Correlation of arthrodesis stability with degree of joint fusion on MDCT

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Nitinol Compression Staples for Midfoot and Chopart Arthrodesis

Nitinol staple use in orthopedic surgery has increased in recent years. Biomechanical studies provide useful data for use in foot/ankle; however, clinical data is limited. This study's purpose is to determine the efficacy of nitinol staples to achieve stable, bony arthrodesis in midfoot and Chopart joints, and examine their clinical outcomes and pain scores. A retrospective chart review was performed on 127 midfoot/Chopart joint arthrodeses (71 patients) using nitinol staples in isolation. The primary outcome variable was radiographic evidence of healing. Radiographs were blinded, randomized, and independently reviewed by 3 board certified foot and ankle surgeons. Complete/partial union was seen in 89% of all joints (113/127), increasing to 93% when including only midfoot joints (98/106). Chopart joints had significantly lower healing rates (15/21; 71%) compared to all midfoot joints (p = .01) and isolated tarsometatarsal joints (86/91; 95%) (p = .006). Neuropathy and smoking did not affect arthrodesis, but diabetes did (p = .004). Joints requiring bone grafting had worse rates of arthrodesis (38/49; 76%) (p = .002). For all joints, postoperative visual analog scale scores were significantly lower than preoperative (p < .001). Preoperative midfoot and Chopart pain scores were similar (p = .30). Midfoot joints had significantly lower pain scores postoperatively than preoperatively (p < .001). No such significance existed in Chopart joints (p = .07). Isolated nitinol staples are a viable option for midfoot arthrodesis, especially tarsometatarsal joints, and offer significant pain improvement. Chopart joints may require more rigid fixation than nitinol staples, given the lower healing rate.

Cone-Beam CT of the Extremities in Clinical Practice

Cone-beam CT (CBCT) is a promising tool with increasing applications in musculoskeletal imaging due to its ability to provide thin-section CT images of the appendicular skeleton and introduce weight bearing, which accounts for loading forces that typically interact with and affect this anatomy. CBCT devices include an x-ray source directly opposite a digital silicon detector panel that performs a single rotation around an object of interest, obtaining thin-section images. Currently, the majority of research has been focused on the utility of CBCT with foot and ankle pathologic abnormalities, due to the complex architectural arrangement of the tarsal bones and weight-bearing nature of the lower extremities. Associated software can provide a variety of options for image reconstruction, including metal artifact reduction, three-dimensional biometric measurements, and digitally reconstructed radiographs. Advancements in this technology have allowed imaging of the knee, hip, hand, and elbow. As more data are published, it is becoming evident that CBCT provides many additional benefits, including fast imaging time, low radiation dose, lower cost, and small equipment footprint. These benefits allow placement of CBCT units outside of the traditional radiology department, including the orthopedic clinic setting. These technologic developments have motivated clinicians to define the scope of CBCT for diagnostics, surgical planning, and longitudinal imaging. As efforts are made to create standardized protocol and measurements, the current understanding and surgical approach for various orthopedic pathologic conditions will continue to shift, with the hope of improving outcomes. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

[Arthroscopic Subtalar Distraction Arthrodesis in Post-Traumatic Indications]

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This manuscript aims to present the method of arthroscopic assisted subtalar arthrodesis and to evaluate the benefi ts of this surgery on our study population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the period from 9/2007 to 1/2020, a total of 33 subtalar arthrodesis were performed in 31 patients aged 19-66 years (mean 48 years, median 50 years). The indication for arthrodesis was subtalar arthritis causing pain and gait disorders, or hindfoot deformities (most commonly after a calcaneus bone fracture). The arthroscopic assisted subtalar arthrodesis was performed with autologous tricortical bone block graft harvesting from the pelvis, supplemented by autologous cancellous bone graft. Stabilization was achieved by cannulated screws inserted in neutral ankle position. Patients in our retrospective study were followed up for a mean of 48 months (range, 24-130 months). The patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years after surgery. The hindfoot angles and height (TCA - talocalcaneal angle, CIA - calcaneal inclination angle, TCH - talocalcaneal height) were evaluated on radiographs, bone union was assessed on radiographs and CT scans. The clinical assessment was performed using the ankle-hindfoot scale (AHS) of AOFAS (AOFAS score).

RESULTS

The preoperative AOFAS score was 35-68 points (mean 52, median 54), the postoperative AOFAS score at 2 years after arthrodesis was 58-94 points (mean 82, median 82). Both the mean and median values of AOFAS score showed a signifi - cant progress from the poor result to the good and excellent result. After 2 years the TCA value decreased in 18 patients (56%) by no more than 3°. The CIA decrease observed in 21 patients (64%) was by 1° on average. The TCH decrease of 1-5 mm after 2 years since the surgery was seen in 16 patients. In 2 patients incomplete healing of arthrodesis was observed, manifested as a clinically asymptomatic non-union. No deep infection was reported.

DISCUSSION

In agreement with the current literature, the arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis has been confi rmed to be a safe method for the management of consequences of hindfoot fractures, with minimum complications and leading to accelerated bone fusion. Differences can be found in the approach, position, use of cancellous bone graft and surgical techniques. In recent years, prone position, posterior approaches, use of cancellous bone graft, distraction and fi xation with 2-3 screws divergently inserted into the bone prevail. The degree of healing of the bone fusion is generally an important factor. In our study population, non-healing was recorded in 2 patients, namely in the form of a clinically silent non-union. Neurological or early complications and/or osteosynthesis material failure occurred in up to a maximum of 10% of cases. The conclusive results of minimally invasive arthrodesis based on the AOFAS score have been confi rmed by us as well as by most authors.

CONCLUSSIONS

Our study confi rmed that the arthroscopic assisted subtalar arthrodesis is a successful, reliable and safe minimally invasive method, with minimum complications, leading to stable arthrodesis.

KEY WORDS

subtalar arthrodesis, subtalar arthroscopy.

Open vs Minimally Invasive Resection of the First Metatarsocuneiform Joint: An Anatomical Study

BACKGROUND

The modified Lapidus arthrodesis is a standard procedure to correct middle to severe hallux valgus (HV) deformities. Recently, minimally invasive techniques of first metatarsocuneiform joint (MCJ) resection using a Shannon burr were described. The primary goal of this study is to compare the anatomical efficacy and safety of first MCJ resection using a straight 2 × 13-mm Shannon burr and minimally invasive technique (MIS) vs an open technique using an oscillating saw.

METHODS

Ten pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric feet were randomly assigned to open or MIS first MCJ resection with subsequent systematic dissection. For the MIS procedure, a dorsomedial approach was used and for the open procedure a medioplantar approach was used. Cartilage removal was investigated by analyzing standardized scaled photographs of the resected articular surfaces with ImageJ software. Nearby structures at risk were analyzed for iatrogenic violation: tibialis anterior (TA), extensor hallucis longus (EHL) and peroneus longus (PL) tendons, and the Lisfranc ligament complex (LLC).

RESULTS

In the MIS group, the median cartilage resection was 85.9% at the cuneiform and 85.6% at the metatarsal bone compared to 100% cartilage resection in open technique (P < .01). Iatrogenic damage of the LLC, EHL, and TA tendons was not found in any group. The PL tendon was thinned out (<25% of tendon thickness) in 4 cases (40%) in the open group and in 1 case (10%) in the MIS group. A safe zone of 3.0 mm between the articular surface of the cuneiform bone and the LLC was identified, which can be resected without putting the LLC at risk when performing lateral-based wedge resections.

CONCLUSION

In this cadaver study with the procedures performed by an experienced foot and ankle surgeon, and using 2 different surgical approaches, we found general parity between the Shannon burr MIS technique vs oscillating saw open technique techniques with more risk to the PL with our open technique and approximately 15% less cartilage resection with our MIS technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, cadaver study.

The Fate of Delayed Unions After Isolated Ankle Fusion

BACKGROUND

Nonunion remains the most common major complication of ankle arthrodesis. Although previous studies have reported delayed union or nonunion rates, few have elaborated on the clinical course of patients experiencing delayed union. In this retrospective cohort study, we sought to understand the trajectory of patients with delayed union by determining the rate of clinical success and failure and whether the extent of fusion on computed tomography scan (CT) was associated with outcomes.

METHODS

Delayed union was defined as incomplete (<75%) fusion on CT between 2 and 6 months postoperatively. Thirty-six patients met the inclusion criterion: isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis with delayed union. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained including patient satisfaction with their fusion. Success was defined as patients who were not revised and reported satisfaction. Failure was defined as patients who required revision or reported being not satisfied. Fusion was assessed by measuring the percentage of osseous bridging across the joint on CT. The extent of fusion was categorized as absent (0%-24%), minimal (25%-49%), or moderate (50%-74%).

RESULTS

We determined the clinical outcome of 28 (78%) patients with mean follow-up of 5.6 years (range, 1.3-10.2). The majority (71%) of patients failed. On average, CT scans were obtained 4 months after attempted ankle fusion. Patients with minimal or moderate fusion were more likely to succeed clinically than those with "absent" fusion (P = .040). Of those with absent fusion, 11 of 12 (92%) failed. In patients with minimal or moderate fusion, 9 of 16 (56%) failed.

CONCLUSION

We found that 71% of patients with a delayed union at roughly 4 months after ankle fusion required revision or were not satisfied. Patients with less than 25% fusion on CT had an even lower rate of clinical success. These findings may help surgeons in counseling and managing patients experiencing a delayed union after ankle fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

CT-Verified Union Rate Following Arthrodesis of Ankle, Hindfoot, or Midfoot: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Ankle, hindfoot, and midfoot arthrodesis surgeries are standard procedures performed in orthopaedics to treat pain and functional disabilities. Although fusions can effectively improve pain and quality of life, nonunions remain a significant concern for surgeons. With the increased availability of computed tomography (CT), more surgeons rely on this modality for increased accuracy in determining whether a fusion was successful. The objective of this study was to report the rates of CT-confirmed fusion following ankle, hindfoot, or midfoot arthrodesis.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane central register from January 2000 to March 2020. Inclusion criteria included studies with adults (<18 years) that received 1 or multiple fusions of the ankle, hindfoot, or midfoot. At least 75% of the study cohort must have been evaluated by CT postoperatively. Basic information was collected, including journal, author, year published, and level of evidence. Other specific information was collected, including patient risk factors, fusion site, surgical technique and fixation, adjuncts, union rates, criteria for successful fusion (%), and time of CT. Once data were collected, a descriptive and comparative analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Included studies (26, n = 1300) had an overall CT-confirmed fusion rate of 78.7% (69.6-87.7). Individual joints had an overall fusion rate of 83.0% (73-92.9). The highest rate of union was in the talonavicular joint (TNJ).

CONCLUSION

These values are lower than previous studies, which found the same procedures to have greater than 90% fusion rates. With these updated figures, as confirmed by CT, surgeons will have better information for clinical decision making and when having informed consent conversations.

Rate of progressive healing with a carbon-fiber orthosis in cases of partial union and nonunion after ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov external fixator

BACKGROUND

The Ilizarov fixator is a popular device for treating arthrodesis of the ankle joint in complex situations. However, the therapy can fail, with nonunion or partial union that might not be load stable. There is the possibility of follow-up surgery or extended wearing of the fixator. Full weight bearing with a carbon orthosis remains another treatment option, which has not yet been investigated.The aim of the study was to determine the rate of progress that can be obtained with a carbon orthosis in cases of partial union or nonunion after fixator removal.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study thirty-three patients received a carbon orthosis after fixator removal due to nonunion or partial union. All patients were allowed to walk with the orthosis under full load. The consolidation rate was determined radiologically and compared with the imaging data obtained during the last follow-up. In addition to demographic data, the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and pain using a numeric rating scale were determined. Nine patients had to be excluded due to insufficient follow-up, and finally n = 24 patients were included in the study.

