Diagnostic and Therapeutic Use of Sonography-Guided Iliopsoas Peritendinous Injections

Evaluation of Clinical Tests to Diagnose Iliopsoas Tendinopathy

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing iliopsoas tendinopathy is challenging because of nonspecific pain patterns and clinical signs overlapping with those of other hip conditions. Although peritendinous anesthetic injections provide the best diagnostic accuracy, they are invasive and resource intensive. Conventional clinical tests largely focus on hip flexion, potentially overlooking the diagnostic contribution of the muscle's secondary function-external rotation. A newly described hip-external rotation-flexion-ceiling (HEC) test combines the primary function (hip flexion) with the secondary function (external rotation) of the iliopsoas, potentially offering enhanced diagnostic reliability.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

This study aimed to (1) determine the diagnostic accuracy of the HEC test and 10 conventional physical examination tests for iliopsoas-related groin pain; (2) detect "good" and "poor" tests for diagnosing iliopsoas tendinopathy based on three diagnostic performance criteria before and after anesthetic injection (mean pain reduction, optimal cutoff value for pain reduction, and area under the curve [AUC]); and (3) rank all tests, based on the same criteria, to identify the best diagnostic tool.

METHODS

In this retrospective study at a high-volume arthroplasty community hospital, we reviewed 48 consecutive fluoroscopy-guided iliopsoas tendon injections performed for persistent groin pain between October 2023 and May 2024. After excluding four patients without any data on the clinical tests performed, a population of 44 participants (mean age 48 ± 15 years; 34% male) remained, which included both native hips (52%) and patients who had undergone THA (48%). Eleven clinical tests-including the novel HEC test and 10 conventional tests (such as resisted hip flexion seated and straight leg raise [SLR] in neutral and external rotation)-were performed before and after a fluoroscopy-guided iliopsoas injection, with an improvement in their characteristic groin pain serving as the diagnostic gold standard. A test was considered "good" if it met all three criteria: (1) a significant mean VAS pain score reduction of ≥ 3 points after injection, (2) a significant optimal cutoff value for pain reduction of ≥ 4, and (3) a significant AUC of ≥ 0.80. A test meeting none of these three criteria was considered "poor." Using the same three criteria, each clinical test with at least 30 valid observations received a ranking position for each criterion, and these three ranks were summed to produce a total score. The test with the lowest total score was deemed the best, followed by the tests with higher scores. Statistical analysis involved estimating sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and optimal cutoff values using receiver operating characteristic curves and the Youden J statistic.

RESULTS

In 82% (36 of 44) of patients who experienced pain reduction after injection and who were diagnosed with iliopsoas tendinopathy, the following tests had the most clinically important pain reduction after infiltration: the HEC test (6.0 ± 2.1; p < 0.001), resisted hip flexion (seated) (5.1 ± 1.3; p < 0.001), and SLR in exorotation (4.9 ± 1.4; p < 0.001). The HEC test demonstrated a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 88%, and an AUC of 0.99, with a high cutoff (VAS score reduction of 5) outperforming conventional tests. Three tests-including the HEC test, resisted hip flexion (seated), and resisted hip external rotation (seated)-met all three criteria to be classified as "good" tests, whereas the Thomas test, SLR in neutral, and the snapping hip test were deemed "poor" tests. The HEC test was ranked best to detect iliopsoas tendinopathy, followed by the resisted hip flexion (seated), SLR in exorotation, and resisted hip external rotation (seated).

CONCLUSION

The HEC test is an accurate diagnostic maneuver for iliopsoas tendinopathy offering improved sensitivity and specificity compared with conventional tests. Surgeons should consider incorporating the HEC test into routine evaluations of patients with groin pain to enhance diagnostic precision and optimize treatment strategies. Future studies should focus on interobserver reliability and assess the test's performance across diverse patient populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Outcomes of Nonoperative versus Operative Treatment of Iliopsoas Impingement after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Iliopsoas impingement (IPI) is a rare cause of persistent groin pain after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Treatment options include conservative management such as corticosteroid injections into the tendon sheath, iliopsoas tenotomy, and acetabular revision. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare outcomes of nonoperative versus operative treatment options for IPI after THA by assessing symptom resolution rate, patient-reported outcomes, complications, and revision surgery rate.

METHODS

A systematic review following guidelines established by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases regarding IPI after THA. Studies were categorized based on the specific treatment modality: conservative treatment (corticosteroid injections), iliopsoas tenotomy, or acetabular revision. There were six studies (151 patients) that evaluated conservative treatment, 21 studies (452 patients) that evaluated iliopsoas tenotomy, and five studies (103 patients) that evaluated acetabular revision as treatment options for IPI after THA.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative to postoperative Harris Hip Scores for the three groups were 64.8 to 78.6 (P = 0.03), 54.9 to 83.1 (P < 0.00001), and 56 to 82.4 (P < 0.00001), respectively. Persistent IPI symptoms were noted in 53.6% (conservative), 17.8% (iliopsoas tenotomy), and 12.6% (acetabular revision) of patients. The complication rate for surgical treatment was 2.3% in the iliopsoas tenotomy group and 15.7% in the acetabular revision group. Revision surgery or additional surgical intervention was required by 16.4% (conservative), 4.5% (iliopsoas tenotomy), and 3.9% (acetabular revision) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperative management of IPI after THA may fail to provide long-term resolution of symptoms. While iliopsoas tenotomy and acetabular revision both effectively treat IPI after THA, tenotomy has a significantly lower complication rate compared to acetabular revision. Thorough patient counseling is critical when discussing surgical treatment options for persistent symptomatic IPI after THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Musculoskeletal mimics of lumbosacral radiculopathy

Electrodiagnostic evaluations are commonly requested for patients with suspected radiculopathy. Understanding lower extremity musculoskeletal conditions is essential for electrodiagnostic medicine specialists, as musculoskeletal disorders often mimic or coexist with radiculopathy. This review delineates radicular pain from other types originating from the lumbosacral spine and describes musculoskeletal conditions frequently mimicking radiculopathy, such as those that cause radiating pain and sensorimotor dysfunction. In clinical evaluation, a history of pain radiating along a specific dermatomal territory with associated sensory disturbance suggests radiculopathy. Physical examination findings consistent with radiculopathy include myotomal weakness, depressed or absent muscle stretch reflexes, focal atrophy along a discrete nerve root territory, and potentially positive dural tension maneuvers like the straight leg raise. However, electrodiagnostic medicine specialists must be knowledgeable of musculoskeletal mimics, which may manifest as incomplete radiation within or beyond a dermatomal territory, non-radiating pain, tenderness, and give-way weakness, in the context of a normal neurological examination. A systematic approach to musculoskeletal examination is vital, and this review focuses on high-yield physical examination maneuvers and diagnostic investigations to differentiate between musculoskeletal conditions and radiculopathy. This approach ensures accurate diagnoses, promotes resource stewardship, enhances patient satisfaction, and optimizes care delivery. Musculoskeletal conditions resembling L1 to S4 radiculopathy are reviewed, emphasizing their distinctive features in history, physical examination, and diagnostic investigation. Among the more than 30 musculoskeletal disorders reviewed are hip and knee osteoarthritis, lumbar facet syndrome, myofascial pain syndrome, greater trochanteric pain syndrome, and plantar fasciitis.

