"Pseudo washout" sign in high-flow hepatic hemangioma on gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced MRI mimicking hypervascular tumor. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:W490-W496. [PMID: 19933623 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.08.1732]

MRI radiomics model differentiates small hepatic metastases and abscesses in periampullary cancer patients

This multi-center, retrospective study focused on periampullary cancer patients undergoing MRI for hepatic metastasis and abscess differentiation. T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and arterial phase images were utilized to create radiomics models. In the training-set, 112 lesions in 54 patients (median age [IQR, interquartile range], 73 [63-80]; 38 men) were analyzed, and 123 lesions in 55 patients (72 [66-78]; 34 men) comprised the validation set. The T1-weighted + T2-weighted radiomics model showed the highest AUC (0.82, 95% CI 0.75-0.89) in the validation set. Notably, < 30% T1-T2 size discrepancy in MRI findings predicted metastasis (Ps ≤ 0.037), albeit with AUCs of 0.64-0.68 for hepatic metastasis. The radiomics model enhanced radiologists' performance (AUCs, 0.85-0.87 vs. 0.80-0.84) and significantly increased diagnostic confidence (P < 0.001). Although the performance increase lacked statistical significance (P = 0.104-0.281), the radiomics model proved valuable in differentiating small hepatic lesions and enhancing diagnostic confidence. This study highlights the potential of MRI-based radiomics in improving accuracy and confidence in the diagnosis of periampullary cancer-related hepatic lesions.

Discontinuous peripheral enhancement of focal liver lesions on CT and MRI: outside the box of typical cavernous hemangioma

The discontinuous peripheral enhancement is a pattern of enhancement usually attributed to typical cavernous hemangioma, that is the most common benign solid lesion of the liver. The discontinuous peripheral enhancement, however, may be encountered in many other benign and malignant focal liver lesions as an atypical presentation or evolution, and hemangiomas with discontinuous peripheral hyperenhancement on hepatic arterial phase may not always have the typical post-contrast pattern on portal venous and delayed phases. Therefore, abdominal radiologists may be challenged in their practice by lesions with discontinuous peripheral enhancement. This pictorial essay aims to review the spectrum of benign and malignant focal liver lesions that may show discontinuous peripheral enhancement. A particular point of interest is the diagnostic tree pathway that may guide the radiologists in the differential diagnosis.

Is there added value of the hepatobiliary phase of MRI with hepatobiliary contrast agents for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis? A meta-analysis

Purpose

So far, there have been published several meta-analyses which focused on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection with hepatobiliary phase (HBP) contrast agents. However, only a few of them aimed at establishing whether there is any added value of the HBP itself for HCC diagnosis. To answer the question, we performed a systematic literature search with the time limit going back to 2010.

Material and methods

True positive, false positive, false negative, and true negative values with and without the HBP were extracted from the included studies. Pooled sensitivities and specificities with and without the HBP were calculated and summary receiver operating characteristics curves were drawn to assess the diagnostic performance of the studies with and without the HBP.

Results

A total of 13 studies were included involving 1184 HCC lesions. In 13 studies without the HBP, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.83, 0.89 and 0.94 respectively. In 13 studies with the HBP, the pooled sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 0.91, 0.85 and 0.98 respectively.

Conclusions

We found no statistically significant differences in sensitivities between studies with and without the HBP (p = 0.1651).

Evaluation of qualitative and quantitative imaging features of hepatic hemangiomas with and without pseudo-washout sign on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: a descriptive and comparative study

BACKGROUND

Hepatic hemangiomas are the most common benign liver tumors. It is important to know the imaging features of hemangiomas on gadoxetic acid (GA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

PURPOSE

To evaluate the qualitative and quantitative imaging features of hemangiomas on GA-enhanced MRI, and to compare imaging features of hemangiomas with and without pseudo-washout sign (PWS).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively included 93 cases of hemangioma that underwent GA-enhanced MRI. The presence of an enhancement pattern in the arterial phase (AP) and PWSs in the transitional phase (TP) were evaluated. Signal-to-norm ratios (SINorm) of hemangiomas, liver parenchyma, and portal vein (PV) as well as contrast-to-norm ratio (CNorm) were assessed. Additionally, hemangiomas with and without PWSs were defined as two separate subgroups, and imaging features were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 93 cases of hemangiomas, 49 (52.6%) had PWSs in the TP. The mean SINorms of hemangiomas showed the highest value in the AP (P < 0.05). The mean CNorms showed positive values in the AP, and gradually decreased (P < 0.05). Hemangiomas with PWSs were significantly rapidly enhanced and smaller in size (P < 0.05), and the mean SINorms was lower in the TP (P = 0.023). While the mean CNorms showed a significant difference in the AP between subgroups (P < 0.001), the enhancement pattern was equal to that of the PV.

CONCLUSION

When evaluating GA-enhanced MRI, radiologists should utilize quantitative measures in addition to qualitative assessment and should be aware that SI matching with PV in all phases can be a distinguishing finding in the diagnosis of hemangioma.

Liver magnetic resonance imaging: how we do it

Magnetic resonance imaging is used for evaluating focal liver lesions, hepatic vascular diseases, biliary diseases and diffuse liver diseases in children. MRI examinations take a long time, often requiring sedation or anesthesia in smaller children. This makes it essential to understand the concepts and technique necessary to obtain an optimal examination for answering the clinical question while minimizing the need for sedation/anesthesia. We discuss key concepts including appropriate sequence selection, choice of contrast media, dynamic imaging, phases of contrast enhancement and protocol organization.

Morphological, dynamic and functional characteristics of liver pseudolesions and benign lesions

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and one of the most common causes of death among patients with cirrhosis, developing in 1-8% of them every year, regardless of their cirrhotic stage. The radiological features of HCC are almost always sufficient for reaching the diagnosis; thus, histological confirmation is rarely needed. However, the study of cirrhotic livers remains a challenge for radiologists due to the developing of fibrous and regenerative tissue that cause the distortion of normal liver parenchyma, changing the typical appearances of benign lesions and pseudolesions, which therefore may be misinterpreted as malignancies. In addition, a correct distinction between pseudolesions and malignancy is crucial to allow appropriate targeted therapy and avoid treatment delays.The present review encompasses technical pitfalls and describes focal benign lesions and pseudolesions that may be misinterpreted as HCC in cirrhotic livers, providing the imaging features of regenerative nodules, large regenerative nodules, siderotic nodules, hepatic hemangiomas (including rapidly filling and sclerosed hemangiomas), segmental hyperplasia, arterioportal shunts, focal confluent fibrosis and focal fatty changes. Lastly, the present review explores the most promising new imaging techniques that are emerging and that could help radiologists differentiate benign lesions and pseudolesions from overt HCC.