RESULTS

The average duration of fixator use was 21 weeks (range 15-40 weeks), and the total average follow-up after removal of the fixator was 16 months (range 4- 56). For 14 (58.33%) patients, there was a further increase in consolidation with the orthosis after the fixator was removed.

CONCLUSION

The results show that if there is only partial union or nonunion, further consolidations can be achieved after the application of a carbon orthosis. In a difficult patient population, using an orthosis should therefore be attempted to avoid unnecessary revision operations.

Talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion with PEEK H-pode™ vs. Titanium Maxlock™ locking plates: Comparison of functional and radiographic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Locking plates are increasingly used to achieve hindfoot fusion. The objective of this study was to compare hindfoot fusion outcomes with the PEEK H-pode™ (Biotech™) locking plate and the titanium Maxlock™ (Tornier-Wright™) locking plate.

HYPOTHESIS

A polyetheretherketone (PEEK) H-pode™ locking plate provides similar fusion rates to a titanium Maxlock™ locking plate for talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid arthrodesis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective comparative study in 39 patients (including 21 [54%] with pes planovalgus and 11 [28%] with neurological equinovarus deformities) who underwent talo-navicular and/or calcaneo-cuboid fusion, usually combined with subtalar fusion. The first 17 patients (January 2014-February 2016) were managed with Maxlock™ locking plates and the next 22 patients (March 2016-August 2018) with H-pode™ locking plates. These two cohorts of consecutive patients were comparable regarding age, sex distribution, body mass index, and comorbidities. At last follow-up more than 1year after surgery, we compared functional scores, pain intensity, and fusion assessed by radiographs and computed tomography (CT) (threshold set at 33%).

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 42months (range: 34-63months) in the Maxlock™ group and 25months (range: 12-36months) in the H-pode™ group. At last follow-up, the two groups were not significantly different for the mean values of the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society score, European Foot & Ankle Society score, and visual analogue scale pain score. Neither were the two groups significantly different for talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion by CT. In the Maxlock™ group, we found non-significant trends towards a higher proportion of patients with talo-navicular nonunion (18% vs. 5% in the H-pode™ group) and weaker talo-navicular fusion in patients with pes planovalgus (60.8% vs. 82.0%, respectively). Radiographic results overestimated the fusion rates.

DISCUSSION

Talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion was not significantly different with H-pode™ and Maxlock™ locking plates. CT was more accurate than standard radiography to assess fusion. These results underline the usefulness of PEEK locking plates for talo-navicular and calcaneo-cuboid fusion; moreover, the radiolucency of PEEK facilitates the interpretation of radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Presurgical Perspective and Postsurgical Evaluation of the Diabetic Foot

Management of the diabetic foot is complex and challenging, requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Imaging plays an important role in the decision-making process regarding surgery. This article discusses the presurgical perspective and postsurgical evaluation of the diabetic foot.

Radiographic Evaluation of Isolated Continuous Compression Staples for Akin Osteotomy Fixation

Continuous compression implants (nitinol staples) are gaining popularity secondary to their lower profile, less demanding technique, and less surgical dissection. Biomechanical support exists; however, clinical data is limited in the foot/ankle. This study's purpose is to determine the efficacy of nitinol staples to achieve stable, bony healing in Akin osteotomies and examine their clinical outcomes, complications, re-operations, and pain scores. We performed a retrospective chart review on 90 patients (93 osteotomies) who underwent an Akin osteotomy using a nitinol staple over a 2-year period. Radiographs were randomized and independently reviewed by 3 blinded foot and ankle surgeons. Osteotomies were deemed healed if greater than 50% of the osteotomy contained bridging bone, partially healed as less than 50% bridging bone, and nonunion as no healing, broken hardware, or loss of reduction. Visual analog scale pain scores were analyzed. Radiographic union was seen in 98.9% of Akin osteotomies (92/93), with no loss of reduction or broken staples (0/95). Only 3.2% (3/93) of patients returned to the operating room unplanned: 1 infection (1.1%), 1 symptomatic hardware removal (1.1%), and 1 traumatic disruption of fixation (1.1%). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower than preoperative. Staples are lower profile and technically less demanding compared to headed screws, plates, and tension band constructs. They offer continuous compression of the osteotomy and are rigid enough to maintain reduction. Based on the findings of this paper, the use of staples provides robust and stable fixation for Akin osteotomies and has low complication and high healing rates.

Inconclusive evidence that arthroscopic techniques yield better outcomes than open techniques for subtalar arthrodesis-A systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Open in situ subtalar arthrodesis (ISTA) has been a standard procedure for treating subtalar arthritis for varied etiologies with good outcomes. There has been a paradigm shift from ISTA to arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis (ASTA) over the past two decades due to increase in number of surgeons performing arthroscopy worldwide. However, there is only limited evidence in the existing literature to substantiate the benefit of this change with regards to patient benefit. To our knowledge, there are also no systematic reviews comparing the results of the two techniques for subtalar arthrodesis (STA).

AIM

Our systematic review aims to determine the superior technique for performing STA by comparing the outcomes, union rates, and complications between open and arthroscopic approach for in situ STA. We hypothesised that both procedures would have similar outcomes, union rates, time to union, and complication rate for in-situ STA.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Three databases, MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, were searched using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to compare the two procedures. Risk of bias assessment was done using The Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for assessing the risk of bias in the included studies. Weighted mean averages were computed for all parameters and tabulated separately for ASTA and ISTA.

FINDINGS

We included a total of 22 studies with a total of 978 (ASTA-310, ISTA-668) patients in the review. The most common indication for both techniques was post traumatic subtalar arthritis due to malunited calcaneal fracture in both groups (54.5%). The American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score was better in the ASTA group with a weighted average improvement of 43.4, while the weighted average improvement was 31.1 in the ISTA group, respectively. Patients undergoing ASTA had a weighted average union rate of 95.5% (standard deviation [SD]-3.6) with a weighted average time to union of 12.2 weeks (SD-2.4) while the ISTA group reported 90.7% (SD-6) union rate with a weighted average time to union of 15.5 weeks (SD-8.4). The weighted overall average complication rate was 13.1% (SD-8.9) in ASTA group and 20.3% (SD-16.2) in the ISTA group with hardware-related complications being the most common in both the groups.

