• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4601653)   Today's Articles (5350)   Subscriber (49365)
For: Schueller G, Kaindl E, Matzek WK, Semturs F, Schueller-Weidekamm C, Helbich TH. Image Quality of a Wet Laser Printer Versus a Paper Printer for Full-Field Digital Mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:38-43. [PMID: 16357374 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.04.1583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Teixeira P, Zabel JP, Baumann C, Albizzati S, Coudane H, Winninger D, Blum A. Can paper replace laser film to communicate the results of wrist radiographs in trauma cases? A reproducibility study of the reading of wrist trauma case radiographs on a PACS workstation, laser film, and paper. J Digit Imaging 2013;26:1013-9. [PMID: 23779150 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-013-9613-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]  Open
2
Li Y, Poulos A, McLean D, Rickard M. A review of methods of clinical image quality evaluation in mammography. Eur J Radiol 2010;74:e122-31. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2009] [Revised: 04/25/2009] [Accepted: 04/28/2009] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
3
Maydell AT, Andronikou S, Ackermann C, Bezuidenhout AF. Comparison of paper print and soft copy reading in plain paediatric radiographs. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2010;53:459-66. [PMID: 19788481 DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02104.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
4
Schueller G, Kaindl E, Langenberger H, Stadler A, Schueller-Weidekamm C, Semturs F, Helbich TH. Validation of image quality in full-field digital mammography: Is the replacement of wet by dry laser printers justified? Eur J Radiol 2007;62:267-72. [PMID: 17188829 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.11.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2006] [Revised: 11/21/2006] [Accepted: 11/24/2006] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
5
Reply. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.06.5042.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
6
Hall FM. Wet Versus Dry Laser Printers for Copying Digital Mammograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:E22; author reply E22. [PMID: 16714631 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.06.5042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA