Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging with parallel technique in assessment of endometrial cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:481-488. [PMID: 18212236 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.07.2155]

Evaluation of multiplexed sensitivity encoding diffusion-weighted imaging in detecting uterine lesions: Image quality optimization

PURPOSE

To compare the image quality of multiplexed sensitivity-encoding diffusion-weighted imaging (MUSE-DWI) and single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI-DWI) techniques in uterine MRI.

METHODS

Eighty-eight eligible patients underwent MUSE-DWI and SS-EPI-DWI examinations simultaneously using a 3.0 T MRI system. Two radiologists independently performed quantitative and qualitative analysis of the two groups of images using a double-blind method. The weighted Kappa test was used to evaluate the interobserver agreement. Wilcoxon's rank sum test was used for qualitative parameters, and paired t-test was used for quantitative parameters. Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to obtained correlation between pathological results and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value.

RESULTS

The qualitative and quantitative analysis of the images by the two radiologists were in good or excellent agreement, with weighted kappa value ranging from 0.636 to 0.981. The scores of total subjective image quality (15.4 ± 0.99) and signal-to-noise ratio (158.99 ± 60.71) of MUSE-DWI were significantly higher than those of SS-EPI-DWI (12.93 ± 1.62 P < 0.001; 130.23 ± 48.29 P < 0.05). It effectively reduced image distortion and artifact, and had better lesion conspicuity. There was no significant difference in contrast-to-noise ratio score and average ADC values between the two DWI sequences. The average ADC values of the two DWI sequences were highest in the normal uterus group and lowest in the endometrial cancer group, with statistically significant differences among groups (P < 0.01). In addition, the average ADC values of the two DWI sequences were negatively correlated with the type of lesions, decreasing with the malignancy of the lesions (r = -0.805 P < 0.01, r = -0.815 P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Compared to SS-EPI-DWI, MUSE-DWI can significantly reduce distortion, artifacts, and fuzziness in MRI of uterine lesions, which is more conducive to lesion detection.

Can the ADC Value Be Used as an Imaging "Biopsy" in Endometrial Cancer?

BACKGROUND

The tumor histological grade is closely related to the prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer (EC). Multiparametric MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), provides information about the cellular density that may be useful to differentiate between benign and malignant uterine lesions. However, correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and histopathological grading in endometrial cancer remain controversial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 92 patients with endometrial cancers, including both endometrioid adenocarcinomas (64) and non-endometrioid adenocarcinomas (28). All patients underwent DWI procedures, and mean ADC values were calculated in a region of interest. These values were then correlated with the tumor grading offered by the histopathological examination, which was considered the gold standard. In this way, the patients were divided into three groups (G1, G2, and G3). The ADC values were then compared to the results offered by the biopsy to see if the DWI sequence and ADC map could replace this procedure. We also compared the mean ADC values to the myometrial invasion (50%) and lymphovascular space invasion.

RESULTS

We have divided the ADC values into three categories corresponding to three grades: >0.850 × 10-3 mm2/s (ADC1), 0.730-0.849 × 10-3 mm2/s (ADC2) and <0.730 × 10-3 mm2/s (ADC3). The diagnostic accuracy of the ADC value was 85.71% for ADC1, 75.76% for ADC2, and 91.66% for ADC3. In 77 cases out of 92, the category in which they were placed using the ADC value corresponded to the result offered by the histopathological exam with an accuracy of 83.69%. For only 56.52% of patients, the biopsy result included the grading system. For each grading category, the mean ADC value showed better results than the biopsy; for G1 patients, the mean ADC value had an accuracy of 85.71% compared to 66.66% in the biopsy, G2 had 75.76% compared to 68.42%, and G3 had 91.66 compared to 75%. For both deep myometrial invasion and lymphovascular space invasion, there is a close, inversely proportional correlation with the mean ADC value.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean endometrial tumor ADC on MR-DWI is inversely related to the histological grade, deep myometrial invasion and lymphovascular space invasion. Using this method, the patients could be better divided into risk categories for personalized treatment.

The role of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in determining tumor aggressiveness during preoperative surgical planning in early-stage endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between tumor volume and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and deep myometrial invasion, tumor grade, and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer.

METHODS

The study included 73 patients diagnosed with early-stage endometrial cancer based on histopathological examination between May 2014 and July 2019. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to estimate the accuracy of ADC and tumor volume in predicting the LVSI, the depth of myometrial invasion (DMI), and the histopathological tumor grade in these patients.

RESULTS

The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of ADC and tumor volume in predicting LVI, DMI, and high tumor grade were significantly greater than those for superficial myometrial invasion and low-grade tumors. The ROC analysis revealed that higher tumor volume was significantly associated with the prediction of DMI and tumor grade (p = 0.002 and p = 0.015). The corresponding cut-off values of tumor volume were > 7.12 and > 9.38 mL. The sensitivity of ADC in predicting DMI was higher than its sensitivity in predicting LVSI and grade 1 tumors. Furthermore, tumor volume was significantly associated with the prediction of DMI and tumor grade.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of pathological pelvic lymph nodes in early-stage endometrial cancer, tumor volume in DWI sequences determines the active tumor load and tumor aggressiveness. Furthermore, a low ADC indicates deep myometrial invasion and helps differentiate stage IA and stage IB tumors.

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for evaluating myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: a comparison of MUSE-DWI, rFOV-DWI, and DCE-MRI

OBJECTIVES

To compare the image quality of high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE) versus reduced field-of-view (rFOV) techniques in endometrial cancer (EC) and to compare the diagnostic performance of these techniques with that of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI for assessing myometrial invasion of EC.

METHODS

MUSE-DWI and rFOV-DWI were obtained preoperatively in 58 women with EC. Three radiologists assessed the image quality of MUSE-DWI and rFOV-DWI. For 55 women who underwent DCE-MRI, the same radiologists assessed the superficial and deep myometrial invasion using MUSE-DWI, rFOV-DWI, and DCE-MRI. Qualitative scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

Artifacts, sharpness, lesion conspicuity, and overall quality were significantly better with MUSE-DWI than with rFOV-DWI (p < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of MUSE-DWI, rFOV-DWI, and DCE-MRI for the assessment of myometrial invasion were not significantly different except for significantly higher AUC of MUSE-DWI than that of DCE-MRI for superficial myometrial invasion (0.76 for MUSE-DWI and 0.64 for DCE-MRI, p = 0.049) and for deep myometrial invasion (0.92 for MUSE-DWI and 0.80 for DCE-MRI, p = 0.022) in one observer, and that of rFOV-DWI for deep myometrial invasion in another observer (0.96 for MUSE-DWI and 0.89 for rFOV-MRI, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

MUSE-DWI exhibits better image quality than rFOV-DWI. MUSE-DWI and rFOV-DWI shows almost equivalent diagnostic performance compared to DCE-MRI for assessing superficial and deep myometrial invasion in EC although MUSE-DWI may be helpful for some radiologists.

Diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating malignant from benign endometrial lesions

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with its innovative techniques, such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), increases the diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions of the endometrium. The aim of the study was MRI differentiation between malignant and benign endometrial lesions and correlation with histopathological findings with a special emphasis on quantitative analysis. An additional aim was to correlate the ADC values and histological tumor grades.

Methods

The prospective study included 119 female patients with or without vaginal bleeding and pathological values of endometrial thickness, who underwent MRI examinations. According to MRI reports the patients were divided into 45 suspicious malignant and 74 suspicious benign endometrial lesions. The radiological diagnosis was compared to the histopathological evaluation, which confirmed 37 malignant lesions while the rest were benign.

Results

The mean ADC value for malignant lesions was 0.761 ± 0.13×10^-3 mm²/s and for benign lesions was 1.318 ± 0.20×10^-3 mm²/s. The ADC values for malignant lesions were expectedly lower than those of benign lesions (p<0.001). The ADC cut-off value was 1.007×10^-3 mm²/s with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 92.7%, a positive predictive value of 60.3%, and a negative predictive value of 100%. In comparison with the histopathological findings, the sensitivity of MRI was 100%, specificity 90.2%, positive predictive value was 82.2%, and negative predictive value was 100%. Observing the histological grades 1, 2, and 3 of endometrial carcinoma, no statistically significant differences of mean ADC values were found. The mean ADC values for histological tumor grades 1,2 and 3 were 0.803 ± 0.13×10^-3 mm²/s, 0.754 ± 0.12×10^-3 mm²/s and 0.728 ± 0.13×10^-3 mm²/s, respectively.

Conclusion

DWI and ADC values represent clinically useful tools for the differentiation between malignant and benign endometrial lesions with high sensitivity and good specificity, but the results failed to demonstrate their usefulness in differentiating histological grades of endometrial cancer.

Correlative study between apparent diffusion coefficient value and grading of cervical cancer

Background

Studying cervical cancer is critical as it is the third most common gynecological malignancy. Therefore, a precise preoperative evaluation of the characteristics of the disease as well as prognosis may significantly aid in the diagnosis of cervical carcinoma as well as planning of its treatment.

The purpose of the study

To investigate if the value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) could be interpreted as a prognostic indicator to predict cervical cancer aggressiveness prior to management.

Results

The value of ADC for high- and low-grade cervical cancer was statistically significantly different. Patients with histological grade I had significantly higher ADC in comparison with those with grade II (1.04 ± 0.07 vs. 0.82 ± 0.02 × 10−3 mm2/s; p < 0.001) and those with grade III (1.04 ± 0.07 vs. 0.67 ± 0.05 × 10−3 mm2/s; p < 0.001). In addition, patients with grade II had significantly higher ADC in comparison with those with grade III (0.82 ± 0.02 vs. 0.67 ± 0.05 × 10−3 mm2/s; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is one of the non-contrast imaging modalities which is identical for quantitative as well as morphological information. Combined DWI with apparent diffusion coefficient value can perform better in detecting cervical cancer and grading.

Utility of the Diffusion Weighted Sequence in Gynecological Imaging: Review Article

Simple Summary

Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is a magnetic resonance imaging sequence with diverse clinical applications in malignant and nonmalignant gynecological conditions. It provides vital supplemental information in the diagnosis and management of various gynecological conditions. Radiologists should be aware of fundamental concepts, clinical applications and pitfalls of DWI. Additionally we briefly discuss potential scope of newer advanced techniques based on DWI including diffusion tensor imaging and diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background signal suppression.

Abstract

Functional imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a complementary tool to conventional diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging sequences. It is being increasingly investigated to predict tumor response and assess tumor recurrence. We elucidate the specific technical modifications of DWI preferred for gynecological imaging, including the different b-values and planes for image acquisition. Additionally, we discuss the problems and potential pitfalls encountered during DWI interpretation and ways to overcome them. DWI has a wide range of clinical applications in malignant and non-malignant gynecological conditions. It provides supplemental information helpful in diagnosing and managing tubo-ovarian abscess, uterine fibroids, endometriosis, adnexal torsion, and dermoid. Similarly, DWI has diverse applications in gynecological oncology in diagnosis, staging, detection of recurrent disease, and tumor response assessment. Quantitative evaluation with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement is being increasingly evaluated for correlation with various tumor parameters in managing gynecological malignancies aiding in preoperative treatment planning. Newer advanced DWI techniques of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and whole body DWI with background suppression (DWIBS) and their potential uses in pelvic nerve mapping, preoperative planning, and fertility-preserving surgeries are briefly discussed.

Echo planar imaging with compressed sensitivity encoding (EPICS): Usefulness for head and neck diffusion-weighted MRI

PURPOSE

To evaluate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using echo planar imaging (EPI) with compressed SENSE (EPICS) of the head and neck magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHOD

We retrospectively observed 32 patients who underwent head and neck DWI according to either the conventional method (SENSE, reduction factor = 2), fast scanning method (SENSE, reduction factor = 4), or fast scanning method with EPICS (EPICS, reduction factor = 4). For quantitative analysis, contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, geometric distortion, and coefficient of variations (CV) were measured and compared. For qualitative analysis, all images were independently and blindly evaluated by two board-certified radiologists.

RESULTS

EPICS revealed the higher CNR between all location compared to those of SENSE with reduction factor = 4. Distortion in the anterior-posterior direction was significantly lower on EPICS than on the conventional scan (p = 0.02). A comparison between the ADC values of the EPICS and conventional scan revealed no significant differences. The CV was significantly lower for EPICS than the conventional scan [DWI: 0.22 (IQR: 0.15-0.30) vs 0.32 (IQR: 0.24-0.40), p = 0.02].

CONCLUSIONS

Compressed SENSE combined with the high acceleration factor can improve image quality, homogeneity, and distortion in the head and neck DWI maintaining ADC values and the scan time duration.

Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram as a quantitative biomarker to preoperatively differentiate stage IA endometrial carcinoma from benign endometrial lesions

BACKGROUND

To assess the value of whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis in differentiating stage IA endometrial carcinoma (EC) from benign endometrial lesions (BELs) and characterizing histopathologic features of stage IA EC preoperatively.

METHODS

One hundred and six BEL and 126 stage IA EC patients were retrospectively enrolled. Eighteen volumetric histogram parameters were extracted from the ADC map of each lesion. The Mann-Whitney U or Student's t-test was used to compare the differences between the two groups. Models based on clinical parameters and histogram features were established using multivariate logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and calibration curves were used to assess the models.

