Update on the Diagnostic Radiologist Employment Market: Findings Through 2004

Update on the diagnostic radiology employment market: findings through 2007-2008

PURPOSE

To describe the employment market for diagnostic radiologists in 2007-2008, with attention to differences among subspecialties.

METHODS

The authors conducted the most recent in a series of annual surveys of vacancies in academic departments and obtained data from the placement service of the ACR (its Professional Bureau) during its operation at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America. The authors also obtained survey data on how radiologists' actual workloads compared with what they desired.

RESULTS

The ratio of job listings to job seekers at the placement service, which serves both community and academic positions, fell to 0.60 for 2008, compared with 1.1 to 1.2 for 2003 to 2006 and 0.22 to 3.8 in the preceding decade. In 2007, workload averaged 3% less than desired, unlike a close match in 2003. Vacancies per academic department have been growing slightly. Data on academic vacancies indicated that interventional, pediatric, and particularly breast imaging were the fields with the most intense shortages. General radiology and (marginally) neuroradiology were at the opposite end of the spectrum. At the placement service, there was a particularly high ratio of job listings to job seekers for interventional radiology and a particularly low ratio for nuclear medicine/radiology.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall job market remains very much intermediate between the highs and lows that have occurred since 1990, but finding highly desirable jobs is likely to be somewhat more difficult, and filling vacancies somewhat easier, in 2008 than in the past few years. There was a strong indication of a 3% surplus of radiologists in 2007. Interventional radiology, pediatric radiology, and particularly breast imaging are the subspecialties in which positions are most difficult to fill; neuroradiology, general radiology, and nuclear radiology may lie at the opposite end of the spectrum.

Update on the diagnostic radiology employment market: findings through 2006-2007

PURPOSE

To describe the employment market for diagnostic radiologists in 2006-2007, with attention to differences among subspecialties.

METHODS

The authors conducted the most recent in a series of annual surveys of vacancies in academic departments and obtained data from the placement service of the American College of Radiology (ACR), its Professional Bureau, during its operation at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America. The two data series were correlated. The percentage of academic vacancies in each subspecialty was compared with the percentage of academic radiologists in that subspecialty.

RESULTS

Job listings per job seeker at the placement service, which serves both community and academic positions, were 0.72 for 2007 compared with approximately 1.1 to 1.2 for 2003 to 2006 and variation from 0.25 to 3.8 in the preceding decade. The correlation of the two data series was 0.84 (P = .08) for the 5 years for which both are available. Particularly high ratios of academic vacancies to academic radiologists were found for interventional radiology and breast imaging; particularly low ratios were found for neuroradiology and nuclear radiology.

CONCLUSIONS

The job market remains very much intermediate between the highs and lows that have occurred since 1990, but finding highly desirable jobs is likely to be somewhat more difficult, and filling vacancies somewhat easier, in 2007 than in the past few years. Interventional radiology and breast imaging are the subspecialties in which academic positions are most difficult to fill; neuroradiology and nuclear radiology seem to be at the opposite end of the spectrum. The same differences across subspecialties are probably found in community practice, given the strong correlation of the two data series.

Successful Recruiting of Radiologists

Hospital systems and radiology organizations often find it difficult to recruit new high-quality radiologists. This article discusses long-range planning for finding new radiologists, methods used to recruit prospective new members for a radiology department or group, how to carry out a satisfactory interview, and questions that are illegal to pose during an interview. The related topics of the state of the radiology job market and ways to reduce staff turnover are also addressed briefly.

The state of teleradiology in 2003 and changes since 1999

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study is to describe in detail the use of teleradiology in 2003 and to report on changes since 1999 in this rapidly evolving field.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyze non-individually identified data from the American College of Radiology's 2003 Survey of Radiologists, a stratified random sample mail survey that achieved a response rate of 63%, and data from the American College of Radiology's 1999 Survey of Practices. Responses were weighted to represent the distribution of individual radiologists and radiology practices nationwide. We present descriptive statistics and multivariable regression analysis results on the prevalence and uses of teleradiology in 2003 and comparisons with 1999.

RESULTS

Overall, 67% of all radiology practices in the United States, which included 78% of all U.S. radiologists, reported using teleradiology. A significant increase (p < 0.05) was seen in the prevalence of teleradiology or PACS, from 58% of practices in 1999 to 73% in 2003. Regression results indicate that, other practice characteristics being equal, in 2003, primarily academic practices were less likely to use teleradiology than private radiology practices, and medium-sized practices (5-14 radiologists) were more likely to have teleradiology than larger ones. In practices using teleradiology, home was the most frequent receiving site in both 1999 (81%) and 2003 (75%), the percentages being not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Already a fixture of radiology practice in 1999, teleradiology increased in prevalence substantially by 2003. The primary use of teleradiology, transmission of images to home, did not change, suggesting that easing the burden of call remains the main use of teleradiology.

Retirement patterns and plans of radiologists

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of our study were to describe radiologists' recent retirement plans and patterns and to assess whether changes in radiologists' retirement patterns over the period of 1995-2003 explain the recent easing of the radiologist shortage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present detailed information from 2003 about the planned retirement age of radiologists, their labor force participation late in their careers, and their actual retirement pattern based on data from the American College of Radiology's (ACR) 2003 Survey of Radiologists. To analyze changes over time, we compare these data with information from the ACR's 1995 and 2000 Surveys of Radiologists. Multivariate regression analysis was also used to identify the effects of radiologist and practice characteristics on radiologists' retirement plans.

RESULTS

The percentage of radiologists fully retired and the average retirement age were the same in 1995 and 2003. Overall, labor force participation rates were decreasing over the period 1995-2003 for both women and men. Standardized labor force participation rates for radiologists age 55-74 years appeared to decrease from 1995 to 2000 and remained at a lower level in 2003, but the changes were not statistically significant. As of 2003, radiologists retired at 64, approximately 2 years older than the average U.S. worker.

CONCLUSION

Radiologists remain active in their profession longer than the typical U.S. worker. There was no change in radiologists' pattern of gradually moving into retirement. If anything, radiologists were retiring earlier in 2003 than in the past. A delay in retirement is not an explanation of the recent easing of the radiologist shortage.

Update on the Diagnostic Radiology Employment Market: Findings Through 2005

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to analyze and summarize the latest data describing the diagnostic radiologist employment market.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three sources of data--vacancies in academic radiology departments as of July 1, 2005; the ratio of job listings to job seekers at a major placement service; and the number of positions advertised in the American Journal of Roentgenology and Radiology-are presented and compared with previous data.

RESULTS

Vacancies in academic departments averaged 4.5 in 2005, an increase of 16% from 2004 but a decrease of 16% from the 2001 peak. Vacancies increased from 2004 in all specialties except nuclear medicine and "other," and vacancies decreased from 2001 in all specialties except pediatric radiology and purely research positions. Job listings per job seeker increased 8% from 2004 but remain far below peak levels. The total number of positions advertised decreased by 6% from 2004, reaching the lowest level since 1998. In 2005, 42% of the total advertised jobs were academic, as compared with 45% in 2004. Proportional decreases were seen between 2004 and 2005 in total advertisements per region except the Northwest and California. The largest proportional increases in subspecialties occurred in general radiology, abdominal imaging, and "other."

CONCLUSION

Data from the American College of Radiology Professional Bureau and a survey of academic radiology departments show an increased demand for diagnostic radiologists in 2005, whereas data from the help wanted index show a decrease. In addition, the regional distribution of advertisements and the proportion of advertisements for certain specialties have shown some shifting in 2005. We believe the job market remains strong, with regional and specialty shifting.