Editorial Commentary: Ultrasound-Guided Diagnostic Injections and Arthroscopic Iliopsoas Fractional Lengthening May Alleviate Post-Total Hip Arthroplasty Pain, Avoid Unnecessary Revision Arthroplasty, and Improve Patients' Prognosis

Identifying the cause of pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be one of the more challenging tasks in orthopaedic surgery. Causes of symptoms after surgery may include infection, periarticular pain (including iliopsoas impingement/tendonitis), referred pain, polyethylene liner wear, component loosening, trunnionosis or metallosis, instability, component misplacement, or idiopathic pain. Psoas impingement, which is reported in up to 8% of patients after THA, may be caused by anatomic, technical, and prosthetic factors. A malpositioned or oversized acetabular component is the most common cause of mechanical irritation of the tendon. Ultrasound-guided diagnostic injections have become an important in-office tool to confirm the diagnosis, and if conservative measures fail, arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening shows excellent outcomes, with no loss of flexion strength or range of motion. Accurate diagnosis and a minimally invasive, cost-effective arthroscopic solution with excellent postoperative results can avoid the need for revision THA.

Iliopsoas Injections: A Systematic Review of Patient Outcomes and Progression to Surgery

BACKGROUND

Iliopsoas injuries are a common cause of anterior hip and groin pain and can be successfully managed with conservative treatment. Corticosteroid and local anesthetic injections can also be offered in conjunction with nonoperative management. Given the variability in reported injection guidelines, composition, and techniques, the purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to assess progression to surgery and patient outcomes following iliopsoas injections.

METHODS

Four online databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Scopus) were searched for studies investigating the outcomes of iliopsoas injections from database inception until January 2024 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses guidelines. Three reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles independently and in duplicate. Recorded data included demographic data, patient-reported outcomes, complications, injection traits, and progression to surgery.

RESULTS

Six articles were included in the review (follow-up time = 28.6 months). These studies included patients with iliopsoas bursitis, tendinopathy, and snapping hip. Five studies used the iliopsoas bursa as the injection target. All studies used local anesthetics in their injection formulations, with 5 also adding a corticosteroid. In 3 studies, the Numeric Rating Scale improved from preinjection (mean = 7.33) to postinjection (mean = 2.47). Three studies demonstrated an improvement in Harris Hip Score from a mean of 58.49 preinjection to 89.91 postinjection. Following injections, 28.9% (68/235) of patients progressed to surgery, with psoas tenotomy (38.3%, 26/68) being the most common procedure. There were no complications reported in all of the included studies.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that iliopsoas injections are a clinically effective treatment of a variety of pathologies, including bursitis, tendinopathy, and snapping hip, and have a low rate of complications. Physicians should consider using iliopsoas injections in patients whose symptoms are refractory to conservative management, including physical therapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Accuracy of ultrasound-guided iliopsoas tendon injection after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective observational study

PURPOSE

To describe and characterize the accuracy and benefit of a technique for performing ultrasound-guided needle placement for iliopsoas peritendon or bursa injections as an alternative method to fluoroscopic guidance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with a history of total hip arthroplasty who were referred by their orthopedic surgeon for iliopsoas peritendon or bursa corticosteroid injection for iliopsoas impingement syndrome between June 2017 and December 2019 were eligible for inclusion. Of these patients, 19 received a total of 26 ultrasound-guided needle placement followed by confirmatory fluoroscopic guidance prior to injection. Pre-injection and post-injection VAS scores were collected to monitor pain. Additionally, the patients were followed for 6 months via chart review after their injection to assess for complications, need for repeat injections, and progression to surgical intervention. The accuracy of a longitudinal in-plane distal to proximal approach to ultrasound guided needle placement was then evaluated.

RESULTS

Ultrasound guided needle placement using a longitudinal in-plane distal to proximal approach demonstrated spread of contrast material in the intended anatomic location with fluoroscopic confirmation in patients who underwent iliopsoas peritendon or bursa injection post total hip arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound guided needle placement using a longitudinal in-plane distal to proximal approach can be an effective alternative technique for diagnostic or therapeutic iliopsoas peritendon injection in patients with total hip arthroplasty.

US-Guided Interventional Procedures for Total Hip Arthroplasty

In patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) with recurrent pain, symptoms may be caused by several conditions involving not just the joint, but also the surrounding soft tissues including tendons, muscles, bursae, and peripheral nerves. US and US-guided interventional procedures are important tools in the diagnostic work-up of patients with painful THA given that it is possible to reach a prompt diagnosis both directly identifying the pathological changes of periprosthetic structures and indirectly evaluating the response and pain relief to local injection of anesthetics under US monitoring. Then, US guidance can be used for the aspiration of fluid from the joint or periarticular collections, or alternatively to follow the biopsy needle to collect samples for culture analysis in the suspicion of prosthetic joint infection. Furthermore, US-guided percutaneous interventions may be used to treat several conditions with well-established minimally invasive procedures that involve injections of corticosteroid, local anesthetics, and platelet-rich plasma or other autologous products. In this review, we will discuss the clinical and technical applications of US-guided percutaneous interventional procedures in painful THA that can be used in routine daily practice for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.

Pelvic Roll Back Can Trigger Functional Psoas Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty

In most cases, impingement of the iliopsoas tendon after total hip arthroplasty is caused by acetabular component retroversion. The present case report describes a patient with functional iliopsoas impingement following total hip arthroplasty. With increasing flexibility of the hip joint after surgery, the functional adjustment to the stiff thoracolumbar spine in this patient with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis resulted in progressive pelvic roll back. This roll back resulted in a functional iliopsoas impingement as the psoas tendon travels over the front of the pecten ossis pubis. Since excessive roll back is usually also addressed in primary total hip arthroplasty by decreasing anteversion of the acetabular component, surgeons should be aware to avoid the combination of roll back and decreased anteversion and their potential impact on iliopsoas impingement.

Endoscopic Tendon Release for Iliopsoas Impingement After Total Hip Arthroplasty-Excellent Clinical Outcomes and Low Failure Rates at Short-Term Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical effectiveness of endoscopic iliopsoas tendon release (IPR) at the lesser trochanter (LT) in patients with iliopsoas impingement (IPI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

Between November 2017 and March 2021, a consecutive series of 36 patients were treated with endoscopic IPR for diagnosed IPI. Patients included had acetabular cup position confirmed by functional imaging (OPS, Corin, Pymble, NSW), typical clinical symptoms of IPI, and a positive response to diagnostic injection. Clinical assessment included validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) along with hip flexion strength and active range of motion at different time marks up to 2-year follow-up, as well as surgical complications.