RESULTS

Stage IA EC showed lower ADC_10th, ADC_90th, ADC_min, ADC_max, ADC_mean, ADC_median, interquartile range, mean absolute deviation, robust mean absolute deviation (rMAD), root mean squared, energy, total energy, entropy, variance, and higher skewness, kurtosis and uniformity than BELs (all p < 0.05). ADC_median yielded the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.928 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.895-0.960; cut-off value = 1.161 × 10^-3 mm²/s) for differentiating stage IA EC from BELs. Moreover, multivariate analysis demonstrated that ADC-score (ADC_10th + skewness + rMAD + total energy) was the only significant independent predictor (OR = 2.641, 95% CI 2.045-3.411; p < 0.001) for stage IA EC when considering clinical parameters. This ADC histogram model (ADC-score) achieved an AUC of 0.941 and a bias-corrected AUC of 0.937 after bootstrap resampling. The model performed well for both premenopausal (accuracy = 0.871) and postmenopausal (accuracy = 0.905) patients. Besides, ADC_min and ADC_10th were significantly lower in Grade 3 than in Grade 1/2 stage IA EC (p = 0.022 and 0.047). At the same time, no correlation was found between ADC histogram parameters and the expression of Ki-67 in stage IA EC (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Whole-lesion ADC histogram analysis could serve as an imaging biomarker for differentiating stage IA EC from BELs and assisting in tumor grading of stage IA EC, thus facilitating personalized clinical management for premenopausal and postmenopausal patients.

Does diffusion weighted imaging have a prognostic value in differentiating gynecological diseases?

INTRODUCTION

Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values are effective in the diagnosis of different gynecological lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation was made of 12 patients with uterine cervix carcinoma and 151 patients with uterine lesions, comprising endometrial cancer, endometrial polyps, carcinosarcoma, submucous myoma, adenomyosis, endometrial hyperplasia, gestational trophoblastic neoplasm (GTN), and leiomyomas. As a control group, 20 healthy volunteers with normal endometrium and normal cervix were also evaluated. In three series, one-shot, spin echo, echo planar, b = 1000 s/mm² value and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) were applied to all subjects and ADC values were obtained.

RESULTS

The mean ADC values of Group 1 (Endometrial carcinoma) were lower than those of all the other groups (P < 0.001) and the mean ADC value of group 6 (GTN) was higher than that all other groups (P < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of the lesion-myometrium ADC ratios (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There are few studies in literature related to ADC measurements in GTN. The ADC values of GTN were found to be significantly higher than the other uterine lesions. These results will aid in the design of future studies and might be used to guide management of patients with GTN.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Diffusion-weighted MRI seems to be a promising imaging technique in differentiating different uterine lesions.

Synergic role of preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET and MRI parameters in predicting histopathological features of endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study is to explore the correlation between PET and MRI parameters of primary tumour and clinicopathological features and to determine their synergic predictive role in patients with endometrial cancer candidate to surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective study including 27 patients with endometrial cancer and preoperative 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)-PET and MRI scan. The following parameters, calculated on the primary tumour, were used for analysis: maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUVmean, metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) for PET scans; mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean) and volume index for MRI scans. FIGO stage, grade, histotype, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and myometrial invasion were the considered clinicopathological features.

RESULTS

MRI volume index was a good predictor for deep myometrial invasion [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.85; P = 0.003] and for LVSI (AUC = 0.74; P = 0.039). A cutoff value of 9.555 for MRI volume index was predictive for deep myometrial invasion (sensitivity = 84.6%; specificity = 76.9%); a cutoff of 12.165 was predictive for LVSI (sensitivity = 69.2%; specificity = 83.3%). A TLG cutoff value of 26.03 was predictive for deep myometrial invasion (sensitivity = 84.6%; specificity = 76.9%). A high-direct correlation was found with MRI volume index (rho = 0.722; P < 0.001); low-direct correlation with SUVmax (rho = 0.484; P = 0.012), SUVmean (rho = 0.47; P = 0.015) and TLG (rho = 0.482; P = 0.013) were identified. The SUVmax/ADCmean ratio showed a low-direct correlation with percentage of myometrial invasion (rho = 0.467; P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Volume index, TLG and SUVmax/ADCmean ratio are associated with deep myometrial invasion. As myometrial invasion is the index used to predict lymph node involvement in endometrial cancer, the synergic use of these imaging parameters may be suggested to predict lymphnodal metastases.

Diffusion-weighted imaging versus dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for pre-operative diagnosis of deep myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study investigates the differences in diagnostic performance between diffuse-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE), either alone or in combination with T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), for diagnosing deep myometrial invasion (dMI) of endometrial cancers (EC).

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search for published studies comparing DWI and DCE for preoperatively diagnosing dMI of EC. The overall diagnostic accuracy of each test was calculated using the areas under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). The sensitivities and specificities were compared using bivariate meta-regression.

RESULTS

Pooled analysis of nineteen studies with 961 patients (main group) showed that DWI had a larger AUC (0.943, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.921-0.967) than DCE (0.922, 95% CI = 0.893-0.953). For the subgroup comprising 7 studies, DWI combined with T2WI and DCE combined with T2WI showed AUCs of 0.959 (95% CI, 0.932-0.986) and 0.929 (95% CI, 0.847-1.000), respectively. None of the differences in AUCs were statistically significant. All comparisons of the sensitivities and specificities of the main group and subgroup also showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis found no significant difference in diagnostic performance between DWI and DCE for diagnosis of dMI in EC. DWI may be preferred for its ease of use in clinical practice.

Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiating endometrial carcinoma from benign lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To determine the diagnostic performance of mean ADC values in the characterization of endometrial carcinoma (EC) from benign lesions by systematic review of the literature and performing meta-analysis. A systematic search of major electronic bibliographic databases was performed to find studies that used ADC values for differentiating EC from benign lesions. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts of the search results and then by reading the full texts selected the pertinent studies for final analyses. A bivariate random-effects model with pooled sensitivity and specificity values with 95% CI (confidence interval) was used. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and area under curve (AUC) were created. Between-study heterogeneity was measured using I squared (I2) index. Eleven studies including 269 ECs and 208 benign lesions were analyzed. Pooled average (95% CI) ADC in EC and benign lesions groups were, respectively, 0.82 (0.77-0.87) × 10-3 mm2/s and 1.41 (1.29-1.52) × 10-3 mm2/s. The combined (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity of mean ADC values for differentiating EC from benign lesions were 93% (87-96%; I2 = 41.19%) and 94% (88-97%; I2 = 46.91%), respectively. The AUC (95% CI) of the SROC curve was 98% (96-99%). ADC values had good diagnostic accuracy for differentiating EC from benign lesions. In order to recommend ADC measurement for detecting endometrial lesions in routine clinical practice, more primary studies, especially trials and comparative studies including hysteroscopically-guided biopsy method, with larger sample sizes are still required.

Normalized apparent diffusion coefficient: a novel paradigm for characterization of endometrial and subendometrial lesions

OBJECTIVES

To assess the role of normalized apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in characterization of endometrial and subendometrial masses, measured as a ratio of the mean ADC of the pathology to mean ADC of two different internal controls, normal myometrium and gluteus maximus muscle, referred to as nADC_m and nADC_g respectively.