Diagnostic criteria of perfluorobutane-enhanced ultrasonography for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk individuals: how is late washout determined?

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal washout criteria of perfluorobutane-enhanced ultrasonography (PFB-US) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk individuals.

METHODS

Participants at risk of HCC with treatment-naïve solid hepatic observations (≥1 cm) who underwent PFB-US from March 2019 to September 2020 were prospectively recruited. Arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), washout time, and washout degree were evaluated. The diagnosis of HCC was made by non-rim APHE with late and mild washout. The per-lesion diagnostic performance for diagnosing HCC using different cutoffs for late washout (50, 55, 60, 65, and 70 seconds postcontrast) and the different time windows for determining washout (until 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 minutes postcontrast) were compared using the McNemar test.

RESULTS

In total, 101 participants with 113 observations (mean size, 33.5±2.8 mm; HCCs [n=82], non-HCC malignancies [n=16], benign [n=15]) were evaluated. Non-rim APHE was observed in 86.6% (71/82) of HCCs. As the cutoff time for late washout increased, the specificity increased to 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.8% to 100%) at the 60-second cutoff with 62.2% sensitivity (95% CI, 50.8% to 72.7%). When the time window for determining washout became wider, the sensitivity and accuracy increased until 6 minutes, with 100% specificity at all times.

CONCLUSION

Determining washout within 6 minutes after contrast injection with a 60-second cutoff for late washout showed the highest sensitivity without losing specificity for diagnosing HCC using PFB-US in individuals at high risk.

Comparison of Gadobenate-Enhanced MRI and Gadoxetate-Enhanced MRI for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection Using LI-RADS Version 2018: A Prospective Intraindividual Randomized Study

Background: Gadobenate and gadoxetate demonstrate different degrees of intracellular accumulation within hepatocytes, potentially impacting these agents' relative performance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis. Objective: To perform an intraindividual comparison of gadobenate-enhanced MRI and gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for detection of HCC, and to assess the impact of inclusion of hepatobiliary phase images on HCC detection for both agents. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 126 patients (112 men, 14 women; mean age 52.3 years) at high risk for HCC who consented to undergo two 3-T liver MRI examinations [one using gadobenate (0.05 mmol/kg), one using gadoxetate (0.025 mmol/kg)], separated by 7-14 days. The order of the two contrast agents was randomized. All examinations included post-contrast dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images (120 minutes for gadobenate; 20 minutes for gadoxetate). Three radiologists independently reviewed the gadobenate and gadoxetate examinations in separate sessions and recorded the location of detected observations. Observations were classified using LI-RADS version 2018 and using a LI-RADS modification whereby hepatobiliary phase hypointensity may upgrade observations from LR-4 to LR-5. Observations classified as LR-5 were considered positive interpretations for HCC. Diagnostic performance for histologically confirmed HCC (n=96) was assessed. Results: Across readers, sensitivity for HCC using dynamic images alone was 74.0%-80.2% for gadobenate versus 54.2%-67.7% for gadoexetate and using dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images was 82.1%-87.4% for gadobenate versus 66.3%-81.1% for gadoxetate. For HCCs measuring 1.0-2.0 cm, sensitivity using dynamic images alone was 61.9% (all readers) for gadobenate versus 38.1%-57.1% for gadoxetate and using dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images was 76.2%-85.7% for gadobenate versus 52.4%-61.9% for gadoxetate. PPV for HCC ranged from 88.6%-97.4% across readers, agents, and image sets. Conclusion: Sensitivity for HCC was higher for gadobenate than for gadoxetate, whether using dynamic images alone or dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images; the improved sensitivity using gadobenate was more pronounced for small HCCs. While hepatobiliary phase images improved sensitivity for both agents, sensitivity of gadobenate using dynamic images alone compared favorably with that of gadoxetate using dynamic and hepatobiliary phase images. Clinical Impact: The findings support gadobenate as a preferred agent over gadoxetate when performing liver MRI in patients at high risk for HCC.

Role of noninvasive imaging in the evaluation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: from diagnosis and prognosis to treatment response

INTRODUCTION

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common liver cancer. Desmoplastic stroma may be revealed as distinctive histopathologic findings favoring intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Meanwhile, a range of imaging manifestations is often accompanied with rich desmoplastic stroma in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, which can indicate large bile duct ICC, and a higher level of cancer-associated fibroblasts with poor prognosis and weak treatment response.

AREAS COVERED

We provide a comprehensive review of current state-of-the-art and recent advances in the imaging evaluation for diagnosis, staging, prognosis and treatment response of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. In addition, we discuss precursor lesions, cells of origin, molecular mutation, which would cause the different histological classification. Moreover, histological classification and tumor microenvironment, which are related to the proportion of desmoplastic stroma with many imaging manifestations, would be also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The diagnosis, prognosis, treatment response of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma may be revealed as the presence and the proportion of desmoplastic stroma with a range of imaging manifestations. With the utility of radiomics and artificial intelligence, imaging is helpful for ICC evaluation. Multicentre, large-scale, prospective studies with external validation are in need to develop comprehensive prediction models based on clinical data, imaging findings, genetic parameters, molecular, metabolic, and immune biomarkers.

Differentiating Between an Atypical Hepatic Abscess and Tumor Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging

Objective

To identify diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) patterns and conspicuity discrepancies on hepatobiliary phase imaging (HBPI) to distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study recruited 31 patients with 43 atypical hepatic abscesses and 32 patients with 35 hepatic metastases who underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. All lesions were confirmed by pathological or clinical diagnosis. For the qualitative and quantitative analyses, the signal intensity, DWI pattern, apparent diffusion coefficient, degree of perilesional edema, perilesional hyperemia, perilesional signal on HBPI, conspicuity, size discrepancy between sequences, contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, and relative enhancement ratio on dynamic phases were independently assessed by two radiologists. Significant findings for differentiating the two groups were identified via univariate and multivariate analyses with a nomogram for predicting atypical hepatic abscesses. The interobserver agreement was also analyzed for each variable.

Results

The multivariate analysis revealed that the conspicuity discrepancy (odds ratio [OR] 34.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.09–579.47, p = 0.013) and non-peripheral high signal intensity (SI) rim on DWI (OR 67.46, 95% CI 2.64, 1723.20, p = 0.011) were significant independent factors for predicting atypical hepatic abscesses. They were also shown to be high predictor points on the nomogram. When any of the set criteria were satisfied, 97.7% of atypical hepatic abscesses were correctly identified, with a specificity of 65.7%. When both criteria were combined, the specificity was up to 100%, with a sensitivity of 44.9%.

Conclusion

Conspicuity discrepancy and a non-peripheral high SI rim on DWI are reliable and meaningful features that can distinguish atypical hepatic abscesses from hepatic metastases.

Errors and Misinterpretations in Imaging of Chronic Liver Diseases

MRI is an important problem-solving tool for accurate characterization of liver lesions. Chronic liver disease alters the typical imaging characteristics and complicates liver imaging. Awareness of imaging pitfalls and technical artifacts and ways to mitigate them allows for more accurate and timely diagnosis.

Superb microvascular imaging technology of ultrasound examinations for the evaluation of tumor vascularity in hepatic hemangiomas

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate and categorize the diverse features of hepatic hemangiomas on superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in a relatively large prospective study.

Methods

In this prospective study, 70 patients with 92 hepatic hemangiomas were consecutively enrolled. All nodules were radiologically confirmed with the typical imaging features of hepatic hemangiomas on dynamic computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Using SMI, all lesions were evaluated and categorized into subgroups according to the flow pattern on SMI. Differences in the frequencies of SMI patterns according to lesion size and enhancement patterns on dynamic CT or MRI were also compared.

Results

In 67.4% (62/92) of hemangiomas, tumor vascularity was detected using SMI, while 32.6% (30/92) did not show any signal on the SMI examination, and the absence of an SMI signal was not shown in rapidly enhancing hemangiomas (0% [0/30] vs. 100% [30/30], P=0.002) and was more frequent in lesions <2 cm than in lesions ≥2 cm (44.0% [22/50] vs. 2.7% [8/42], P=0.011). In hepatic hemangiomas in which vascularity was detected (n=62), the strip rim pattern was the most common SMI pattern of hepatic hemangiomas (48.4%, 30/62), followed by the nodular rim pattern involving spotty dot-like engorged vessels (37.1%, 23/62).

Conclusion

The evaluation of the inner vascularity of hepatic hemangiomas with SMI was feasible for most hemangiomas, especially in larger (≥2 cm) or rapidly enhancing hemangiomas. The most frequent SMI patterns of hepatic hemangiomas were the strip rim pattern and nodular rim pattern.

Intraindividual Comparison of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Washout between MRIs with Hepatobiliary and Extracellular Contrast Agents

Objective

To intraindividually compare hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) washout between MRIs using hepatobiliary agent (HBA) and extracellular agent (ECA).

Materials and Methods

This study included 114 prospectively enrolled patients with chronic liver disease (mean age, 55 ± 9 years; 94 men) who underwent both HBA-MRI and ECA-MRI before surgical resection for HCC between November 2016 and May 2019. For 114 HCCs, the lesion-to-liver visual signal intensity ratio (SIR) using a 5-point scale (−2 to +2) was evaluated in each phase. Washout was defined as negative visual SIR with temporal reduction of visual SIR from the arterial phase. Illusional washout (IW) was defined as a visual SIR of 0 with an enhancing capsule. The frequency of washout and MRI sensitivity for HCC using LR-5 or its modifications were compared between HBA-MRI and ECA-MRI. Subgroup analysis was performed according to lesion size (< 20 mm or ≥ 20 mm).

Results

The frequency of portal venous phase (PP) washout with HBA-MRI was comparable to that of delayed phase (DP) washout with ECA-MRI (77.2% [88/114] vs. 68.4% [78/114]; p = 0.134). The frequencies were also comparable when IW was allowed (79.8% [91/114] for HBA-MRI vs. 81.6% [93/114] for ECA-MRI; p = 0.845). The sensitivities for HCC of LR-5 (using PP or DP washout) were comparable between HBA-MRI and ECA-MRI (78.1% [89/114] vs. 73.7% [84/114]; p = 0.458). In HCCs < 20 mm, the sensitivity of LR-5 was higher on HBA-MRI than on ECA-MRI (70.8% [34/48] vs. 50.0% [24/48]; p = 0.034). The sensitivity was similar to each other if IW was added to LR-5 (72.9% [35/48] for HBA-MRI vs. 70.8% [34/48] for ECA-MRI; p > 0.999).

Conclusion

Extracellular phase washout for HCC diagnosis was comparable between MRIs with both contrast agents, except for tumors < 20 mm. Adding IW could improve the sensitivity for HCC on ECA-MRI in tumors < 20 mm.

The humbling hemangioma: uncommon CT and MRI imaging features and mimickers of hepatic hemangiomas

Cavernous hemangiomas are among the most common liver lesions encountered in abdominal imaging. While classical imaging characteristics usually aid the radiologist in confidently arriving at its diagnosis, atypical hemangiomas can prove to be difficult to distinguish from other more worrisome hepatic lesions such as metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma. Furthermore, some malignant lesions can display features that simulate hemangiomas. The radiologist must be aware of these pitfalls to make an accurate diagnosis, when possible.

