Comparison of measured and calculated skin doses in CT-guided interventional procedures

Measuring skin dose in CT examinations under complex geometries: Instruments, methods and considerations

OBJECTIVE

To investigate skin dose in Computed Tomography (CT) and its dependence on scanning geometry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Measurements of entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) in free air and entrance skin dose (ESD) on an anthropomorphic phantom were performed in a 64-slice CT scanner, using two different instruments: the Dose Profiler (DP) and the QED skin diode (QEDSD). Using DP and QEDSD, the ESAK rate profiles at the isocenter and at different distances from it, were measured using axial scans. Using DP and helical scans the ESAK rate profile in the Z-axis was acquired. The same profile was acquired with the QEDSD also, using many axial scans and manual table translation. ESD measurements were performed with the DP and QEDSD, in axial and helical scan mode.

RESULTS

ESAK measurements with DP and QEDSD were in good agreement, for both point dose and profile measurements. The agreement was also good for ESD measurements but not for helical scans, due to variable X-ray beam overlapping and different tube angular positions at each scan start. It was observed that the ESD values at different Y-axis offsets were comparable to the respective ESAK values recorded at the same Y-axis offset distances without the phantom.

CONCLUSIONS

Both DP and QEDSD were proven suitable for performing point ESD measurements. However, calculating the skin dose distribution in CT examinations is a very challenging task. A practical approach would be for CT scanners to provide a conservative estimate of the peak skin dose using the isocenter ESAK value.

Comparison of measured and estimated maximum skin doses during CT fluoroscopy lung biopsies

PURPOSE

To measure patient-specific maximum skin dose (MSD) associated with CT fluoroscopy (CTF) lung biopsies and to compare measured MSD with the MSD estimated from phantom measurements, as well as with the CTDIvol of patient examinations.

METHODS

Data from 50 patients with lung lesions who underwent a CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy were collected. The CT protocol consisted of a low-kilovoltage (80 kV) protocol used in combination with an algorithm for dose reduction to the radiology staff during the interventional procedure, HandCare (HC). MSD was assessed during each intervention using EBT2 gafchromic films positioned on patient skin. Lesion size, position, total fluoroscopy time, and patient-effective diameter were registered for each patient. Dose rates were also estimated at the surface of a normal-size anthropomorphic thorax phantom using a 10 cm pencil ionization chamber placed at every 30°, for a full rotation, with and without HC. Measured MSD was compared with MSD values estimated from the phantom measurements and with the cumulative CTDIvol of the procedure.

RESULTS

The median measured MSD was 141 mGy (range 38-410 mGy) while the median cumulative CTDIvol was 72 mGy (range 24-262 mGy). The ratio between the MSD estimated from phantom measurements and the measured MSD was 0.87 (range 0.12-4.1) on average. In 72% of cases the estimated MSD underestimated the measured MSD, while in 28% of the cases it overestimated it. The same trend was observed for the ratio of cumulative CTDIvol and measured MSD. No trend was observed as a function of patient size.

CONCLUSIONS

On average, estimated MSD from dose rate measurements on phantom as well as from CTDIvol of patient examinations underestimates the measured value of MSD. This can be attributed to deviations of the patient's body habitus from the standard phantom size and to patient positioning in the gantry during the procedure.

Radiation exposure in CT-guided interventions

PURPOSE

To investigate radiation exposure in computed tomography (CT)-guided interventions, to establish reference levels for exposure, and to discuss strategies for dose reduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 1576 consecutive CT-guided procedures in 1284 patients performed over 4.5 years, including drainage placements; biopsies of different organs; radiofrequency and microwave ablations (RFA/MWA) of liver, bone, and lung tumors; pain blockages, and vertebroplasties. Data were analyzed with respect to scanner settings, overall radiation doses, and individual doses of planning CT series, CT intervention, and control CT series.

RESULTS

Eighty-five percent of the total radiation dose was applied during the pre- and post-interventional CT series, leaving only 15% applied by the CT-guided intervention itself. Single slice acquisition was associated with lower doses than continuous CT-fluoroscopy (37 mGy cm vs. 153 mGy cm, p<0.001). The third quartile of radiation doses varied considerably for different interventions. The highest doses were observed in complex interventions like RFA/MWA of the liver, followed by vertebroplasty and RFA/MWA of the lung.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper suggests preliminary reference levels for various intervention types and discusses strategies for dose reduction. A multicenter registry of radiation exposure including a broader spectrum of scanners and intervention types is needed to develop definitive reference levels.

A method for calculating the dose length product from CT DICOM images

OBJECTIVE

The dosimetric calculations in CT examinations are currently based on two quantities: the volume weighted CT dose index (CTDI(vol)) and the dose-length product (DLP). The first quantity is dependent on the exposure factors, scan field of view, collimation and pitch factor selections, whereas the second is additionally dependent on the scan length.

METHODS

In this study a method for the calculation of these quantities from digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) CT images is presented that allows an objective audit of patient doses. This method was based on software that has been developed to enable the automatic extraction of the DICOM header information of each image (relating to the parameters that affect the aforementioned quantities) into a spreadsheet with embedded functions for calculating the contribution of each image to the CTDI(vol) and DLP values. The applicability and accuracy of this method was investigated using data from actual examinations carried out in three different multislice CT scanners. These examinations have been performed with the automatic exposure control systems activated, and therefore the tube current and tube loading values varied during the scans.

RESULTS

The calculated DLP values were in good agreement (±5%) with the displayed values. The calculated average CDTI(vol) values were in similar agreement with the displayed CTDI(vol) values but only for two of the three scanners. In the other scanner the displayed CTDI(vol) values were found to be overestimated by about 25%. As an additional application of this method the differences among the tube modulation techniques used by the three CT scanners were investigated.

CONCLUSION

This method is a useful tool for radiation dose surveys.

Patient dose considerations in computed tomography examinations

Ionizing radiation is extensively used in medicine and its contribution to both diagnosis and therapy is undisputable. However, the use of ionizing radiation also involves a certain risk since it may cause damage to tissues and organs and trigger carcinogenesis. Computed tomography (CT) is currently one of the major contributors to the collective population radiation dose both because it is a relatively high dose examination and an increasing number of people are subjected to CT examinations many times during their lifetime. The evolution of CT scanner technology has greatly increased the clinical applications of CT and its availability throughout the world and made it a routine rather than a specialized examination. With the modern multislice CT scanners, fast volume scanning of the whole human body within less than 1 min is now feasible. Two dimensional images of superb quality can be reconstructed in every possible plane with respect to the patient axis (e.g. axial, sagital and coronal). Furthermore, three-dimensional images of all anatomic structures and organs can be produced with only minimal additional effort (e.g. skeleton, tracheobronchial tree, gastrointestinal system and cardiovascular system). All these applications, which are diagnostically valuable, also involve a significant radiation risk. Therefore, all medical professionals involved with CT, either as referring or examining medical doctors must be aware of the risks involved before they decide to prescribe or perform CT examinations. Ultimately, the final decision concerning justification for a prescribed CT examination lies upon the radiologist. In this paper, we summarize the basic information concerning the detrimental effects of ionizing radiation, as well as the CT dosimetry background. Furthermore, after a brief summary of the evolution of CT scanning, the current CT scanner technology and its special features with respect to patient doses are given in detail. Some numerical data is also given in order to comprehend the magnitude of the potential radiation risk involved in comparison with risk from exposure to natural background radiation levels.