METHODS

55 females with pathologically proven endometrial and subendometrial lesions, including 27 cases of endometrial carcinoma, and 28 cases of benign masses were enrolled in this prospective study and assessed with single-shot echoplanar diffusion-weighted imaging. The normalized and absolute ADC of the lesions, measured by two radiologists, were compared in different pathologies and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) performed to distinguish benign and malignant endometrial masses. In the endometrial carcinoma group, the ADC values were further compared with tumor grade and subtype.

RESULTS

There was good interobserver agreement (>0.800) for both internal controls, however it was higher for myometrium [intraclass correlation coefficient-0.92; confidence interval (0.86-0.95)] than gluteus maximus muscle [ICC-0.84; CI (0.72-0.90)]. There were statistically significant differences in absolute ADC (p-0.02), nADC_m (p-0.02) and nADC_g (p < 0.0001) of benign and malignant endometrial masses.

CONCLUSION

Normalized ADC is useful to distinguish benign and malignant masses with comparable accuracy as absolute ADC.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Normalized ADC represents an easily measurable quantitative parameter which limits the influence of endogenous and exogenous factors that affect its reproducibility.

The Role of Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Patients with Gastric Wall Thickening

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide.

AIMS

In the benign and malign gastric pathologies, we measured the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) value from the thickened section of the stomach wall. We assessed the diagnostic value of ADC and we wanted to see whether this value could be used to diagnose gastric pathologies.

STUDY DESIGN

This study has a prospective study design.

METHODS

A total of 90 patients, 27 with malign gastric pathologies 63 with benign gastric pathologies with Gastric Wall (GW) thickening in multidector CT, were evaluated by T2 weighted axial MR imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI). Measurements were made both from the thickened wall and from the normal GW. Also, a new method called GW/spine ADC ratio was performed in image analysis. The value found after ADC measurement from the GW was proportioned to the spinal cord ADC value in the same section.

RESULTS

The ADC values measured from the pathological wall in patients with gastric malignancy (1.115 ± 0.156 x10-3 mm2/s) were significantly lower than the healthy wall measurements (1.621 ± 0.292 × 10-3 mm2/s) and benign gastric diseases (1.790± 0.359 x10-3 mm2/s). GW/spine ADC ratio was also lower in gastric malignancy group.

CONCLUSION

ADC measurement in DWI can be used to distinguish between benign and malign gastric pathologies.

Can conventional DWI accurately assess the size of endometrial cancer?

PURPOSE

To compare T2-weighted image (T2WI) and conventional Diffusion-weighted image (cDWI) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for sensitivity of qualitative diagnosis and accuracy of tumor size (TS) measurement in endometrial cancer (EC). Meanwhile, the effect of the lesion size itself and tumor grade on the ability of T2WI and cDWI of TS assessment was explored. Ultimately, the reason of deviation on size evaluation was studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

34 patients with EC were enrolled. They were all treated with radical hysterectomy and performed MR examinations before operation. Firstly, the sensitivity of T2WI alone and T2WI-DWI in qualitative diagnosis of EC were compared according to pathology. Secondly, TS on T2WI and cDWI described with longitudinal (LD) and horizontal diameter (HD) were compared to macroscopic surgical specimen (MSS) quantitatively in the entire lesions and the subgroup lesions which grouped by postoperative tumor size itself and tumor grade. Thirdly, the discrepancy of mean ADC values (ADC mean) and range ADC values (ADC range) between different zones of EC were explored.

RESULTS

For qualitative diagnosis, the sensitivity of T2WI-DWI (97%) was higher than T2WI alone (85%) (p = 0.046).For TS estimation, no significant difference (PLD = 0.579; PHD = 0.261) was observed between T2WI (LDT2WI = 3.90 cm; HDT2WI = 2.88 cm) and MSS (LD = 4.00 cm; HD = 3.06 cm), whereas TS of cDWI (LDDWI = 3.01 cm; HDDWI = 2.54 cm) were smaller than MSS (PLD = 0.002; PHD = 0.002) in all lesions. In subgroup of tumor with G1 (grade 1) and small lesion (defined as maximum diameter < 3 cm), both T2WI and cDWI were not significantly different from MSS; In subgroup of tumor with G2 + 3 (grade 2 and grade 3) and big lesion (maximum diameter ≥ 3 cm), T2WI matched well with MSS still, but DWI lost accuracy significantly. The result of ADC values between different zones of tumor showed ADC mean of EC rose from central zone to peripheral zone of tumor gradually and ADC range widened gradually.

CONCLUSION

cDWI can detect EC very sensitively. The TS on cDWI was smaller than the fact for the ECs with G2/3 and big size. The TS of T2WI was in accordance with the actual size for all ECs. The heterogeneity may be responsible for the inaccuracy of cDWI.

The usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation between focal uterine endometrial soft tissue lesions

Background

Several endometrial conditions may be challenging for radiologists due to the overlap of imaging features and variable endometrial pathologies. MRI with DWI is the most commonly used imaging technique for the diagnosis and characterization of endometrial focal lesions.

Results

The 50 studied lesions were classified according to their histopathological results into the benign group (28 lesions, 56%) and the malignant group (22 lesions, 44%). Conventional MRI could correctly diagnose 39 of the 50 lesions (22/28 benign and 17/22 malignant lesions), achieving a sensitivity of 77.27%, specificity of 78.56%, accuracy of 78%, predictive positive value (PPV) of 73.91%, and negative positive value (NPV) of 81.48%. By combining DWI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value mapping at a high b value (b = 1000) in MRI, we could correctly diagnose 47 of the 50 lesions (26/28 benign and 21/22 malignant lesions), with increased sensitivity (95.45%), specificity (92.86%), accuracy (94%), PPV (91.3%), and NPV (96%).

Conclusion

Combining DWI with ADC mapping at a high b value in pelvic MRI examination is valuable in differentiating endometrial focal lesions with increased diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Aim of the work

This study aimed to evaluate the role of DWI in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of benign and malignant focal endometrial masses.

The diagnostic precision of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in grading of malignant endometrial lesions compared with histopathological findings

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to extract apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values from the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequence of endometrial lesions and compare them with tissue specimen results in order to determine the precision of ADC values in grading of malignant endometrial lesions.

METHODS

The present prospective study was conducted on 22 patients complaining of abnormal vaginal bleeding or evidence for endometrial thickening or masses detected using the ultrasound. Sampling was performed for pathological examination. MRI T2W+DWI+T1W+Post Contrast T1W were performed for patients. The statistical analysis was performed in SPSS 20 and MedCalc.

RESULTS

In this study, although the mean ADC value was lower in patients with endometrial cancer than those with benign endometrial lesions, the difference was not significant (0.86 ± 0.2 mm²/sec versus 1.33 ± 0.53 mm²/sec; P = 0.13). Using the cutoff point of 0.53, the sensitivity and specificity of ADC value for differentiating benign and malignant lesions, respectively, equaled 90.91 and 9.09, with an equal positive and negative predictive value of 50%. In patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma, mean ADC value was 0.93 ± 0.15 in FIGO Grade I, and 0.76 ± 0.165 in FIGO Grade II. Based on the statistical test, no significant difference existed between the two groups in terms of ADC values.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate that the use of a DWI sequence (ADC values) can prevent invasive measures in the diagnosis of benign endometrial lesions and the identification of malignant lesions with a high precision in many patients having accompanying diseases or other cases for which invasive measures cannot be used. Also, there is no significant difference in the mean ADC values between G1 and G2 of endometrioid carcinoma.

The diagnostic performance of ADC value for tumor grade, deep myometrial invasion and lymphovascular space invasion in endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Disputes exist regarding whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can differentiate the tumor grade, deep myometrial invasion and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in endometrial cancer. The aim of this review was to assess the diagnostic performance of the ADC value in endometrial cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies that used the ADC value to assess tumor grade, deep myometrial invasion and LVSI in endometrial cancer. We used forest plots to analyze the heterogeneity and generate the pooled sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE). We used summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves to work out the area under the SROC curve (AUC). Likelihood ratios (LRs) were also obtained.

RESULTS

Of the 460 identified studies, 11 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included. Overall, nine studies (491 patients) aimed at differentiating high tumor grade had a pooled SEN, SPE and AUC of 77%, 73% and 81%, respectively; three studies (181 patients) for differentiating deep myometrial invasion had a pooled SEN, SPE and AUC of 71%, 67% and 77%, respectively; and two studies (106 patients) for differentiating LVSI had a pooled SEN and SPE of 66% and 74%, respectively. The positive and negative LRs were 2.77 and 0.35 for the tumor grade, 2.08 and 0.45 for deep myometrial invasion, and 2.48 and 0.45 for LVSI.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that the ADC value had a moderate diagnostic performance for the tumor grade, deep myometrial invasion and LVSI in endometrial cancer.

A Predictor of Tumor Recurrence in Patients With Endometrial Carcinoma After Complete Resection of the Tumor: The Role of Pretreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic and incremental value of pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of tumors for the prediction of tumor recurrence after complete resection of the tumor in patients with endometrial cancer.

Methods

This study enrolled 210 patients with stages IA to IIIC endometrial cancer who had undergone complete resection of the tumor and pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging. The minimum and mean ADC values (ADCmin, ADCmean) of tumors and normalized ADC (nADCmin, nADCmean) were calculated from magnetic resonance imaging. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic performance of ADC values of 4 types. The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests, and Cox regression were used to explore associations between recurrence and the ADC values with adjustment for clinicopathological factors.

Results

In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the areas under the curve were significant for ADCmean and nADCmean predicting tumor recurrence but were not significant for ADCmin and nADCmin. Regarding univariate analysis, ADCmean and nADCmean were significantly associated with increased risk of recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that ADCmean and nADCmean remained independently associated with shorter RFS. In the high-risk group, the RFS of patients with lower ADC values (ADCmean and nADCmean) was significantly shorter than that of patients in the higher ADC value group.

Conclusions

Pretreatment tumor ADCmean and nADCmean were important imaging biomarkers for predicting recurrence in patients after complete resection of the tumor. They might improve existing risk stratification.

Evaluation and validation of the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating early-stage endometrial carcinomas from benign mimickers at 3T MRI

Previous researchers obtained various apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) cutoff values to differentiate endometrial carcinoma from benign mimickers with 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Few studies have used 3T MRI or validated the effectiveness of these cutoff ADC values prospectively. This study was designed in two stages to obtain a cutoff ADC value at 3T MRI and to validate prospectively the role of the ADC value. First, we conducted a retrospective study of 60 patients to evaluate the diagnostic value of ADC by obtain a theoretical cutoff ADC value for differentiating between benign and malignant endometrial lesions. Student's t test revealed that ADC values for stage I endometrial carcinomas were significantly lower than those for benign lesions. The area under the curve value of the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.993, and the cutoff ADC value was 0.98 × 10-3 mm2/s. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of diagnosing stage I endometrial carcinoma were 100%, 97.1%, and 98.3%, respectively. Second, we conducted a prospective study of 26 patients to validate the use of the cutoff ADC value obtained in the study's first stage. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy for differentiating malignant from benign endometrial lesions based on the cutoff ADC value obtained earlier were as follows: radiologist 1 attained 86.67%, 100.0%, and 92.31%, respectively; radiologist 2 attained 86.67%, 91.0%, and 88.5%, respectively. Our results suggest that ADC values could be a potential biomarker for use as a quantitative and qualitative tool for differentiating between early-stage endometrial carcinomas and benign mimickers.

Can the apparent diffusion coefficient differentiate the grade of endometrioid adenocarcinoma and the histological subtype of endometrial cancer?

Background Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) provides useful information for the identification of benign and malignant uterine lesions. However, the use of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for histopathological grading of endometrial cancer is controversial. Purpose To explore the use of ADC values in differentiating the preoperative tumor grading of endometrioid adenocarcinomas and investigate the relationship between the ADC values of endometrial cancer and the histological tumor subtype. Material and Methods We retrospectively evaluated 98 patients with endometrial cancers, including both endometrioid adenocarcinomas (n = 80) and non-endometrioid adenocarcinomas (n = 18). All patients underwent DWI procedures and ADC values were calculated. The Kruskal-Wallis test and the independent samples Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare differences in the ADC values between different tumor grades and different histological subtypes. Results The mean ADC values (ADCmean) for high-grade endometrioid adenocarcinomas were significantly lower than the values for low-grade tumors (0.800 versus 0.962 × 10^-3 mm²/s) ( P = 0.002). However, no significant differences in ADCmean and minimum ADC values (ADCmin) were found between tumor grades (G1, G2, and G3) of endometrial cancer. Compared with endometrioid adenocarcinomas, the adenocarcinoma with squamous differentiation showed lower ADC values (mean/minimum = 0.863/0.636 versus 0.962/0.689 × 10^-3 mm²/s), but the differences were not significant ( P_mean = 0.074, P_min = 0.441). Moreover, ADCmean for carcinosarcomas was significantly higher than the value for G3 non-carcinosarcoma endometrial cancers (1.047 versus 0.823 × 10^-3 mm²/s) ( P = 0.001). Conclusion The ADCmean was useful for identifying high-grade and low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Additionally, squamous differentiation may decrease ADCmean and ADCmin of endometrioid adenocarcinoma, and carcinosarcomas showed relatively high ADCmean.

Fertility-sparing for young patients with gynecologic cancer: How MRI can guide patient selection prior to conservative management

Historically, cancer treatment has emphasized measures for the "cure" regardless of the long-term consequences. Advances in cancer detection and treatment have resulted in improved outcomes bringing to the fore various quality of life considerations including future fertility. For many young cancer patients, fertility preservation is now an integral component of clinical decision-making and treatment design. Optimal fertility-sparing options for young patients with gynecologic cancer are influenced by patient age, primary cancer, treatment regimens, and patient preferences. Possible approaches include embryo or oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian transposition, conservative surgery, and conservative medical treatment to delay radical surgery. These may be used alone or in combination to maximize fertility preservation. Awareness of the various fertility-sparing options, eligibility criteria, and the central role of magnetic resonance imaging in the proper selection of patients will enable radiologists to produce complete clinically relevant imaging reports and serve as effective consultants to referring clinicians. Knowledge of the potential imaging pitfalls is essential to avoid misinterpretation and guide appropriate management.

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: A molecular imaging tool caught between hope, hype and the real world of “personalized oncology”

“Personalized oncology” is a multi-disciplinary science, which requires inputs from various streams for optimal patient management. Humongous progress in the treatment modalities available and the increasing need to provide functional information in addition to the morphological data; has led to leaping progress in the field of imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging has undergone tremendous progress with various newer MR techniques providing vital functional information and is becoming the cornerstone of “radiomics/radiogenomics”. Diffusion-weighted imaging is one such technique which capitalizes on the tendency of water protons to diffuse randomly in a given system. This technique has revolutionized oncological imaging, by giving vital qualitative and quantitative information regarding tumor biology which helps in detection, characterization and post treatment surveillance of the lesions and challenging the notion that “one size fits all”. It has been applied at various sites with different clinical experience. We hereby present a brief review of this novel functional imaging tool, with its application in “personalized oncology”.

Role of diffusion-weighted MRI in the differential diagnosis of endometrioid and non-endometrioid cancer of the uterus

Background Many publications have examined the relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and tumor grade in endometrial cancer. Nevertheless, none were designed to evaluate according to the histopathological type of endometrioid and non-endometrioid tumors. Purpose To evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the differential diagnosis of endometrioid and non-endometrioid cancer of the uterus, by comparing them with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Material and Methods Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. The MRI findings of 63 patients with endometrial cancer were retrospectively evaluated and divided into four groups: Grades I, II, and III endometrioid tumors, and non-endometrioid tumors. ADC values, DWI quotients ( b = 1000 s/mm²), and post-contrast signal intensities between lesions and the myometrium (b1000q-Cq values) were evaluated. The one-way-ANOVA, student's t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used for statistical evaluation. Results Mean ADC values were 0.86 ± 0.14 in Grade I, 0.80 ± 0.7 in Grade II, 0.71 ± 0.14 in Grade III for endometrioid tumors, and 0.70 ± 0.12 in non-endometrioid tumors. There was a significant difference in ADC values between Grade I and Grade III ( P = 0.006), and non-endometrioid tumors ( P = 0.003). The difference was also significant between Grades I + II and Grade III ( P = 0.009), and non-endometrioid tumors ( P = 0.004). Besides, there was a significant difference between endometrioid and non-endometrioid tumors ( P = 0.022). However, when considering b1000q (F = 0.640, P = 0.593) and Cq (χ²= 6.233; P = 0.101), no significant difference was detected among the groups. Conclusion The difference in ADC values between the endometrioid and non-endometrioid tumors was statistically significant. However, the difference in DWI and contrast-enhancement findings were not statistically significant. Furthermore, the mean ADC values had an inverse relationship with tumor grade in the endometrioid cancer group.

Evaluating Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Reduced Field-of-view Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic ability of reduced FOV diffusion-weighted (DW) MR imaging with that of 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging in evaluating the depth of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Three tesla MR images including T₂-weighted imaging, reduced FOV DW imaging and 3D DCE MR imaging in sagittal and oblique axial (short axis) planes in 25 women with surgically proven endometrial cancer were retrospectively evaluated. The depth of myometrial invasion (stage S: < 50% vs stage D: ≥ 50%) on MR imaging was correlated with surgical pathology results.

RESULTS

The 25 endometrial cancers included 16 stage S and 9 stage D tumors. The depth of myometrial invasion could be accurately evaluated in 68% of the cases for T₂-weighted imaging, 92% for 3D DCE MR imaging, and 96% for reduced FOV DW imaging. In two patients with coexisting adenomyosis, both T₂-weighted imaging and 3D DCE MR imaging failed to reveal the deep myometrial invasion, and reduced FOV DW imaging clearly demonstrated the tumor margin in the cases. Combination of reduced FOV DW imaging reading together with T₂-weighted imaging improved the assessment of myometrial invasion with a diagnostic accuracy of up to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of reduced FOV DW imaging may improve the staging accuracy of MR imaging for endometrial cancer in assessing the depth of myometrial invasion. Especially, reduced FOV DW imaging has an advantage in assessing the depth of myometrial invasion for patients with coexisting adenomyosis. Reduced FOV DW imaging can be an alternative to 3D DCE MR imaging in evaluating myometrial invasion of endometrial cancer without the use of contrast medium.

Current strategies in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy in developed countries. There are no uniform recommendations for endometrial cancer screening in the general population. Therefore, it is of paramount importance that the primary physician profoundly understands, and is familiar with the methods for prevention and early detection of endometrial cancer. The aim of this review is to provide the primary physician with a toolbox to reach these goals.

METHODS

We performed a systemic review to summarize the current strategies to diagnose and prevent endometrial cancer. Many published articles from the last years were identified and included.

RESULTS

A systematic review that summarizes the important subjects in the diagnosis and prevention of endometrial cancer.

CONCLUSION

Maintaining a high index of suspicion and obtaining endometrial biopsies from all suspected patients is the key for achieving a timely diagnosis.

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging of gestational trophoblastic disease: Can it predict progression of molar pregnancy to persistent form of disease?

•

The incidence of GTD in Iran is significantly higher than America and Europe.

•

ADC value of GTD is (1.96 ± 0.32 × 10⁻³ mm²/s).

•

GTD in T1 and T2-weighted images shows heterogeneous “snow-storm” appearance.

•

Focal intratumoral hemorrhage is bright in DWI and low signal in the ADC map.

•

ADC value and DWI are not helpful to predict progression of HM to persistent disease.

Purpose

To describe the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) appearance of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) and to determine its apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. To evaluate the feasibility of DWI to predict progression of hydatidiform mole (HM) to persistent disease.

Methods

During a period of 6 months, women with preliminary diagnosis of GTD, based on ultrasound and ßhCG levels, underwent 1.5T MRI (T2 high-resolution and DWI; b values 50, 400, 800; sagittal and perpendicular to the endometrium; and T1, T2 Turbo Spin Echo [TSE] axial images). Patients were followed for 6–12 months to monitor progression to persistent form of the disease. ADC values and image characteristics were compared between HM and persistent neoplasia and between GTD and non-molar pregnancy using Mann–Whitney U and Fisher’s exact tests, respectively.