Imaging-based diagnosis of benign lesions and pseudolesions in the cirrhotic liver

Liver cirrhosis is a leading cause of death worldwide, with 1-year mortality rates of up to 57% in decompensated patients. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary tumor in cirrhotic livers and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Annually, up to 8% of patients with cirrhosis develop HCC. The diagnosis of HCC rarely requires histological confirmation: in fact, according to the most recent guidelines, the imaging features of HCC are almost always sufficient for a certain diagnosis. Thus, the role of the radiologist is pivotal because the accurate detection and characterization of focal liver lesions in patients with cirrhosis are essential in improving clinical outcomes. Despite recent technical innovations in liver imaging, several issues remain for radiologists regarding the differentiation of HCC from other hepatic lesions, particularly benign lesions and pseudolesions. It is important to avoid misdiagnosis of benign liver lesions as HCC (false-positive cases) because this diagnostic misinterpretation may lead to ineligibility of a patient for potentially curative treatments or inappropriate assignment of high priority scores to patients on waiting lists for liver transplantation. This review presents a pocket guide that could be useful for the radiologist in the diagnosis of benign lesions and pseudolesions in cirrhotic livers, highlighting the imaging features that help in making the correct diagnosis of macroregenerative nodules; siderotic nodules; arterioportal shunts; hemangiomas, including fast-filling hemangiomas, hemangiomas with pseudowashout, and sclerosed hemangiomas; confluent fibrosis; pseudomasses in chronic portal vein thrombosis; and focal fatty changes.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for differentiating hepatic sclerosing hemangioma from malignant tumor

BACKGROUND

To investigate the imaging features of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to differentiate hepatic sclerosing hemangioma from malignant tumors.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study included 18 patients with sclerosing hemangioma and 54 patients with common hepatic malignant tumor, including hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic adenocarcinoma, and cholangiocarcinoma, who were examined using gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI from January 2008 to June 2019. Imaging features including signal intensity, tumor margins, enhancement pattern, and presence or absence of diffusion restriction were analyzed. Significant MRI features for predicting sclerosing hemangioma were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Diagnostic performances of each imaging feature and combinations of significant imaging features were summarized.

RESULTS

In the multivariable analysis, irregular margins (odds ratio [OR], 10.12; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.27-80.94; p = 0.029), centripetal or internal nodular enhancement in the transitional phase (OR, 13.58; 95 % CI, 1.48-124.82; p = 0.021), and absence of diffusion restriction (OR, 39.20; 95 % CI, 4.82-318.49; p = 0.001) were significant imaging features for the diagnosis of sclerosing hemangioma. Presence of at least two significant imaging features had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 88.9 %, 96.3 %, and 94.4 %, respectively, for diagnosing sclerosing hemangioma.

CONCLUSION

Combinations of two or more of the significant imaging features (irregular margins, centripetal or internal nodular enhancement in the transitional phase, and absence of diffusion restriction) were effective for differentiating hepatic sclerosing hemangioma from malignant tumors using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: can hypointensity on the late portal venous phase be used as an alternative to washout?

PURPOSE

To investigate the added value of considering hypointensity on late portal venous phase (LPVP) images as washout for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD).

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 97 patients at high risk for HCC who underwent Gd-EOB-MRI including unenhanced, multi-arterial phase, conventional portal venous phase (CPVP, 60 s), and LPVP (mean, 99.9 ± 9.1 s; range, 90-119 s) images. A total of 115 hepatic lesions were identified by histopathological or clinical diagnosis. Three independent radiologists assessed the MRI images by consensus. Diagnosis of HCC was made using criteria of arterial hyperenhancement and hypointensity relative to the surrounding liver parenchyma (1) on CPVP or (2) on CPVP and/or LPVP images. The generalized estimating equation was used to compare diagnostic performance for HCC between Criterion 1 and 2.

RESULTS

In 82 HCCs, the frequency of hypointensity differed significantly between the CPVP and LPVP images (64.6% [53/82] vs. 84.1% [69/82], P < 0.001). Among 33 non-HCCs, two cHCC-CCs showed additional hypointensity on LPVP than CPVP images (33.3% [11/33] vs. 39.4% [13/33], P = 0.500). Criterion 2 provided significantly greater sensitivity for diagnosing HCC than Criterion 1 (54.9% [45/82] vs. 74.4% [61/82], P < 0.001), with relatively little reduction in specificity (90.9% [30/33] vs. 84.8% [28/33], P = 0.145).

CONCLUSION

Additional use of LPVP hypointensity as washout could significantly improve sensitivity for HCC diagnosis when utilizing Gd-EOB-MRI in patients with CLD, without a significant decrease in specificity.

Intra-individual comparison of dual portal venous phases for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma at gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic performances of first and second portal venous phases (PVP1 and PVP2) in revealing washout and capsule appearance for non-invasive HCC diagnoses in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 123 at-risk patients with 160 hepatic observations (HCCs, n = 116; non-HCC malignancies, n = 18; benign, n = 26) showing arterial phase hyper-enhancement (APHE) ≥ 1 cm at Gd-EOB-MRI. The mean time intervals from gadoxetic acid injection to PVP1 and PVP2 acquisitions were 53 ± 2 s and 73 ± 3 s, respectively. After evaluating image findings independently, imaging findings and diagnoses were finalized by a consensus of two radiologists using either PVP1 or PVP2 image sets according to the LI-RADS v2018 or EASL criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared.

RESULTS

Among HCCs, more washout and enhancing capsule were observed in PVP2 (83.6% and 27.6%) than in PVP1 (50.9% and 19.8%) (p < 0.001, both). The PVP2 set presented significantly higher sensitivity (83.6% vs. 53.5%, LI-RADS; 82.8% vs. 50.0%, EASL; p < 0.001, both) and accuracy (0.88 vs. 0.73, LI-RADS; 0.88 vs. 0.72, EASL; p < 0.001, both) than the PVP1 set without significant specificity loss (93.2% vs. 93.2%, by LI-RADS or EASL; p = 0.32, both). None of the non-HCC malignancy was non-invasively diagnosed as HCC in both PVP image sets.

CONCLUSION

Late acquisition of PVP detected washout and enhancing capsule of HCC more sensitively than early acquisition, enabling accurate diagnoses of HCC, according to LI-RADS or EASL criteria.

KEY POINTS

• Among HCCs, more washout and enhancing capsules were observed in PVP2 than PVP1, quantitatively and qualitatively. • The portal venous phase acquired at around 70 s after contrast media administration (PVP2) provided significantly higher sensitivity and AUC value than PVP1 by using LI-RADS v2018 or EASL criteria. • More HCCs were categorized as LR-5 in PVP2 than in PVP1 images, and the specificity of PVP2 (93.5%) was comparable with PVP1 (93.5%).

Evaluation of Primary Liver Cancers Using Hepatocyte-Specific Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Pitfalls and Potential Tips

When radiologists interpret hepatic focal lesions seen on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, it is important not only to distinguish malignant lesions from benign ones but also to distinguish nonhepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) malignancies from HCCs. In addition, most major guidelines, including those of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and Korean Liver Cancer Association and National Cancer Center, allow for the noninvasive imaging diagnosis of HCC in at-risk patients. However, ~40% of HCC cases show atypical imaging features mimicking non-HCC malignancies. Furthermore, several benign and malignant lesions, such as flash-filling hemangioma and intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma, frequently look like HCC. In contrast, although multiparametric MRI options, including hepatobiliary phase and diffusion-weighted imaging, provide useful information that could help address these challenges, there remain several unresolved issues with regard to the noninvasive diagnostic criteria characterizing HCC. In this article, we discuss the typical imaging features and challenging situations related to primary liver cancers in MRI, while considering how to make a correct diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Hepatic tumors: pitfall in diagnostic imaging

On computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), hepatocellular tumors are characterized based on typical imaging findings. However, hepatocellular adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hepatocellular carcinoma can show uncommon appearances at CT and MRI, which may lead to diagnostic challenges. When assessing focal hepatic lesions, radiologists need to be aware of these atypical imaging findings to avoid misdiagnoses that can alter the management plan. The purpose of this review is to illustrate a variety of pitfalls and atypical features of hepatocellular tumors that can lead to misinterpretations providing specific clues to the correct diagnoses. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Atypical Appearance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Its Mimickers: How to Solve Challenging Cases Using Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed noninvasively with contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasonography on the basis of its hallmark imaging features of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout on portal or delayed phase images. However, approximately 40% of HCCs show atypical imaging features, posing a significant diagnostic challenge for radiologists. Another challenge for radiologists in clinical practice is the presentation of many HCC mimickers such as intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma, arterioportal shunt, and hemangioma in the cirrhotic liver. The differentiation of HCCs from these mimickers on preoperative imaging studies is of critical importance. Hence, we will review the typical and atypical imaging features of HCCs and the imaging features of its common mimickers. In addition, we will discuss how to solve these challenges in practice.

Multimodality Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Diagnosis to Treatment Response Assessment in Everyday Clinical Practice

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a recently developed classification aiming to improve the standardization of liver imaging assessment in patients at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The LI-RADS v2017 implemented new algorithms for ultrasound (US) screening and surveillance, contrast-enhanced US diagnosis and computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging treatment response assessment. A minor update of LI-RADS was released in 2018 to comply with the American Association for the Study of the Liver Diseases guidance recommendations. The scope of this review is to provide a practical overview of LI-RADS v2018 focused both on the multimodality HCC diagnosis and treatment response assessment.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: molecular and genetic background

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays important roles in diagnosis of hepatic lesions because of its superiority in the detectability of small lesions, its differentiation ability, and its utility for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In HCC, expression of organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B3 correlates with the enhancement ratio in the hepatobiliary phase. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, an indirect molecular imaging method, reflects OATP1B3 expression in HCC. OATP1B3 expression gradually decreases from the dysplastic nodule stage to advanced HCC. Decreased expression is a sensitive marker of multistep hepatocarcinogenesis, especially in the early stages. Hypervascular HCCs commonly show hypointensity in the hepatobiliary phase corresponding to a decrease in OATP1B3; however, approximately 10% of HCCs show hyperintensity due to OATP1B3 overexpression. This hyperintense HCC shows less aggressive biological features and has a better prognosis than hypointense HCC. Hyperintense HCC can be classified into a genetic subtype of HCC with a mature hepatocyte-like molecular expression. OATP1B3 expression and the less aggressive nature of hyperintense HCC are regulated by the molecular interaction of β-catenin signaling and hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α, a tumor suppressor factor. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging has the potential to be an imaging biomarker for HCC. KEY POINTS: • The hepatobiliary phase is a sensitive indirect indicator of organic anion transporting polypeptide1B3 (OATP1B3) expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). • The OATP1B3 expression, namely, enhancement in the hepatobiliary phase, decreases from the very early stage of hepatocarcinogenesis, contributing to early diagnosis of HCC. • HCC showing hyperintensity on the hepatobiliary phase is a peculiar genetic subtype of HCC with OATP1B3 overexpression, a less aggressive nature, and mature hepatocyte-like molecular/genetic features.

Combined gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine enhanced liver MRI: a parameter optimization study

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the feasibility of combined delayed-phase gadoxetic acid (GA) and gadobenate dimeglumine (GD) enhanced liver MRI for improved detection of liver metastases, and to optimize contrast agent dose, timing, and flip angle (FA).

METHODS

Fourteen healthy volunteers underwent liver MRI at 3.0T at two visits during which they received two consecutive injections: 1. GA (Visit 1 = 0.025 mmol/kg; Visit 2 = 0.05 mmol/kg) and 2. GD (both visits = 0.1 mmol/kg) 20 min after GA administration. Two sub-studies were performed: Experiment-1 Eight subjects underwent multi-phase breath-held 3D-fat-saturated T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo (SGRE) imaging to determine the optimal imaging window for the combined GA + GD protocol to create a homogeneously hyperintense liver and vasculature ("plain-white-liver") with maximum contrast to muscle which served as a surrogate for metastatic lesions in both experiments. Experiment-2 Six subjects underwent breath-held 3D-fat-saturated T1-weighted SGRE imaging at three different FA to determine the optimal FA for best image contrast. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Experiment-1 The combined GA + GD protocol created a homogeneously hyperintense liver and vasculature with maximum CNR liver/muscle at approximately 60-120 s after automatic GD-bolus detection. Experiment-2 Flip angles between 25° and 35° at a dose of 0.025 mmol/kg GA provided the best combination that minimized liver/vasculature CNR, while maximizing liver/muscle CNR. CNR performance to achieve a "plain-white-liver" was superior with 0.025 mmol/kg GA compared to 0.05 mmol/kg.