CONCLUSION

From the existing literature, our review suggests that both ASTA and ISTA techniques are effective procedures for STA. However, there is no conclusive evidence to recommend one technique over another. High quality randomised studies may be further required to clearly define the superiority of one technique over another LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level III.

How to assess consolidation after foot and ankle arthrodesis with computed tomography. A systematic review

PURPOSES

Many studies have been performed that investigate consolidation after arthrodesis of foot and ankle joints. Consolidation in foot and ankle joints is best assessed by computed tomography (CT). However, no golden-standard methodology exists for radiological consolidation assessment from CT after ankle and foot arthrodesis. The aim of this review is to present an overview of the radiological methodologies for consolidation assessment, outcomes on reliability and validity and to advise which methodology should be used.

METHOD

Scientific databases were systematically searched. Eligible studies were studies that 1) performed foot or ankle arthrodesis, 2) mentioned radiological or CT follow-up in abstract, 3) performed postoperative CT in > 50% of patients. Two authors selected eligible studies and performed a risk of bias assessment with the COSMIN tool.

RESULTS

Risk of bias assessment showed that most studies (80%) were at high risk of bias due to poor methodology. The most popular method for consolidation assessment is by subjectively categorizing consolidation into consolidation groups, with a substantial reliability score. Another popular method is to calculate the fusion ratio and then apply a fusion threshold, to distinguish between fused and non-fused joints. This method had an excellent reliability score. In most studies a fusion threshold of 50% is used. However, four studies in this review showed that a 30% fusion threshold may by more valid.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this review we would advise to calculate fusion threshold and apply a 30% fusion threshold to distinguish fused from non-fused foot and ankle joints.

Outcomes and Complications of Open vs Posterior Arthroscopic Subtalar Arthrodesis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Open subtalar arthrodesis is the standard treatment for subtalar arthritis. Posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis (PASTA) has recently gained increasing popularity due to a shorter recovery time and better cosmesis. However, studies comparing outcomes and complications between these 2 techniques are limited.

METHODS

In total, 56 patients with subtalar joint arthritis were prospectively randomized to 2 parallel groups to receive either PASTA (n = 28 patients) or open subtalar arthrodesis (n = 28 patients). The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. Primary outcome was union rate confirmed on postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. Secondary outcomes were union time; visual analog scale (VAS), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores; tourniquet time; and complications.

RESULTS

Union time (9.4 vs 12.8 weeks) and recovery time (time to return to activities of daily living [8.4 vs 10.8 weeks], work [10.6 vs 12.9 weeks], and sports [24.9 vs 32.7 weeks]) were significantly shorter with PASTA than with the open technique (P < .05 all). Both techniques led to significant improvements in all functional outcomes (FAAM, SF-36, and VAS scores; P < .01 all); however, there was no significant difference between the techniques in these outcomes (P > .05 all). Other outcomes, including tourniquet time (55.8 vs 67.2 min), union rate (96.3% vs 100%), and complication rate, were not significantly different between the techniques.

CONCLUSION

Both open and PASTA techniques led to significant improvements in pain and function in patients with isolated subtalar joint arthritis. Although short-term functional outcomes and complication rates were not significantly different between the techniques, the PASTA technique was better at shortening the union and recovery times.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Isolated Arthroscopic-Assisted Subtalar Fusion: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The subtalar joint has a complex anatomic function that includes inversion and eversion of the hindfoot, assisting in walking on uneven surfaces. Arthritis is the most common pathological condition affecting this joint and can require fusion. The surgery can be performed open or with arthroscopic assistance. This systematic review assesses articles written on the safety and efficacy of isolated arthroscopic subtalar fusion.

METHODS

Using MEDLINE and Embase, we systematically reviewed articles published before May 21, 2020.

RESULTS

Of 395 articles, 17 on a total of 395 patients (409 operations) were included in the review. The average duration of follow-up was 40.0 months (range, 3 to 105 months). Radiographic evidence of union was reported for 95.8% of cases at an average of 11.9 weeks (range, 6 to 56 weeks) postoperatively. Delayed union was reported in 1.0% of patients and nonunion, in 4.3% of patients. In the articles reporting patient satisfaction, including pain relief, 95.4% of patients had positive outcomes. Postoperative complications were reported in 64 patients (16.2%), including 37 (9.4%) with symptomatic implants, 11 (2.8%) with dysesthesia or neuropathic pain, and 3 (0.8%) with postoperative infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic subtalar fusion is a safe and effective alternative to open subtalar arthrodesis, with high patient satisfaction rates, high union rates at similar follow-up intervals, and low complication rates. The aim of future research should be to determine the ideal cases for this approach as well as the most efficient arthroscopic surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation to optimize function and union as seen on radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Men who stare at bone: multimodal monitoring of bone healing

Knowledge of the physiological and pathological processes, taking place in bone during fracture healing or defect regeneration, is essential in order to develop strategies to enhance bone healing under normal and critical conditions. Preclinical testing allows a wide range of imaging modalities that may be applied both simultaneously and longitudinally, which will in turn lower the number of animals needed to allow a comprehensive assessment of the healing process. This work provides an up-to-date review on morphological, functional, optical, biochemical, and biophysical imaging techniques including their advantages, disadvantages and potential for combining them in a multimodal and multiscale manner. The focus lies on preclinical testing of biomaterials modified with artificial extracellular matrices in various animal models to enhance bone remodeling and regeneration.

Effect of bone morphogenetic protein-2/hydroxyapatite on ankle fusion with bone defect in a rabbit model: a pilot study

Background

Revision ankle-fusion surgery after a failure of total ankle arthroplasty has a problem with bone-defect management by implant removal. For the reconstruction of bone defects, autogenous bone often causes minor and major complications. Recombinant human-bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) plays essential roles in bone regeneration strategies, and hydroxyapatite (HA) is beneficial as the rhBMP-2 carrier. In this study, we evaluate whether rhBMP-2/HA can replace autogenous bone in a rabbit ankle-fusion model with distal tibia bone defect.

