the evidence was reduced by risk of bias and inconsistency. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Overall, digital interventions may result in a large increase in adherence (low-certainty evidence). There is moderate-certainty evidence that digital adherence interventions likely improve asthma control to a degree that is clinically significant, and likely increase quality of life, but there is little or no improvement in lung function. The review found low-certainty evidence that digital interventions may reduce asthma exacerbations. Subgroup analyses show that EMDs may improve adherence by 23% and SMS interventions by 12%, and interventions with an in-person element and adherence feedback may have greater benefits for asthma control and adherence, respectively. Future studies should include percentage adherence as a routine outcome measure to enable comparison between studies and meta-analysis, and use validated questionnaires to assess adherence and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Chan
- Centre for Behavioural Medicine, Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Anna De Simoni
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Centre for Primary Care Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Vari Wileman
- Centre for Behavioural Medicine, Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lois Holliday
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Centre for Primary Care Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Chris J Newby
- Research Design Service, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Claudia Chisari
- Centre for Behavioural Medicine, Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sana Ali
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Natalee Zhu
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Victoria Ting
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Chris J Griffiths
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Janjua S, Pike KC, Carr R, Coles A, Fortescue R, Batavia M. Interventions to improve adherence to pharmacological therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 9:CD013381. [PMID: 34496032 PMCID: PMC8425588 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013381.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic lung condition characterised by persistent respiratory symptoms and limited lung airflow, dyspnoea and recurrent exacerbations. Suboptimal therapy or non-adherence may result in limited effectiveness of pharmacological treatments and subsequently poor health outcomes. OBJECTIVES To determine the efficacy and safety of interventions intended to improve adherence to single or combined pharmacological treatments compared with usual care or interventions that are not intended to improve adherence in people with COPD. SEARCH METHODS We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase (search date 1 May 2020). We also searched web-based clinical trial registers. SELECTION CRITERIA RCTs included adults with COPD diagnosed by established criteria (e.g. Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease). Interventions included change to pharmacological treatment regimens, adherence aids, education, behavioural or psychological interventions (e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy), communication or follow-up by a health professional (e.g. telephone, text message or face-to-face), multi-component interventions, and interventions to improve inhaler technique. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Working in pairs, four review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We assessed confidence in the evidence for each primary outcome using GRADE. Primary outcomes were adherence, quality of life and hospital service utilisation. Adherence measures included the Adherence among Patients with Chronic Disease questionnaire (APCD). Quality of life measures included the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ). MAIN RESULTS We included 14 trials (2191 participants) in the analysis with follow-up ranging from six to 52 weeks. Age ranged from 54 to 75 years, and COPD severity ranged from mild to very severe. Trials were conducted in the USA, Spain, Germany, Japan, Jordan, Northern Ireland, Iran, South Korea, China and Belgium. Risk of bias was high due to lack of blinding. Evidence certainty was downgraded due to imprecision and small participant numbers. Single component interventions Six studies (55 to 212 participants) reported single component interventions including changes to pharmacological treatment (different roflumilast doses or different inhaler types), adherence aids (Bluetooth inhaler reminder device), educational (comprehensive verbal instruction), behavioural or psychological (motivational interview). Change in dose of roflumilast may result in little to no difference in adherence (odds ratio (OR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22 to 1.99; studies = 1, participants = 55; low certainty). A Bluetooth inhaler reminder device did not improve adherence, but comprehensive verbal instruction from a health professional did improve mean adherence (prescription refills) (mean difference (MD) 1.00, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.54). Motivational interview improved mean adherence scores on the APCD scale (MD 22.22, 95% CI 8.42 to 36.02). Use of a single inhaler compared to two separate inhalers may have little to no impact on quality of life (SGRQ; MD 0.80, 95% CI -3.12 to 4.72; very low certainty). A Bluetooth inhaler monitoring device may provide a small improvement in quality of life on the CCQ (MD 0.40, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.73; very low certainty). Single inhaler use may have little to no impact on the number of people admitted to hospital compared to two separate inhalers (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.90; very low certainty). Single