CONCLUSION

Combined GA + GD enhanced T1-weighted MRI is feasible to achieve a homogeneously "plain-white-liver". Future studies need to confirm that this protocol can improve sensitivity of liver lesion detection in patients with metastatic liver disease.

Differentiation of Hepatic Sclerosed Hemangiomas From Cavernous Hemangiomas Based on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the imaging features of a hepatic sclerosed hemangioma by comparing them with those of a cavernous hemangioma using magnetic resonance imaging with gadoxetic acid enhancement.

METHODS

Nine patients with hepatic sclerosed hemangiomas and 36 patients with cavernous hemangiomas (control group) who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were included. Qualitative values (imaging findings and enhancement pattern [typical vs atypical enhancement]) and quantitative values (apparent diffusion coefficient) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients with sclerosed hemangiomas showed significantly more irregular tumor margin on hepatobiliary phase images, peritumoral arterial enhancement, and a lower proportion of hyperintensity on heavily T2-weighted images compared with controls (all P values <0.05). In addition, the sclerosed hemangioma group had significantly more frequent atypical enhancement patterns than did the control group (88.9% vs 33.3%; P = 0.006). However, the mean apparent diffusion coefficient value of hemangiomas was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.639).

CONCLUSIONS

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance images can help in differentiating between hepatic sclerosed hemangiomas and cavernous hemangiomas.

Late Gadolinium Hyperintensity of Suspected Colorectal Liver Metastases on Gadofosveset-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Predictor of Benignity and a Potential Problem-Solving Tool

PURPOSE

Late gadolinium hyperintensity (LGH) is sometimes seen in colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and represents a significant diagnostic pitfall due to overlap with LGH in benign hemangiomas; therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of LGH and the ability of LGH to differentiate between CRLM and benign lesions with intravascular (gadofosveset) vs extracellular contrast agents (gadobutrol).

METHODS

Patients with known colorectal cancer and suspected liver lesions were prospectively recruited into this institutional review board-approved, single institution study and received magnetic resonance imaging of the liver with gadofosveset and gadobutrol. The prevalence of LGH for CRLMs and solid benign lesions was determined. Receiver operating characteristics curves were determined for the presence of LGH as a predictor of benignity. The utility of LGH to differentiate between CRLM and solid benign lesions using gadofosveset vs gadobutrol was compared using the generalized estimating equation.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with 131 solid focal liver lesions were recruited. The prevalence of LGH of CRLMs was 11.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5%-21.8%) with gadofosveset vs 63.7% (95% CI: 45.7%-81.7%) with gadobutrol. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the presence of LGH as a predictor of benignity was 0.86 using gadofosveset vs 0.75 using gadobutrol. Both LGH (P = .003) and the interaction of contrast agent and LGH (P = .003) statistically significantly differentiated CRLM from benign lesions.

CONCLUSION

LGH is more common with extracellular than with intravascular contrast agents and is statistically significantly associated with benign lesions rather than metastases.

Comparison of the Enhancement Pattern of Hepatic Hemangioma on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Performed With Gd-EOB-DTPA Versus Gd-BOPTA

PURPOSE

To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings with gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine for the diagnosis of hepatic hemangiomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included 26 hemangiomas (mean size was 14 mm ± 10 mm) in 19 patients (mean age 60 ± 14 years) scanned with both gadobenate dimeglumine MRI and gadoxetic acid MRI. For each patient, we collected multiple lesion variables including location, number, size and enhancement pattern on arterial, portal venous, 3-minute and hepatobiliary phases with both gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine. The enhancement pattern with the two contrast agents was then compared.

RESULTS

The typical enhancement pattern of hepatic hemangiomas was more common-though not statistically significant-with gadobenate dimeglumine compared to gadoxetic acid (57% [15 of 26] vs 42% [11 of 26], respectively; P = 0.4057 for both peripheral globular discontinuous enhancement in the arterial phase and centripetal fill-in in the portal venous phase). A significantly higher number of hemangiomas showed centripetal fill-in or hyperintensity in the 3-minute phase with gadobenate dimeglumine compared to gadoxetic acid (88% [23 of 26) vs 58% [15 of 26]; P = 0.0266). A pseudo washout sign in the 3-minute phase was detected in one of the 5 flash-filling hemangiomas with gadoxetic acid, but not gadobenate dimeglumine. All hemangiomas were hypointense in the hepatobiliary phase with both gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

The enhancement pattern of hepatic hemangiomas may vary depending on the hepatobiliary agent, with more frequent lack of the typical pattern with gadoxetic acid compared to gadobenate dimeglumine.

User and system pitfalls in liver imaging with LI-RADS

The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology, technique, interpretation, reporting, and data collection of liver imaging, created specifically for patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. Over the past years, LI-RADS has been progressively implemented into clinical practice, but pitfalls remain related to user error and inherent limitations of the system. User pitfalls include the inappropriate application of LI-RADS to a low-risk patient population, incorrect measurement techniques, inaccurate assumptions about LI-RADS requirements, and improper usage of LI-RADS terminology and categories. System pitfalls include areas of discordance with the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) as well as pitfalls related to rare ancillary features. This article reviews common user pitfalls in applying LI-RADS v2018 and how to avoid preventable errors and also highlights deficiencies of the current version of LI-RADS and how it might be improved in the future. Level of Evidence:3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1673-1686.

Spectrum of Pitfalls, Pseudolesions, and Potential Misdiagnoses in Cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this article are to review a variety of pitfalls in liver imaging that can lead to the inaccurate diagnosis of focal hepatic lesions in cirrhosis, to describe the pathophysiologic processes of these pitfalls, and to provide specific clues for achieving the correct diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

Cirrhosis complicates liver imaging. The distortion and replacement of normal liver parenchyma by fibrous and regenerative tissue can change the typical appearance of many benign lesions, causing them to be misinterpreted as malignancy. In addition, the high incidence and prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with cirrhosis put radiologists on high alert for any suspicious findings, especially because not all hepatocellular carcinomas have a typical imaging appearance.