Results

Among the 23 studied patients, 19 (83%) were classified as molar and 4 (17%) as non-molar, based on pathology reports. After 6–12 months of follow-up, 5 (26%) cases progressed to persistent disease and 14 (74%) cases were benign HM. There was no significant difference between ADC values for HM (1.93 ± 0.33 × 10⁻³ mm²/s) and persistent neoplasia (2.03 ± 0.28 × 10⁻³ mm²/s) (P = 0.69). The ADC of non-molar pregnancies was (0.96 ± 0.46 × 10⁻³ mm²/s), which was significantly different from GTD (1.96  ± 0.32 × 10⁻³ mm²/s) (P = 0.001). Heterogeneous snowstorm appearance, focal intratumoral hemorrhage, myometrial contraction, and prominent myometrial vascularity were more common in GTD compared to non-molar pregnancy (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Heterogeneous snowstorm appearance, focal intratumoral hemorrhage, myometrial contraction, and prominent myometrial vascularity are among the imaging characteristics of GTD. We cannot use ADC values to predict progression to persistent disease.

Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with tumor cellularity and tumor grade

BACKGROUND

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) are widely used for detecting uterine endometrial cancer. The relationships between ADC values and pathological features of endometrial cancer have not yet been established.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether ADC values of endometrial cancer vary according to histologic tumor cellularity and tumor grade.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 30 pathologically confirmed endometrial cancers. All patients underwent conventional non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and DWI procedures, and ADC values were calculated. Tumor cellularity was evaluated by counting cancer cells in three high-power ( × 400) fields. The correlation between ADC values and tumor cellularity was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient test for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation (SD) ADC value ( ×10(-3) mm(2)/s) of endometrial cancer was 0.85 ± 0.22 (range, 0.55-1.71). The mean ± SD tumor cellularity was 528.36 ± 16.89 (range, 298.0-763.6). ADC values were significantly inversely correlated with tumor cellularity. No significant relationship was observed between ADC values and tumor grade (mean ADC values: G1, 0.88 ± 0.265 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; G2, 0.80 ± 0.178 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s; G3, 0.81 ± 0.117 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s).

CONCLUSION

There is a significant inverse relationship between ADC values and tumor cellularity in endometrial cancer. No significant differences in average ADC value were observed between G1, G2, and G3 tumors. However, the lower the tumor grade, the wider the SD.

Diffusion-Weighted Mri of Postmenopausal Women with Vaginal Bleeding and Endometrial Thickening: Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions

Purpose:

To investigate the feasibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in differentiating endometrial cancer from benign endometrial lesions in postmenopausal patients with vaginal bleeding and endometrial thickening and to predict the depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer.

Materials and Methods:

Postmenopausal patients with vaginal bleeding and endometrial thickening were enrolled in this prospective study. T2-weighted, pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted images were obtained. The ADC values of all the patients with endometrial pathologies were recorded. The staging accuracies of DWI and postcontrast T1-weighted images in the assessment of myometrial invasion were evaluated in histopathologically proven endometrial cancer patients.

Results:

Fifty-two patients (mean age: 57 ± 10, range: 41–79) were enrolled in the study. Thirty-eight of the lesions were benign (27 as hyperplasia and endometritis; 11 as polyps). Fourteen of the 52 endometrial lesions were pathologically proven as cancers and underwent hysterectomy, and all the specimens were reported as endometrioid adenocarcinomas. The mean ADC value (10^–3 mm²/second) of cancer (0.88 ± 0.10) was significantly lower than that of benign lesions (1.78 ± 0.27, p = 0,001). There was no significant difference between ADC values of endometrial tissue in patients with FIGO stage 1A (0.87 ± 0.11, n = 9) and FIGO stage 1B (0.91 ± 0.07, n = 5). The staging accuracy was 92.9 per cent (13/14) for DWI and 85.7 per cent (12/14) for postcontrast T1-weighted images.

Conclusion:

ADC values allow benign endometrial lesions to be differentiated from endometrial cancer in postmenopausal patients but do not correlate with the depth of myometrial invasion and histological tumor grading.

Non-neoplastic diseases of the fallopian tube: MR imaging with emphasis on diffusion-weighted imaging

OBJECTIVE

We illustrate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of non-neoplastic tubaric conditions.

BACKGROUND

A variety of pathologic non-neoplastic conditions may affect the fallopian tubes. Knowledge of their imaging appearance is important for correct diagnosis. With recent advances in MRI, along with conventional MR sequences, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences are available and may improve lesion characterization by discriminating the nature of the content of the dilated tube. Tubal fluid with low signal intensity on T1-weighted images, high signal intensity on T2-weighted images and no restricted diffusion on DWI is indicative of hydrosalpinx. Content with high signal intensity on T1-weighted images and restricted diffusion on DWI is suggestive of hematosalpinx associated with endometriosis or tubal pregnancy. A dilated tube with variable or heterogeneous signal intensity content on conventional MR sequences and restricted diffusion on DWI may suggest a pyosalpinx or tubo-ovarian abscess. We describe morphological characteristics, MR signal intensity features, enhancement behaviour and possible differential diagnosis of each lesion.

CONCLUSION

MRI is the method of choice to study adnexal pelvic masses. Qualitative and quantitative functional imaging with DWI can be of help in characterization of tubaric diseases, provided that findings are interpreted in conjunction with those obtained with conventional MRI sequences.

TEACHING POINTS

• Nondilated fallopian tubes are not usually seen on MR images. • MRI is the method of choice to characterize and localize utero-adnexal masses. • MRI allows characterization of lesions through evaluation of the fluid content's signal intensity. • DWI in conjunction with conventional MRI sequences may improve tissue characterization. • Pelvic inflammatory disease is the most common tubal pathology.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of high-risk features of endometrial carcinoma: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to review the available literature on the reliability of contemporary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques in the assessment of high-risk features of endometrial carcinoma, that is, deep myometrial invasion, cervical stromal involvement, and lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for studies published before March 2014. Studies on plain MRI were excluded.

RESULTS

Fifty-two eligible studies were identified. For the assessment of deep (≥ 50%) myometrial invasion (50 studies, 3720 patients), the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 80.7%, 88.5%, 77.6%, and 89.5%, respectively, by random-effects analysis. For predicting cervical stromal involvement (12 studies, 1153 patients), the pooled values were 57.0%, 94.8%, 68.7%, and 90.5%, respectively. For lymph node metastasis on a per-patient basis (10 studies, 862 patients), they were 43.5%, 95.9%, 66.3%, and 92.2%, respectively. In a meta-regression analysis, dynamic imaging was associated with a higher sensitivity in detecting deep myometrial invasion, as compared with contrast-enhanced imaging (P = 0.021). The improvement by diffusion-weighted imaging was of a borderline significance (P = 0.057). Significant small-study effects were found for the sensitivity of MRI in detecting deep myometrial invasion (P < 0.0001) and cervical stromal involvement (P = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the poor-to-moderate sensitivity of MRI in detecting high-risk features of endometrial carcinoma, patients with negative findings on MRI may not safely forgo surgical staging unless the findings are confirmed by a backup method. The high specificities allow the targeting of staging procedures by MRI alone in patients with positive findings. Compared with contrast-enhanced imaging, dynamic and diffusion-weighted imaging may be more reliable in the radiological staging of endometrial carcinoma.