component interventions may have little to no impact on the number of people expereincing adverse events (very low certainty evidence from studies of a change in pharmacotherapy or use of adherence aids). A change in pharmacotherapy may have little to no impact on exacerbations or deaths (very low certainty). Multi-component interventions Eight studies (30 to 734 participants) reported multi-component interventions including tailored care package that included adherence support as a key component or included inhaler technique as a component. A multi-component intervention may result in more people adhering to pharmacotherapy compared to control at 40.5 weeks (risk ratio (RR) 1.37, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.59; studies = 4, participants = 446; I2 = 0%; low certainty). There may be little to no impact on quality of life (SGRQ, Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire, CAT) (studies = 3; low to very low certainty). Multi-component interventions may help to reduce the number of people admitted to hospital for any cause (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.63; studies = 2, participants = 877; low certainty), or COPD-related hospitalisations (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.34; studies = 2, participants = 220; moderate certainty). There may be a small benefit on people experiencing severe exacerbations. There may be little to no effect on adverse events, serious adverse events or deaths, but events were infrequently reported and were rare (low to very certainty). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Single component interventions (e.g. education or motivational interviewing provided by a health professional) can help to improve adherence to pharmacotherapy (low to very low certainty). There were slight improvements in quality of life with a Bluetooth inhaler device, but evidence is from one study and very low certainty. Change to pharmacotherapy (e.g. single inhaler instead of two, or different doses of roflumilast) has little impact on hospitalisations or exacerbations (very low certainty). There is no difference in people experiencing adverse events (all-cause or COPD-related), or deaths (very low certainty). Multi-component interventions may improve adherence with education, motivational or behavioural components delivered by health professionals (low certainty). There is little to no impact on quality of life (low to very low certainty). They may help reduce the number of people admitted to hospital overall (specifically pharmacist-led approaches) (low certainty), and fewer people may have COPD-related hospital admissions (moderately certainty). There may be a small reduction in people experiencing severe exacerbations, but evidence is from one study (low certainty). Limited evidence found no difference in people experiencing adverse events, serious adverse events or deaths (low to very low certainty). The evidence presented should be interpreted with caution. Larger studies with more intervention types, especially single interventions, are needed. It is unclear which specific COPD subgroups would benefit, therefore discussions between health professionals and patients may help to determine whether they will help to improve health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadia Janjua
- Cochrane Airways, Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Robin Carr
- 28 Beaumont Street Medical Practice, Oxford, UK
| | - Andy Coles
- COPD Patient Advisory Group, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Fortescue
- Cochrane Airways, Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Mitchell Batavia
- Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development, Department of Physical Therapy, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chan AHY, Pleasants RA, Dhand R, Tilley SL, Schworer SA, Costello RW, Merchant R. Digital Inhalers for Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Scientific Perspective. Pulm Ther 2021; 7:345-376. [PMID: 34379316 PMCID: PMC8589868 DOI: 10.1007/s41030-021-00167-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Impressive advances in inhalation therapy for patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have occurred in recent years. However, important gaps in care remain, particularly relating to poor adherence to inhaled therapies. Digital inhaler health platforms which incorporate digital inhalers to monitor time and date of dosing are an effective disease and medication management tool, promoting collaborative care between clinicians and patients, and providing more in-depth understanding of actual inhaler use. With advances in technology, nearly all inhalers can be digitalized with add-on or embedded sensors to record and transmit data quantitating inhaler actuations, and some have additional capabilities to evaluate inhaler technique. In addition to providing an objective and readily available measure of adherence, they allow patients to interact with the device directly or through their self-management smartphone application such as via alerts and recording of health status. Clinicians can access these data remotely and during patient encounters, to better inform them about disease status and medication adherence and inhaler technique. The ability for remote patient monitoring is accelerating interest in and the use of these devices in clinical practice and research settings. More than 20 clinical studies of digital inhalers in asthma or COPD collectively show improvement in medication adherence, exacerbation risk, and patient outcomes with digital inhalers. These studies support previous findings about patient inhaler use and behaviors, but with greater granularity, and reveal some new findings about patient medication-taking behaviors. Digital devices that record inspiratory flows with inhaler use can guide proper inhaler technique and may prove to be a clinically useful lung function measure. Adoption of digital inhalers into practice is still early, and additional research is needed to determine patient and clinician acceptability, the appropriate place of these devices in the therapeutic regimen, and their cost effectiveness. Video: Digital Inhalers for Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Scientific Perspective (MP4 74535 kb)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy H. Y. Chan