RESULTS

Overall, 36 consecutive patients (11 males) with a mean age of 62 ± 12 years were included. All patients had failed nonoperative management. Dynamic computed tomography assessment was available in 89% of the patients, edge loading was reported in 10%, and variable cup overhang was reported in 50%. Clinically, PROMs were significantly improved at every time mark when compared with preoperative values (P < .001), showing the biggest improvement within the first 4 weeks after surgery. At the 6-month follow-up, peak isometric hip flexion strength on the operated side was 20% lower than the contralateral side (P < .001). Failure rate of the procedure was 2.8% (1 case). Linear regression showed no association between cup overhang and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic IPR at the LT is a safe and reproducible technique associated with significant and immediate improvement in pain, functional outcomes, and high patient satisfaction. With minimal short-term weakness, no complications, and only a single revision, even in cases with cup malposition and/or edge loading, we believe that endoscopic IPR can be considered as one of the first-line operative options in patients with symptomatic IPI, irrespective of component position.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Ultrasound-Guided Iliopsoas Bursal Injections for Management of Iliopsoas Bursitis After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Iliopsoas tendonitis can cause persistent pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Nonoperative management of iliopsoas tendonitis includes anti-inflammatory drugs and image-guided corticosteroid injections. This study evaluated the efficacy of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injections (US-CSIs) for iliopsoas tendonitis following THA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 42 patients who received an US-CSI for iliopsoas tendonitis after primary THA between 2009 and 2020 at a single institution. Outcomes including reoperation, groin pain at last follow-up, additional intrabursal injection, and Harris Hip Score (HHS) were evaluated at a minimum of 1 year. Cross-table lateral radiographs (36 patients) or computed tomography scans (6 patients) were reviewed to determine if anterior cup overhang was present, indicating a mechanical etiology of iliopsoas tendonitis. Descriptive statistics and univariate comparison of HHS preinjection and postinjection were performed, with alpha < 0.05.

RESULTS

Among the 22 patients who did not have cup overhang, four (18.2%) had persistent groin pain at mean follow-up of 40 months (range, 14-94) after US-CSI. Three patients had a second injection; none had groin pain at most recent follow-up. No patients required acetabular revision. Mean HHS improved from 74 points (range, 52-94 points) to 91 points (range, 76-100 points; P < .001) at last follow-up. Among the 20 patients who had anterior cup overhang, five underwent acetabular revision after only temporary pain relief from injection. Groin pain was resolved in all revised patients at mean follow-up of 43 months (range, 12-60) after revision. Of the remaining 15 patients, five had persistent groin pain at mean follow-up of 35 months (range, 12-83). Mean HHS improved from 69 points (range, 50-96 points) preinjection to 81 (range, 56-98 points; P = .007) at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Resolution of groin pain was demonstrated in 78.6% of patients in the cohort; however, those who did not have acetabular overhang had higher rates of success. The overall revision rate was 11.9%. US-CSI appears to be safe and effective in the diagnosis and treatment of iliopsoas tendonitis following primary THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

Partial Flexor Tendon Injury Causing Locking: Illustration of the Utility of Dynamic Ultrasound

Clinical diagnosis of partial flexor tendon lacerations is challenging because tendon function may be preserved. Although some partial flexor tendon tears can be managed conservatively, pain, stiffness, and triggering/locking may result, requiring surgical management. The mechanism by which this occurs has been investigated in animal and cadaver studies but has not been demonstrated in patients with real-time, in vivo imaging. Here, we present a case of partial tendon tear presenting with severe pain and locking that was diagnosed before surgery and characterized with dynamic ultrasound.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Hip Pain: 2022 Update

Chronic hip pain is a frequent chief complaint for adult patients who present for evaluation in a variety of clinical practice settings. Following a targeted history and physical examination, imaging plays a vital role in elucidating the etiologies of a patient's symptoms, as a wide spectrum of pathological entities may cause chronic hip pain. Radiography is usually the appropriate initial imaging test following a clinical examination. Depending on the clinical picture, advanced cross-sectional imaging may be subsequently performed for further evaluation. This documents provides best practice for the imaging workup of chronic hip pain in patients presenting with a variety of clinical scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Ultrasound-guided bursal injections

The native bursa is a structure lined by synovium located adjacent to a joint which may serve to decrease friction between the tendons and overlying bone or skin. This extra-articular structure can become inflamed resulting in bursitis. Steroid injections have proven to be an effective method of treating bursal pathology in various anatomic locations. Performing these procedures requires a thorough understanding of relevant anatomy, proper technique, and expected outcomes. Ultrasound is a useful tool for pre procedure diagnostic evaluation and optimizing needle position during these procedures while avoiding adjacent structures. The purpose of this article is to review core principles of ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal procedures involving bursae throughout the upper and lower extremities.

Lower extremity ultrasound-guided interventions: tendon, ligament, and plantar fascia

Lower extremity tendinopathy and soft tissue injury are common clinical problems that can cause significant disability. Ultrasound-guided minimally invasive treatments using orthobiologics and image-guided percutaneous treatments continue to gain relevance with an ever-growing body of literature. We review the indications, technique, risks, and benefits according to the literature of common ultrasound-guided interventions utilized in the lower extremities.

Imaging-Guided Musculoskeletal Interventions in the Lower Limb

Imaging guidance is essential for musculoskeletal interventional procedures performed in the lower limb. A strong evidence supports the use of imaging guidance to improve safety, accuracy, and effectiveness of these interventions. Joints, tendons, bursae, and nerves can be effectively approached especially with ultrasound-guided injections. Here, we discuss evidence and technique of the most common image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures in the lower limb.

Pain After Hip Arthroplasty

MR imaging and ultrasound (US) have complementary roles for the comprehensive assessment of painful hip arthroplasty. Both modalities demonstrate synovitis, periarticular fluid collections, tendon tears and impingement, and neurovascular impingement, often with features indicating the causative etiology. MR imaging assessment requires technical modifications to reduce metal artifact, such as multispectral imaging, and optimization of image quality, and a high-performance 1.5-T system. US images periarticular structures at high-spatial resolution without interference of metal artifact, permitting real-time dynamic evaluation, and is useful for procedure guidance. Bone complications (periprosthetic fracture, stress reaction, osteolysis, and component loosening) are well depicted on MR imaging.

Ultrasound-guided Musculoskeletal Interventional Procedures Around the Hip: A Practical Guide

Several studies have shown that ultrasound guidance may contribute to improved safety, effectiveness and accuracy of musculoskeletal interventional procedures performed around the hip if compared to those performed with a landmark-guided technique. Different approaches and injectates can be used for treating hip musculoskeletal disorders. These procedures may involve injections in the hip joint, periarticular bursae, tendons, and peripheral nerves. Intra-articular hip injections are mostly used as a conservative approach for treating patients affected by hip osteoarthritis. Ultrasound-guided injection of the iliopsoas bursa is performed in patients with bursitis and/or tendinopathy, to treat those with painful prosthesis due to iliopsoas impingement, or when the lidocaine test is indicated to identify the iliopsoas as a source of pain. Ultrasound-guided interventions are routinely used in patients with greater trochanteric pain syndrome having as target the gluteus medius/minimus tendons and/or the trochanteric bursae. Ultrasound-guided fenestration and platelet-rich plasma injection are applied in patients with hamstring tendinopathy with good clinical outcomes. Last but not least, ultrasound-guided perineural injections can be used for peripheral neuropathies or blocks of the sciatic, lateral femoral cutaneous, and pudendal nerves. In this paper, we discuss the evidence and technical tips for musculoskeletal interventional procedures performed around the hip, highlighting the added value of ultrasound as an imaging guidance modality.

