Low Body Mass Index Is an Independent Predictive Factor after Surgical Resection in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Real-world surgical treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with stages IA-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective multicentric observational study involving 11,958 patients

PURPOSE

Surgical resection is cornerstone treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and offers a chance for cure. This study was conducted to determine current surgical treatment patterns and outcomes of Chinese patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

Data of patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC of stages IA-IIIA and who underwent surgery between July 2014 and July 2020 were retrospectively collected from 9 tertiary hospitals in China. Cox model was used for multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

This study included 11,958 patients, among whom 59.1%, 19.2%, and 21.7% were in stages I, II, and IIIA, respectively. Lobectomy was the most common operation method (78.4%), followed by wedge resection (8.2%), segmentectomy (5.4%), pneumonectomy (5.2%), and bronchial sleeve lobectomy (2.8%). Among patients who underwent wedge resection and segmentectomy, majority had stage I NSCLC (87.2% and 93.3%, respectively), and sublobectomy accounted for 20.7% of stage I operations. With a median follow-up time of 30.2 months, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of entire population were 88.9% and 96.1% at 1 year, 75.2% and 85.1% at 3 years, and 65.3% and 77.0% at 5 years, respectively. The 5-year OS rates for stages IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIA disease were 93.2%, 82.7%, 70.3%, 67.0%, and 52.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest real-world cohort study of patients with NSCLC who underwent surgery in China, where we described characteristics of surgical treatment and survival outcomes. The results of our study provide insights into real-world surgical treatment status for surgeons and clinicians.

Somatic mutations combined with clinical features can predict the postoperative prognosis of stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Prognostic factors for stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) are unclear. The current main treatment for stage IIIA LUAD is still controversial. Some Clinicians advocate synchronous chemoradiotherapy as the main treatment for stage IIIA LUAD. In contrast, some clinicians argue that there are still certain patients with stage IIIA LUAD who have a better postoperative prognosis. This study aimed to analyze preoperative factors as well as the association between somatic mutations and prognosis in stage IIIA LUAD [including overall survival (OS) time and the risk of postoperative recurrence].

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with stage IIIA LUAD who underwent radical resection of lung cancer in the thoracic surgery department of Tianjin Chest Hospital from January 01, 2011 to September 30, 2016. All patients involved in the study provided written informed consent. The associations between OS and DFS and the clinical characteristics as well as somatic mutations of patients were analyzed separately. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for univariate analysis, and survival curves were drawn. Multivariate analysis was performed by the Cox regression model.

Results

For univariate analysis, the prognostic factors of OS were the level of preoperative CYFRA21-1, the number of metastatic lymph node stations (NMLS), maximum tumor diameter, EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) classical base mutations, and the number of copies of POLE (polymerase epsilon) mutation (NCPM). Preoperative total protein level, preoperative CYFRA21-1 level, the number of metastatic lymph nodes (NMLN), maximum tumor diameter, the number of mutated genes (NMG) in tumor samples, TP53 mutations, and the number of copies of POLE mutation (NCPM) were associated with disease-free survival (DFS). The multivariate analysis showed that the preoperative CYFRA21-1 level, the number of metastatic lymph node stations (NMLS), and EGFR typical base mutations were independent prognostic factors of OS. The number of mutated genes (NMG), EGFR classical base mutations, preoperative NSE level, maximum tumor diameter, and the number of metastatic lymph node stations (NMLS) were independent prognostic factors for DFS.

Conclusions

The preoperative level of tumor markers, the number of metastatic lymph node stations, and EGFR typical base mutations are important factors for the prognosis of patients with resectable stage IIIA LUAD.

Body Mass Index Has a Nonlinear Association With Postoperative 30-Day Mortality in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy for Tumors in Men: An Analysis of Data From the ACS NSQIP Database

BACKGROUND

The association between body mass index (BMI) and mortality is controversial. Thus, the purpose of our research was to survey the association between BMI and postoperative 30-day mortality in brain tumor patients undergoing craniotomy.

METHODS

This study analyzed data collected in a multicenter, cross-sectional study that consecutively and nonselectively collected data from a total of 18,642 patients undergoing craniotomy for tumors in the ACS NSQIP from 2012 to 2015. We constructed three linear and non-linear binomial logistic models (the inflection point was set at 18.5) to evaluate the association between BMI and postoperative 30-day mortality, respectively. We also conducted subgroup analyses. Additionally, we compared non-linear models with vs. without interaction with sex.