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023 New Zealand
| | - Roy A. Pleasants
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Rajiv Dhand
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN USA
| | - Stephen L. Tilley
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Stephen A. Schworer
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Richard W. Costello
- Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, 123 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, D02 YN77 Ireland
| | - Rajan Merchant
- Dignity Health Woodland Clinic, 632 W Gibson Rd, Woodland, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Almonacid C, Melero C, López Viña A, Cisneros C, Pérez de Llano L, Plaza V, García-Rivero JL, Romero Falcón A, Ramos J, Bazús González T, Andrés Prado M, Muriel A. Effectiveness of Text Message Reminders on Adherence to Inhaled Therapy in Patients With Asthma: Prospective Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5:e12218. [PMID: 33560235 PMCID: PMC7902182 DOI: 10.2196/12218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2018] [Revised: 07/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Poor adherence to inhaled medication in asthma patients is of great concern. It is one of the main reasons for inadequate asthma control. Objective The goal of the research was to determine if motivational messages using short message service (SMS, or text) improved adherence to inhaled medication in patients with asthma. Methods A prospective multicenter randomized parallel-group clinical trial was conducted in 10 asthma clinics in Spain. Adherence was assessed with electronic monitors (Smartinhaler, Adherium Ltd) connected to inhalers. Patients in the SMS group received psychologist-developed motivational messages every 3 days for 6 months. Results There were 53 patients in the SMS group and 88 patients in the control group. After 6 months, mean electronic adherence was 70% (SD 17%) in the intervention group and 69% (SD 17%) in the control group (P=.82). Significant differences between the study groups in morning and evening adherence to inhaled therapy, asthma control, exhaled nitric oxide levels, or improvement of lung functions were not observed. Conclusions Motivational messages were not useful to improve adherence to inhaled asthma medication compared with usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Almonacid
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, University of Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Melero
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Institute for Health Research (i+12), Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antolín López Viña
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Autonoma University of Madrid, Majadahonda, Spain
| | - Carolina Cisneros
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Autónoma University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Pérez de Llano
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, University of Lugo, Lugo, Spain
| | - Vicente Plaza
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Institut d'Investigació Biomédica Sant Pau, Autònoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Auxiliadora Romero Falcón
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, University of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Jacinto Ramos
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Teresa Bazús González
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
| | - María Andrés Prado
- Department of Health Information Management, Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alfonso Muriel
- Unit of Clinical Biostatistics, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, University of Alcala de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The efficacy of a novel monitoring device on asthma control in children with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2020; 125:352-354. [PMID: 32574599 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
8
|
Alwashmi MF, Fitzpatrick B, Davis E, Farrell J, Gamble JM, Hawboldt J. Features of a mobile health intervention to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2020; 14:1753466620951044. [PMID: 32894025 PMCID: PMC7479870 DOI: 10.1177/1753466620951044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of mobile health (mHealth) interventions has the potential to enhance chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treatment outcomes. Further research is needed to determine which mHealth features are required to potentially enhance COPD self-management. AIM The aim of this study was to explore the potential features of an mHealth intervention for COPD management with healthcare providers (HCPs) and patients with COPD. It could inform the development and successful implementation of mHealth interventions for COPD management. METHODS This was a qualitative study. We conducted semi-structured individual interviews with HCPs, including nurses, pharmacists and physicians who work directly with patients with COPD. Interviews were also conducted with a diverse sample of patients with COPD. Interview topics included demographics, mHealth usage, the potential use of medical devices and recommendations for features that would enhance an mHealth intervention for COPD management. RESULTS A total of 40 people, including nurses, physicians and pharmacists, participated. The main recommendations for the proposed