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block and Iliopsoas Plane Block: A Scoping Review of Quadriceps Weakness after Two Proclaimed Motor-Sparing Hip Blocks

Iliopsoas plane (IP) is a fascial plane deep to the iliopsoas complex that can serve as a potential space for the injection of local anesthetics to selectively block the articular branches of femoral nerve and accessory obturator nerve to the anterior hip capsule. Two highly similar ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks that target the IP, pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and iliopsoas plane block (IPB), were both designed to achieve motor-sparing sensory block to the anterior hip capsule. However, the most recent evidence shows that PENG block can cause 25% or more of quadriceps weakness, while IPB remains the hip block that can preserve quadriceps strength. In this scoping review of quadriceps weakness after PENG block and IPB, we first performed a focused review on the complicated anatomy surrounding the anterior hip capsule. Then, we systematically searched for all currently available cadaveric and clinical studies utilizing PENG block and IPB, with a focus on quadriceps weakness and its potential mechanism from the perspectives of fascial plane spread along and outside of the IP. We conclude that quadriceps weakness after PENG block, which places its needle tip directly deep to iliopsoas tendon (IT), may be the result of iliopectineal bursal injection. The incidental bursal injection, which can be observed on ultrasound as a medial fascial plane spread, can cause bursal rupture/puncture and an anteromedial extra-IP spread to involve the femoral nerve proper within fascia iliaca compartment (FIC). In comparison, IPB places its needle tip lateral to IT and injects just one-fourth of the volume of PENG block. The current evidence, albeit still limited, supports IPB as the true motor-sparing hip block. To avoid quadriceps weakness after PENG block, a more laterally placed needle tip, away from the undersurface of IT, and a reduction in injection volume should be considered. Future studies should focus on comparing the analgesic effects and quadriceps function impairment between PENG block and IPB.

Postoperative Musculoskeletal Imaging and Interventions Following Hip Preservation Surgery, Deformity Correction, and Hip Arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty and hip preservation surgeries have substantially increased over the past few decades. Musculoskeletal imaging and interventions are cornerstones of comprehensive postoperative care and surveillance in patients undergoing established and more recently introduced hip surgeries. Hence the radiologist's role continues to evolve and expand. A strong understanding of hip joint anatomy and biomechanics, surgical procedures, expected normal postoperative imaging appearances, and postoperative complications ensures accurate imaging interpretation, intervention, and optimal patient care. This article presents surgical principles and procedural details pertinent to postoperative imaging evaluation strategies after common hip surgeries, such as radiography, ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. We review and illustrate the expected postoperative imaging appearances and complications following chondrolabral repair, acetabuloplasty, osteochondroplasty, periacetabular osteotomy, realigning and derotational femoral osteotomies, and hip arthroplasty.

Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)-part IV, hip

OBJECTIVES

Image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures around the hip are widely used in daily clinical practice. The need for clarity concerning the actual added value of imaging guidance and types of medications to be offered led the Ultrasound and the Interventional Subcommittees of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) to promote, with the support of its Research Committee, a collaborative project to review the published literature on image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures in the lower limb in order to derive a list of clinical indications.

METHODS

In this article, we report the results of a Delphi-based consensus of 53 experts who reviewed the published literature for evidence on image-guided interventional procedures offered in the joint and soft tissues around the hip in order of their clinical indications.

RESULTS

Ten statements concerning image-guided treatment procedures around the hip have been collected by the panel of ESSR experts.

CONCLUSIONS

This work highlighted that there is still low evidence in the existing literature on some of these interventional procedures. Further large prospective randomized trials are essential to better confirm the benefits and objectively clarify the role of imaging to guide musculoskeletal interventional procedures around the hip.

KEY POINTS

• Expert consensus produced a list of 10 evidence-based statements on clinical indications of image-guided interventional procedures around the hip. • The highest level of evidence was only reached for one statement. • Strong consensus was obtained for all statements.

Snapping Hip Syndrome: A Comprehensive Update

Purpose of review

This is a comprehensive literature review regarding the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of snapping hip syndrome (SHS). It covers the diverse etiology of the syndrome and management steps from conservative to more advanced surgical techniques.

Recent Findings

Recent advances in imaging modalities may help in diagnosing and treating SHS. Additionally, arthroscopic procedures can prove beneficial in treating recalcitrant cases of SHS and have recently gained popularity due to their non-invasive nature.

Summary

SHS presents as an audible snap due to anatomical structures in the medial thigh compartment and hip. While often asymptomatic, in some instances, the snap is associated with pain. Its etiology can be broadly classified between external SHS and internal SHS, which involve different structures but share similar management strategies. The etiology can be differentiated by imaging and physical exam maneuvers. Treatment is recommended for symptomatic SHS and begins conservatively with physical therapy, rest, and anti-inflammatory medications. Most cases resolve after 6-12 months of conservative management. However, arthroscopic procedures or open surgical management may be indicated for those with persistent pain and symptoms. Different surgical approaches are recommended when treating internal SHS vs. external SHS. Due to advancements in treatment options, symptomatic SHS commonly becomes asymptomatic following intervention.

Meditation Monologue can Reduce Clinical Injection-Related Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Trial

Background.

Strategies to reduce anxiety prior to injection procedures are not well understood. The purpose is to determine the effect of a meditation monologue intervention delivered via phone/mobile application on pre-injection anxiety levels among patients undergoing a clinical injection. The following hypothesis was tested: patients who listened to a meditation monologue via phone/mobile application prior to clinical injection would experience less anxiety compared to those who did not.

Methods.

A prospective, randomized controlled trial was performed at an orthopedics and sports medicine clinic of a tertiary level medical center in the New England region, USA. Thirty patients scheduled for intra- or peri-articular injections were randomly allocated to intervention (meditation monologue) or placebo (nature sounds) group. Main outcome variables were state and trait anxiety inventory (STAI) scores and blood pressure (BP), heart rate, and respiratory rate.

Results.

There were 16 participants who were allocated to intervention (meditation monologue) while 14 participants were assigned to placebo (nature sounds). There was no interaction effect. However, a main time effect was found. Both state anxiety (STAI-S) and trait anxiety (STAI-T) scores were significantly reduced post-intervention compared to pre-intervention (STAI-S: p = 0.04, STAI-T: p = 0.04). Also, a statistically significant main group effect was detected. The pre- and post- STAI-S score reduction was greater in the intervention group (p = 0.028). Also, a significant diastolic BP increase between pre- and post-intervention was recorded in the intervention group (p = 0.028), but not in the placebo group (p = 0.999).

Conclusion.

