IL-1ɑ C376A Transversion Variant and Risk of Idiopathic Male Infertility in Iranian Men: A Genetic Association Study

Genetics and molecular biology of male infertility among Iranian population: an update

Infertility is one of the main social and health problems among young couples. Although a noticeable ratio of infertilities are asymptomatic, about half of the cases are observed among males. Various environmental factors such as life style, dietary patterns, and pathogens are associated with male infertility. Mutations and chromosomal abnormalities are also the most important genetic risk factors of male infertility. Similar to other populations, there is a dramatically rising trend of male infertility among Iranian. Regarding the high ratio of asymptomatic cases, it is required to clarify the molecular biology and cellular processes involved in male infertility in this population to suggest an efficient panel of diagnostic markers. In this review, we have summarized all of the cellular and molecular processes which have been reported among Iranian infertile males to clarify the molecular biology of male infertility in this population. It was observed that the stress response, cellular detoxification, and DNA repair processes were the most common aberrant cellular mechanisms among Iranian infertile males. This review paves the way of introducing a population-based diagnostic panel of genetic markers among Iranian infertile males.

Genetic Landscape of Nonobstructive Azoospermia and New Perspectives for the Clinic

Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) represents the most severe expression of male infertility, involving around 1% of the male population and 10% of infertile men. This condition is characterised by the inability of the testis to produce sperm cells, and it is considered to have an important genetic component. During the last two decades, different genetic anomalies, including microdeletions of the Y chromosome, karyotype defects, and missense mutations in genes involved in the reproductive function, have been described as the primary cause of NOA in many infertile men. However, these alterations only explain around 25% of azoospermic cases, with the remaining patients showing an idiopathic origin. Recent studies clearly suggest that the so-called idiopathic NOA has a complex aetiology with a polygenic inheritance, which may alter the spermatogenic process. Although we are far from a complete understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying NOA, the use of the new technologies for genetic analysis has enabled a considerable increase in knowledge during the last years. In this review, we will provide a comprehensive and updated overview of the genetic basis of NOA, with a special focus on the possible application of the recent insights in clinical practice.

Methionine Synthase Reductase-A66G and -C524T Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Prostate Cancer: A Case-Control Trial

Purpose:

Some variations in the sequence of methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) gene can increase the risk of various cancers such as prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between prostate cancer and the MTRR A66G and C524T gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using an in silico analysis.

Methods:

In this case-control study, 218 Iranian men, including 108 men with prostate cancer and 110 prostate cancer-free men, were enrolled. The MTRR A66G and C524T genotyping was performed by PCR-RFLP. Some of the bioinformatics tools were employed for the evaluation of polymorphism on the molecular aspects of the MTRR.

Results:

With regard to the MTRR A66G polymorphism, the genotype AG (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.47-1.54, p= 0.6014), genotype GG (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.42-1.87, p= 0.7512), and allele G (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.63-1.35, p= 0.6686) were not associated with prostate cancer risk. However, the data for C524T SNP showed that the genotype CT was associated with prostate cancer risk (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.06-3.47, p= 0.0308). Further, carriers of the allele T (OR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.04-3.13, p= 0.0358) were associated with high risk of prostate cancer. In addition, bioinformatics analysis revealed that C524T SNP could affect some molecular aspects of the protein structure, while having no effect on the mRNA structure.

Conclusion:

The MTRR C524T is a genetic risk factor for prostate cancer; however, the MTRR A66G is not suggested as a suitable biomarker for prostate cancer. To obtain more reliable results, further studies are recommended to use larger sample sizes and investigate the effects of environmental factors.