mHealth intervention were categorised into two categories: patient interface and HCP interface. The prevalent features suggested for the patient interface include educating patients, collecting baseline data, collecting subjective data, collecting objective data via compatible medical devices, providing a digital action plan, allowing patients to track their progress, enabling family members to access the mHealth intervention, tailoring the features based on the patient's unique needs, reminding patients about critical management tasks and rewarding patients for their positive behaviours. The most common features of the HCP interface include allowing HCPs to track their patients' progress, allowing HCPs to communicate with their patients, educating HCPs and rewarding HCPs. CONCLUSION This study identifies important potential features so that the most effective, efficient and feasible mHealth intervention can be developed to improve the management of COPD.The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meshari F. Alwashmi
- Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University of
Newfoundland, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | | | - Erin Davis
- Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John’s,
NL, Canada
| | - Jamie Farrell
- Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John’s,
NL, Canada
| | - John-Michael Gamble
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science,
University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - John Hawboldt
- Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John’s,
NL, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gregoriano C, Dieterle T, Breitenstein AL, Dürr S, Baum A, Giezendanner S, Maier S, Leuppi-Taegtmeyer A, Arnet I, Hersberger KE, Leuppi JD. Does a tailored intervention to promote adherence in patients with chronic lung disease affect exacerbations? A randomized controlled trial. Respir Res 2019; 20:273. [PMID: 31796013 PMCID: PMC6892023 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-019-1219-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor medication-adherence is common in chronic lung patients, resulting in reduced health-outcomes and increased healthcare-costs. This study aimed to investigate the impact of an acoustic reminder and support calls on adherence to inhaled therapy in asthma and COPD patients and to determine their effect on exacerbations. METHODS This single-blinded randomized controlled trial investigated asthma and COPD patients during 6 months in an ambulatory setting. The intervention consisted of daily alarm clock and support phone calls, whenever use of rescue medication doubled or inhaled medication was not taken as prescribed. Primary outcome was time to next exacerbation. Frequency of exacerbations, adherence to inhaled medication and quality of life scores were secondary outcomes. Cox and Poisson regression were used to determine intervention effect on time to exacerbation and frequency of exacerbations, respectively. RESULTS Seventy-five participants were assigned to the intervention group and 74 to usual follow-up care. During a median follow-up of 6.2 months, 22 and 28% in the intervention and control groups respectively, experienced at least one exacerbation. Intervention had no effect on time to first exacerbation (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.21 to 2.07, P = .24), but showed a trend toward a 39% decreased frequency of exacerbations (RR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.03, P = .070) for the adjusted models, respectively. The intervention group had significantly more days with 80-100% taking adherence regarding puff inhalers (82 ± 14% vs. 60 ± 30%, P < .001) and dry powder capsules (90 ± .10% vs. 80 ± 21%, P = .01). Timing adherence in participants using puff inhalers was higher in the intervention group (69 ± 25% vs. 51 ± 33%, P < .001). No significant differences in QoL were found between the two groups. CONCLUSION Participants assigned to the intervention group had significantly better taking and timing adherence of inhaled medication resulting in a trend towards a decreased frequency of exacerbations. However, no effect on time to next exacerbation was observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02386722, Registered 14 February 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Gregoriano
- University Clinic of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, CH - 4410, Liestal, Switzerland. .,Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Thomas Dieterle
- University Clinic of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, CH - 4410, Liestal, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Anna-Lisa Breitenstein
- University Clinic of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, CH - 4410, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - Selina Dürr
- University Clinic of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, CH - 4410, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - Amanda Baum
- University Clinic of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, CH - 4410, Liestal, Switzerland
| | | | - Sabrina Maier
- University Clinic of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, CH - 4410, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - Anne Leuppi-Taegtmeyer
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Arnet
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kurt E Hersberger
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jörg D Leuppi