Listening to a meditation monologue via phone/mobile application prior to clinical injection can reduce anxiety in adult patients receiving intra- and peri-articular injections. Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02690194

The Limited Reliability of Physical Examination and Imaging for Diagnosis of Iliopsoas Tendinitis

PURPOSE

To determine if any association exists between physical examination, imaging findings [ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)], and iliopsoas tendinitis (IPT) to characterize the reliability of these diagnostic modalities.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone US-guided iliopsoas tendon sheath injection (of lidocaine and a corticosteroid agent) as well as MRI performed within 1 year of injection from 2014 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, response to physical exam maneuvers, and response to injection were queried from patient records. US and MRI were reviewed by 2 independent musculoskeletal-trained radiologists. Response to injection was considered positive if the patient improved by >2 points on a 0- to 10-point VAS score. Chi-squared and Fisher exact testing were used to assess for any associations. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients, age 52.3 ± 17.3 years (mean ± standard deviation), body mass index 27.4 ± 4.3 kg/m², and follow-up 33.6 ± 20.6 months, met inclusion criteria. No physical exam maneuvers, sonographic features, or MRI findings were significantly associated with response to iliopsoas tendon injection (P > .05). Groin pain had a sensitivity of 100% but a specificity of 7%. Snapping hip had a specificity of 82% but a sensitivity of 24%. Pain with resisted straight leg raise (SLR) (sensitivity 62%, specificity 25%) and weakness with resisted SLR (sensitivity 15%, specificity 71%) both were nonreliable. Sonographic bursal distension and tendinosis had low sensitivities (67% and 63%, respectively) and specificities (35% and 32%). Bursal distension on MRI had sensitivity and specificity of 64% and 45%, respectively. Tendon thickening had sensitivity and specificity of 55% and 60%, respectively, and heterogeneity had sensitivity and specificity of 52% and 65%.

CONCLUSION

Neither physical examination nor US or MRI findings were associated with a positive response to peritendinous iliopsoas corticosteroid injections in patients with suspected IPT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative trial limited by lack of a reference standard for iliopsoas tendonitis diagnosis.

Effectiveness of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Iliopsoas Tendonitis after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report

Disorders involving artificial joints are difficult to evaluate due to metal artifacts hindering plain computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the current case study 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET)/CT and MRI were used to confirm iliopsoas tendonitis within the metal artifact area following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The patient was a 61-year-old woman who developed hip pain on flexion of the ipsilateral hip after THA. Imaging studies were performed to evaluate for iliopsoas tendonitis due to impingement with the cup. Assessment of the iliopsoas muscle near the artificial joint was difficult due to the metal artifact on plain CT and MRI. Imaging using 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/MRI showed uptake along the iliopsoas muscle. Therefore, revision was performed to resolve iliopsoas tendon impingement, and the preoperative pain resolved. The result of the current case study suggest 18F-FDG-PET/CT or 18F-FDG-PET/MRI will be useful to detect iliopsoas tendonitis within metal artifact areas after THA.

Low Back Pain Caused by Iliopsoas Tendinopathy Treated with Ultrasound-Guided Local Injection of Anesthetic and Steroid: A Retrospective Study

Background

Low back pain is a prevalent symptom that occurs in all age of people, whereas the pathogenesis is unknown. Iliopsoas tendinopathy is an increasingly recognized hip disorder that may contribute to low back pain. Our purpose is to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided local injection of anesthetic and steroid into the trigger point of iliopsoas tendon in treating low back pain caused by iliopsoas tendinopathy.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study reviewed 45 patients diagnosed with iliopsoas tendinopathy treated by B-ultrasound guided injection of 2 mL 2% lidocaine and 1 mL (5 mg) triamcinolone acetonide into the trigger point of iliopsoas tendon from March 2016 to June 2016. Medical records were collected to analyze the clinical presentation. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) measuring low back pain and Harris Hip score (HHS) measuring hip pain and function were administered to determine patient outcomes. Telephone follow-up was conducted, and the mean follow-up was 11 months.

Results

We observed that most patients with iliopsoas tendinopathy also complain about chronic low back pain except for groin pain. After injection of anesthetic and corticosteroid into the iliopsoas tendon, the NRS of patients with low back pain fell from 7.68±1.31 to 2.58±1.16 immediately after the injection and 0.75±0.73 at follow-up. The HHS improved from 43.02±16.81 to 98.15±2.56 at follow-up. Statistically significant difference (P<0.001) was observed. All patients returned to their original level of function, and only five patients presented with mild low back pain at the follow-up.

Conclusion

Low back pain is a prevalent presentation for iliopsoas tendinopathy. Diagnosis of iliopsoas tendinopathy should be considered in patients with low back pain with tenderness over the iliopsoas tendon. Ultrasound-guided local injection of anesthetic and steroid lead to satisfactory effect in relieving low back and groin pain and improving joint function.

non-arthroplasty iliopsoas impingement in athletes: a narrative literature review

INTRODUCTION

Iliopsoas impingement occurs secondary to a tight iliopsoas tendon that causes impingement during movement. This review presents current aspects regarding the diagnosis of iliopsoas impingement and also exposes the readers to the possible anatomic and clinical variations together with the available treatment options.

METHODS

We conducted a narrative literature review with regard to non-arthroplasty iliopsoas impingement.

RESULTS

Iliopsoas impingement is characterised by a distinct pattern of labral pathology, with anteriorly localised labral damage, that does not extend to the anterosuperior portion of the acetabulum. Anterior groin pain and intermittent catching, snapping or popping of the hip are common symptoms. Non-specific focal tenderness is often found over the iliopsoas tendon at the level of the anterior aspect of the joint. The 'C-sign' and Impingment test are usually positive. Dynamic ultrasonography is also useful for confirming the diagnosis. Initial management of painful iliopsoas impingement should be conservative. When patients continue to have pain, an ultrasound-guided injection can provide relief and predict the response to the surgical release. For patients who have recurrent pain after local injection of steroids, arthroscopic release has shown to achieve effective results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although different treatment options for iliopsoas impingement are emerging, the current standard of therapy is conservative followed by an arthroscopic tenotomy if necessary. Young adult hip surgeons should always keep this differential in mind in a patient presenting with groin pain and mechanical symptoms.

Short-term Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Iliopsoas Peritendinous Corticosteroid Injection

OBJECTIVES

Treatment for iliopsoas tendinopathy includes ultrasound (US)-guided iliopsoas peritendinous corticosteroid injection. Evidence is lacking regarding US-guided iliopsoas injection efficacy in patients with iliopsoas tendinopathy and intra-articular (IA) hip abnormalities. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of US-guided iliopsoas corticosteroid injection for iliopsoas tendinopathy in patients with and without IA hip abnormalities.

METHODS

This work was a prospective study evaluating patients aged 12 to 50 years with iliopsoas tendinopathy. Participants completed a Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) questionnaire before and 6 weeks after injection. The main outcome measure was the change in HOOS subcategory scores. Independent variables included time and hip status. Normal hips were compared to abnormal hips with IA abnormalities. A 2-way repeated measures analysis of covariance with effect size (η² ) was used to determine injection effects on HOOS scores before and 6 weeks after injection.