Methods

The bone defect was created in the distal tibia. The ankle fusion was performed by a cannulated screw from lateral malleolus and various treatments on bone defect. Thirty male white New Zealand rabbits were divided into three groups of 10 animals on each group dependent on treatment methods as control group (no treatment into defect), auto-bone group (autogenous bone treatment), and rhBMP-2/HA group (40 μL of 1 μg/mL rhBMP-2/100 μL HA). Bone formation on defect and the union of the ankle joint were evaluated by X-ray, micro-CT, and histological analysis at 8 weeks and 12 weeks, postoperatively.

Results

Radiographic assessment found the control and auto-bone groups still had the bone defect present, but rhBMP-2/HA group showed complete replacement of the defect with newly formed bone at 12 weeks. Micro-CT showed significantly higher new bone formation within the defect in the rhBMP-2/HA group than in the auto-bone and control groups at 8 weeks (p > 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively) and 12 weeks (p < 0.05, p < 0.001, respectively). Fusion rate (%) analysis of micro-CT showed a higher percentage of union in the rhBMP-2/HA group than in the auto bone and control groups at 8 weeks (p > 0.05, p < 0.001, respectively) and 12 weeks (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The histological showed the highest osteointegration between distal tibia and talus in the rhBMP-2/HA group at 12 weeks.

Conclusions

This study indicated that rhBMP-2/HA showed much better bone fusion than did the autogenous bone graft and was effective in promoting fusion rate and improving the quality of the ankle joint fusion.

Ankle Arthroscopy as an Adjunctive Method for Diagnosis of Nonunion After Tibiotalar Arthrodesis

The definition of consolidation after ankle arthrodesis can be challenging in some situations. Computed tomography has increased diagnostic accuracy; however, there are still no clear criteria for nonunion. In this context, arthroscopy with direct visualization of the arthrodesis may provide crucial data to inform the choice of treatment. The present report illustrates a case in which arthroscopy prompted a change in treatment strategy. More extensive surgery, with the potential for greater morbidity due to revision arthrodesis, could be avoided.

Do clinical results of arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis correlate with CT fusion ratio?

BACKGROUND

CT analysis of arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis rarely finds complete fusion. The aim of the present study was to determine, at 12 months' follow-up of arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis: (1) CT fusion ratio, (2) functional results, and (3) the correlation between the two.

HYPOTHESIS

Incomplete fusion ratio does not impair the result of arthrodesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A continuous series of 22 arthroscopic subtalar arthrodeses was assessed at 12 months' follow-up. The procedure used a posterior approach without bone graft, with stabilization by 2 compression screws. Clinical assessment comprised of a numerical analog pain scale (NAS, AOFAS and SF12) scores. Satisfaction was assessed on an NAS and on Odom's criteria. CT analysis at 12 months determined the posterior subtalar joint fusion ratio.

RESULTS

At follow-up, 2 patients showed non-union (9.1%). Among the 20 patients with fusion (91%), fusion was complete (>67°) in 16 (72.7%) and partial (34-66%) in 4 (18.2%). Mean fusion ratio at 12 months was 77.7%±14.8 (range, 36-98%). Functional gains (Δ) were: Δ pain NAS 4.8±2 (range, 1-10) and Δ AOFAS score 31.1±14 (range, 10-59). Mean satisfaction score was 8±2.5 (range, 3-10). There were no significant correlations between fusion ratio and any clinical or satisfaction scores.

CONCLUSION

Although clinical gain was systematic, functional and satisfaction scores were independent of whether subtalar fusion ratio was partial or complete.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

Recombinant Human Platelet-Derived Growth Factor BB in Combination With a Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate (rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP)-Collagen Matrix as an Alternative to Autograft

BACKGROUND

Joint arthrodesis often employs autograft to promote union; graft harvesting can lead to perioperative morbidity. A Canadian randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB homodimer (rhPDGF-BB) combined with beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP)-collagen was a safe, effective alternative to autograft. This multicenter North American RCT compared the safety and efficacy of rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen with autograft for ankle and hindfoot fusion. Subclassification using propensity scores (PS) incorporated patients from previous trials for enhanced statistical power for noninferiority testing and broader review of treatments.

METHODS

Patients requiring ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis and supplemental bone graft were treated with rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen (n = 69) or autograft (n = 35). Outcomes included joint fusion on computed tomography (24 weeks), clinical healing status, visual analog scale (VAS) pain, Short-Form 12 (SF-12), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, and Foot Function Index (FFI) scores over 52 weeks. PS methodology addressed potential selection bias arising from pooling data among these patients and 2 previous RCTs with similar inclusion criteria, surgical techniques, graft harvest techniques, and outcomes. All 132 rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen-treated patients and 167 of 189 candidate autograft-treated controls were selected for comparison by an independent statistician blinded to outcomes.

RESULTS

In the PS subclassification, 68.1% treatment patients and 68.4% controls achieved >50% osseous bridging at fusion sites. Clinical healing status was achieved in 84.8% of treated patients and 90.7% of controls at 52 weeks. Clinical, functional, and quality of life results demonstrated noninferiority of rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen to autograft. Safety-related outcomes were equivalent.

CONCLUSION

PS subclassification analysis of 3 RCTs demonstrated that rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen was as effective as autograft for ankle and hindfoot fusions, with less pain and morbidity than treatment with autograft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, prospective randomized study.

Ankle Arthritis

Ankle arthritis is a major source of morbidity impacting a younger working age population than hip and knee arthritis. Unlike the hip and knee, more than 70% of ankle arthritis cases are post-traumatic, with the remainder being inflammatory or primary arthritis. Nonoperative treatment begins with lifestyle and shoe-wear modifications and progresses to bracing, physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medications, and intra-articular injections. Ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty are the 2 main surgical options for end-stage ankle arthritis, with debridement, realignment osteotomy, and distraction arthroplasty being appropriate for limited indications.

Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Utilizing a Titanium Intramedullary Nail With an Internal Pseudoelastic Nitinol Compression Element: A Retrospective Case Series of 33 Patients

Nitinol has been shown to generate durable compression under loading via pseudoelastic shape memory. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a hindfoot arthrodesis nail with an internal pseudoelastic nitinol compression element. Patients who had undergone tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis from 2013 to 2016 were identified at 2 tertiary referral centers (12-week follow-up minimum). Patients managed with a tibiotalocalcaneal nail with an internal nitinol compression element were identified for review. Sagittal computed tomographic scan reformats were reviewed to calculate a percentage of joint surface bony union. Intraoperative and postoperative radiographs were compared to calculate postoperative screw position change generated by the nitinol element, a surrogate for postoperative unloading of compressive forces. Thirty-three patients were included in analysis and 81% of patients had successful union of both tibiotalar and subtalar joints. Overall, 90% of all arthrodesis surfaces united. The union rate of arthrodesis surfaces among patients without Charcot osteoarthropathy was 94%. A history of Charcot was identified as a risk factor for subtalar nonunion (p = .04) and was associated with less complete computed tomography-based tibiotalar union: 94% versus 71% (p < .01). The posterior-to-anterior screw translated an average of 3.9 mm proximally relative to the rigid portion of the nail from intraoperative to initial postoperative radiographs (p < .0001). High rates of computed tomography-confirmed union were demonstrated in the face of challenging clinical scenarios. Shortening of the pseudoelastic nitinol element occurs early in the postoperative period, indicating continued unloading of the nitinol compression element through the arthrodesis sites after initial implantation.

Diagnostics in tarsal fusion: The theory and practise in The Netherlands

BACKGROUND

This study compares the preferences of Dutch orthopaedic surgeons for different diagnostic modalities in performing tarsal fusions versus consensus, evidence or expert opinion reported in the literature.

METHODS

A literature search of Medline was performed to obtain evidence-based information on various diagnostic tools. In addition, 89 registered Dutch foot and ankle surgeons were sent a questionnaire concerning the diagnostic modalities use in tarsal fusion.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight (65%) questionnaires were returned. The experienced surgeons measured outcomes significantly more often than other surgeons. Diagnostic injections were often used, although scant evidence exists in the literature. Postoperative diagnostics mainly consist of X-ray examination, although there is consensus in the literature that computed tomography is more accurate.

CONCLUSIONS

The study revealed some surprising discrepancies concerning the use of diagnostic imaging in tarsal fusion. More clinical research is needed to identify the most effective diagnostic imaging modalities so as to encourage their wider adoption.

Clinical Outcomes of Nonunions of Hindfoot and Ankle Fusions

BACKGROUND

While nonunion after foot and ankle fusion surgery has been associated with poor outcomes, we are not aware of any longitudinal study on this subject. Thus, we prospectively evaluated the impact of nonunion on clinical outcomes of foot and ankle fusions and identified potential risk factors for nonunion after these procedures.

METHODS

Using data from a randomized clinical trial on recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB; Augment Bone Graft, BioMimetic Therapeutics), union was defined either by assessment of computed tomography (CT) scans at 24 weeks by a reviewer blinded to the type of treatment or by the surgeon's composite assessment of clinical and radiographic findings at 52 weeks and CT findings at 24 or 36 weeks. The nonunion and union groups (defined with each assessment) were then compared in terms of clinical outcome scores on the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS-AHS), Foot Function Index (FFI), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) as well as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, diabetes status, work status, and arthrodesis site.

RESULTS

Blinded CT assessment identified nonunion in 67 (18%) of 370 patients, and surgeon assessment found nonunion in 21 (5%) of 389 patients. Postoperatively, the nonunion group scored worse than the union group, regardless of the method used to define the nonunion, on the AOFAS-AHS and FFI, with mean differences of 10 and 12 points, respectively, when nonunion was determined by blinded CT assessment and 19 and 20 points when it was assessed by the surgeon. The nonunion group also had worse SF-12 Physical Component Summary scores. Differences between the union and nonunion groups were clinically meaningful for all outcome measures, regardless of the nonunion assessment method. The concept of an asymptomatic nonunion (i.e., imaging indicating nonunion but the patient doing well) was not supported. Patients with nonunion were more likely to be overweight, smokers, and not working.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective longitudinal study demonstrated poorer functional outcomes in patients with a nonunion after foot and ankle fusion, regardless of whether the diagnosis of nonunion was based on CT only or on combined clinical, radiographic, and CT assessment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Importance of Sufficient Graft Material in Achieving Foot or Ankle Fusion

BACKGROUND

Nonunion, an important complication following foot and ankle arthrodesis, causes substantial morbidity and disability. In patients undergoing hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis, autogenous bone graft (autograft) or a suitable alternative is often used to promote osseous fusion across the joint. This study assessed the importance of adequate graft material in the fusion space to achieve joint fusion during ankle and hindfoot arthrodesis.

METHODS

This study used data from a previously published clinical trial of grafting material (recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB with beta-tricalcium phosphate [rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP] or autograft) for healing in hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis to correlate the amount of graft fill at 9 weeks with ultimate healing. Patients who received supplemental graft material for ankle or hindfoot arthrodesis for end-stage ankle or hindfoot arthritis were stratified according to nonunion risk factors and surgical fusion site. Patients underwent arthrodesis using standard rigid internal fixation. Graft fill was defined as "adequate" if the material occupied ≥50% of the cross-sectional area of the fusion space on a computed tomography (CT) scan made at 9 weeks. Fusion was defined as osseous bridging of ≥50% of each articulation on a CT scan made at 24 weeks. Three hundred and seventy-nine patients with 573 joints (383 managed with rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP and 190 managed with autograft) that underwent arthrodesis had complete follow-up with 9-week and 24-week CT scans available.