- University Clinic of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, CH - 4410, Liestal, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Arnet I, Rothen JP, Albert V, Hersberger KE. Validation of a Novel Electronic Device for Medication Adherence Monitoring of Ambulatory Patients. PHARMACY 2019; 7:pharmacy7040155. [PMID: 31756904 PMCID: PMC6958479 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy7040155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Revised: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Several methods exist for measuring medication adherence. The Time4MedTM device (Adherence Innovations, Hong Kong) is a small, electronic card to affix on medication packaging that records date and time of intakes when a button is pushed. We aimed to validate the device with an emphasis on polypharmacy. Twenty volunteers used Time4MedTM devices with a virtual thrice daily intake over 14 days. Diary-recorded date and time were compared to electronically-stored events. Functionality, reliability and recovery for different stress conditions were calculated. User‘s acceptability was assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Eleven elderly outpatients (mean age 80.2 ± 8.1 years) taking >3 medications daily used the device over 4 weeks. Volunteers logged 847 events. Functionality (100%), sensitivity (94.9%), specificity (99.4%) and recovery (100%) were high. Dropping the smart card and storing it in a refrigerator caused either the recording of false events or no recording at all. The mean SUS score was 82.6 (SD 14.8), demonstrating excellent acceptability. Satisfaction was very high for volunteers and patients, except for pushing the button. Time4MedTM devices are highly accurate in recording, retaining and delivering electronic data of multiple medication intake. They are well accepted by elderly patients. They can be recommended in clinical studies and for practitioners who desire to elucidate adherence patterns of ambulatory patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Gregoriano C, Dieterle T, Breitenstein AL, Dürr S, Baum A, Maier S, Arnet I, Hersberger KE, Leuppi JD. Use and inhalation technique of inhaled medication in patients with asthma and COPD: data from a randomized controlled trial. Respir Res 2018; 19:237. [PMID: 30509268 PMCID: PMC6276152 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-018-0936-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The burden of asthma and COPD among patients is high and people affected are frequently hospitalized due to exacerbations. There are numerous reasons for the lack of disease control in asthma and COPD patients. It is associated with non-adherence to guidelines on the part of the health care provider and with poor inhalation technique and/or non-adherence to the prescribed treatment plan by the patient. This study aims to present data on inhaler technique and its impact on quality of life (QoL) and symptom control in a typical population of patients with chronic lung disease from a randomized controlled trial on medication adherence. Methods For this cross-sectional analysis, 165 asthma and COPD patients were analyzed. Correct application of inhaler devices was tested using pre-defined checklists for each inhaler type. QoL and symptom control were investigated using COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and Asthma Control Test (ACT). Spirometry was used to measure forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). Results Overall, incorrect inhalation technique ranged from 0 to 53% depending on the type of inhaler. COPD patients with incorrect device application had a higher CAT sum score compared to those with a correct device application (P = .02). Moreover, COPD patients with incorrect device application were more likely to suffer from cough (P = .03) and were more breathless while walking uphill or a flight of stairs (P = .02). While there was no significance found in asthma patients, COPD patients who used their devices correctly had a significantly better mean FEV1% predicted at baseline compared to those who applied their devices incorrectly (P = .04). Conclusions Correct inhalation of prescribed medication is associated with improved health status and lung function. These findings should encourage health professionals to provide instructions on correct inhalation technique and to regularly re-evaluate the patients’ inhalation technique. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0238672, Registered 14 February 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Gregoriano
- University Clinic of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, CH - 4410, Liestal, Switzerland. .,Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Thomas Dieterle
- University Clinic of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, CH - 4410, Liestal, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Anna-Lisa Breitenstein
- University Clinic of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, CH - 4410, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - Selina Dürr
- University Clinic of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, CH - 4410, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - Amanda Baum
- University Clinic of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, CH - 4410, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - Sabrina Maier
- University Clinic of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, CH - 4410, Liestal, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Arnet
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kurt E Hersberger
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jörg D Leuppi
- University Clinic of Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, CH - 4410, Liestal, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhu D, Zhang C, Shen H, Ying S. Breaking through Restricting Bottleneck for Better Asthma Control. J Transl Int Med 2017; 5:192-193. [PMID: 29340274 DOI: 10.1515/jtim-2017-0032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ding Zhu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Chao Zhang
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Huahao Shen
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Songmin Ying
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|