RESULTS

A total of 178 patients (154 female and 24 male) were analyzed. Time effects were found for both normal and abnormal hips in all HOOS subcategories: symptoms (P = .041; η²  = 0.050), pain (P = .001; η²  = 0.184), activities of daily living (P = .011; η²  = 0.076), function in sports and recreation (P = .001; η²  = 0.151), and quality of life (QOL; P = .001; η²  = 0.193). Significant differences between normal versus abnormal hips were found in the sports and recreation (P = .032; η²  = 0.056) and QOL scores (P = .001; η²  = 0.135).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with iliopsoas tendinopathy, US-guided iliopsoas corticosteroid injection improved outcomes regardless of coexisting IA hip abnormalities. Patients without IA hip abnormalities showed greater improvement in sports and recreation and QOL scores compared to patients with IA hip abnormalities. Ultrasound-guided iliopsoas injection for iliopsoas tendinopathy may advance short-term care and help continue with nonsurgical treatment regimens.

Arthroscopic techniques for treating ilio-psoas tendinopathy after hip arthroplasty

Impingement of hip arthroplasty components on soft tissues may adversely affect outcomes. An example is impingement of the cup on the ilio-psoas tendon, which has been reported in 0.4% to 8.3% of patients. Contributors to ilio-psoas tendon impingement (IPTI) can be categorised as anatomic (hypoplastic anterior wall), technical (inadequate anteversion and/or lower inclination, oversized cup, cement in contact with the tendon, and intra-muscular screw), and prosthetic (e.g., aggressive cup design, large-diameter head, resurfacing, and collared femoral prosthesis). IPTI manifests as groin pain, raising diagnostic challenges since this symptom lacks specificity. Physical findings of value for the diagnosis include pain exacerbation during active hip flexion, groin pain upon straight-leg raise to 30°, and/or snapping hip syndrome. Confirmation is then provided by ultrasonography and, most importantly, computed tomography. Once the diagnosis is confirmed, non-operative treatment combining physical therapy and local corticosteroid injections is prescribed. When these measures fail, endoscopic or arthroscopic surgery is generally effective. In patients with major cup malposition, revision of the cup is the preferred option, despite the higher complication rate. When cup position is adequate, ilio-psoas tenotomy can be performed either extra-articularly at the lesser trochanter (by endoscopy) or intra-articularly (by arthroscopy). The arthroscopic technique is more demanding but useful when the diagnosis is in doubt, as it allows examination of the prosthetic bearing surfaces. Both techniques and the risks inherent in each are discussed in detail. Tenotomy, whether performed endoscopically or arthroscopically, promptly provides good outcomes in over 85% of patients, usually with full recovery of hip flexor strength over time. These minimally invasive techniques, while as effective as conventional surgery, are associated with lower morbidity rates.

Arthroscopic treatment of iliopsoas impingement syndrome after hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK

Groin pain after hip arthroplasty (HA) ranges from 0.4% to 18.3%. Defining the cause of groin pain after HA can be difficult. Iliopsoas impingement (IPI) has been reported to be the underlying cause of groin pain in up to 4.4% of cases. The purpose of this study is to present arthroscopic surgical outcomes in the treatment of IPI after HA.

METHODS

Between September 2013 and March 2018, 13 patients, 11 total hip arthroplasty (THA), 1 hip endoprosthesis and 1 total hip resurfacing affected by groin pain due to unceasing iliopsoas tendinopathy for impingement after HA were treated arthroscopically. The patients underwent to physical examination, blood analysis, hip X-rays, bone scintigraphy and CT assessment. We performed the arthroscopic OUT-IN access to hip joint in all patients. VAS scale, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Medical Research Council (MRC) scale were performed before surgery and during follow up at 1-3-6-12 months.

RESULTS

After 10 months of mean follow-up, average HHS and MRC scale improved significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively. No complications arose in our case series.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip arthroscopy after hip arthroplasty is supported in the literature for a variety of indications. Hip arthroscopy is a viable and reproducible technique in treatment of IPI, being less invasive than the classic open technique. This simple arthroscopic release provides satisfactory results and preserves HA function. Moreover an arthroscopic OUT-IN access proves good clinical outcomes, few complications and iatrogenic lesions.

Ultrasound in Total Hip Replacement: Value of Anterior Acetabular Cup Visibility and Contact With the Iliopsoas Tendon

OBJECTIVES

To assess visibility of the acetabular cup in total hip replacement and to determine the value of direct and indirect signs of iliopsoas impingement syndrome with ultrasound.

METHODS

Ultrasound examinations were performed by a single operator in 17 patients with iliopsoas impingement syndrome and 48 control patients. Cup visibility, contact between the cup and psoas tendon, and the presence of indirect signs of iliopsoas impingement syndrome were investigated in all patients. When the acetabular cup was visible, its size and position in relation to the psoas tendon were recorded.

RESULTS

Anterior cup visibility (P = .03), contact with the psoas tendon (P < .001), psoas tendinopathy (P = .02), and iliopsoas bursitis (P < .001) were significantly associated with iliopsoas impingement syndrome, the latter reported with specificity of 100%. In the sagittal plane at the level of the psoas tendon, a maximum sagittal length of greater than 5 mm and a posteroanterior cup shift of 3 mm or greater yielded respective sensitivities of 82% and 59% and specificities of 81% and 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

When iliopsoas impingement syndrome is clinically suspected, the presence of iliopsoas bursitis or a posteroanterior cup shift of greater than 3 mm under the psoas tendon serve to confirm the diagnosis. In the absence of these conditions, a therapeutic test may be necessary because of the incomplete, albeit high, specificity of other signs.

A Systematic Review of Arthroscopic Versus Open Tenotomy of Iliopsoas Tendonitis After Total Hip Replacement

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review of the literature comparing patient outcomes following arthroscopic and open operative management of iliopsoas tendonitis (IPT) following total hip replacement (THR).

METHODS

This review study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Inclusion criteria were as follows: outcome studies following open or arthroscopic iliopsoas tendon release after THR with at least 6 months of follow-up, English language, and human studies. The exclusion criteria included case reports, articles evaluating nonsurgical management or cup revision, and articles without a specific diagnosis of IPT or in which results between open and arthroscopic treatment were reported in conjunction.

RESULTS

A total of 131 studies were initially retrieved, with 7 satisfying all inclusion criteria (4 studies on arthroscopic tenotomy and 3 studies on open tenotomy). The review included a total of 88 patients with IPT-61 patients treated arthroscopically and 27 patients treated with open tenotomy. In total, 77 of the 88 patients demonstrated successful outcomes following surgery. In the group treated with arthroscopy, 91.8% (56/61) of patients had successful outcomes, whereas in those treated with open tenotomy, 77.8% (21/27) of patients had successful outcomes. Of patients with signs of mechanical impingement from acetabular component overhang, those who underwent open tenotomy had complete pain relief in 6/8 patients (75%) compared to arthroscopic tenotomy in which there was relief in 40/43 patients (93%).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic iliopsoas release for management of IPT is suggested to be an effective minimally invasive operative technique that may also yield a lower complication rate in comparison to open tenotomy. Tenotomy, both arthroscopic and open, are successful treatment options for IPT, including those with signs of mechanical impingement, and are recommended prior to cup revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of level IV studies.

