"Clinicians Are From Mars and Pathologists Are From Venus" Revisited: Synoptic Reports Improve Clinician Comprehension of Pathology Reports in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

CONTEXT.—

A prior study in this journal, "Clinicians Are from Mars and Pathologists Are From Venus," demonstrated that clinicians can erroneously interpret pathology reports up to 30% of the time. After noticing reporting heterogeneity in the setting of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), we speculated that a standardized synoptic report could improve gastroenterologist comprehension.

OBJECTIVE.—

To investigate the effect of a synoptic table on gastroenterologist comprehension of IBD pathology reports.

DESIGN.—

We recruited gastroenterology fellows and faculty to participate in this study. All participants were given 6 pathology reports and asked if the following were present: active inflammation, chronic inflammation, IBD, and dysplasia. Participants were also asked to rate their confidence. After a 6-week washout period, the same questionnaire was distributed with a synoptic report. We performed paired t-tests to compare the mean accuracy and confidence scores between the preintervention and postintervention responses.

RESULTS.—

A total of 39 physicians participated: 9 fellows and 30 faculty. Mean accuracy scores were higher after the intervention (0.81 versus 0.86; P < .001). Mean confidence was also higher after intervention, but this was not statistically significant (3.91 versus 3.98; P = .24).

CONCLUSIONS.—

The improvement in accuracy scores after intervention confirms that clinician comprehension improved with the synoptic table. A synoptic report may provide a standardized way of communicating diagnostic information to clinicians in the setting of IBD and potentially other inflammatory conditions.

Structured Head and Neck CT Angiography Reporting Reduces Resident Revision Rates

PURPOSE

This resident-driven quality improvement project was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of structured reporting to reduce revision rates for afterhours reports dictated by residents.

METHODS

The first part of the study assessed baseline revision rates for head and neck CT angiography (CTA) examinations dictated by residents during afterhours call. A structured report was subsequently created based on templates on the RSNA informatics reporting website and critical findings that should be assessed for on all CTA examinations. The template was made available to residents through the speech recognition software for all head and neck CTA examinations for a duration of 2 months. Report revision rates were then compared with and without use of the structured template.

RESULTS

The structured template was found to reduce revision rates by approximately 50% with 10/41 unstructured reports revised and 2/17 structured reports revised.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that structured reporting can help reduce reporting errors, particularly in term of typographical errors, train residents to evaluate complex examinations in a systematic fashion, and assist them in recalling critical findings on these examinations.

Abdominopelvic MRI for lesion characterization after prior imaging: factors associated with likelihood of added value

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to evaluate factors associated with the likelihood that abdominopelvic MRI examinations performed for characterization of lesions identified on other imaging modalities will provide information that adds value to patient management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One thousand one hundred thirty-two lesions in 863 patients undergoing MRI for further characterization after detection by an alternative imaging modality were identified. Reports of the MRI examinations and of previous studies were reviewed to classify cases in terms of patient-, examination-, and lesion-related factors. MRI reports were also classified in terms of measures reflecting inclusion of content with the potential to add value to patient management. Data were analyzed using logistic regression for correlated data.

RESULTS

MRI provided a definitive diagnosis in 79.2% (897/1132), upgraded the severity of the favored diagnosis in 5.3% (60/1132), downgraded the severity of the favored diagnosis in 34.5% (390/1132), and showed an absence of the suspected lesion in 12.1% (137/1132) of cases. Provision of a definitive diagnosis (most common in liver, kidney, gallbladder, bowel, myometrium, and adrenal gland) was significantly associated with the organ containing the lesion (p < 0.001). A change in severity of the favored diagnosis (most common after CT or PET/CT) and the absence of the suspected lesion (most common after PET/CT) were significantly associated with the prior imaging modality (p ≤ 0.001). Among the lesions that were upgraded in severity, 76.7% subsequently underwent intervention or change in medical management.

CONCLUSION

Abdominopelvic MRI examinations performed for further lesion characterization may affect clinical management in a high fraction of cases, the likelihood of which is influenced by factors related to the given examination.

Comprehensive review of the limitations of relative value unit measurements of productivity in academic departments

Measuring radiologist, especially sonologist, productivity has never been of greater interest than now, as radiology has moved from its historical status as a cost center to the largest revenue generator in most institutions. With more local institutional and federal oversight and regulation into the reimbursement and valuation of imaging procedures, including emphasis on outsourcing, overvalued procedures, and bundling, the ability to measure productivity and to draw meaningful conclusions from the data becomes increasingly imperative if we as radiologists and sonologists expect to contribute meaningfully to the process. This article presents a history of the "relative value unit" and discusses the valuation of radiologist/sonologist productivity in this era of ubiquitous high-technology implementation.

Aging Q3: an initiative to improve internal medicine residents' geriatrics knowledge, skills, and clinical performance

A growing number of older adults coupled with a limited number of physicians trained in geriatrics presents a major challenge to ensuring quality medical care for this population. Innovations to incorporate geriatrics education into internal medicine residency programs are needed. To meet this need, in 2009, faculty at the Medical University of South Carolina developed Aging Q(3)-Quality Education, Quality Care, and Quality of Life. This multicomponent initiative recognizes the need for improved geriatrics educational tools and faculty development as well as systems changes to improve the knowledge and clinical performance of residents. To achieve these goals, faculty employ multiple intervention strategies, including lectures, rounds, academic detailing, visual cues, and electronic medical record prompts and decision support. The authors present examples from specific projects, based on care areas including vision screening, fall prevention, and caring for patients with dementia, all of which are based on the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders quality indicators. The authors describe the principles driving the design, implementation, and evaluation of the Aging Q(3) program. They present data from multiple sources that illustrate the effectiveness of the interventions to meet the knowledge, skill level, and behavior goals. The authors also address major challenges, including the maintenance of the teaching and modeling interventions over time within the context of demanding primary care and inpatient settings. This organized, evidence-based approach to quality improvement in resident education, as well as faculty leadership development, holds promise for successfully incorporating geriatrics education into internal medicine residencies.