1
|
The Factors Predicting Concordant Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Detected in Liquid/Tissue Biopsy and the Related Clinical Outcomes in Patients of Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma with EGFR Mutations. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8111758. [PMID: 31652678 PMCID: PMC6912667 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8111758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Liquid biopsy to identify epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations from circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for lung adenocarcinoma is less invasive than traditional tissue biopsy. Most patients have concordant results in liquid/tissue biopsy, while the clinical significance of concordant results remains unclear. Our study aimed to evaluate the predicting factors and clinical outcomes associated with concordant results in liquid/tissue biopsy in newly diagnosed lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations. In the 80 patients of stage III or IV lung adenocarcinoma, 51 patients had EGFR mutations detected in tissue samples, while 33 (65%) of them had concordant results shown in liquid biopsy. Multivariable regression analysis showed that lymph node involvement (adjusted odds ratio (95% CI): 8.71 (1.88–40.35), p = 0.0057) and bone metastasis (adjusted odds ratio (95% CI): 9.65 (1.72–54.05), p = 0.0099) were the independent predicting factors for concordant results. Forty of these 51 patients were stage IV and were treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The concordant results in liquid/tissue samples were associated with significantly poorer progression-free survival (PFS) in univariate analysis. However, multivariable analysis showed that lymph node involvement was the only independent predicting factor for poorer PFS, while concordant results in liquid/tissue samples were excluded during variable selection. The concordant results in liquid/tissue samples might indicate a larger tumor burden, which actually contributes to poorer PFS.
Collapse
|
2
|
Del Re M, Crucitta S, Gianfilippo G, Passaro A, Petrini I, Restante G, Michelucci A, Fogli S, de Marinis F, Porta C, Chella A, Danesi R. Understanding the Mechanisms of Resistance in EGFR-Positive NSCLC: From Tissue to Liquid Biopsy to Guide Treatment Strategy. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20163951. [PMID: 31416192 PMCID: PMC6720634 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20163951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2019] [Revised: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Liquid biopsy has emerged as an alternative source of nucleic acids for the management of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). The use of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been recently introduced in clinical practice, resulting in the improvement of the identification of druggable EGFR mutations for the diagnosis and monitoring of response to targeted therapy. EGFR-dependent (T790M and C797S mutations) and independent (Mesenchymal Epithelial Transition [MET] gene amplification, Kirsten Rat Sarcoma [KRAS], Phosphatidyl-Inositol 4,5-bisphosphate 3-Kinase Catalytic subunit Alpha isoform [PI3KCA], and RAF murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 [BRAF] gene mutations) mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been evaluated in plasma samples from NSCLC patients using highly sensitive methods (i.e., digital droplet PCR, Next Generation Sequencing), allowing for the switch to other therapies. Therefore, liquid biopsy is a non-invasive method able to detect the molecular dynamic changes that occur under the pressure of treatment, and to capture tumor heterogeneity more efficiently than is allowed by tissue biopsy. This review addresses how liquid biopsy may be used to guide the choice of treatment strategy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzia Del Re
- Unit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
| | - Stefania Crucitta
- Unit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Giulia Gianfilippo
- Unit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonio Passaro
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milano, Italy
| | - Iacopo Petrini
- General Pathology, Department of Translational Research & New Technologies in Surgery and Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Giuliana Restante
- Unit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Angela Michelucci
- Unit of Molecular Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Stefano Fogli
- Unit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Filippo de Marinis
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, 20141 Milano, Italy
| | - Camillo Porta
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Division of Translational Oncology, I.R.C.C.S. Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Antonio Chella
- Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Critical Area and Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Romano Danesi
- Unit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Potential Utility of Liquid Biopsy as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool for the Assessment of Solid Tumors: Implications in the Precision Oncology. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8030373. [PMID: 30889786 PMCID: PMC6463095 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8030373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 02/24/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Liquid biopsy is a technique that utilizes circulating biomarkers in the body fluids of cancer patients to provide information regarding the genetic landscape of the cancer. It is emerging as an alternative and complementary diagnostic and prognostic tool to surgical biopsy in oncology. Liquid biopsy focuses on the detection and isolation of circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA and exosomes, as a source of genomic and proteomic information in cancer patients. Liquid biopsy is expected to provide the necessary acceleratory force for the implementation of precision oncology in clinical settings by contributing an enhanced understanding of tumor heterogeneity and permitting the dynamic monitoring of treatment responses and genomic variations. However, widespread implementation of liquid biopsy based biomarker-driven therapy in the clinical practice is still in its infancy. Technological advancements have resolved many of the hurdles faced in the liquid biopsy methodologies but sufficient clinical and technical validation for specificity and sensitivity has not yet been attained for routine clinical implementation. This article provides a comprehensive review of the clinical utility of liquid biopsy and its effectiveness as an important diagnostic and prognostic tool in colorectal, breast, hepatocellular, gastric and lung carcinomas which were the five leading cancer related mortalities in 2018.
Collapse
|
4
|
Saarenheimo J, Eigeliene N, Andersen H, Tiirola M, Jekunen A. The Value of Liquid Biopsies for Guiding Therapy Decisions in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Front Oncol 2019; 9:129. [PMID: 30891428 PMCID: PMC6411700 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Targeted therapies have allowed for an individualized treatment approach in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The initial therapeutic decisions and success of targeted therapy depend on genetic identification of personal tumor profiles. Tissue biopsy is the gold standard for molecular analysis, but non-invasive or minimally invasive liquid biopsy methods are also now used in clinical practice, allowing for later monitoring and optimization of the cancer treatment. The inclusion of liquid biopsy in the management of NSCLC provides strong evidence on early treatment response, which becomes a basis for determining disease progression and the need for changes in treatment. Liquid biopsies can drive the decision making for treatment strategies to achieve better patient outcomes. Cell-free DNA and circulating tumor cells obtained from the blood are promising markers for determining patient status. They may improve cancer treatments, allow for better treatment control, enable early interventions, and change decision making from reactive actions toward more predictive early interventions. This review aimed to present current knowledge on and the usefulness of liquid biopsy studies in NSCLC from the perspective of how it has allowed individualized treatments according to gene profiling and how the method may alter the treatment decisions in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jatta Saarenheimo
- Department of Pathology, Vasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland.,Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Nano Science Center, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Natalja Eigeliene
- Department of Oncology, Vasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland.,Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Heidi Andersen
- Department of Pulmonology, Vasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland
| | - Marja Tiirola
- Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Nano Science Center, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Antti Jekunen
- Department of Oncology, Vasa Central Hospital, Vaasa, Finland.,Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|