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Hepatocellular carcinoma and mimickers

Gadoxetic acid, a hepatocyte-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent, has emerged as an important tool for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is useful for the evaluation of early-stage HCC, diagnosis of HCC precursor lesions, and highly sensitive diagnosis of HCC. Furthermore, functional information provided by gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI can aid in the characterization of focal liver lesions. For example, whereas lesions lack functioning hepatocytes appear hypointense in the hepatobiliary phase, preserved or enhanced expression of organic anion transporting polypeptides in some HCCs as well as focal nodular hyperplasia lead to hyperintensity in the hepatobiliary phase; and a targetoid appearance on transitional phase or hepatobiliary phase imaging can be helpful for identifying the histopathological composition of tumors. While gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI may improve the sensitivity of HCC diagnosis and provide new insights into the characterization of focal liver lesions, there are many challenges associated with its use. This article reviews the pros and cons of HCC diagnosis with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and discuss some clues in the radiological differentiation of HCC from HCC mimickers.

Prospective Intraindividual Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Gadoxetic Acid and Extracellular Contrast for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinomas Using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System

We intraindividually compared the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI) and MRI with hepatobiliary agents (HBA-MRI) for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS). Between November 2016 and November 2017, we enrolled 91 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent both ECA-MRI and HBA-MRI within a 1-month interval for a first detected hepatic nodule on ultrasound. In total, 117 observations (95 HCCs, 19 benign lesions, and 3 other malignancies; median size, 18 mm) were identified with surgical resection. Two observers assessed two MRIs based on LI-RADS v2017, with consensus by a third observer. We then compared the diagnostic performance of LR-5 according to LI-RADS and modified LI-RADS. ECA-MRI had higher sensitivity (77.9% versus 66.3%) and accuracy (82.1% versus 72.6%) than HBA-MRI in the LR-5 category (P < 0.001). When applying either modified washout on the portal venous phase (PVP)/transitional phase (TP) of HBA-MRI or isointensity with a capsule during the PVP/delayed phase of ECA-MRI (illusional washout), 13 HCCs on HBA-MRI and 11 HCCs on ECA-MRI were correctly classified as HCC, while achieving 100% specificity. One cholangiocarcinoma was accurately classified only with HBA-MRI due to its targetoid appearance in the TP and hepatobiliary phase. Conclusion: ECA-MRI showed better sensitivity and accuracy than HBA-MRI for the diagnosis of HCC with LI-RADS. We achieved better diagnostic performance when applying a modified washout on PVP/TP HBA-MRI and an illusional washout on ECA-MRI than we did with conventional criteria.

Intra-individual comparison of gadolinium-enhanced MRI using pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for diagnosis of HCCs using LI-RADS

OBJECTIVES

To determine the usefulness of extracellular contrast agent (ECA)-enhanced multiphasic liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition scheme by intra-individual comparison with gadoxetic acid-MRI (EOB-MRI) with regard to image quality and the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 15 patients with 18 HCCs who underwent EOB-MRI using a Cartesian approach and ECA-MRI using the pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition scheme (free-breathing continuous data acquisition for 64 s following ECA injection, generating six images). Two reviewers evaluated the arterial and portal phases of each MRI for artifacts, organ sharpness, and conspicuity of intrahepatic vessels and the hepatic tumors. A Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category was also assigned to each lesion.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the subjective image quality analysis between the arterial phases of two MRIs (p > 0.05). However, ghosting artifact was seen only in EOB-MRI (N = 3). Six HCCs showed different signal intensities in the arterial phase or portal phase between the two MRIs; five HCCs showed arterial hyperenhancement on ECA-MRI, but not on EOB-MRI. The capsule was observed in 15 HCCs on ECA-MRI and 6 HCCs on EOB-MRI. Five and one HCC were assigned as LR-5 and LR-4 with ECA-MRI and LR-4 and LR-3 with EOB-MRI, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Free-breathing ECA-enhanced multiphasic liver MRI using a pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition was more sensitive in detecting arterial hyperenhancement of HCC than conventional EOB-MRI, and the image quality was acceptable.

KEY POINTS

• The pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition scheme can be applied to perform free-breathing multiphasic dynamic liver MRI. • Adopting the pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition scheme can improve the detection of arterial enhancement of HCC. • The pseudo-golden-angle radial acquisition scheme enables motion-free liver MRI.

New hallmark of hepatocellular carcinoma, early hepatocellular carcinoma and high-grade dysplastic nodules on Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI in patients with cirrhosis: a new diagnostic algorithm

OBJECTIVE

Many improvements have been made in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the radiological hallmarks of HCC have remained the same for many years. We prospectively evaluated the imaging criteria of HCC, early HCC and high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDNs) in patients under surveillance for chronic liver disease, using gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging.

DESIGN

Our study population included 420 nodules >1 cm in 228 patients. The MRI findings of each nodule were collected in all sequences/phases. The diagnosis of HCC was made according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) criteria; all atypical nodules were diagnosed using histology.

RESULTS

A classification and regression tree was developed using three MRI findings which were independently significant correlated variables for early HCC/HCC, and the best sequence of their application in a new diagnostic algorithm (hepatobiliary hypointensity, arterial hyperintensity and diffusion restriction) was suggested. This algorithm demonstrated, both in the entire study population and for nodules ≤2 cm, higher sensitivity (96% [95% CI 93.5% to 97.6%] and 96.6% [95% CI 93.9% to 98.5%], P<0.001, respectively) and slightly lower specificity (91.8% [95% CI 88.6% to 94.1%], P=0.063, and 92.7% [95% CI 88.9% to 95.4%], P=0.125, respectively) than those of the AASLD criteria. Our new diagnostic algorithm also showed a very high sensitivity (94.7%; 95% CI 92% to 96.6%) and specificity (99.3%; 95% CI 97.7% to 99.8%) in classifying HGDN.

CONCLUSION

Our new diagnostic algorithm demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity and comparable specificity than those of the AASLD imaging criteria for HCC in patients with cirrhosis evaluated using Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI, even for lesions ≤2 cm. Moreover, this diagnostic algorithm allowed evaluating other lesions which could arise in a cirrhotic liver, such as early HCC and HGDN.