RESULTS

Overall, 472 (82%) of 573 joints had adequate graft fill; of those, 383 (81%) were successfully fused at 24 weeks compared with 21 (21%) of 101 joints without adequate graft fill (p < 0.0001). Absolute fusion rate differences (joints with adequate fill minus those without adequate fill) were consistent across joints (61% to 63%) and for graft materials. The overall odds ratio (OR) of successful fusion in joints with adequate graft fill compared with those without adequate graft fill was 16.4 (95% confidence interval, 9.6 to 27.9).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates an association between the amount of graft material and successful hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis. Graft material filling of ≥50% of the fusion space at 9 weeks, regardless of type or origin, was associated with significantly higher fusion rates at 24 weeks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Hindfoot and Ankle Fusions Treated With rhPDGF-BB in Combination With a β-TCP-Collagen Matrix

BACKGROUND

Ankle and hindfoot arthrodesis is often supplemented with autograft to promote bony union. Autograft harvest can lead to increased perioperative morbidity. Purified recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB homodimer (rhPDGF-BB) has stimulated bone formation in mandibular defects and hindfoot fusion. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of rhPDGF-BB combined with an injectable, osteoconductive beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP)-collagen matrix versus autograft in ankle and hindfoot fusions.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients requiring ankle or hindfoot fusion were randomized 5:1 for rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen (treatment, n = 63) or autograft (control, n = 12). Prospective analysis included 142 autograft control subjects from another clinical trial with identical study protocols. Standardized operative and postoperative protocols were used. Patients underwent standard internal fixation augmented with autograft or 0.3 mg/mL rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen. Radiologic, clinical, and quality-of-life outcomes were assessed over 52 weeks. Primary outcome was joint fusion (50% or more osseous bridging on computed tomography) at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included radiographs, clinical healing status, visual analog scale pain score, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score, Foot Function Index score, and Short Form-12 score. Noninferiority P values were calculated.

RESULTS

Complete fusion of all involved joints at 24 weeks as indicated by computed tomography was achieved in 53 of 63 (84%) rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen-treated patients and 100 of 154 (65%) autograft-treated patients (P < .001). Mean time to fusion was 14.3 ± 8.9 weeks for rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen patients versus 19.7 ± 11.5 weeks for autograft patients (P < .01). Clinical success at 52 weeks was achieved in 57 of 63 (91%) rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen patients and 120 of 154 (78%) autograft patients (P < .001). Safety-related outcomes were equivalent. Autograft controls had 2 bone graft harvest infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP-collagen was a safe, effective alternative to autograft for ankle and hindfoot fusions, eliminating the pain and morbidity associated with autograft harvesting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, prospective randomized study.

Reproducibility of computed tomography to evaluate ankle and hindfoot fusions

BACKGROUND

Although plain radiographs have been historically used to evaluate the status of arthrodesis in the foot and ankle, computed tomography (CT) has gained popularity for evaluation of fusion status. The degree of fusion identified on CT scan has been correlated with functional outcome, with an arthrodesis area of 25-50% necessary for clinical success. In the clinical setting, orthopaedic surgeons often evaluate CT scans independently. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interrater reliability of CT scans to assess the status of hindfoot or ankle fusions among orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons.

METHODS

Forty-one CT scans were identified retrospectively from the tertiary referral practices of 4 fellowship-trained orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons. Inclusion criteria were patients with ankle, subtalar, or tibiotalocalcaneal fusions. Fusions with bulk allograft were excluded. All CT scans were completed at the investigating institution. The primary author (RAC) reviewed all CT scans to ensure the adequacy and completeness of the films. Images were blinded of any patient identifiers. All 4 surgeons individually reviewed the blinded scans and determined whether the arthrodesis site was greater than or less than 50% fused. Interrater reliability was completed via kappa analysis.

RESULTS

Based on kappa analysis, there was high interrater reliability in the assessment of subtalar arthrodesis. This was not statistically significant for the evaluation of ankle arthrodesis.

CONCLUSION

The CT scan has become instrumental in determining the adequacy of arthrodesis in the foot and ankle. The present study demonstrates the reliability of orthopaedic surgeons to ascertain the status of subtalar arthrodesis via CT scan.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Recombinant human BMP-2 increases the incidence and rate of healing in complex ankle arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Although its FDA-approved applications are limited, the pro-osteogenic benefits of recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2) administration have been shown in off-label surgical applications. However, the effects of rhBMP-2 on ankle fusions are insufficiently addressed in the literature, which fails to include a case-control study of adequate sample size to evaluate the efficacy of rhBMP-2 treatment.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this study we asked whether rhBMP-2 treatment (1) would increase the rate of successful ankle fusion in complex patients (patients with comorbidities associated with poor surgical healing) compared with a control group of patients undergoing ankle fusion who did not receive rhBMP-2; (2) would reduce total time wearing a frame when compared with the control group; (3) would result in a difference in the percentage of bone bridging between the group treated with rhBMP-2 and the control group, as determined by CT scans 3 months after surgery; and (4) would encounter an equal rate of complications different from untreated patients.

METHODS

A retrospective chart study was performed on 82 patients who, because of a host of comorbidities associated with poor healing, required a complex ankle arthrodesis with the Ilizarov technique. The first 40 patients did not receive rhBMP-2, whereas the subsequent 42 patients received intraoperative rhBMP-2. Time wearing the frame was determined by chart review; decision to remove the frame was made by the surgeon based on quantitative bone bridging measured using a CT scan taken 3 months after fusion.

RESULTS

Patients treated with rhBMP-2 were more likely to obtain fusion after the initial surgery (93% versus 53%, p < 0.001; OR, 11.76; 95% CI, 3.12-44.41), spent less total time wearing the frame (124 versus 161 days, p < 0.01), and showed more bone bridging on CT scans (48% versus 32%, p < 0.05). All patients with greater than 30% bone bridging observed on CT scans 3 months postoperatively achieved successful union without further intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that rhBMP-2 is a beneficial adjunct for selected groups of patients undergoing complex ankle arthrodesis. CT is a promising modality in the assessment of bone healing in ankle fusion. A proper randomized controlled trial remains necessary to fully describe the efficacy of rhBMP-2 in accelerating bone healing.