Functional MR Imaging in Gynecologic Cancer

Dynamic-contrast enhanced (DCE) and diffusion-weighted (DW) MR imaging are invaluable in the detection, staging, and characterization of uterine and ovarian malignancies, for monitoring treatment response, and for identifying disease recurrence. When used as adjuncts to morphologic T2-weighted (T2-W) MR imaging, these techniques improve accuracy of disease detection and staging. DW-MR imaging is preferred because of its ease of implementation and lack of need for an extrinsic contrast agent. MR spectroscopy is difficult to implement in the clinical workflow and lacks both sensitivity and specificity. If used quantitatively in multicenter clinical trials, standardization of DCE- and DW-MR imaging techniques and rigorous quality assurance is mandatory.

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cancer: Reported apparent diffusion coefficients, in-vitro and in-vivo reproducibility

There is considerable disparity in the published apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values across different anatomies. Institutions are increasingly assessing repeatability and reproducibility of the derived ADC to determine its variation, which could potentially be used as an indicator in determining tumour aggressiveness or assessing tumour response. In this manuscript, a review of selected articles published to date in healthy extra-cranial body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is presented, detailing reported ADC values and discussing their variation across different studies. In total 115 studies were selected including 28 for liver parenchyma, 15 for kidney (renal parenchyma), 14 for spleen, 13 for pancreatic body, 6 for gallbladder, 13 for prostate, 13 for uterus (endometrium, myometrium, cervix) and 13 for fibroglandular breast tissue. Median ADC values in selected studies were found to be 1.28 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s in liver, 1.94 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s in kidney, 1.60 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s in pancreatic body, 0.85 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s in spleen, 2.73 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s in gallbladder, 1.64 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s and 1.31 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s in prostate peripheral zone and central gland respectively (combined median value of 1.54×10(-3) mm(2)/s), 1.44 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s in endometrium, 1.53 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s in myometrium, 1.71 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s in cervix and 1.92 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s in breast. In addition, six phantom studies and thirteen in vivo studies were summarized to compare repeatability and reproducibility of the measured ADC. All selected phantom studies demonstrated lower intra-scanner and inter-scanner variation compared to in vivo studies. Based on the findings of this manuscript, it is recommended that protocols need to be optimised for the body part studied and that system-induced variability must be established using a standardized phantom in any clinical study. Reproducibility of the measured ADC must also be assessed in a volunteer population, as variations are far more significant in vivo compared with phantom studies.

Quantification of image distortions on the Utrecht interstitial CT/MR brachytherapy applicator at 3T MRI

PURPOSE

To quantify distortions on MR images of the Utrecht interstitial CT/MR applicator at a field strength of 3T using an MRI-only method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An MR-compatible phantom suspending the applicator in water was built and imaged on a Philips Ingenia 3T MRI scanner. A map of the magnetic field (B0) was calculated from multiecho images and used to quantify the field inhomogeneity. The expected displacements of the applicator could be quantified using the measured field inhomogeneity and sequence bandwidth. Additionally, two scans were acquired using opposing readout gradients. These scans were rigidly matched and their displacement was compared with the expected displacements from the B0 map. These same methods were applied in 4 patients. By rigid matching of the scans acquired with opposing readout direction the applicator displacement due to image distortion from B0 inhomogeneity as well as patient movement and organ deformation was determined.

RESULTS

According to the B0 map, the displacement on the intrauterine device of the plastic brachytherapy applicator was <0.4 mm for both the phantom and patients. Displacements obtained by the opposing readout method were ≤0.8 mm for each patient with a mean ± SD over the patients of 0.3 ± 0.1 mm.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study indicate that the B0 method agrees with the opposing readout method. Displacements caused by magnetic field inhomogeneity on 3T MRI were small compared with displacements due to patient movement and organ deformation.

Diffusion volume (DV) measurement in endometrial and cervical cancer: A new MRI parameter in the evaluation of the tumor grading and the risk classification

PURPOSE

A new MRI parameter representative of active tumor burden is proposed: diffusion volume (DV), defined as the sum of all the voxels within a tumor with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values within a specific range. The aims of the study were: (a) to calculate DV on ADC maps in patients with cervical/endometrial cancer; (b) to correlate DV with histological grade (G) and risk classification; (c) to evaluate intra/inter-observer agreement of DV calculation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-three patients with endometrial (n=28) and cervical (n=25) cancers underwent pelvic MRI with DWI sequences. Both endometrial and cervical tumors were classified on the basis of G (G1/G2/G3) and FIGO staging (low/medium/high-risk). A semi-automated segmentation procedure was used to calculate the DV. A freehand closed ROI outlined the whole visible tumor on the most representative slice of ADC maps defined as the slice with the maximum diameter of the solid neoplastic component. Successively, two thresholds were generated on the basis of the mean and standard deviation (SD) of the ADC values: lower threshold (LT="mean minus three SD") and higher threshold (HT="mean plus one SD"). The closed ROI was expanded in 3D, including all the contiguous voxels with ADC values in the range LT-HT × 10-3mm(2)/s. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess the differences in DV among G and risk groups. Intra-/inter-observer variability for DV measurement was analyzed according to the method of Bland and Altman and the intraclass-correlation-coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

DV values were significantly different among G and risk groups in both endometrial (p<0.05) and cervical cancers (p ≤ 0.01). For endometrial cancer, DV of G1 (mean ± sd: 2.81 ± 3.21 cc) neoplasms were significantly lower than G2 (9.44 ± 9.58 cc) and G3 (11.96 ± 8.0 cc) ones; moreover, DV of low risk cancers (5.23 ± 8.0 cc) were significantly lower than medium (7.28 ± 4.3 cc) and high risk (14.7 ± 9.9 cc) ones. For cervical cancer, DV of G1 (0.31 ± 0.13 cc) neoplasms was significantly lower than G3 (40.68 ± 45.65 cc) ones; moreover, DV of low risk neoplasms (6.98 ± 8.08 cc) was significantly lower than medium (21.7 ± 17.13 cc) and high risk (62.9 ± 51.12 cc) ones and DV of medium risk neoplasms was significantly lower than high risk ones. The intra-/inter-observer variability for DV measurement showed an excellent correlation for both cancers (ICC ≥ 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

DV is an accurate index for the assessment of G and risk classification of cervical/endometrial cancers with low intra-/inter-observer variability.