Existing Evidence on Ultrasound-Guided Injections in Sports Medicine

Office-based ultrasonography has become increasingly available in many settings, and its use to guide joint and soft tissue injections has increased. Numerous studies have been conducted to evaluate the use of ultrasound-guided injections over traditional landmark-guided injections, with a rapid growth in the literature over the past few years. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted to demonstrate increased accuracy of ultrasound-guided injections regardless of anatomic location. In the upper extremity, ultrasound-guided injections have been shown to provide superior benefit to landmark-guided injections at the glenohumeral joint, the subacromial space, the biceps tendon sheath, and the joints of the hand and wrist. Ultrasound-guided injections of the acromioclavicular and the elbow joints have not been shown to be more efficacious. In the lower extremity, ultrasound-guided injections at the knee, ankle, and foot have superior efficacy to landmark-guided injections. Conclusive evidence is not available regarding improved efficacy of ultrasound-guided injections of the hip, although landmark-guided injection is performed less commonly at the hip joint. Ultrasound-guided injections are overall more accurate than landmark-guided injections. While current studies indicate that ultrasound guidance improves efficacy and cost-effectiveness of many injections, these studies are limited and more research is needed.

Ultrasound Diagnostic and Therapeutic Injections of the Hip and Groin

Hip and groin pain often presents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The differential diagnosis is extensive, comprising intra-articular and extra-articular pathology and referred pain from lumbar spine, knee and elsewhere in the pelvis. Various ultrasound-guided techniques have been described in the hip and groin region for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Ultrasound has many advantages over other imaging modalities, including portability, lack of ionising radiation and real-time visualisation of soft tissues and neurovascular structures. Many studies have demonstrated the safety, accuracy and efficacy of ultrasound-guided techniques, although there is lack of standardisation regarding the injectates used and long-term benefit remains uncertain.

Outcomes of cup revision for ilio-psoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty: Retrospective study of 46 patients

BACKGROUND

Impingement of the ilio-psoas tendon on the acetabular component is a cause of pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Studies of cup revision for ilio-psoas impingement (IPI) are scarce and limited in size. We therefore conducted a large multicentre retrospective study with the following objectives: to assess the effectiveness of cup replacement in resolving the impingement syndrome, to determine the frequency and nature of complications after cup revision for IPI, and to identify pre-operative factors associated with good outcomes of cup revision for IPI.

HYPOTHESIS

Cup revision is effective in resolving the pain due to IPI in selected patients.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentre study included 46 patients who underwent cup revision because of IPI. Before the revision, 38 (83%) patients had prominence of the anterior cup rim (mean, 9.9±4.5mm (range, 2-22mm) by radiography and 35 (76%) had cup malposition (anteversion<10° and/or inclination>50°). Mean follow-up was 21months (range, 6months to 6 years) and no patient was lost to follow-up. Outcomes at last follow-up were assessed based on the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), patient satisfaction index, complications, and revisions.

RESULTS

At last follow-up, 39 (85%) patients were satisfied with the revision procedure, a significant improvement versus baseline was noted in the OHS (mean, 43±6; range, 25-48; P<0.001), and 41 patients were free of pain during hip flexion (P<0.001 versus baseline). Complications occurred in 3 (6.5%) patients, but only one complication was severe (deep infection). Recurrent groin pain was reported by 4 (8.7%) patients at last follow-up. None of the factors studied predicted the outcome of revision surgery.

DISCUSSION

Cup revision for IPI after THA is effective in relieving the groin pain in 80% of patients with anterior cup rim prominence and/or cup malposition. However, complications can occur. Tenotomy may be preferable when the diagnosis is in doubt and/or cup position is acceptable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective observational study.

Endoscopic or arthroscopic iliopsoas tenotomy for iliopsoas impingement following total hip replacement. A prospective multicenter 64-case series

INTRODUCTION

Impingement between the acetabular component and the iliopsoas tendon is a cause of anterior pain after total hip replacement (THR). Treatment can be non-operative, endoscopic or arthroscopic, or by open revision of the acetabular component. Few studies have assessed these options. The present study hypothesis was that endo/arthroscopic treatment provides rapid pain relief with a low rate of complications.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter study included 64 endoscopic or arthroscopic tenotomies for impingement between the acetabular component and the iliopsoas tendon, performed in 8 centers. Mean follow-up was 8months, with a minimum of 6months and no loss to follow-up. Oxford score, patient satisfaction, anterior pain and iliopsoas strength were assessed at last follow-up. Complications and revision procedures were collated. Forty-four percent of patients underwent rehabilitation.

RESULTS

At last follow-up, 92% of patients reported pain alleviation. Oxford score, muscle strength and pain in hip flexion showed significant improvement. The complications rate was 3.2%, with complete resolution. Mean hospital stay was 0.8 nights. In 2 cases, arthroscopy revealed metallosis, indicating revision of the acetabular component. The only predictive factor was acetabular projection on oblique view. Rehabilitation significantly improved muscle strength.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic or arthroscopic tenotomy for impingement between the acetabular component and the iliopsoas tendon following THR significantly alleviated anterior pain in more than 92% of cases. The low complications rate makes this the treatment of choice in case of failure of non-operative management. Arthroscopy also reorients diagnosis in case of associated joint pathology. Projection of the acetabular component on preoperative oblique view is the most predictive criterion, guiding treatment.

Musculoskeletal Approach to Pelvic Pain

Visceral and somatic causes of pelvic pain are often inter-related, and a musculoskeletal examination should always be considered for the successful diagnosis and treatment of pelvic pain. For the diverse etiologies of hip pain, there are many unique considerations for the diagnosis and treatment of these various disorders. Pelvic pain is often multidimensional due to the overlap between lumbo-hip-pelvic diagnoses and may require a multidisciplinary approach to evaluation and management.

Understanding and Treating the Snapping Hip

Snapping hip, or coxa saltans is a palpable or auditory snapping with movement of the hip joint. Extra-articular snapping is divided into external and internal types, and is caused laterally by the iliotibial band and anteriorly by the iliopsoas tendon. Snapping of the iliopsoas usually requires contraction of the hip flexors and may be difficult to distinguish from intra-articular coxa saltans. Ultrasound can be a useful modality to dynamically detect tendon translation during hip movement to support the diagnosis of extra-articular snapping. Coxa saltans is typically treated with conservative measures including anti-inflammatories, stretching, and avoidance of inciting activities. Recalcitrant cases are treated with surgery to lengthen the iliopsoas or the iliotibial band.

Ultrasound-Guided Hip Procedures

This article describes the techniques for performing ultrasound-guided procedures in the hip region, including intra-articular hip injection, iliopsoas bursa injection, greater trochanter bursa injection, ischial bursa injection, and piriformis muscle injection. The common indications, pitfalls, accuracy, and efficacy of these procedures are also addressed.