Establishing the relationship between clinical outcome and extent of osseous bridging between computed tomography assessment in isolated hindfoot and ankle fusions

BACKGROUND

Determining the success of joint fusion operations is often a diagnostic dilemma, and many factors may be considered. Most would agree that the broad categories of clinical success and radiographic success are likely most useful to determine the overall success of a joint fusion operation. Very little evidence exists to assist the surgeon in determining what constitutes a successful radiographic fusion. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of osseous bridging as measured by computed tomography (CT) that was associated with a good clinical outcome as measured by the 12-Item Short Form (SF-12), Foot Function Index (FFI), and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) clinical outcomes questionnaires at 24 weeks.

METHODS

Patients who had isolated joint fusions were evaluated (n = 275) to determine the correlation of extent of osseous bridging with clinical outcome. The extent of osseous bridging across the joint in question was categorized as absent (0%-24%), minimal (25%-49%) moderate (50%-74%), or complete (75%-100%). Clinical outcome scores included the SF-12, FFI, and AOFAS outcomes score.

RESULTS

Patients evaluated to have at least minimal osseous bridging at fusion sites (25%-49%) on CT reported a clinically important improvement in SF-12, FFI, and AOFAS, whereas those with "absent" osseous bridging (0%-24%) did not report a clinically important improvement in outcome scores.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that osseous bridging of greater than 25% to 49% at the fusion site measured by CT may be necessary to consider a hindfoot or ankle fusion clinically successful.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

A prospective pilot study of B2A-coated ceramic granules (Amplex) compared to autograft for ankle and hindfoot arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

To reduce fusion nonunion, autogenous bone graft is often incorporated into foot and ankle fusion procedures. B2A peptide-coated ceramic granules, with encouraging results in pilot studies of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, were here reformulated into Amplex with a coating concentration of 225 μg B2A/cm(3) ceramic granules (B2A-granule) with the goal of eliminating autogenous bone graft in foot and ankle arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to perform a multicenter prospective randomized pilot clinical trial designed to compare the safety and effectiveness of B2A-granule to autogenous bone graft in patients undergoing foot and ankle arthrodesis surgery.

METHODS

This study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, pilot clinical trial designed to compare safety and effectiveness of B2A-granule to autogenous bone graft in patients undergoing foot and ankle arthrodesis surgery. Twenty-four patients were enrolled and randomized (1:1) into 2 groups: autogenous bone graft control and B2A-granule. Primary outcome measures at 6 months (with follow-up at 9 and 12 months) included radiographic fusion assessed by computerized tomography and Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale scores for pain and disability.

RESULTS

Radiographic fusion success rates were similar in both groups (100% in the B2A-granule group, 92% autograft). Both the B2A-granule group and the autograft group had improvements in the pain and disability scores over the course of the study. Graft harvest-site pain affected only autograft-treated patients. There were no adverse events attributed to the graft material in either the B2A-granule or autograft group.

CONCLUSION

The results of this pilot study are supportive of a larger clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of B2A-granule as a bone graft substitute in foot and ankle fusions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB and beta-tricalcium phosphate (rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP): an alternative to autogenous bone graft

BACKGROUND

Joint arthrodesis employing autogenous bone graft (autograft) remains a mainstay in the treatment of many foot and ankle problems. However, graft harvest can lead to perioperative morbidity and increased cost. We tested the hypothesis that purified recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) homodimer combined with an osteoconductive matrix (beta-tricalcium phosphate [β-TCP]) would be a safe and effective alternative to autograft.

METHODS

A total of 434 patients were enrolled in thirty-seven clinical sites across North America in a prospective, randomized (2:1), controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of the combination rhPDGF-BB and β-TCP with those of autograft in patients requiring hindfoot or ankle arthrodesis. Radiographic, clinical, functional, and quality-of-life end points were assessed through fifty-two weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty patients (394 joints) underwent arthrodesis with use of rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP. One hundred and thirty-seven patients (203 joints) underwent arthrodesis with use of autograft. With regard to the primary end point, 159 patients (61.2% [262 joints (66.5%)]) in the rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP group and eighty-five patients (62.0% [127 joints (62.6%)]) in the autograft group were fused as determined by computed tomography at six months (p < 0.05). Clinically, 224 patients (86.2%) [348 joints (88.3%)]) in the rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP group were considered healed at fifty-two weeks, compared with 120 patients (87.6% [177 joints (87.2%)] in the autograft group (p = 0.008). Overall, fourteen of sixteen secondary end points at twenty-four weeks and fifteen of sixteen secondary end points at fifty-two weeks demonstrated statistical non-inferiority between the groups, and patients in the rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP group were found to have less pain and an improved safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients requiring hindfoot or ankle arthrodesis, treatment with rhPDGF-BB/β-TCP resulted in comparable fusion rates, less pain, and fewer side effects as compared with treatment with autograft.

Computer Tomography assessment of the fusion rate after posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the fusion rate on CT examinations and to correlate clinically the functional result with the degree of bone fusion in the subtalar joint after posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis (PASTA).

METHODS

Fourteen cases, from 36 to 84 years old, were retrospectively followed-up for a minimum of one year (range 12-92 months). A CT scan had been systematically performed at the six-month follow-up visit. The CT scans were examined in sagittal 2-mm-thick reformatted slices, measuring the length of the joint surface and the length of the fused portion of the joint space on each image.

RESULTS

At six months, the average fusion ratio was 39±19% (range 0-69%). Fusion defined by a fusion ratio superior or equal to 33% on the CT scan was observed in 11 cases. One patient had a delayed union and required a revision of fixation. One patient had a bilateral nonunion. Mean average AOFAS score improved from 51±10 to 77±9 at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Compared to open procedures, the posterior arthroscopic fusion seems to offer a promising alternative. However, our results suggest that the fusion rate following PASTA is not as favourable as reported in previous studies. Factors such as adequate compression and stable fixation provided by the screws together with the surgeons' experience with this demanding technique are of the utmost importance. A 33% CT fusion ratio threshold could accurately discriminate between clinical stability and instability.