RESULTS

A total of 17,713 patients were included in this analysis. Of these, 47.38% were male. The postoperative 30-day mortality of the included cases was 2.39% (423/17,713), and the mean BMI was 28.41 ± 6.05 kg/m². The linear logistic models suggested that after adjusting for the covariates, BMI was not associated with postoperative 30-day mortality (OR=0.999; 95% CI: 0.981, 1.017). The non-linear binomial logistic models suggested a nonlinear relationship between BMI and postoperative 30-day mortality. When BMI was < 18.5, we observed a stronger negative association between them after adjusting for covariates; the OR and 95% CI were 0.719, 0.576-0.896. When BMI was > 18.5, the relationship between them was not significant. We also found that a one-unit decrease in BMI for male patients with BMI < 18.5 kg/m² was related to a 34.6% increase in the risk of postoperative 30-day mortality (OR=0.654, 95% CI (0.472, 0.907). There was no significant association between them in male patients with BMI > 18.5 kg/m² or female patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a non-linear relationship between BMI and the risk of postoperative death. Preoperative underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m²) would increase the risk of postoperative death in male patients (> 18 years old) undergoing craniotomy for brain tumors. Appropriate nutritional management prior to craniotomy for brain tumors may reduce the risk of postoperative 30-day mortality in underweight men.

Low Body Mass Index Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

Background

Sarcopenia and obesity have been suspected as factors associated with efficacy of treatment and prognosis in various malignancies. This study aimed to investigate the association of pretreatment sarcopenia and visceral obesity with efficacy and prognosis of first- and second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and positive EGFR mutation.

Methods

We retrospectively collected 167 NSCLC patients with mutant EGFR who had started EGFR-TKI monotherapy between October 2007 and August 2018 at our hospital. We classified 167 patients into two groups, according to the definition of underweight based on the World Health Organization (WHO) body mass index (BMI) classification and the Japanese sex-specific cut-off values of the following computed tomography (CT) images-assessed markers of pretreatment sarcopenia or visceral obesity, such as psoas muscle index (PMI), intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC) and visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio (VSR) at lumbar vertebra L3 level. We compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of two groups by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses adjusted by age, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, performance status, EGFR mutation types and EGFR-TKI lines, and extra-pulmonary metastases or three or more than 3 metastatic sites, we searched independent prognostic factors of OS and PFS of EGFR-TKI therapy.

Results

The OS (median 26.0 vs. 32.3 months, P = 0.02) and PFS (9.1 vs. 14.8 months, P = 0.03) of patients with BMI < 18.5 were significantly shorter than those of patients with BMI ≥ 18.5. However, there was no significant difference in OS and PFS according to PMI, IMAC and VSR. The multivariate analyses detected only BMI < 18.5 as an unfavorable prognostic factor of shorter OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 - 2.81, P = 0.04) and PFS (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.11 - 2.67, P = 0.02).

Conclusions

Pretreatment underweight was a significant prognostic factor of poor PFS and OS of EGFR-TKI therapy. However, neither pretreatment sarcopenia nor visceral obesity was associated with prognosis of EGFR-TKI. Underweight may be a surrogate for advanced disease burden.

Does Preoperative Low HbA1c Predict Esophageal Cancer Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Although several reports have shown that diabetes is a poor prognostic factor for esophageal cancer, no reports assessed prognostic impact of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in the patients with esophageal cancer. Therefore, we evaluated the prognostic significance of HbA1c in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 137 patients with esophageal carcinoma surgically treated at our institute between 2009 and 2017 were enrolled in this retrospective study. We divided these patients into quarters according to pretreatment levels of HbA1c. We used 5.5% as a cutoff for classifying patients into low (Q1; n = 30) and high (Q2, Q3, Q4; n = 107) HbA1c groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were then used to evaluate the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of pretreatment level of HbA1c.

RESULTS

There was no significant relationship between HbA1c level and clinicopathological factors. The low HbA1c group had a significantly worse survival rate as compared to that of the high HbA1c group (overall survival p = 0.04, relapse-free survival p = 0.02). However, the difference was not confirmed in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Although low level of pretreatment HbA1c might be associated with poor prognosis for patients with esophageal cancer, low HbA1c was not an independent risk factor.