Iliopsoas impingement after revision total hip arthroplasty treated with iliopsoas muscle transection

Introduction

Iliopsoas tendinitis after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is rare and its etiology and optimal treatment are still unclear. We report a case of iliopsoas impingement after revision THA with a Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device requiring two-level iliopsoas muscle transection.

Presentation of case

A 70-year-old woman presented to our hospital complaining of debilitating right groin pain after revision THA with a Kerboull reinforcement device. She had undergone multiple hip operations after experiencing a pelvic fracture in a motor vehicle accident. A lidocaine nerve block at the level of the Kerboull device resulted in temporary but marked reduction in pain and a diagnosis of psoas impingent. We performed surgery via an anterior approach to release the iliopsoas muscle from the lesser trochanter. After iliopsoas tenotomy was performed, the muscle was still under high tension because of dense adhesions. Repeat transection of the iliopsoas muscle at the level of the anterior branch of the Kerboull device resulted in loosening of the iliopsoas muscle and resolution of impingement. Postoperatively, the patient's groin pain completely disappeared, and she can now walk with a single cane and is satisfied with her result.

Discussion

Adhesions around the iliopsoas muscle likely contributed to the patient's groin pain. Open surgery to perform complete release of iliopsoas muscle impingement should be considered in patients with pain after revision THA.

Conclusion

We reported a patient with Iliopsoas tendinitis after revision THA requiring two-level iliopsoas muscle transection.

•

We reported a patient with Iliopsoas tendinitis after revision THA.

•

Two-level iliopsoas muscle transection was necessary.

•

Open surgery should be considered in patients with pain after revision THA.

Three-dimensional in vivo difference between native acetabular version and acetabular component version influences iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The potential influence of acetabular component orientation on iliopsoas impingement in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been previously quantified. The aim of the present study was to utilize pre- and post-operative CT-based 3D models to quantify iliopsoas impingement on acetabular components, and to identify any potential factors associated with iliopsoas impingement.

METHODS

Iliopsoas muscle was modelled from pre-operative CT scans and transferred to the post-operative 3D models in 19 THAs. The volume and the area of the overlap between iliopsoas muscle and acetabular cup (iliopsoas volume & area) was measured on axial and sagittal images. Most protruded lengths of cup uncovered by acetabular bone were measured on axial sagittal scan of CT scans. Version of acetabulum, acetabular cup, and the difference between the two (version difference) were also measured with cup inclination and size. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify any factor influencing iliopsoas impingement.

RESULTS

Iliopsoas impingement volume and area were 100.6 ± 226.1 (range, 0.0-663.9) mm³ and 52.6 ± 102.0 (0.0-342.3) mm³, respectively. The protruded lengths on axial and sagittal view were 6.9 ± 5.3 (0.0-16.0) and 2.1 ± 2.7 (0.0-8.0). Linear regression model showed that version difference was significantly related to the iliopsoas impingement volume and area (beta = -0.709, p = 0.041 for volume, and beta = -0.684, p = 0.047 for area).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that iliopsoas impingement on acetabular components was influenced by the version difference between pre-operative acetabular bone and acetabular component rather than the magnitude of post-operative cup version alone.

Lower Extremity Injury Patterns in Elite Ballet Dancers: Ultrasound/MRI Imaging Features and an Institutional Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Interventions

BACKGROUND

Altered biomechanics from repetitive microtrauma, such as long practice hours in en pointe (tip of the toes) or demi pointe (balls of the feet) predispose ballet dancers to a multitude of musculoskeletal pathologies particularly in the lower extremities. Both ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are radiation-sparing modalities which can be used to confidently evaluate these injuries, with ultrasound (US) offering the added utility of therapeutic intervention at the same time in experienced hands.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purposes of this paper were: (1) to illustrate the US and MRI features of lower extremity injury patterns in ballet dancers, focusing on pathologies commonly encountered at a single orthopedic hospital; (2) to present complementary roles of both ultrasound and MRI in the evaluation of these injuries whenever possible; (3) to review and present our institutional approach towards therapeutic ultrasound-guided interventions by presenting explicit cases.

METHODS

Online searches were performed using the search criteria of "ballet biomechanics" and "ballet injuries." The results were then further narrowed down by limiting articles published in the past 15 years, modality (US and MRI), anatomical region (foot and ankle, hip and knee) and to major radiology, orthopedics, and sports medicine journals.

RESULTS

Performing ballet poses major stress to lower extremities and predisposes dancer to several musculoskeletal injuries. These can be adequately evaluated by both US and MRI. US is useful for evaluating superficial structures such as soft tissues, tendons, and ligaments, particularly in the foot and ankle. MRI provides superior resolution of deeper structures such as joints, bone marrow, and cartilage. In addition, US can be used as a therapeutic tool for providing quick symptomatic improvement in these athletes for who "time is money".

CONCLUSION

Performing ballet may cause major stress to the lower extremities, predominantly affecting the foot and ankle, followed by the knee and hip. US and MRI play complementary roles in evaluating various orthopedic conditions in ballet dancers, with US allowing for dynamic evaluation and guidance for interventions.

Interventional MSK procedures: the hip

Percutaneous musculoskeletal procedures are widely accepted as low invasive, highly effective, efficient and safe methods in a vast amount of hip pathologies either in diagnostic or in therapeutic management. Hip intra-articular injections are used for the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis. Peritendinous or intrabursal corticosteroid injections can be used for the symptomatic treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome and anterior iliopsoas impingement. In past decades, the role of interventional radiology has rapidly increased in metastatic disease, thanks to the development of many ablative techniques. Image-guided percutaneous ablation of skeletal metastases provides a minimally invasive treatment option that appears to be a safe and effective palliative treatment for localized painful lytic lesion. Methods of tumour destruction based on temperature, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryotherapy, are performed for the management of musculoskeletal metastases. MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery provides a non-invasive alternative to these ablative methods. Cementoplasty is now widely used for pain management and consolidation of acetabular metastases and can be combined with RFA. RFA is also used to treat benign tumours, namely osteoid osteomas. New interventional procedures such as percutaneous screw fixation are also proposed to treat non-displaced or minimally displaced acetabular roof fractures.

The running athlete: stress fractures, osteitis pubis, and snapping hips

CONTEXT

Pelvic stress fractures, osteitis pubis, and snapping hip syndrome account for a portion of the overuse injuries that can occur in the running athlete.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PUBMED SEARCHES WERE PERFORMED FOR EACH ENTITY USING THE FOLLOWING KEYWORDS: snapping hip syndrome, coxa sultans, pelvic stress fracture, and osteitis pubis from 2008 to 2013. Topic reviews, case reports, case series, and randomized trials were included for review.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

RESULTS

Collectively, 188 articles were identified. Of these, 58 were included in this review.

CONCLUSION

Based on the available evidence, the majority of these overuse injuries can be managed non-operatively. Primary treatment should include removal from offending activity, normalizing regional muscle strength/length imbalances and nutritional deficiencies, and mitigating training errors through proper education of the athlete and training staff.

STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATION TAXONOMY

C.