The capsule appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: Correlation with pathology and dynamic CT

This study aimed to evaluate the capability of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR (GAeMR) to detect presence of capsule appearance in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to correlate it with dynamic computed tomography (CT) and pathological features.Sixty-three patients (54: 9 = M: F, mean age 55.8) surgically confirmed HCCs with preoperative CT and GAeMR were included in this retrospective study. Two readers evaluated presence of capsule appearances on CT and GAeMR images in each phase including precontrast (Pre), portal phase (PP), delayed phase (DP), transitional phase (TP), and hepatobiliary phase (HBP). Histologic capsule was compared with CT and GAeMR. Diagnostic performance of CT and GAeMR of each phase for histologic capsule was evaluated and compared by receiver operating characteristic curve. Interobserver agreement was assessed with kappa statistics.Histologically the capsule was complete in 12.7% (8/63) and incomplete in 60.3% (38/63). Four cases (6.3%) were pseudocapsule. Interobserver agreement for capsule appearance on GAeMR was good in Pre (κ = 0.684), moderate in PP (κ = 0.434), poor in TP (κ = 0.187), fair in HBP (κ = 0.395), and moderate on CT in PP (κ = 0.476) and DP (κ = 0.485). Diagnostic performance and sensitivity for the histologic capsule in DP on CT was highest among PP on CT and other phases on GAeMR. DP on CT images showed a higher Az value than PP on CT images with statistical significance (P < .001). PP on MR images revealed higher Az value than PP on CT images.The capsule appearance was most frequently observed in the DP on CT with highest diagnostic performance, and so DP images should be obtained on CT study for liver mass categorization. GAeMR yielded comparable capsule appearance to CT with moderate interobserver agreement. Considering hypointense rim on the HBP as fibrous capsule on pathology should be refrained, and so further study is warranted to correlate HBP hypointense rim with pathologic findings.

Gadofosveset-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a problem-solving tool for diagnosing colorectal liver metastases: a case report

Due to significant improvements in morbidity and mortality, surgery with curative intent is now the standard of care for patients with colorectal liver metastases who are surgical candidates. As a result, highly accurate preoperative per-lesion diagnosis is crucial. However, in some instances, this remains limited with standard techniques, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with conventional contrast agents. Delayed retention of contrast of fibrotic liver metastases on MRI with extracellular contrast agents may mimic the late retention of contrast in hemangiomas and represent a diagnostic pitfall that limits diagnosis. Early preliminary work suggests that this imaging pitfall may not be seen on MRI with intravascular contrast agents (e.g., gadofosveset). This case report describes a surgical patient with colorectal liver metastases where gadofosveset-enhanced liver MRI was helpful in determining patient management.

Comparison of Visualization Rates of LI-RADS Version 2014 Major Features With IV Gadobenate Dimeglumine or Gadoxetate Disodium in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to compare visualization rates of the major features covered by Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2014 in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma using either gadobenate dimeglumine or gadoxetate disodium IV contrast agent.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included liver MRI examinations performed with either gadobenate dimeglumine or gadoxetate disodium contrast enhancement. Using age, sex, underlying liver disease, and presence of cirrhosis, patients were placed into matched cohorts. All hepatic nodules 1 cm or larger (up to five per subject) were included, resulting in 63 subjects with 130 nodules (median nodule size, 1.9 cm) imaged with gadobenate and 64 subjects with 117 nodules (median nodule size, 2.0 cm) imaged with gadoxetate. Three radiologists reviewed the studies for LI-RADS major features independently. Bootstrap resampling with 10,000 repetitions was used to compare feature detection rates.

RESULTS

Arterial phase hyperenhancement was seen in a similar number of nodules with gadobenate dimeglumine (mean, 91.5% [119/130]) and gadoxetate disodium (mean, 88.0% [103/117]) (p = 0.173). Dynamic phase washout was more commonly seen with gadobenate dimeglumine (mean, 60.2% [78.3/130]) than with gadoxetate disodium (mean, 45.3% [53/117]) (p = 0.006). The capsule feature was more often visualized with gadobenate dimeglumine (mean, 50.2% [65.3/130]) than with gadoxetate disodium (mean, 33.3% [39/117]) (p < 0.001). Interreader agreement for arterial phase enhancement and dynamic phase washout was almost perfect for both contrast agents (κ > 0.83). Agreement for the capsule feature was moderate for gadobenate dimeglumine (κ = 0.52) and substantial for gadoxetate disodium (κ = 0.67).

CONCLUSION

The rates of visualization of arterial phase hyperenhancement are similar in studies performed with gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetate disodium, but dynamic phase washout and capsule appearance are more commonly visualized with gadobenate dimeglumine.

Liver Masses: What Physicians Need to Know About Ordering and Interpreting Liver Imaging

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This paper reviews diagnostic imaging techniques used to characterize liver masses and the imaging characteristics of the most common liver masses.

RECENT FINDINGS

The role of recently adopted ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents will be emphasized. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is an inexpensive exam which can confirm benignity of certain liver masses without ionizing radiation. Magnetic resonance imaging using hepatocyte-specific gadolinium-based contrast agents can help confirm or narrow the differential diagnosis of liver masses.

Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma

Objectives

To investigate the difference of T1 relaxation time on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and cavernous hemangioma of liver (CHL), and to quantitatively evaluate the uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA in these three focal liver lesions (FLLs).

Results

The T1_P of CHL was significantly higher than those of HCC and FNH (P < 0.05). Reduction of T1 relaxation time on hepatobiliary phase could be observed in all three types of lesions. There were significant differences of T1_P, T1_E, T1_D and T1_D% between FNH, CHL and HCC (P < 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that T1_D% was the best indicator for diagnostic differentiation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.702. Discriminant analysis using three variables (T1_P, T1_E, and T1_D%) showed that the classification accuracy was 88.2%.

Materials and Methods

74 patients diagnosed with focal liver lesions underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI including T1 mapping were enrolled, consisting of 51 HCCs, 10 FNHs, and 13 CHLs. T1 relaxation times of these lesions were measured on pre-contrast (T1_P) and on hepatobiliary phase images at 20 minute after contrast (T1_E). The reduction of T1 relaxation time on hepatobiliary (T1_D) and the percentage reduction (T1_D%) was calculated. The differences of T1_P, T1_E, T1_D and T1_D% in these FLLs were analyzed. The usefulness of these parameters for classification of FLLs was evaluated.

Conclusions

Uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA is different between in HCC, FNH and CHL. These three lesions can be distinguished using T1 mapping.